政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33527

政大典藏 > College of Liberal Arts > Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies > Theses > Item 140.119/33527

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33527

Title:	電子期刊E-Metrics評鑑模式應用於大學圖書館之研究 E-Metrics Assessment Model for the Study of Electronic Journals in University Libraries
Authors:	張慈玲 Chang,Tze-ling
Contributors:	王梅玲 Wang, Mei-ling 張慈玲 Chang,Tze-ling
Keywords:	電子期刊電子資源電子計量評鑑大學圖書館 Electronic Journal (E-Journal) Electronic Resources E-Metrics Assessment University Libraries
Date:	2005
Issue Date:	2009-09-17 16:57:28 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	由於電子資源蓬勃興起，大學圖書館紛紛引進以滿足師生教學研究之需求，然同時預算規模卻未見增加，加以電子資源市場，尤其是電子期刊部份，每年皆以平均7%~10%漲幅成長，使得圖書館對電子期刊使用及其效益，需要有更清楚的了解與掌握，透過衡量網路化服務與資源品質的方法，除可作為圖書館人員決策參考，並能提供有利的理由以尋求經費支援。本研究目的希能探討電子期刊E-Metrics評鑑相關理論與研究，以ARL E-Metrics計畫為基礎，對大學圖書館電子期刊提出績效評鑑模式芻議與實證分析。採用研究方法為文獻分析法、深度訪談法與電子計量(E-Metrics)分析法，以國立臺灣大學館藏西文電子期刊為對象進行研究。經訪談與實證資料分析結果，本研究確認了館藏導向電子期刊的績效評鑑的目的、歸納出電子期刊資源與服務評鑑的程序及方法，並建構大學圖書館電子期刊E-Metrics評鑑模式與要件，包含電子期刊資源、使用、成本與績效四大類型，合計14項指標，同時並獲得具體電子期刊績效評鑑結果，確認國內大學圖書館進行電子期刊E-Metrics評鑑模式之可行性。最後，本研究根據結論，建議可以質化方式進行電子期刊評鑑研究，以獲得對電子期刊資源的全面性瞭解，並對電子期刊E-Metrics評鑑模式與指標、資料蒐集方式等提出建議。而對於未來研究方向，建議可從朝以下四方面努力：(1)進行網路資源與服務導向電子期刊評鑑模式之研究；(2)開發電子期刊使用統計管理軟體；(3)進行電子期刊成本經濟學研究；(4)進行電子期刊使用紀錄分析之評鑑研究。 Due to the fast growth of electronic resources, it has become a trend for university libraries to acquire such resources to meet the research needs for their users. The expenditures libraries have to spend for electronic resources, especially that for electronic journals have been raised at average rate of 7% to 10% each year. However, the yearly budget for libraries never has been increased as much. It thus has become important for libraries to identify the real usage of and institutional research outcomes from the acquired electronic journals. The assessment of networked information service and resources quality of it is useful for acquisition decision-making. If there is a positive assessment result, then it will also provide justification for seeking budget support. The purpose of this study is to conduct an empirical study so as to enable formulating an assessment model for electronic journals a library has subscribed. The author firstly explores the theories and researches for the application of E-Metrics as assessment model for electronic journals. Taking the ARL E-Metrics project as a referential model, the author combines literature review, in-depth interview, and E-metrics in the research methodology to do researches about the western-language electronic journals subscribed by the National Taiwan University Library. This study has resulted in very useful assessment statistics for electronic journals. From analyzing the data collected from interviews and the related empirical study, the author is able to verify the purpose of assessment for electronic journals under collection development policy, to formulate procedures and methodology for the assessment of electronic journal resource and, the services based on it, to find out necessary components for E-Metrics assessment model for university libraries which comprises of fourteen indicators of four major criteria of (1) e-journal resources (2) its usage (3) its cost and (4) performance from it. The author concludes that the E-Metrics model is good for university libraries to assess their acquired electronic journals. Based on the findings of this study, the author recommends qualitative research to be the more adequate approach for the assessment of electronic journals and proposed the following four areas for future research: (1) investigation of Internet resources and assessment model for electronic journals under the library’s service policy (2) development of statistics and management tools for the subscribed electronic journals (3) cost study of electronic journals from economics point of view (4) analytical study of access logs of electronic journals.
