政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33443
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 112704/143671 (78%)
造訪人次 : 49806071      線上人數 : 540
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33443


    題名: 連接詞對台灣高職生英文閱讀理解的影響
    The Influence of Logical Conjunctions on Vocational High School Students` English Reading Comprehension
    作者: 李馥光
    Lee,Fu kuang
    貢獻者: 張郇慧
    Chang,Hsun huei
    李馥光
    Lee,Fu kuang
    關鍵詞: 連接詞
    閱讀理解
    Conjunctions
    Reading comprehension
    日期: 2007
    上傳時間: 2009-09-17 16:36:38 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究旨在探討連接詞對台灣高職生英文閱讀理解的影響，分別從以下兩方面來探討：一、連接詞是否對閱讀理解有幫助？二、那些類的連接詞較簡單？哪些類較困難？
    總共有七十五位高職生參與本實驗研究，他們共接受了「有」、「無」連接詞兩種版本的閱讀測驗，以及一個克漏字測驗，所收集的資料更進一步分為高低程度來探討，並加以統計的方式分析。
    結果顯示連接詞在英文閱讀理解上的確有正面的影響，然而，高程度組在整篇文章的文意的理解上受益較大，相反地，低程度組則在細節的了解上所獲得的幫助較多，此發現說明了高程度的學生所採取的閱讀方式為「由上往下」，而低程度的學生則採取「由下往上」的方式。本研究也發現了在連接詞本身的理解上，由簡單到困難的順序為：遞增類(additive)、時間類(temporal)、轉折類(adversative)、 因果類(causal)，此順序沒有高低程度的不同，表示語言本身句型結構的難易與相對的認知困難度才是決定此順序的關鍵。同時，越簡單的連接詞，如：遞增類，高低程度學生的表現差異越大，而最困難的連接詞：因果類，高低程度學生的表現並無不同。最後，錯誤分析發現了高程度的學生對自己選擇的答案較有自信，而低程度的學生則傾向用遞增類來取代其他類的連接詞。
    This present study aims to investigate the influence of logical conjunctions on Taiwanese vocational high school students’ English reading comprehension. It mainly discusses whether logical conjunctions play a facilitating role as well as determines what types of logical relations are more challenging and what types are easier.
    This study adopted an experimental design. A total of 75 EFL students participated in the experiment. They received two versions of reading comprehension tests: texts with / without logical conjunctions first and then a cloze test. The data collected from the high and low groups were compared and analyzed statistically.
    The results confirm the effects of conjunctions and the sequence of comprehension difficulty among the four types of relations. Logical conjunctions are facilitating in EFL students’ reading comprehension. They are beneficial to the high group in overall comprehension of the texts while they are more helpful to the low group in the understanding of detailed information. This finding suggests that higher achievers adopt a more top-down approach in reading whereas lower achievers adopt a more bottom-up approach. As for the sequence of comprehension difficulty, the results revealed an ascending difficulty order: additive, temporal, adversative, and causal conjunctions. The fact that no different order was found between the high and low groups suggests that linguistic complexity and cognitive processing difficulty are more likely the causes of this order instead of language proficiency. Also, it is found that the gap between the two groups is becoming widened as the difficulty level is decreasing. For example, the high group performed much better than the low group in additive conjunctions, but it performed as poorly as the low group did in causal ones. Finally, error analysis also discovered that higher achievers are more confident and capable in choosing their own answers while lower achievers tend to substitute additive conjunctions for the other ones.
    參考文獻: Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposal system and its control processes. In K. W. S. a. J. T. Spence (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8). London: Academic Press.
    Bormuth, J. R. (1967). Comparable cloze and multi-choice comprehension test scores. Journal of Reading, 10, 291-299.
    Bormuth, J. R. (1968b). Cloze test readability: criterion reference scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 186-196.
    Britton, B. K., Glynn, S. M., Meyer, B. J. F., & Pendland, M. J. (1982). Effects of text structure on the use of cognitive capacity during reading. Journal of Education Psychology, 74, 51-61.
    Cain, K. (2003). Text comprehension and its relation to coherence and cohesion in children`s fictional narratives. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 335-351.
    Cain, K., Patson, N., & Andrews, L. (2005). Age- and ability-related differences in young readers` use of conjunctions. Journal of Child Language, 32, 877-892.
    Caron, J. M., H. C., & Thüring, M. (1988). Conjunctions and the recall of composite sentences. Journal of memory and language, 27, 309-323.
    Chou, Y. U. (2002). The effect of short stories on English conjunction instruction for ESL students in vocational high school. Master`s Thesis. National Taiwan Normal University.
    Chung, J. S. L. (2000). Signals and reading comprehension -- theory and practice. System, 28(2), 247-259.
    Crewe, W. J. (1990). The illogic of logical connectives. ELT Journal, 44(4), 316-325.
    Crewe, W. J., Wright, & Leung, M. W. K. (1985). "Connectives: On the other hand, who needs them, though?" Working Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 8, 61-75.
    Degand, L., Lefevre, N., & Bestgen, Y. (1999). The impact of connectives and anaphoric expressions on expository discourse comprehension. Document Design, 1, 39-51.
    Degand, L., & Sanders, T. (2002). The impact of relationsl markers on expository text comprehension in L1 and L2. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 739-757.
    Franks, B. A., Mulhern. S. L. & Schilinger, S. M. (1997). Reasoning in a reading context: Deductive inferences in basal reading series. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 285-312.
