Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33642
|
| Title: | 1992至1997年俄羅斯轉型期間所得不均之研究
A Study on Income Inequality of Russia during Transition: 1992-1997 |
| Authors: | 王光絜 |
| Contributors: | 洪美蘭
王光絜 |
| Keywords: | 俄羅斯
所得不均
私有化
自由化
穩定化
社會救助政策
Russia
Income Inequality
Privatization
Liberalization
Stabilization
Social Assistance Policy |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 17:46:01 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 經濟效率與經濟公平，是經濟學中最具爭議性的議題之一。俄羅斯自1992年開始由計劃經濟轉型為市場經濟，政府的首要目標就是追求經濟效率的提升，相較而言對於經濟公平的問題較不重視，因此，在轉型的過程中社會所得分配差距持續擴大，最終導致兩極化分配結果。
本文透過文獻整理和統計數據對比分析論證方法探究1992至1997年間俄羅斯轉型政策對其所得不均惡化之影響。首先，藉由俄羅斯轉型前、後所得不均指標之對比，以及其與同時期其他中所得國家和轉型國家之比較，暸解俄羅斯所得不均情況，證明俄國轉型後所得分配惡化程度。其次，由私有化政策、自由化政策、穩定化政策以及社會救助政策等四個層面，分析俄羅斯轉型政策如何影響其所得分配。最後，說明已經是市場經濟體且被譽為金磚四國之一的俄羅斯，其近年來亮麗的經濟成長表現和普欽總統之社會救助政策，對其所得不均皆尚未產生改善效果，故1998年後的俄國所得分配狀況仍値得改以市場因素和相關政策等方面作為觀察重點，進行後續研究。
關鍵詞：俄羅斯、所得不均、私有化、自由化、穩定化、社會救助政策
Economic efficiency and equity have always been one of the most controversial issues in the economics. Russia began the transformation from a planned economy to a market economy since 1992, and during the process of transformation, the primary objective of the Russian government was to enhance economic efficiency, by contrast, the economic equity was less emphasized. Therefore, the inequality of income distribution had become more and more serious. At the end, it led to the polarization of income distribution.
In this study, literature review, comparative analysis and statistical data analysis methods will be used to explore how Russian transformation policies had resulted in the aggravation of income inequality between 1992 and 1997.
First of all, in order to clarify the income inequality in Russia, some income inequality indexes of Russia before and after the transformation will be compared, and by the comparison with other mid-income and transformation countries in the same era, we can identify the aggravation of income distribution after the transformation.
Secondly, how Russian transformation policies had influenced income distribution will be analyzed from four aspects: privatization policy, liberalization policy, stabilization policy, and social assistance policies.
Finally, author interpret that although Russia has moved towards a market economy and become one of the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries in recent years, its brilliant economic performance with Putin’s social assistance policies have not yet improved the situation. Therefore, author suggests that the further research on Russian income distribution after 1998 is better to focus on market factors and related economic policies.