Reference:	一、中文（一）圖書李華偉。現代化圖書館管理。台北市：三民，民85年。林呈潢計畫主持。圖書館統計標準與電子圖書館服務使用評量。台北市：國家圖書館，民93年。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所編輯。中國圖書館學會九十二年度電子期刊出版與管理研習班研習手冊。臺北市：中國圖書館學會，2003年。張淑惠。圖書館績效評估之研究。臺北市：漢美，民83年。詹麗萍。電子資源與圖書館館藏發展。臺北市：麥田，民94年。（二）期刊論文王梅玲。「電子期刊對學術圖書館技術服務的影響」。中華民國圖書館學會會報 75(民94)：161-172。王梅玲。「電子計量應用在電子期刊評鑑」，數位時代圖書館館藏發展研討會論文集(台中市：中興大學圖書館，民95年1月16-17日)，頁241-259。吳明德。「大學圖書館電子資源館藏發展之研究」。大學圖書館3:2 (民88年4月)：4-28。吳明德。「圖書館評鑑」。國立成功大學圖書館館刊11(民92年4月)：1-8。<http://www.lib.ncku.edu.tw/journal/11st_Journal/P1.HTM> (2003/10/26) 吳美美等。「數位圖書館／博物館評鑑指標建構探討」。圖書資訊學刊14 (民88年12月)：49-70。吳英美。「電子期刊對圖書館期刊服務的影響」。國立中央圖書館臺灣分館館刊4:2 (民86年12月)：36-50。吳雅慧、吳明德。「電子期刊使用研究--以國立臺灣大學電機資訊學院及文學院為例」。國家圖書館館刊 92:1(民92年4月)：169-196。邱炯友。「資訊價值體系中之電子出版」。資訊傳播與圖書館學3:2(民85)：54-65。林珊如。「鄉土教育網站使用者研究之應用：以「淡水河溯源」數位博物館為例」。大學圖書館6:2 (民91年9月)：51-64。林愉珊、張慧銖。「期刊使用率調查暨電子期刊館藏發展之探討：以臺大醫圖為例」。大學圖書館5:1 (民90年3月)：79-92。梁朝雲。「新媒體、新挑戰：電子出版品服務的省思」。台北市立圖書館館訊13:4(民85)：1-9。張嘉彬。「系統評估研究之文獻探討：從電子圖書館角度考量」。大學圖書館3:2 (民88年4月)：69-94。張嘉彬。「運用深度訪談法評估臺大電子圖書館與博物館系統」。大學圖書館6:1 (民91年3月)：94-118。張嘉彬。「臺大電子圖書館與博物館系統之評估研究–以查詢過程記錄分析法為例」。中國圖書館學會會報66 (民90年6月)：103-125。郭麗芳。「網路電子期刊評估之研究」。大學圖書館1:3 (民86年7月)：56-81。陳昭珍。「電子資源的長久保存」。佛教圖書館館訊25/26（民90年3月）。＜http://www.gaya. org.tw/journal/m25-26/25-main3.htm＞（2002/11/27）詹麗萍。「E-Metrics在數位圖書館使用評估的應用」。新世紀數位圖書館與數位博物館趨勢研討會論文集(新竹市：交大圖書資訊中心，民90年11月)，頁II-1-10。詹麗萍。「圖書館數位化館藏的建置內容、經費架構及使用研究」。興大人文學報33(下)(民92年6月)：1069-1094。盧秀菊。「學術圖書館之績效評估」。大學圖書館3:4 (民88年10月)：4-14。蕭瓏、張宇紅。「電子資源評價指標體系的建立初探」。大學圖書館學報3 (2002年)：35-42。戴玉旻等。「臺灣電子期刊使用者行為分析：以Elsevier SDOS電子期刊系統為例」。圖書與資訊學刊39 (民90年11月)：1-27。薛理桂。「數位化館藏發展展望」。國立中央圖書館台灣分館館刊5：1（民87年）：7-17。（三）學位論文吳雅慧。「電子期刊使用研究：以國立臺灣大學電機資訊學院及文學院為例」。台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，碩士論文，民91年。郭麗芳。「網路電子期刊之評估研究--以生物醫學資源為例」。輔仁大學圖書資訊學研究所，碩士論文，民85年。張嘉彬。「台大電子圖書館與博物館－台灣平埔族探員雛型系統之評估研究」。臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，碩士論文，民88年。二、英文（一）圖書 Association of Research Libraries. Measures for electronic resources (E-Metrics). Washington, D.C: Association of Research Libraries, 2002 Bertot, J. C., C. R.McClure , and J. Ryan.. Statistics and Performance Measures for Public Library Networked Services. Chicago, IL : American Library Association, 2001 Bertot, John Carlo and Denise M. Davis. Planning and Evaluating Library Networked Services and Resources .Westport,Conn.:Libraries Unlimited, 2004 Bluh, P., ed. Managing Electronic Serials. Chicago: American Library Association, 2001. Brophy, P. and P. M. Wynne. Management information systems and performance measurement for the electronic library: eLib supporting study (MIEL2). Final Report. JISC, June 1997. <http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/elib/papers/supporting/pdf/mis.pdf> (2003/10/6) Covey, Denise Troll. Usage and Usability Assessment: Library Practices and Concernsby. Washington, DC: DLI CLIR, 2002. <http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub105/pub105.pdf> Curtis, Donnelyn, Virginia M. Scheschy, and Adolfo R. Tarango. Developing and Managing Electronic Journal Collections: A How-to-Do-It Manual for Librarians. New York: Neal-Schuman, 2000. Evans, Edward. Developing Library and Information Center Collection 4th ed. Englewood, Colo. : Libraries Unlimited, 2000. Fraser, B. T., and C. R. McClure. Toward a Framework of Library and Institutional Outcomes. Tallahassee, FL: Information Use Management and Policy Institute and the Association of Research Libraries E-Metrics Project, 2002. <http://www.arl.org/stats/newmeas/emetrics/phase3/ARL.Emetrics.Outcomes.Paper.Final.Jan.8.02.pdf> (2003/10/6) Gregory, Vicki L.. Selecting And Managing Electronic Resources: A How-to-Do-It Manual for Librarians. New York: Neal-Schuman, 2000. Lancaster, F.W.. If You Want to Evaluate Your Library…. 2nd ed. London: Library Association Publishing, 1993. Lancaster, F.W.. The Measurement and Evaluation of Library Services. 2nd ed. Virginia: Information Resources Press, 1991. Luther, Judy. White Paper on Electronic Journal Usage Statistics. 