    Gardner, P. L. (1983). Students` difficulties with logical connectives in everyday contexts. Australian Journal of Reading, 6(1), 12-18.
    Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Coherence cues mapping during comprehension. In J. Costermans, & Fayol, M. (Ed.), Processing interclausal relationships: Studies in the production and comprehension of text (pp. 3-21). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Geva, E. (1983). Facilitating reading comprehension through flowcharting. Reading Research Quarterly, 18(4), 384-405.
    Geva, E. (1992). The role of conjunctions in L2 text comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 26(4), 731-747.
    Geva, E., & Ryan, E. B. (1985). Use of conjunctions in expository text by skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17, 331-346.
    Golding, J. M., Millis, K. M., & Sego, S. A. (1995). The effect of connectives and casual relatedness on text comprehension. In R. F. Lorch, & O`Brien, E.J. (Ed.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 127-143). Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Goldman, S. R., & Murray, J. D. (1992). Knowledge of connectors as cohesion devices in text: A comparative study of native-English and English-as-a-second-language speakers. Journal of Education Psychology, 84, 504-519.
    Greene, B. (2001). Testing reading comprehension of theoretical discourse with cloze. Journal of Research in Reading, 24(1), 82-98.
    Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    Hoey, M. (1983). On the surface of discouse. London: Allen & Unwin.
    Irwin, J. W. (1982). The effects of coherence explicitness on college readers` prose comprhension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 275-284.
    Keenan, J. M., Baillet, S. D., & Brown, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 115-126.
    Liu, L., Tobin, J., & Green, E. (2005). Classroom 3 in 1 Reading Assessment Tests: Classroom Publications Ltd.
    Loman, N. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Education Psychology, 73(3), 402-412.
    Lorch, R. A. F., & Lorch, E. P. (1986). On-Line Processing of Summary and Importance Signals in Reading. Discourse Processes, 9, 489-496.
    Maury, P., & Teisserenc, A. (2005). The role of connectives in science text comprehension and memory. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(3), 489-512.
    McLaughlin, G. (1969). SMOG grading: A new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12(8), 639-646.
    Millis, K. K., Graesser, A. C., & Haberlandt, K. (1993). The impact of connectives on the memory for expository texts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 317-339.
    Millis, K. K., & Just, M.A. (1994). The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 128-147.
    Murray, J. D. (1995). Logical connectives and local coherence. In R. F. Lorch, & O`Brien, E.J. (Ed.), Sources of Coherence in Reading (pp. 107-125). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Murray, J. D. (1997). Connectives and narratives text: the role of continuity. Memory and Cognition, 25, 227-236.
    Myers, L. J., Shinjo, M., & Duffy, S. A. (1987). Degree of Causal relatedness and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 128-147.
    Nippold, M. A., Schwarz, I. E., & Undlin, R. A. (1992). Use and understanding of adverbial conjuncts: a developmental study of adolescents and young adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25, 108-118.
    Nunan, D. (1993). Introducing discourse analysis. London: Penguin English.
    Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language (2 ed.). Oxford: Heinemann.
    Ozono, S., & Ito, H. (2003). Logical connectives as catalysts for interactive L2 reading. System, 31(2), 283-297.
    Pretorius, E. J. (2006). The comprehension of logical relations in expository text by students who study through the medium of ESL. system, 34, 432-450.
    Robertson, J. E. (1968). Pupil understanding of connectives in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 387-417.
    Sanders, T. J. M., & Noordman, L. G. M. (2000). The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes, 29(1), 37-60.
    Soltis, J. M., & Pflaum, S. W. (1979). Effect of instruction in connectives on reading comprehension. Reading World, 19, 179-184.
    Steffani, S. A., & Nippold, M. A. (1997). Japanese speakers of American English: competence with connectives in written language. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 40(5), 1048-1055.
    Stoodt, B. D. (1972). The relationship between understanding grammatical conjunctions and reading comprehension. Elementary English, 49, 502-504.
    van den Broek, P., Lynch, J. S., Naslund, J., Ievers-Landis, C. E., & Verduin, K. (2003). The Development of Comprehension of Main Ideas in Narratives: Evidence from the Selection of Titles. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 707.
    van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and context. New York: Longman.
    Vonk, W., & Noordman, L. G. M. (1990). On the control of inference processes in text understanding. In D. A. Balota, Flores d`Arcais, G. F., & Rayner, K. (Ed.), Comprehension processes in reading. (pp. 447-464). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Wu, J. S. (1994). A study on college-level Chinese students` use of conjunctions and their reading comprehension. Mater`s Thesis. National Chengchi University.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
    94951009
    96
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094951009
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    100901.pdf45KbAdobe PDF2859檢視/開啟
    100902.pdf12KbAdobe PDF2892檢視/開啟
    100903.pdf13KbAdobe PDF2836檢視/開啟
    100904.pdf70KbAdobe PDF2880檢視/開啟
    100905.pdf24KbAdobe PDF21733檢視/開啟
    100906.pdf50KbAdobe PDF24299檢視/開啟
    100907.pdf31KbAdobe PDF21102檢視/開啟
    100908.pdf80KbAdobe PDF21010檢視/開啟
    100909.pdf28KbAdobe PDF21048檢視/開啟
    100910.pdf22KbAdobe PDF211813檢視/開啟
    100911.pdf83KbAdobe PDF21657檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