Keyword: Russia, Income Inequality, Privatization, Liberalization, Stabilization, Social Assistance Policy |
| Reference: | 中文資料：
專書
1. 林鐘雄，《西洋經濟思想史》，台北：三民書局，1990年。
2. 洪美蘭，《經濟激進轉型策略―中東歐之經驗與啟示》，台北：翰蘆圖書，2002年。
3. 陳厚文，《蘇聯「職官名錄」制度之研究》，台北：國立政治大學碩士論文，1998年。
4. 張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧、吳聰敏，《經濟學理論與實際四版下冊》，臺北：翰蘆圖書，2000年。
5. 許新，《重塑超級大國―俄羅斯經濟改革和發展道路》，南京：江蘇人民出版社，2004年。
6. 歐陽承新，《東歐國營企業私有化模式之探討》，臺北：中華經濟研究院，1994年。
7. Kotz, David M., and Weir, Fred 著，曹榮湘、孟鳴歧 譯，《來自上層的革命—蘇聯體制的終結》，北京：中國人民大學出版社，2002年。
8. Loehr, William, and Powelson, John P. 著, 王慶輝 譯，《經濟發展暨所得分配經濟學》，台北：國立編譯館，1987年。
9. 大前研一，劉錦秀、江裕真譯，《M型社會》，台北：商周文化，2006年。
期刊
1. 王大波，｢俄羅斯經濟轉型過程中的養老保險制度改革及其反思｣，《市場與人口分析》，2003年第9卷第4期。
2. 徐元宮，｢轉型時期中俄貧富分化及其對策比較｣， 《俄羅斯研究》 ，上海：俄羅斯研究中心，2004年第4期。
3. 劉文革、伍楠林，｢從企業改革透視俄羅斯社會制度變遷｣，《哈爾濱工業大學學報》，哈爾濱：哈爾濱工業大學，2002年第4卷第4期。
4. 關海庭，｢中俄兩國轉型時期貧富分化問題比較研究—兼論中國漸進體制轉型模式的合理性｣，《當代中國史研究》，北京：中國社會科學院，2003年第10卷第6期。
5. РойМедведев 著，徐元宮 譯，｢俄羅斯社會階級分化新趨勢｣，《當代世界與社會主義》，北京：當代世界與社會主義雜誌社，1998年第4期。
西文資料 ：
專書
1. Aslund, Anders. How Russia became a market economy, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1995.
2. Aslund, Anders eds., Russian Economic Reform at Risk, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.
3. Avtonomov, V. S., and Soubbotina, T. P. (Editors), The World and Russia, Material for Reflection and Discussion, Washington D.C.: The World Bank, 1999.
4. Braithwaute, Jeanine, Grootatert, Christiaan, and Milanovic, Branko, Poverty and Social Assistance in Transition Countries, London: Macmillan Press, 2000.
5. Commander, Simon, and Une Lee, How Does Public Policy Affect the Income Distribution? Evidence from Russia 1992–96, London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 1998.
6. Davydov, Oleg D., and Oreshikin, Valeriy A., Liberalization of Russian Foreign Trade, New York: Fordham University Press, 2000.
7. Gregory, Paul R., and Stuart, Robert C., Russian and Soviet Economic Performance and Structure 6th edition, New York: Addison-Wesley Longman, 1998.
8. Ledeneva, Alena V., Russia’s Economy of Favours, Blat, Networking and Informal Exchange, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
9. Shorrocks, Anthony, and Hoeven, Rolph Van Der (Editors), Growth, Inequality, and Poverty: Prospect for Pro-Poor Economic Development, New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
10. Tikhomirov, Vladimir, The Political Economy of Post-Soviet Russia, London: Macmillan Press, 2000.
11. The World Bank, Making Transition Work for Everyone: Poverty and Inequality in Europe and Central Asia, Washington D.C.: The World Bank, 2000.
期刊
1. Aghion, Philippe, and Commander, Simon, and “On the dynamics of inequality in the transition”, Economics of Transition, vol. 7(2), Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1999.
2. Alesina, Alberto, and Rodrik, Dani, “Distributive Politics and Economic Growth”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 109(2), 1994.
3. Alexeev, Michael, “The effect of privatization on wealth distribution in Russia”, Economics of Transition, vol. 7(2), Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1999.
4. Atdinson, Anthony B., and Andrea, Brandolini, “Promise and Pitfalls in the Use of Secondary Data-Sets: Income Inequality in OECD Countries as a Case Study”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 39(3), 2001.
5. Barro, Robert J., “Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries”, Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 5(1), 2000.
6. Boss, Dieter, and Harms, Philipp, “Mass Privatization, Management Control and Efficiency”, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 64(3), 1997.
7. Cagan, Phillip, “The Monetary Dynamics of Hyperinflation“, in Milton Friedman eds., Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.
8. Commander, Simon, Tolstopiatenko, Anderi, and Yemtsov, Ruslan, “Channels of Redistribution: Inequality and Poverty in the Russian Transition”, Economics of Transition, vol. 7(2), 1999, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
9. Dolinskaya, Irina, “Transition and Regional Inequality in Russia: Reorganization or Procrastination”, IMF working paper, wp/02/169, Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 2002.