2nd ed. Washington,D.C.: DLF CLIR, 2001. MuClure, Charles R. and John Carlo Bertot, ed. Evaluating Networked Information Services: Techniques, Policy, and Issues. Medford, NewJersey: Information Today, 2001. McClure, Charles R.ed. Planning and Evaluating Library Networked Services and Resources. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited, 2004 Shim,Wonsik “Jeff”, Charles R. McClure, Bruce T.Fraser, John Carlo Bertot, Arif Gagli, and Emily H. Leahy. Measures and Statistics for Research Library Networked Services: Procedures and Issues: ARL E-Metrics Phase II Report. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, 2001 Stein, Joan, Martha Kyrillidou, and Denise Davis, ed. Proceedings of the 4th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services: “Meaningful Measures for Emerging Realities”. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, 2002. Tenopir, Carol. Use andUsers of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies. Washington, D.C.: DLF CLIR, 2003. <http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub120/pub120.pdf> (二)期刊論文 ----. “Approaches, Techniques, and Criteria for Serials Evaluation in the Electronic Environment.” Serials Librarian 40:3/4 (2001): 393-407. ----. “Guidelines for Statistical Measures of Usage of Web-based Indexed, Abstracted, and Full Text Resources.” Information Technology and Libraries 17:4 (Dec 1998): 219-21. ----. “Guidelines for Statistical Measures of Usage of Web-based Indexed, Abstracted, and Full-text Resources.” Information Technology and Libraries 18:3 (Sept 1999): 161-3. Alexander, Steve. “E-METRICS.” Computerworld 34:50(2000):64. Anderson, Lounan, Christie T. Degener, and Yvonne W. Zhang. “Measuring Electronic Journal Collections: A Homeric Struggle.”The Serials Librarian 42:3/4 (2002): 241-7. Bauer, K.. “Indexes as Tools for Measuring Usage of Print and Electronic Resources.” College & Research Libraries 62:1 (2001): 36-42. Bauer, K.. “Who Goes There? Measuring Library Web Site Usage.” Online 24:1 (2000): 25-31. Becky, Hartland Fox, Dalton,-Peter-A and Barr,-Perry.“eVALUEd- an Evaluation Model for E-library Developments,”Ariadne 31( Mar/Apr 2002) <http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue31/evalued/> (2003/11/8) Bendig, D. and M. Hlava. “Supporting E-journal Integration Through Standards: The OCLC Reference Services Experience and Experiences from the Field.”The Serials Librarian 38:3/4 (2000): 313-322. Bertot, J.. “Developing National Library Network Statistics & Performance Measures.” (2000) <http://www.albany.edu/~imlsstat>（2003/10/2） Bertot, John Carlo. “Measuring Service Quality in the Networked Environment: Application and Considerations.” Library Trends 49:4（Spring 2001）：758-775. Bertot, John Carlo and Charles R McClure.“Outcomes Assessment in The Networked Environment: Research Questions, Issues, Considerations, and Moving Forward.” Library Trends 51:4 (Spring 2003): 590-689. Bishop, Ann Peterson. “Logins and Bailouts: Measuring Access, Use, and Success in Digital Libraries.”The Journal of Electronic Publishing 4:2 (Dec 1998) <http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/04-02/bishop.html> (2002/9/29) Blecic, D. D. , J. B. Fiscella, and Jr. S. E. Wiberley. “The Measurement of Use of Web-based Information Resources: An Early Look at Vendor-supplied Data.” College & Research Libraries News 62:5 (2001): 434-453. Blixrud, J. C. “Measures for Electronic Use: The ARL E-Metrics Project.” in IFLA Preconference (UK: Loughborough, August 13-25, 2002) <http://www.arl.org/stats/newmeas/emetrics/Blixrud_IFLA.pdf> (2003/9/6) Blosser, J., H Lightman, W A McHugh, and A Ren. “Aggregator Services Evaluation: Not an Easy Comparison.” The Serials Librarian 41:1 (2001): 65-78. Bollen, J and R Luce. “Evaluation of Digital Library Impact and User Communities by Analysis of Usage Patterns.” D-Lib Magazine 8:6 (Jun 2002) <http://dlib.ejournal.ascc.net/dlib/june02/bollen/06bollen.html>(2003/10/6) Bollen, Johan, Rick Luce, S.S.Vemulapalli, and Weining Xu. “Usage Analysis for the Identification of Reaearch Trends in Digital Libraries.”D-Lib Magazine 9:5 (May 2003) <http://dlib.ejournal.ascc.net/dlib/may03/bollen/05bollen.html> (2003/8/16) Bonthron, Karen, Christine Urquhart, Rhian Thomas, et al..