政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33555

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33555

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51245536 Online Users : 911

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Liberal Arts > Graduate Institute of Religious Studies > Theses > Item 140.119/33555

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33555

Title:	呂格爾《惡的象徵》中的悲劇神學 Tragic Theology in Ricoeur`s The Symbolism of Evil
Authors:	林洪遠 Lin, Hong Yuan
Contributors:	黃冠閔林洪遠 Lin, Hong Yuan
Keywords:	惡的象徵悲劇悲劇神學悲劇人學 the symbolism of evil tragedy tragic theology tragic anthropology
Date:	2006
Issue Date:	2009-09-17 17:02:27 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本論文所要處理的是惡的意願與非意願性的辯證。在《惡的象徵》中，悲劇神學和人學的概念便是作為辯證之中介。這兩概念與一種痛苦意識有關，所意識者就是仲裁正義者，亦是違反其正義原則的惡的來源。對「悲劇神學」而言，這個對象就是神；對「悲劇人學」而言，便是意識到人的良知隱藏著惡的可能。可見悲劇神學和人學是一相互依賴的概念。但是由於在呂格爾的象徵系列當中，尤其是玷污及罪的象徵，皆是在神與人的某種關係而論的，因此我們更為凸顯悲劇神學的概念。第二章主要從情節和美學效果兩途徑，呈現呂格爾如何由古希臘悲劇抽繹出悲劇神學和人學兩概念。第三章則著重闡述呂格爾《惡的象徵》中的玷汙/罪/罪咎象徵系列，以及突顯悲劇神學和人學如何受制於象徵系列所賦予的意義及角色。藉由象徵系列，奴隸意志的概念得以釐清。其所表達的是，由自由意志的選擇，所造成的自我囚禁之惡。第四章將悲劇概念放在神話重力場結構及基督論的脈絡中，呈現悲劇的相對位置。針對悲劇神學和人學概念，呂格爾將兩者視為批判和限制的否定性概念。另一方面，藉由基督論，嘗試呈現超克悲劇神學和人學的可能性。值得注意的是，當呂格爾將悲劇神學和人學當成批判性概念的時候，在一定程度上，便具有解構其他象徵(內含的奴隸意志成分)的力道。但是相對於基督論來講，悲劇神學和人學便是等待超越，而有所不足的概念。因此我們可以排列出相對位階：奴隸意志－初步自由(悲劇)－參與之自由(基督論)。至於結論部分，在《惡的象徵》中，我們已經看到，呂格爾將信仰和知識劃歸不同真理領域的嘗試，也看到需要以信仰或象徵語言為前理解基礎的意義領域。但是，如何在詮釋作為超越之意義領域的基督論之時，肯定其超越性又保持其意義之開放性和模糊性呢？甚至更進一步地，保持相異宗教或象徵語言之真理的可能性呢？這些都是仍待探索的議題。 This thesis deals with the dialectic of the voluntary and the involuntary of evil. In The Symbolism of Evil, the mediations of the dialectic are tragic theology and tragic anthropology. They are related to the consciousness of suffering. It means awareness of the source of evil that who judges the justice is one violating its own. ‘Tragic theology’ concerns god; for ‘tragic anthropology’, it means the possibility of evil which hides in the conscience of human. One can see that tragic theology and anthropology are mutually-dependent conceptions. Even if Ricoeur’s symbolical series associate much to the relation of god and man, we stress much more the conception of ‘tragic theology’. Chapter two discusses how Ricoeur analyzes these two conceptions of tragic theology and anthropology in ways of plot and aesthetic influences. Chapter three explains the symbolical series of stain, sin, and guilt. It also deals with how tragic theology and anthropology are subject to the meaning and the role of the symbolical series. Moreover, the concept of the servile will can be clarified by means of the symbolical series, which expresses that the will of freedom results in the evil of self-enclosure. Chapter four puts the concept of tragedy in the structure of mythically gravitational space and in the context of Christology to express the unique place of tragedy. Ricoeur regards tragic theology and anthropology as the negative conceptions which is critical and limiting. Moreover, he tries to exhibit the possibility of surpassing tragic theology and anthropology which, noticeably, have the power of deconstructing other symbols (the elements of servile will within) to some extent that Ricoeur regards them as critical conceptions. But in contrast to Christology, they are conceptions which wait for being surpassed and are limited. Thus, we can manifest the hierarchical levels: the servile will－a initial freedom(tragedy)－a freedom of participation(Christology). As to the conclusion, in The Symbolism of Evil, we have seen that Ricoeur tries to divide belief and knowledge into different fields of truth and that he needs the field of meaning which regards belief or symbolical language as the fundamental of pre-understanding. But, how do we assert its transcendence and keep the openness and the ambiguity at the same time that we interpret the Christology as the sphere of transcendental meaning? Even much more, we keep the possibility of truth of different religions and symbolical languages? These are issues waiting for further investigating.
