政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33434

政大典藏 > College of Foreign Languages and Literature > Department of English > Theses > Item 140.119/33434

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33434

Title:	英文童謠教學對國小英語補救教學效能之研究 The Effects of Nursery Rhyme Instruction on EFL Remedial Teaching in Elementary School
Authors:	吳雅真 Wu,Ya Chen
Contributors:	殷允美 Yin,Yuen Mei 吳雅真 Wu,Ya Chen
Keywords:	國小補救教學英文童謠教學平衡閱讀童謠教學課程設計字母拼讀教學法低成就學童音素覺識認字能力拼字能力學習態度
Date:	2006
Issue Date:	2009-09-17 16:35:01 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究旨在探討英文童謠教學對台灣國小英語學習低成就學童對英語的音素覺識、認字、拼字能力、以及英語學習態度的影響。實驗分兩階段進行。第一階段進行小規模的前測作為正式研究的準備，先行測試選用的英語童謠是否適切、教學活動是否可行，以及低成就學童在音素覺識與學習態度是否因此改善等等，並根據初探結果規劃正式實驗。第二階段的正式實驗，除音素覺識與學習態度外，更進一步探討英文童謠教學對認字及拼字能力的影響。在正式實驗中，實驗對象為桃園市某國小36名四年級的學習低成就學童(學業表現為後百分之十)。研究者將此36名學童隨機平均分配為兩組；實驗組及對照組兩組，各18名學生。對實驗組施以平衡閱讀「由整體到細部」(whole-to-parts)架構設計的英文童謠教學，將音素覺識及字母拼讀法(phonics)等技巧訓練自然地融入有趣的英文童謠情境中；而對照組則單獨採用字母拼讀教學，循序教授字母與音的對應關係。實驗組及對照組每週均有兩節英語補救教學，每節課40分鐘，持續十二週。兩組學生在教學前後各施以前測及後測，內容包括音素覺識測驗、認字測驗、拼字測驗，以及英語學習態度問卷調查，以評量受試者在早期讀寫技巧上的發展，及學習態度上的改變情形。同組組內前後測比較結果顯示，在十二週實驗教學後，實驗組及對照組二組學生在音素覺識、認字及拼字能力三方面，均有顯著的進步。然而，只有實驗組學生對英語學習的態度有顯著的正向改變，對照組學生則無。此外，兩組組間比較結果發現，雖然在實驗前，兩組學生英語拼讀能力相當，對英語的看法也類似，但經實驗教學後，兩組的後測成績有非常明顯的差異，實驗組學生在音素覺識、認字、拼字能力的進步幅度，以及學習態度各方面，均顯著優於對照組。以上研究結果顯示，運用英文童謠進行補救教學確實極為有效，不但能增進台灣英語低成就學童的早期讀寫技巧，且能改善其學習英語的態度。本研究之結果及教學建議，可供未來國小補救教學相關研究之參考。 The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of nursery rhyme instruction on Taiwanese elementary school EFL underachievers with regard to their development on phonemic awareness, word recognition and spelling abilities, and their attitudinal changes toward learning English. The present study was conducted in two stages. A small-scale pilot study was first carried out as a preparation for the formal study. The feasibility of nursery rhyme instruction and the effects of this instruction on phonemic awareness and learning attitudes were tested on seven EFL underachievers preliminary to the formal study. In the second stage, a formal study which followed closely the design of the pilot study, further explored the effects of nursery rhyme instruction on word recognition and spelling abilities. In the formal study, thirty-six fourth grade underachievers (whose academic performances were at the bottom 10 percent) with deficient phonemic awareness were screened for this study. The experimental group and the control group were evenly matched with eighteen students each. The experimental group received nursery rhyme instruction using the “whole-to-parts” framework of balanced reading within which training in skills including phonemic awareness and phonics is embedded into the context of children’s literature. The eighteen subjects in the matched control group received explicit phonics instruction wherein the isolated sound-letter correspondences were sequenced and taught explicitly and systematically. To assess their development in early literacy skills, all subjects took the pretests and posttests of phonemic awareness, word recognition and spelling. Moreover, to measure their attitudinal changes toward learning English, they were administered the attitude questionnaires before and after the remedial instruction. Data was collected from early-September until early-December, 2006, covering twenty four 40-minute class periods for each group. Comparison of within-group performance indicated that both the experimental group and the control group made significant post- over pretest improvements in phonemic awareness, word recognition and spelling abilities. However, only the experimental group had a significant positive change on their attitudes toward English. In addition, at the onset of the study, both groups started with equivalent early literacy skills, and held similar attitudes toward English learning. However, posttest scores revealed that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in phonemic awareness skills, word recognition and spelling abilities. Significant differences can also be found in their attitudes towards learning English. The findings from this study indicate that a remedial instruction utilizing nursery rhymes can effectively help Taiwanese EFL underachievers improve their early literacy skills, and more significantly, their learning attitudes towards English. Based on the findings, pedagogical implications and suggestions for further studies are provided.