“Trends in Use of Electronic Journals in Higher Education in the UK – Views of Academic Staff and Students.” D-Lib Magazine 9:6 (June 2003) <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june03/urquhart/06urquhart.html> (2003/8/16) Borghuis, M. G. M..“User Feedback from Electronic Subscriptions: The Possibilities of Logfile Analysis.”Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory 21:3 (1997): 373-380. Borgman, Christine L. “Fourth DELOS Workshop. Evaluation of Digital Libraries: Testbeds, Measurements, and Metrics.”2002. <http://www.sztaki.hu/conferences/deval/presentations/final_report.html>（2003/6/13）. Buckley, C., M. Burright, A. Prendergast, R. Sapon-White, and A. Taylor. “Electronic Publishing of Scholarly Journals: A Bibliographic Eessay of Current Issues.”Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 22 (Spring 1999) <http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/99-spring/article4.html> (2003/10/6) Buttenfield, Barbara. “Usability Evaluation of Digital Libraries.”Science & Technology Libraries 17:3/4 (1999): 39-59. Choudhury, S , B Hobbs, M Lorie, and N Flores. “A Framework for Evaluating Digital Library Services.”D-Lib Magazine 8:7/8 (Jul/Aug 2002) <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july02/choudhury/07choudhury.html> (2003/10/6) Chu, H. “Promises and Challenges of Electronic Journals: Academic Libraries Surveyed.”Learned Publishing 13:3 (1999): 169-175. Cleveland, Gary. “Digital Libraries: Definitions, Issues and Challenges.” 1998. <http://www.ifla.org/VI/5/op/udtop8/udtop8.htm> (2002/2/18) Clpkowski, Pamela. “Articles, Articles Everywhere- but Where？And Does It Matter？.” The Serials Librarian. 42: 3/4 (2002): 171-6. Cole, L. “A Library Odyssey: Electronic Journals Management in an Academic Institution.”VINE 125 (2001): 43-48. Cole, Louise “Back to Basics: What is the E-Journal?” Serials Librarian 47:1/2 (2004): 78.？ Culpepper, J C. “Electronic Resources: Exactly, What Is Online?.” Acquisitions Librarian 24 (2000): 21-8. Davis, Denise M.. “Electronic Access and Use Related Measures: Summary of Findings.”Sep.8 , 2000. <http://www.nclis.gov/statsurv/2000ven.pdf> (2003/10/15) Dixon, J. H.. “Library Management Statistics form an Integrated Library System (ILS).”The Acquisitions Librarian 24 (2000): 41-46. Dolenko, Michael. “Making User-based Assessment Work: Evaluating Statistics Canada’s Web site.” Information Today (1998): 105-14. Duranceau, Ellen Finnie (ed). “Old Wine in New Bottles?: Defining Electronic Serials.”Serials Review 22:1 (1996): 69-79. Duy, Joanna and Liwen Vaughan. “Usage Data for Electronic Resources: A Comparison between Locally Collected and Vendor-Provided Statistics.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 29:1 (2003): 16-22. Emery, J. “Evaluating, Selecting, and Acquiring Electronic Resources: Part 3 – Usage and Other Statistics.” Serials Review 27:2 (2001): 78-81. Gardner, S. “The Impact of Electronic Journals on Library Staff at ARL Member Institutions.”Serials Review 27:3/4 (2001): 17-32. Gorman, G. E. and Ruth H. Miller.“Collection Evaluation: New Measures for a New Environment,”Advances in Librarianship 25 (2001): 67-96. Grackin, Ann. “The Three Principles of .Com.” Manufacturing System 34:50(Apr.2000):74. Greenstein, D. and D. Troll. “Usage, Usability and User Support.”Report of a Discussion Group Convened at the Digital Library Federation Forum on April 2, 2000. <http://www.diglib.org/use/useframe.htm> (2003/10/6) Griffiths, J R, R J Hartley, and F C Johnson. “Task Dimensions of User Evaluations of Information Retrieval Systems.” Information Research 8:4 (Jul 2003) Griffiths, Jillian R. “Evaluation of the JISC Information Environment: Student Perceptions of Services.” Information Research 8:4 (Jul 2003) Guthrie, K. M.. “JSTOR Usage Data Reveals Fascinating Trends.”JSTOR News 4:2 (2000) <http://www.jstor.org/news/june2000.4usage.html> (2003/10/6) Hahn, Karla L and Lila A Faulkner. “Evaluative Usage-based Metrics for the Selection of E-journals.” College and Research Libraries 63:3 (May 2002): 215-27. Harker, Karen R.. “Order Out of Chaos: Using a Web Database to Manage Access to Electronic Journals: at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.” Library Computing. 