10. Forbes, Kristin J., “A Reassessment of the Relationship Between Inequality and Growth”, The American Economic Review, September, vol. 90(4), 2000.
11. Gaidar, Yegor, Russia Economy in 2006 (Issue28): Trends and Outlooks, Moscow: Instiute for the Economy in Transition, 2007.
12. Gerry, Christopher J., and Mickiewicz, Tomasz, “Inequality, Fiscal Capacity and the Political Regime Lessons from the Post-Communist Transition”, William Davidson Institute Working Paper Number 831, Michigan: The William Davidson Institute, 2006.
13. Havrylyshyn, Oleh and Srnee, John Odling, “Political Economy of Stalled Reforms”, Finance & Development, vol. 37 (3), September 2000.
14. Keane, Michael P., and Prasad, Eswar S., “Poland: Inequality, Transfers, and Growth in Transition”, Finance and Development, vol. 38(1), Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 2001.
15. Klugman, Jeni, Micklewright, John, and Redmond, Gerry, “Poverty in the Transition: Social Expenditures and The Working-Age Poor”, Innocenti Working Paper No.91, Florence: UNICEF Innocent Research Centre, 2002.
16. McFaul, Michael “The Allocation of Property Rights in Russia: The First Round“, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, vol. 29(3), September 1996.
17. Milanovic, Branko, “Explaining the Increase in Inequality during Transition”, Economics of Transition, vol. 7(2), Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1999.
18. Perotti, Roberto, “Political Equilibrium, Income Distribution, and Growth”, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 60(4), Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1993.
19. Richard H. Jr., Adams, “Economic Growth, Inequality, and Poverty: Findings from a New Data Set”, Policy Research Working Paper Series 2972, Washington D.C.: The World Bank, 2003.
20. Steelman, Aaron and Weinberg, John A., “What’s Driving Wage Inequality?”, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, vol. 91(3), Richmond: Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 2005.
21. Torsten, Persson and Tabellini, Guido, “Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? Theory and evidence”, in Robert Moffitt eds., American Economic Review, vol. 84(3), 1994.
22. UNICEF, “A decade of Transition”, Regional Monitoring Report Series. 8, Florence: UNICEF Innocent Research Centre, 2001.
網路資料 ：
1. 王立新，｢俄羅斯股份改革評析｣，《東歐中亞研究》， http://euroasia.cass.cn/Chinese/Magazine/Yanjiu/1998/19980506.htm。
2. 中華民國經濟部，｢當前俄羅斯經濟情勢分析｣，《今日經濟季刊》，1998年，http://www.moea.gov.tw/~ecobook/ecotoday/et372/b6.htm。
3. 中國社會科學院俄羅斯東歐中亞研究所，｢金融工業集團與政權｣，http://euroasia.cass.cn/chinese/Production/Rus_lyjt/003.html。
4. 中國國際電子商務網，｢俄聯邦租賃法｣，http://zcq.ec.com.cn/article/hwgbsc/hwzcfg/200609/200891_1.html。
5. 史妍嵋，｢俄羅斯的影子經濟｣， http://www.china.org.cn/chinese/OP-c/417288.htm。
6. 石泱，｢我國社會救助政策：從安貧到脫貧｣，www.cares.org.tw/Workshop/Social%20Relief/Treatise/我國社會救助政策：從安貧到脫貧--石泱.htm。
7. 成之約，｢貿易自由化的影響與因應策略之探討｣， http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SS/091/SS-R-091-012.htm。
8. 林建甫，｢經濟公平與效率｣， http://linshi.twbbs.org/usr/n/ntussc/20041004.ppt。
9. 陳映芳，｢轉型期社會開放度的中俄比較｣，http://www.frchina.net/data/personArticle.php?id=3693。
10. 陳慎慶，｢從倫理學的進路討論經濟問題｣，http://www.edb.gov.hk/FileManager/TC/Content_5642/be.ppt。
11. 張五常，經濟解釋全文，http://economicexplanation.tripod.com/Economic_explanation.html。
12. 張樹華，｢私有化的社會後果與社會評價｣，《俄羅斯私有化：社會衝突與社會評價》，北京：中國社會科學院俄羅斯東歐中亞研究所，http://euroasia.cass.cn/chinese/Production/projects28/003.html。