Reference:	Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Adams, M. J., Foorman, B. R., Lundberg, I. & Beeler, T. (1998). Phonemic awareness in young children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. Abbott, S. P., Reed. E., Abbott, R.D., & Berninger, V.W. (1997). Year-long balanced reading/writing tutorial: A design experiment used for dynamic assessment. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 249-263. Armbruster, B. B., Lehr, F., & Osborn, J. (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read. Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement. Ball, E. W., & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49-66. Blevins, W. (1997). Phonemic awareness Activities for early reading success. New York: Scholastic. Blevins, W. (1998). Phonics from A to Z—A practical guide. New York: Scholastic. Blevins, W. (2000). Playing with sounds. Instructor, 109(6), 16-17. Bock, R. (1998). Why children succeed or fail at reading. Research from NICHD’s program in learning disabilities. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. MD: Bethesda. Bromley, H. (2005). Synthetic phonics could deprive children of literacy experiences. Retrieved April 7, 2007, from http://www.literacytrust.org.uk/Database/Primary/ phonicsgov.html Stoicheva, M. (1999). Balanced reading instruction. ERIC Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED435986). Strickland, D. S. (1998). What’s basic in beginning reading? Finding common ground. Educational Leadership, 55(6), 7-10. Su, C. T. (2004). The effects of onset-rime based phonics instruction on phonemic awareness and oral reading in an EFL elementary school. Master’s Thesis, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan. Sun, L. Y. （2002）孫麗瑛。A study of phonological and word recognition abilities of elementary school students. 國小學童英文聲韻覺識能力及認字能力之相關研究。碩士論文，台中師範學院。 Thomas, A. C. & Richard G. (1984). The role of songs in the foreign language classroom. OMLTA Journal, 33(2), 28-32. Torgesen, J. K., Mathes, P. G. (1998). What every teacher should know about phonological awareness. Florida State University, Florida Department of Education. Treiman, R. (1985). Onsets and Rimes as Units of Spoken Syllables: Evidence from Children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 161-181. Treiman, R. (1992). The role of intrasyllabic units in learning to read and spell. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading Acquisition (pp. 65-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Wagner, R. and Torgeson, J. (1987). The Nature of Phonological Processing and Its Causal Role in the Acquisition of Reading Skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192-212. Wang, C. L. (2001) 王啟琳主持。A study on the trial testing of reformed English phonics instruction at elementary level. 國小英語教學試用改良式字母拼讀法的探討。台中市：東海大學。 Brooks, M. C., & Brooks, J. S. (2005). Whole language or phonics: improving language instruction through general semantics. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 62(3), 271-280. Wang, H. T. (2004). Promoting primary students’ phonemic awareness through phonics instruction with information technology. Master’s Thesis, Southern Taiwan University, Tainan, Taiwan. Weaver, C. (1994). Phonics in whole language classrooms. ERIC Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED372375) Weaver, C. (Ed.). (1998). Reconsidering a balanced approach to reading. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. White, N. C. (2000). Phonological Awareness, Phonemic Awareness and Phonics: What are they? How do they differ? Slingerland. Retrieved January 12, 2007, from http://www.slingerland.org/newsletters/00-phonological.htm Wolfram, W. & Johnson, R. (1982). Phonological analysis: Focus on American English. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Wu, L. S. (2005). The effectiveness of phoneme segmentation training on early reading ability in Taiwanese EFL first-graders: A case study of Taipei city. Master’s Thesis, National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei, Taiwan. Yen, T. Y. (2004). Effect of teaching English nursery rhymes and chants on young Taiwanese EFL beginners’ rime awareness. Master’s Thesis, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan. Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159-177. Yopp, H. K. (1992). Developing phonemic awareness in young children. The Reading Teacher, 45(9), 696-703. Yopp, H.K. & Yopp, R.H. (2000). Supporting phonemic awareness development in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 54(2), 130-143. Brumer, L. (1998). Phonics and the politics of reading instruction. In C. Weaver, (Ed.), Practicing what we know: Informed reading instruction (pp. 7-25). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED461098) Zapparoli, R. (2005). Rethinking Taiwan’s grade one English curriculum: A “sound” alternative to early teaching of the alphabet. Master’s Thesis, National Tsing Hwa University, Hsinchu, Taiwan. Bryant, P. & Bradley, L. (1985). Children’s reading problems. Oxford: Blackwell. Bryant, P. E., MacLean, M., Bradley, L. L., & Crossland, J. (1990). Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read. Developmental Psychology, 26, 429-438. Burns, M.S., Griffin, P., & Snow, C.E. (Eds.) (1999). Starting out right: A guide to promoting children’s reading success. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Carbo, M. (1996). Whole language or phonics? Use both! The Education Digest, 61(6), pp.60-63. Chall, J. S. (1996). Learning to read: The great debate 3rd Ed. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace. Chang, C. H. (1992) 張春興。Modern psychology: A science for people to study their own problems. 現代心理學：現代人研究自身問題的科學。台北：東華。 Chang, S. J. (2000) 張新仁。On all facets of remedial instruction. 補救教學面面觀。載於邱上真、張新仁、洪麗瑜、陳美芳合著之補救教學理論與實務，1-40。高雄市：國立高雄師範大學特殊教育中心出版。 Chang, C. H. (2003) 張湘君。Creative nursery rhyme teaching. 童謠創意教學。兒童英語教學面面觀，141-178。台北市：財團法人趙麗蓮教授文教基金會。 Chang, W. C., Chou, C. T., Chen, C. Y., Ye, H. N., Lin, C. C., & Hsu, Y. G. (2003). The bimodal distribution in the Basic Competence Test for Junior High School Students in the English test and measures for improvement. Taipei: Bureau of Education. (NIOERAR NO. F0037623). Chard, D. J., Dickson, S. V. (1999). Phonological Awareness: Instructional and Assessment Guidelines. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34(5), p. 261 – 270. Chard, D. J., & Osborne, J. (1999). Phonics and word recognition instruction in early reading programs: Guidelines for accessibility. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14(2), 107–117 . Chen, W. L. (2003). Let’s study phonics. Taipei: Caves Books. Chen, L. W. (2004). An action research on phonics instruction to improve decoding and oral reading of EFL remedial learners in a junior high school. Master’s Thesis, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan. Chia, H. W. (2004). Effects of Peer Tutoring on Phonics Learning and English Learning Attitude in Elementary School Students with Low English Performance. Master’s Thesis, National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei, Taiwan. Chiang, H. Y. (2003). Incorporating English into content-based classes in an elementary school EFL setting. Master’s Thesis, National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei, Taiwan. Chien, L. C. (2002). A developmental study on phonological awareness, spelling and reading in Taiwanese EFL children. Master’s Thesis, National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei, Taiwan. Cunningham, P. M., & Hall, D. P. (1998). The four blocks: A balanced framework for literacy in primary classrooms in teaching every child everyday. Learning in diverse schools and classrooms. Cambridge, Mass: Brookline Books. Dahl, K. L., Scharer, P. L., Lawson, L. L., & Grogan, P. R., (1999). Phonics instruction and student achievement in whole language first grade classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 312-341. Danielson, E. (2000). The importance of nursery rhymes. Opinion Papers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED442117) Demoulin, D., & Loye, R. D. (1999). Helping children learn to read. Education, 120(1), 40-43. Diegmueller, K. (1996). The best of both worlds: Combination of whole language and basic phonics instruction. Teacher Magazine, 7(5), 20-23. Du, Z. Z. (1993) 杜正治。The implementation of remedial instruction. 補救教學的實施。刊於李咏吟(民82)。學習輔導：學習心理學的應用。台北：心理出版社。 Duffy, A. M. (2001). Balance, literacy acceleration, and responsive teaching in a Summer school literacy program for elementary school struggling readers. Reading Research Instruction, 40(2), 67-100. Ehri, L.C. (2003). Systematic phonics instruction: Findings of the National Reading Panel. London: DfES. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.) (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Goodman, K. S. (1986). What’s whole in whole-language? Portmouth, NH: Heinemann. Goswami, U. (1994). The role of analogies in reading development. Support for Learning, 9, 22-26. Goswami, U. (2001). Early Phonologicl Development and the Acquisition of Literacy. In Neuman, Susan B. & Dickinson, David K. Handbook of Early Literacy Research. (pp. 111-125). NY: Guilford Press. Graham, C. (1994). Mother goose jazz chants. New York: Oxford University Press. Griffith, P. L., & Olson, M. W. (1992). Phonemic awareness helps beginning readers break the code. The Reading Teacher, 45(7), 516-523. Guidelines of Language Arts Learning Area in Grade 1-9 Curriculum/English. (2006). Ministry of Education. Retrieved May 30, 2007, from http://www.edu.tw/EDU_ WEB/EDU_MGT/EJE/EDU5147002/9CC/9CC.html Gunner, A. S., Smith, J., A., & Smith, S. D. (1999). Improving comprehension and attitudes toward reading using a balanced reading approach. Master`s thesis: Saint Xavier University and IRI/Skylight (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED435095). Gunning, T. G., (1995). Word Building: A Strategic Approach to the Teaching of Phonics. The Reading Teacher, 48(6), 484-488. Gunning, T. G., (2000). Creating literacy instruction for all children. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Hamner, D. (2003). Growing readers and writers with help from mother goose. Retrieved November 27, 2006, from http://www.readwritethink.org/lessons/ lesson_view.asp?id=83 Hempenstall, K. (2001). Some issues in phonics instruction. Education News 26/2/2001. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from http://www.educationnews.org/ some_issues_in_phonics_instructi.htm Hempenstall, K. (2003). Phonemic awareness: What does it mean? Retrieved January 3, 2007, from http://www.educationnews.org/phonemic_awareness_what_does_ it_.htm Honig, B. (1996). The role of skills in a comprehensive reading program. California English, 1(3), 16-20. Hoover, W.A. (2002). The importance of phonemic awareness in learning to read [Electronic Version]. SEDL Letter, 14(3), 1-6. Retrieved July 25, 2006, from http://www.sedl.org/pubs/sedl-letter/v14n03/3.html Hsu, H. L. (2003). Integrating theory of multiple intelligences to the teaching of English nursery rhymes: An action research of EFL beginners in elementary school. Master’s Thesis, National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei, Taiwan. Hsu, L. L. (2003). The effectiveness of two phonics programs on sixth graders’ phonemic awareness and spelling ability. Master’s Thesis, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. 胡潔芳 (Hu, C. F.)。(2002)。On the importance of phonological awareness in foreign language acquisition. 淺談「舞音弄韻」在外語習得之重要性。國教新知，49(1)，19-28。 Huang, T. L. (1999) 黃自來。A study of high school English teachers’ perception of phonics. 中學英語教師對見字識音的認知研究。第十六屆中華民國英語文教學研討會論文集，30-50。台北：文鶴。 Huang, B. (2006). Using nursery rhymes to enhance phonological awareness & learning motivation in primary school students. Master’s Thesis, National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan. Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447. Kenney, S. (2005). Nursery rhymes: Foundation for learning. General Music Today, 19(1), p28-31. Ko, N. W. (2004). Phonological processing and word decoding skills in elementary EFL (English as a Foreign Language) underachievers. Master’s Thesis, National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei, Taiwan. Krashen, S. D. (1987). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Prentice-Hall International. Lai, W. T. (2003). A study of phonics as a method to enhance spelling skills of remedial EFL learners in Taiwan. Master’s Thesis, National Tsing Hwa University, Hsinchu, Taiwan. Leou, Y. M. (2005). Influence of balanced reading instruction on students’ reading ability and reading motivation. Doctoral Dissertation, Southern Taiwan University, Tainan, Taiwan. Liaw, M. L. (2003). Integrating phonics instruction and whole language principles in an elementary school EFL classroom. English Teaching and Learning, 27(3), 15-34. Lin, M. Y. (2002). English phonics instruction and its teaching sequence for elementary school students in Taiwan. Master’s Thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan. Lin, C. Y. (2003) 林靜宜。A survey of English teaching in elementary schools. 「國小英語教學現況民意調查」分析報告。台北：中華民國全國教師會。 Lin, P. Y. (2005). The English speech perception abilities of elementary school students with learning disabilities. Master’s Thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan. Liu, S. C. (2005). The study of nursery rhyme teaching to develop children’s rhyme awareness. Master’s Thesis, National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei, Taiwan. Lomax, R. G., & McGee, L. M. (1987). Young children’s concepts about print and meaning: Toward a model of word reading acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 237-256. Lombardo, M. A. (2005). Rhythmic reading and role playing. Library Media Connection, 23(4), 38-39. (ERIC Journal Reproduction Service No.EJ717608) Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Peterson, O. P. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(3), 263-284. (ERIC Journal Reproduction Service No. EJ373262) Lyon, G. R. (1995). Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 3-27. Moats, L.C. (2000). Whole language lives on: The illusion of “balance” in reading instruction. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. Moustafa, M. (1998). Whole-to-parts phonics instruction. In C. Weaver, (Ed.), Practicing what we know: Informed reading instruction (pp. 26-36). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED461098) Moustafa, M., & Maldonado-Colon, E. (1999). Whole-to-parts phonics instruction: Building on what children know to help them know more. The Reading Teacher, 52(5), 448-458. National Institute for Literacy (NIFL). (n.d.). Word recognition. Retrieved December 16, 2006, from http://www.nifl.gov/readingprofiles/MC_Word_Recognition.htm National Reading Panel (NRP). (April, 2000). Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved August 15, 2006, from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.htm Neuman, S. D. (2006). Connecting Letters and Sounds. Early Childhood Today, 20(6), 20-21. Ngeow, Karen Yeok-Hwa. (1998). Motivation and Transfer in Language Learning. ERIC Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED427318). Opie, I. & Opie, P. (1959). Lore and language of schoolchildren. London: Oxford University Press. Opie, I. (2001). My very first mother goose. Taipei: Hsin-Yi Publications. Pikulski, J. J., Templeton, S., & Chard, D. J. (2000). From phonemic awareness to fluency: Effective decoding instruction in a research-based reading program (Author Paper). Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Poindexter, C., & Oliver, I. (1998). Early Literacy: How to achieve a balanced, comprehensive approach to teaching reading. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED424566) Putnam, J. (2002). Phonics finds favor in Michigan schools. The National Right to Reading Foundation. Retrieved April 7, 2007, from http://www.nrrf.org/ article_putnam-8-19-02.htm Reyhner, J. (2003). The reading wars: phonics versus whole language. Retrieved February 4, 2007 from http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~jar/Reading_Wars.html Richards, D. J., Poremba, K. J., & McGee, L. M. (1996). Kindergarteners talk about print: Phonemic awareness in meaningful contexts. The Reading Teacher, 49(8), 632-642. Rigby. (1997). ELIC Unit 1A: Phonemic Awareness and Phonics Instruction. Crystal Lake, IL: Rigby. Routman, R., & Butler, A. (1998). Why talk about phonics? In C. Weaver, (Ed.), Practicing what we know: Informed reading instruction (pp. 69-69). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED461098) Sadlier-Oxford Research and Development Staff. (2000). Nursery rhymes and phonemic awareness. New York, New York: Sadlier-Oxford. Sensenbaugh, R. (1996). Phonemic awareness: An important early step in learning to read. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English, and Communication. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED400530] Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Song, M., & Miskel, C. G. (2002). Interest groups in national reading policy: Perceived influence and beliefs on teaching reading. Theory and Research in Educational Administration, 1, 77-96. Stanovich, K. E. (1994). Romance and Reason. The Reading Teacher, 47, 280-291.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班 93951007 95
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093951007
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of English] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
95100701.pdf	42Kb	Adobe PDF2	1069	View/Open
95100702.pdf	13Kb	Adobe PDF2	1196	View/Open
95100703.pdf	79Kb	Adobe PDF2	1379	View/Open
95100704.pdf	19Kb	Adobe PDF2	1265	View/Open
95100705.pdf	54Kb	Adobe PDF2	2173	View/Open
95100706.pdf	212Kb	Adobe PDF2	16358	View/Open
95100707.pdf	314Kb	Adobe PDF2	3042	View/Open
95100708.pdf	102Kb	Adobe PDF2	1540	View/Open
95100709.pdf	33Kb	Adobe PDF2	1834	View/Open
95100710.pdf	104Kb	Adobe PDF2	2588	View/Open
95100711.pdf	1002Kb	Adobe PDF2	1590	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...