18:1 (1999): 59-67. Harter, S. and C. Ford. “Web-based Analyses of E-journal Impact: Approaches, Problems, and Issues.”Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51:13 (2000): 1159-1176. Hartland-Fox, B and P Dalton. “eVALUEd: An Evaluation Model for E-library Developments.” Ariadne 31 (Apr 2002) <http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue31/evalued/> (2003/10/6) Hartland-Fox, Rebecca and Stella Thebridge. “Towards A Toolkit for Evaluating Electronic Information Services.” SCONUL Newsletter 29 (Summer 2003): 37-43. Henderson, Kittie S.. “Licensing Information: Where Can We Go from Here? The Publisher and Vendor Perspective.” Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory 22:1 (1998): 55-7。 Hudgins, Christine. “How Healthy is Your Web Site?.” Informationweek.com Issue 783(Apr.24 2000):87-88. Huotari, M-L and T D Wilson. “Determining Organizational Information Needs: the Critical Success Factors Approach.” Information Research 6:3 (Apr 2001). Hurd, Julie M, Deborah D Blecic, and Ann E Robinson. “Performance Measures for Electronic Journals: a User-centered Approach.” Science and Technology Libraries 20:2/3 (2001): 57-71. International Coalition of Library Consortia (ICOLC). “Guidelines for Statistical Measures of Usage of Web-based Indexed, Abstracted, and Full Text Resources.”(1998) <http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/webstats.html> (2003/10/6) International Coalition of Library Consortia (ICOLC). “Guidelines for Statistical Measures of Usage of Web-based Information Resources.”(2001) <http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/2001webstats.htm> (2003/10/6) International Coalition of Library Consortia (ICOLC). “Statement of Current Perspective and Preferred Practices for the Selection and Purchase of Electronic Information.”(1998) <http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/statement.html> (2003/10/6) International Coalition of Library Consortia (ICOLC). “Statement of Current Perspective and Preferred Practices for the Selection and Purchase of Electronic Information: Update No. 1: New Developments in E-journal Licensing.”(2001) <http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/2001currentpractices.htm> (2003/10/6) Jaguszewski, J. M., and L. K. Probst. “The Impact of Electronic Resources on Serial Cancellations and Remote Storage Decisions in Academic Research Libraries.”Library Trends 48:4 (2000): 799-820. Jewell, Timothy D. “Recent Trends in ARL Electronic and Access Services Data.” August 14 , 2002 <http://www.arl.org/stats/specproj/etrends.htm> (2005/9/2) Jewell, T. D.. “The ARL “Investment in Electronic Resources” Study: Final Report to the Council on Library and Information Resources.”(1998) <http://www.arl.org/stats/specproj/jewell.html> (2003/10/6) Keiser, Barbie E. “Economic Statistics And Forecasting Data via the Web.” Searcher 9:10 (Nov/Dec 2001): 42-70. Kelly, B. “Performance Indicators for Web Sites.” Exploit Interactive 5 (2000). King, Donald W., Peter B. Boyce, Carol Hansen Montgomery, and Carol Tenopir. “Library Economic Metrics: Examples of the Comparison of Electronic and Print Journal Collections and Collection Services.” Library Trends 51:3 (2003): 376-400. Kling, Rob and Ewa Callahan.“Electronic Journals, the Internet, and Scholarly Communication.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37(2003): 127-177. Kling, Rob and G. McKim.“A Typology for Electronic Journals: Characterizing Scholarly Journals by Their Distribution Forms.”（CSI Working Paper No.WP-97-07）,Sep.1997 <http://rkcsi.indiana.edu/archive/CSI/WP/wp97-07B.html> (2006/7/15) Kyrillidou, M.. “Round-up of Other E-metrics Developments.”ARL Bimonthly Report 213 (2000) <http://www.arl.org/newsltr/213/roundup.html> (2003/10/6) Lancaster, F. W. “The Evolution of Electronic Publishing.” Library Trends 43:4(Spring 1995): 518-27. Library of Congress. “Final Report of the American Memory User Evaluation, 1991-1993.” <http://lcweb2.loc.gov/ammem/usereval.html> (2003/7/20) Luther, Judy. “White Paper on Electronic Journal Usage Statistics.” The Serials Librarian 41:2 (2001): 119-48. Marchionini, G. & G. Crane, “Evaluating Hypermedia And Learning: Mothods and Results from the Perseus Project.”ACM Transactions on Information System 12:1 (1994): 5-34. Marek, K and E J Valauskas. “Web Logs As Indices of Electronic Journal Use: Tools for Identifying A ‘Classic’ Article.” Libri 52:4 (Dec 2002):220-30. McLean, Carla. “More Statistics: Measuring Electronic Resources Usage.” Alki 16:2 (July 2000): 14. Mercer, L S. “Measuring the Use And Value of Electronic Journals And Books.” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 25 (Winter 2000). <http://www02.library.ucsb.edu/istl/00-winter/article1.html> (2003/10/06) Miller, R and S Schmidt. “E-Metrics: Measures for Electronic Resources.” Serials 15:1 (Mar 2002):19-25. Monopoli, M, D Nicholas, P Georgiou, and M Korfiati. “A User-oriented Evaluation of Digital Libraries: Case Study the ‘Electronic Journals’ Service of the Library and Information Service of the University of Patras, Greece.” Aslib Proceedings 54:2 (2002): 103-17. Montgomery, C. H.. “Measuring the Impact of an Electronic Journal Collection on Library Costs: a Framework and Preliminary Observations at Drexel University.”D-Lib Magazine 6:10 (2000) <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october00/montgomery/10montgomery.html> (2003/10/6) Montgomery, Carol Hansen and Donald W. King. “Comparing Library and User Related Costs of Print and Electronic Journal Collections: A First Step Towards a Comprehensive Analysis.”D-Lib Magazine 8:10 (2002) <http://dlib.ejournal.ascc.net/dlib/october02/montgomery/10montgomery.html> (2002/10/16) Montgomery, Carol Hansen and JoAnne Sparks. “Framwork for Assessing the Impact of an Electronic Journal Collection on Library Costs and Staffing Patterns.” Presented at the Economics and Usage of Digital Library Collections, Ann Arbor, MI, March 24, 2000. <http://www.si.umich.edu/PEAK-2000/montgomery.pdf> (2002/10/16) Morse, David H. and William A. Clintworth.“Comparing Patterns of Print and Electronic Journal Use in an Academic Health Science Library.” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 28 (Fall 2000) <http://www.istl.org/00-fall/refereed.html> (2002/9/29) Mullins, James L.. “Statistical Measures of Usage of Web-based Resources.” The Serials Librarian 36:1/2 (1999): 207-10. Nicholas, David, Paul Huntington, and Peter E Williams. “Evaluating Metrics for Comparing the Use of Web Sites: a Case Study of Two Consumer Health Web Sites.” Journal of Information Science 28:1 (2002): 63-75. Nisonger, Thomas E.. “Usage Statistics for the Evaluation of Electronic Resources: Report of a Session at the 1999 ALA Conference.”Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 24:2 (Summer 2000): 299-302. Nisonger, Thomas E. and Gloria Guzi. “Approaches, Techniques, and Criteria for Serials Evaluation in the Electronic Environment.”The Serials Librarian 40:3/4 (2001): 393-407. Okerson, A.. “Are We There Yet? Online E-resources Ten Years After.” Library Trends 48:4 (Spring 2000): 671-93. Poll, R. “Performance Measures for Library Networked Services and Resources.” Electronic Library 19:5 (2001): 307-14. Rogers, S.. “Electronic Journal Usage at Ohio State University.”College & Research Libraries 62:1 (2001): 25-34. Rupp-Serrano, Karen , Sarah Robbins, and Danielle Cain. “Canceling Print Serials in Favor of Electronic: Criteria for Decision Making.”Library Collection, Acquisitions,& Technical Services 26 (2002): 369-78. Rusch-Feja, D., and U. Siebeky. “Evaluation of Usage and Acceptance of Electronic Journals: Results of an Electronic Survey of Max Planck Society Researchers Including Usage Statistics from Elsevier, Springer, and Academic Press.”D-Lib Magazine 5:10 (Oct. 1999) <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october99/rusch-feja/10rusch-feja-summary.html> (2003/10/7) Ryzik, Melena Z. “New Way to Dig for Data.” Internet World 7:15(Aug. 1, 2001): 26-7. Saracevic, Tefko. “Digital Library Evaluation: Toward an Evolution of Concept.”Library Trends 49:2（Fall 2000）: 350-69. Shemberg, Marian and Cheryl Grossman. “Electronic Journals in Academic Libraries: A Comparison of ARL and Non-ARL Libraries.”Library Hi Tech 17:1 (1999): 26-45. Shepherd, P. “Keeping Count.” Library Journal 128:2 (Feb 2003): 46-8. Shim, W. “Measuring Services, Resources, Users and Use in the Networked Environment.” Journal of Library Administration 35:4 (2001):71-84. Shim, W. and C. R. McClure.“Measuring Services, Resources, Users, and Use in the Networked Environment.” ARL Bimonthly Report 210 (2000) <http://www.arl.org/newsltr/210/emetrics.html> (2003/10/6) Shim, W., C. McClure, and J. Bertot. “Data Gathering Practices in the Networked Environment.”ARL Bimonthly Report 213 (2000) <http://www.arl.org/newsltr/213/data.html> (2003/10/6) Shim, W., C. R. McClure, and J. C. Bertot. “E-metrics Project: Developing Statistics and Performance Measures to Describe Electronic Information Services and Resources for ARL Libraries. Phase One Report.”Nov 7, 2000. <http://www.arl.org/stats/newmeas/emetrics/phaseone.pdf> (2003/10/6) Shim, W., C. R. McClure, B. T. Fraser, J. C. Bertot , A. Dagli, and E. H. Leahy. “Measures and Statistics for Research Library Networked Services: Procedures and Issues. ARL E-Metrics Phase II Report.”Oct 2001. <http://www.arl.org/stats/newmeas/emetrics/phasetwo.pdf> (2003/10/6) Simmonds, P L and S S Andaleeb. “Usage of Academic Libraries: the Role of Service Quality, Resources, and User Characteristics.” Library Trends 49:4 (Spring 2001): 626-34. Slagell, Jeff. “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Evaluating Electronic Journals.” Computers in Libraries 21:5 (May 2001): 34-8. Sumsion, J. “Library Statistics to Enjoy: Measuring Success!.” IFLA Journal 27:4 (2001): 211-14. Svenningsen, K. “An Evaluation Model for Electronic Resources Utilizing Cost Analysis.” Bottom Line 11:1 (1998): 18-23. Tenopir, Carol. “Information Metrics and User Studies.” Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives 55:1/2 (2003): 13-17. Tenopir, Carol. “Reference Use Statistics: Electronic Resources.” Library Journal 123:8 (May 1 1998): 32-3. Thebridge, Stella, Pete Dalton, Anjlee Bhatt, and Rebecca Hartland-Fox.“The Evaluation of Electronic Information Services: Questionnaire to Higher Education Institutions in the UK Analysis of Responses.”(Birmingham: University of Central England, 2002), pp.25-6.<http://www.cie.uce.ac.uk/cirt>（2003/10/26） Thumlert, Kurt. “Internet Day：Eye in the Sky E-metrics,” Jan 9,2001 <http://www.internetday.com/print/0,,1381_682251,00.html>（2002/6/17） Troll, D. “Changes in library usage, usability and user support.” In the 4th Northumbria Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services. “Meaningful Measures for Emerging Realities.” Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, August 14, 2001. UCLA Biomedical Library.“Research Project to Study Electronic Journal Usage.” (2001). <http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/biomed/update/sep01/cmi.html> (2003/10/6) Van Orsdel, L and K. Born. “Big Chill on the Big Deal? – 2003 Periodicals Price Survey.” Library Journal 128:7 (15 Apr 2003): 51-6. Wang, Chengzhi.