13. 韓麗，｢中國立法的非正式性及其功能｣，http://www.xslx.com/htm/mzfz/fxtt/2002-10-16-10494.htm。
14. Central Bank of Russia (CBR), Annual Report 2004, http://www.cbr.ru/today/annual_report/ar_2004_4.pdf.
15. Central Bank of Russia (CBR), Statistics, http://www.cbr.ru/eng/statistics/credit_statistics.
16. Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE), Publications, Annual report, http://www.cipe.org/publications/report/index.php.
17. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Selected economic indicator data, http://www.ebrd.com/country/sector/econo/stats/sei.xls.
18. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Transition reports online, http://transitionreport.co.uk/TRO/a/archives.
19. Galbraith, James K., and Krytynskaia, Ludmila and Qifei Wang, “The Experience of Rising Inequality in Russia and China during the Transition”, The European Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 1(1), Cattaneo University (LIUC), 2004, http://eaces.liuc.it/18242979200401/182429792004010104.pdf.
20. Guriev, Sergei and Rachinsky, Andrei, “WIDER Research Paper 2006-120 The Evolution of Personal Wealth in the Former Soviet Union and Central and Eastern Europen”, http://www.wider.unu.edu/publications/rps/rps2006/rp2006-120.pdf.
21. IAS Plus, Standards, IAS 29, http://www.iasplus.com/standard/ias29.htm.
22. Independent Instiute for Social Policy, “Inequality and Poverty in Russia in Transition”, http://www.socpol.ru/eng/research_projects/pdf/proj10a.pdf.
23. Institute for the Economy in Transition, “Russia: Political and Institutional Determinants of Economic Reforms”, http://www.gdnet.org/pdf2/gdn_library/annual_conferences/seventh_annual_conference/mau_parallel_4_4.pdf
24. International Monetary Fund (IMF), Data and statistics, World Economic Outlook Database, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2007/01/data/index.aspx.
25. Internet Center for Corruption Research, Corruption Perceptions Index, Older Indices, http://www.icgg.org/corruption.cpi_olderindices.html.
26. Russian Federal State Statics Servic, http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/2007/b07_12/07-01.htm.
27. Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS), http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/rlms.
28. Shapre, Andrew, “Linkages between Economic Growth and Inequality: Introduction and Overview”, http://www.csls.ca/cpp/2/Sharpe.pdf.
29. The World Bank, Data and Research, http://econ.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/0,,menuPK:476823~pagePK:64165236~piPK:64165141~theSitePK:469372,00.html.
30. Theodore P. Gerber and Michael Hout, “More Than Shock Therapy: Market Transition, Employment, and Income in Russia, 1991-1995”, Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics, Paper wps-1999-03.
http://repositories.cdlib.org/iir/ccop/wps-1999-03
31. United Nations (UN), Publications, Stamps, Databases, online publication, http://www.un.org/Pubs/onlinepubs.htm.
32. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Human Development Report for the Russian Federation 2004, Table 3.2, p.51, http://hdr.undp.org/docs/reports/national/RUS_Russian_Federation/Russia_Federation_2004_en.pdf.
33. United Nations Statistics Division, http://unstats.un.org/unsd/default.htm.
34. United Nations University (UNU), World Institute Development Economics Research (WIDER), World Income Inequality Database V 2.0a June 2005, http://www.wider.unu.edu/wiid/WIID2a.zip.
35. Vecernik, Jiri, “From Needs to the Market: Changing Inequality of Household Income in the Czech Transition”, William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 370, Michigan: The William Davidson Institute, 2001.
36. Центрального банка Российской Федерации, Годовой отчет Центрального банка Российской Федерации за 1999; 2001; 2004; 2006, (Central Bank of Russia, CBR Annual Report 1999; 2001; 2004; 2006.) http://www.cbr.ru/publ/main.asp?Prtid=God. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
俄羅斯研究所
93263011
96 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0932630112 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [俄羅斯研究所] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