Reference:	Aristotle. Poetics. Translated by Malcolm Heath, Penguin Classics. London: Penguin, 1996. Aristotle, and George Alexander Kennedy. Aristotle on Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Translated by George A. Kennedy. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991. Bouchard, Larry D. Tragic Method and Tragic Theology: Evil in Contemporary Drama and Religious Thought. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1989. Bricke, John, ed. Freedom & Morality, Lindley Lecture. Lawrence: University of Kansas, 1976. Grene, David, and Richmond Alexander Lattimore. Greek Tragedies. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991. Hesiod. Theogony. Translated by Norman Oliver Brown. New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1953. Ihde, Don. Hermeneutic Phenomenology: The Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur, Northwestern University Studies in Phenomenology & Existential Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1971. Lowe, Walter James. "The Coherence of Paul Ricoeur." The Journal of Religion 61, no. 4 (Oct., 1981): 384-402. Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. The Birth of Tragedy. Translated by Douglas Smith, Dr. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Oates, Whitney Jennings, and Eugene O`Neill, eds. The Complete Greek Drama; All the Extant Tragedies of Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides, and the Comedies of Aristophanes and Menander, in a Variety of Translations. New York: Random House, 1938. Plato. The Republic. Translated by G.M.A. Grube. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc, 1992. Reagan, Charles E. Paul Ricoeur: His Life and His Work. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996. ———, ed. Studies in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1979. Ricoeur, Paul. The Conflict of Interpretations; Essays in Hermeneutics, Northwestern University Studies in Phenomenology & Existential Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1974. ———. Fallible Man. Translated by Charles A. Kelble. New York: Fordham University Press, 1986. ———. Figuring the Sacred: Religion, Narrative, and Imagination. Translated by David Pellauer. Edited by Mark I. Wallace. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995. ———. Finitude et Culpabilité II：La Symbolique du Mal. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne, 1960. ———. Finitude et Culpabilité I: L`homme Faillible. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne, 1960. ———. "The Hermeneutics of Symbols and Philosophical Reflections." International Philosophical Quarterly, II (May, 1962): 191-218. ———. Histoire et Vérité. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1955. ———. History and Truth. Translated by Charles A. Kelbley. Evanston Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1965. ———. Le Conflit Des Interprétations; Essais D`herméneutique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1969. ———. A Ricoeur Reader: Reflection and Imagination. Edited by Mario J. Valdés, Theory/Culture 2. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1991. ———. The Symbolism of Evil. Translated by Emerson Buchanan. Boston: Beacon Press, 1972. Ricoeur, Paul, François Azouvi, and Marc B. de Launay. Critique and Conviction: Conversations with François Azouvi and Marc De Launay. Translated by Kathleen Blamey, European Perspectives. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998. Robert, Piercey. "The Role of Greek Tragedy in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur." Philosophy Today 49, no. 1 (2005): 3. Segal, Charles. Tragedy and Civilization: An Interpretation of Sophocles. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1999. 沈清松，《呂格爾》，台北：東大，2000。佛洛伊德著/楊庸一譯，《圖騰與禁忌》，台北：志文，1975。佛洛伊德著/楊韶剛譯，《一個幻覺的未來》，台北：米娜貝爾，2001。柯志明，《論惡、自我與自由的辯證關係：呂格爾(Paul Ricoeur)前期(1950-1960)主體存有學之研究》，台北：中國文化大學哲學研究所博士論文，1997。
Description:	碩士國立政治大學宗教研究所 92156005 95
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0921560051
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Religious Studies] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
56005101.pdf		43Kb	Adobe PDF2	1164	View/Open
56005102.pdf		70Kb	Adobe PDF2	1180	View/Open
56005103.pdf		72Kb	Adobe PDF2	1127	View/Open
56005104.pdf		33Kb	Adobe PDF2	1764	View/Open
56005105.pdf		83Kb	Adobe PDF2	1130	View/Open
56005106.pdf		161Kb	Adobe PDF2	1733	View/Open
56005107.pdf		340Kb	Adobe PDF2	2570	View/Open
56005108.pdf		343Kb	Adobe PDF2	4874	View/Open
56005109.pdf		320Kb	Adobe PDF2	2076	View/Open
56005110.pdf		328Kb	Adobe PDF2	1755	View/Open
56005111.pdf		172Kb	Adobe PDF2	1123	View/Open
56005112.pdf		70Kb	Adobe PDF2	1420	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback