政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33944
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50934389      Online Users : 949
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > International MBA > Theses >  Item 140.119/33944


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33944


    Title: 貝里斯公共服務之績效評定：評量方法檢測
    Authors: 康栢玲
    Contributors: 韓志翔
    康栢玲
    Keywords: 貝里斯公共服務之績效評定：評量方法檢測
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 18:52:50 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 貝里斯公共服務之績效評定：評量方法檢測
    Reference: Baird, L. S., Beatty, R.W., and Schneier, C. E. (1982). Performance appraisal sourcebook. Amherst, Mass.: Human Resource Development Press.
    Bernardin, H. J. and M. R. Buckley. 1981. Strategies in rater training. Academy of Management Review 6: Pgs. 205-212.
    Bernardin, H. J. and Walter C. S. (1977). Effects of rater training and diary keeping on psychometric error in rating. Journal of applied psychology, 62: Pgs. 64 – 69.
    Bernardin, H. J., Kane J., Ross S., Spina J., Johnson D. (1995). Performance appraisal design, development and implementation. In: Ferris R. et al: Handbook of Human Resource Management. Cambridge: Blackwell (1995).
    Blumberg, H. H. (1972). Communication of interpersonal evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 23, Pgs. 157-162.
    Boice, D.F. and Kleiner, B.H. (1997), Designing effective performance appraisal system, Work Study, Vol. 46, no.6, pp. 197-201.
    Borman, W. (1975). Effects of instructions to avoid halo error on reliability and validity of performance evaluation ratings, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 60, Pgs. 556-560.
    Borman, W. (1978). Exploring upper limits of reliability and validity in job performance rankings, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 63, Pgs. 135-144.
    Bretz, R., G. Melkovich, and W. Read (1992). The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions and implications, Journal of Management, Vol. 18, no. 2, Pgs. 321-352.
    Carroll, S. J. & Schneier, Craig E. (1982). Performance appraisal and review systems: The identification, measurement and development of performance in organizations Pgs. 2 -6, 217 – 246. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman
    Cooper, W. (1981). Ubiquitous Halo, Psychological Bulletin, 90, Pgs. 218-244.
    Cummings & Schwab (1973). Performance in organizations: Determinants and Appraisals. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
    Day, N. (1989). Performance management year round, Personnel, Vol. 66, no. 8, Pgs. 43-46
    Driver, R. S. (1942). Training as a means of improving employee performance rating. Personnel, Vol. 18, Pgs. 364-370.
    Feldman, J. M. (1979). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive process in employee performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 66, Pgs. 127-148.
    Ferris. G. R. & Rowland, K. M. (1990). Performance evaluation, goal setting and feebdack, Pgs. 185 -211. Greenwich, Connecticut: Jai Press Inc.
    Fisher, C.D. (1989). Self and superior assessment: Unraveling the causes of disagreement, unpublished manuscript, University of Baltimore.
    Fisher, C.M. (1994). The difference between appraisal schemes: Variation and acceptability part I, Personnel Review, Vol. 23, no. 8, Pgs. 33-48. Nottingham Trent University, UK, MCB University Press.
    Freidson, E. & Rhea, B. (1965). Knowledge and judgment in professional evaluations. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 10, Pgs. 107 – 124.
    Gioia, D. A., & Longenecker, C. O. (1994). Delving into the dark side: The politics of executive appraisal. Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 22, Pgs. 47-58.
    Ilgen, D. R. & Feldman, J. M. (1983). Performance Appraisal: A process focus research in organizational behaviour, Vol. 5, Pgs. 141 -197.
    Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
    Landy, F., Zedeck, S. & Cleveland, J. 1983. Performance Measurement and Theory, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Latham, G. P. & Wexley, K. N. (1981). Increasing productivity through performance appraisal, Pgs. 104-115 Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
    Latham, G. P., Wexley, K. N., & Pursell, E. D. (1975). Training managers to minimize rating errors on the observation of behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 60, Pgs. 550-555.
    Lee, C. (1996). Performance Appraisal, Training, Vol. 33, No. 5, Pgs. 44-59.
    Longenecker, C. O. (1989). Truth or consequences: Politics and performance appraisals, Business Horizons. Vol. 32, Pgs. 76-82.