“International vital statistics: a resource guide.”Collection Building 22:2 (2003): 53-9. Watson, Paula D. “Sources for E-journals.” Library Technology Reports 39:2 (Mar/Apr 2003): 6-27. Woodward, Hazel M. and Cliff McKnight. “Electronic Journals: Issues of Access and Bibliographic Control.”Serials Reviews 21:2 (Summer 1995): 71-8. Young, Mark and Martha Kyrillidou(ed.). “ARL Supplementary Statistics 2002-03.” in ARL Supplementary Statistics, 2004. <http://www.arl.org/stats/pubpdf/sup03.pdf> (2005/9/2) Young, P.. “Electronic Services and Library Performance Measurement: A Definitional Challenge.” From the 4th Northumbria Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services. “Meaningful Measures for Emerging Realities.” Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, August 13, 2001. <http://www.arl.org/stats/north/powerpoints/young-Northumbria2001.ppt (2003/10/7) Young. Peter R.. “Measurement of Electronic Services in Libraries: Statistics for the Digital Age.”In 63rd IFLA General Conference , Aug. 31- Sep. 5, 1997. <http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla63/63youp.htm> (2003/10/6) Zhang, Z..“Evaluating Electronic Journal Services and Monitoring their Usage by Means of WWW Server Log File Analysis.”Vine 111(1999): 37-42. （三）網路資源 --.“ANSI/NISO Z39.7-2004: Information Services and Use: Metrics & Statistics for Libraries and Information Providers--Data Dictionary” <http://www.niso.org/emetrics/> (2005/8/27) --.“EQUINOX: Definition of Electronic Library Performance Indicators”, Nov. 2000 <http://equinox.dcu.ie/reports/pilist.html> (2005/8/24) Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL), 14 October 2003 <http://www.ala.org/ACRLTemplate.cfm> (2003/11/4) Association of Research Libraries (ARL), “ARL New Measures Initiative.” 11 September 2003 < http://www.arl.org/stats/newmeas/newmeas.html > (2003/10/8) Association of Research Libraries (ARL), “E-Metrics – Measures for Electronic Resources.” 12 September 2003 < http://www.arl.org/stats/newmeas/emetrics/> (2003/10/8) Brennan, Patricia, Karen Hersey and Georgia Harper. Licensing Electronic Resources. 23 June 2002. <http://www.arl.org/scomm/licensing/licbooklet.html> (2003/10/26) Brophy, P., Z.Clarke, M. Brinkley, S. Mundt, and R. Poll. EQUINOX. Library performance measurement and quality management system: Performance indicators for electronic library services. Nov 2000. <http://equinox.dcu.ie/reports/pilist.html> (2003/10/6) Council on Library and Information Resources – CLIR, 28 Aug 2003, <http://www.clir.org/> (2003/10/8) COUNTER – Counting Online Usage of Network Electronic Resources <http://www.projectcounter.org/index.html> (2003/9/28) Digital Library Federation <http://www.diglib.org/dlfhomepage.htm> (2005/8/24) eLib: The Electronic Libraries Programme.<http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/elib/> (2003/10/9) SPARC (Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition). 3 Oct 2003 <http://www.arl.org/sparc/home/index.asp?page=0> (2003/10/8)
Description:	碩士國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所 90155006 94
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0901550061
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
55006101.pdf	44Kb	Adobe PDF2	1022	View/Open
55006102.pdf	103Kb	Adobe PDF2	1007	View/Open
55006103.pdf	71Kb	Adobe PDF2	960	View/Open
55006104.pdf	87Kb	Adobe PDF2	1016	View/Open
55006105.pdf	144Kb	Adobe PDF2	1598	View/Open
55006106.pdf	367Kb	Adobe PDF2	1821	View/Open
55006107.pdf	162Kb	Adobe PDF2	1871	View/Open
55006108.pdf	493Kb	Adobe PDF2	1721	View/Open
55006109.pdf	329Kb	Adobe PDF2	1600	View/Open
55006110.pdf	150Kb	Adobe PDF2	1118	View/Open
55006111.pdf	142Kb	Adobe PDF2	1588	View/Open
55006112.pdf	90Kb	Adobe PDF2	1151	View/Open
55006113.pdf	104Kb	Adobe PDF2	966	View/Open
55006114.pdf	103Kb	Adobe PDF2	1162	View/Open
55006115.pdf	152Kb	Adobe PDF2	988	View/Open
55006116.pdf	153Kb	Adobe PDF2	969	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...