    Longenecker, C. O., Sims, H. P., & Gioia, D. A. (1987). Behind the mask: The politics of employee appraisal. Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 1, no. 3Pgs. 183-193.
    Mero, N. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1995). Effects of rater accountability on the accuracy and the favorability of performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 80, Pgs. 517-524.
    Nash, M. M. (1984). Managing organizational performance, Vol. 2, Pgs. 1-19. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
    Nathan, B. R & R. G. Lord (1983), Cognitive categorization and dimensional schemata: A process approach to the study of halo in performance ratings, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 68, no. 1, Pgs. 102-114.
    Neck,C. P., Stewart, G. L. & Manz, C. C. (1995). Thought self-leadership as framework for enhancing the performance of appraisers. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, Vol. 31, no. 3, Pgs. 278 – 302.
    Newcomb, T. (1993). An experiment designed to test the validity of a rating technique. Journal of educational psychology, Vol. 22: Pgs. 279 – 288.
    Nisbett, R. D. & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alterations of judgments. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, Vol. 35: Pgs. 250 – 256.
    Pulakos, E., N. Schmitt, & C. Ostroff (1986), A warning about the use of a standard deviation within ratees to measure halo, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 1, Pgs. 29-32.
    Ramsey, R. D. (1998). How to make better employee evaluations. Supervision, Vol. 59, no. 6, Pgs. 5 – 7.
    Roberts, G. (1996). A case study in performance appraisal system development: Lessons from a municipal police department. American review of public administration, Vol. 23, no. 3, Pgs. 361 – 385.
    Sahi, R.J. (1990). Design effective performance appraisals, Personnel Journal, October, Vol. 3, Pgs. 53-60.
    Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage Publications.
    Spool, M. D. (1978). Training programs for observers of behaviour: A review personnel psychology, Vol. 31, Pgs. 853 – 888.
    Sulsky, L. M., & Day, D. V. (1992). Frame-of-reference training and cognitive categorization: An empirical investigation of rater memory issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 77, Pgs. 501-510.
    Tessor, A., & Rosen, S. (1975). The reluctance to transmit bad news. In L Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, Pgs. 193-232). New York: Academic Press.
    Thornton, G. C., & Zorich, S. (1980). Training to improve observer accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, Pgs. 351-354.
    Wilkens, J.D. (1972). Corporate strategy and management by objectives. In B. Taylor and K. Hawkins (Eds.), A Handbook of Strategic Planning.
    Williams, R. S. (1998). Performance management: Perspective on Employee Performance. London: International Thomson Business Press.
    Winegardner, K. E. (2001). The case study methodology of scholarly research. The Graduate School of America, 2001.
    Winston R. B. Jr., & Creamer D. G. (1997). Improving staffing practices in student affairs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Woehr, D. J., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1994). Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 67, Pgs. 189-205.
    Public Service of Belize Handbooks
    Performance Appraisal Manual for the Public Service of Belize.
    Public Sector Reform Country Case Study
    Public Sector Reform: Charting the Way Forward 2000 and Beyond.
    Public Service Regulation
    Service Commission Regulation
    Websites
    BELTRADE.
    Website: http://www.belizeinvest.org.bz
    Central Statistics office of Belize
    Website: http://www.cso.gov.bz/
    Government of Belize
    Website: http://www.belize.gov.bz
    World Atlas
    Website: http://www.worldatlas.com
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營管理碩士班(IMBA)
    93933040
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093933040
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[International MBA] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    93304001.pdf14KbAdobe PDF2931View/Open
    93304002.pdf13KbAdobe PDF2848View/Open
    93304003.pdf11KbAdobe PDF21082View/Open
    93304004.pdf12KbAdobe PDF2815View/Open
    93304005.pdf20KbAdobe PDF221979View/Open
    93304006.pdf93KbAdobe PDF21325View/Open
    93304007.pdf50KbAdobe PDF236655View/Open
    93304008.pdf16KbAdobe PDF21062View/Open
    93304009.pdf51KbAdobe PDF2963View/Open
    93304010.pdf32KbAdobe PDF220415View/Open
    93304011.pdf21KbAdobe PDF26553View/Open
    93304012.pdf20KbAdobe PDF2773View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback