政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33427
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50825410      線上人數 : 699
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33427


    題名: 二00三年國中英語新版本的教科書評量
    作者: 林素美
    Lin, Su-mei
    貢獻者: 林啟一
    Lin, Chi-yee
    林素美
    Lin, Su-mei
    關鍵詞: 九年一貫課程
    康軒版教科書
    南一版教科書
    翰林版教科書
    朗文版教科書
    何嘉仁版教科書
    基本學力測驗
    Nine-year Integrated Curriculum
    Kang-Hsuan textbook
    Nan-I textbook
    Han-Lin textbook
    Longman textbook
    Hess textbook
    the Basic Competence Test
    日期: 2005
    上傳時間: 2009-09-17 16:34:00 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究旨在調查九年一貫課程實施後，台北縣市國中英語教科書的使用現況及國中英語教師對這些教材的意見。
    　　本研究主要探討的為：(1)國中英語教師選用新版教科書時所強調的標準,（2)各校英語教科書的評選委員與評選程序，(3)國中英語教師對新版英語教科書的滿意度與意見，包括學生習作與教師手冊，(4)更換教科書的原因與結果。
    　　研究對象為五十七所國中的兩百五十三位英語教師。根據問卷調查，目前台北縣市的國中英語教科書有六個版本。
    　　根據資料分析，得到以下主要的發現:
    1. 在選教材時，英語教師所秉持的標準依序為合乎課程標準，教材內容，主題多元性，字彙數量，活動設計，插圖，版面，教師手冊，出版商的售後服務、聲望，教科書的第一印象，出版商為教師舉辦的研習，作者的學識等。
    2. 各校的評選委員主要由英文老師組成，大多數學校評選教科書的程序為瀏覽各版本教科書，邀請出版商舉辦說明會，及舉行評選會議 。
    3. 根據本研究所收集的資料顯示，大多數教師普遍上皆滿意九年一貫課程的新版教科書，但約有一半的教師認為內容太多、太難是他們所遭遇到的最大問題。
    4. 根據所收集的資料顯示，有五所學校在第二學期更改教科書。教師們對第一學期所用的教科書不滿意的主要原因為教材內容非常難，內容組織不佳，及課與課之間缺乏連貫性。在更換新教科書後，大部分教師發覺之前教材所衍生的問題都解決了。因此大多數教師在更改教科書後覺得較滿意。
    This study aims to survey English textbook selection of junior high schools in Taipei City and Taipei County after the implementation of the Nine-year Integrated Curriculum and explore English teachers` opinions of these textbooks.
    This study focuses on the following issues: (1) the criteria highlighted by English teachers when evaluating the new textbooks, (2) the committees and the procedure of English textbook selection in each school, (3) the junior high school English teachers` satisfaction with and opinions about the contents of the new teaching materials, including students’ workbooks and teachers` manuals, (4)the reasons for teachers’ changing textbooks and its consequences.
    The recruited subjects are 253 junior high school English teachers from 57 schools. According to the questionnaires, there are 6 versions of textbooks used in junior high schools in Taipei City and Taipei County.
    After data analysis, the main findings are obtained as follows:
    1.The criteria highlighted by English teachers when selecting the new textbooks are the correspondence to the curriculum standards, the contents, and a variety of themes. Considered important in sequence to the teachers who responded are the amount of vocabulary, the design of activities, the illustrations, the layout, the content of the teacher’s manual, and the level of service offered by the publisher, the publisher’s reputation, the first impression of the textbook, workshops provided for teachers by a publisher and the expertise of authors.
    2.The selection committee in each school is mainly composed of the English teachers and the selection of English textbooks in most schools are done in the procedure of reviewing textbooks, inviting publishers to present their textbooks, and holding selection meetings.
    3.According to the questionnaires collected in this study, most teachers were generally satisfied with the new textbooks developed for the Nine-year Integrated
    Curriculum. The most obvious problem with these new textbooks, according to the questionnaires, is that about half of the English teachers` dissatisfication with too much and too difficult content in the material.
    4.Based on the questionnaires, five of the schools change textbooks in the second semester. The main reasons for the dissatisfaction with the first semester textbooks are that the textbooks are overly difficult, poorly organized, and lacking in continuity between lessons. After changing to new textbooks, most teachers find that the problems are solved. Therefore, most teachers are more satisfied after changing the textbooks.
    參考文獻: Allwright, R. (1978). Abdication and responsibility in language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2-(1), 105-121.
    Allwright, R. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 36 (1), 5-18.
    Anderson, G. S. (1984). A whole language approach to reading. Lanham, MD:University Press of America.
    Brown, H. Douglas. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
    Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum—a systematic approach to
    program development. Massachusetts: Heinle& Heinle Publishers.
    Breen, M. P. and Candlin C. N. (1987) Which materials?: A consumer’s and designer’s guide. In Sheldon, E. (ed.), ELT Textbooks and Materials.
    Canale, M. (1983). Communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (eds.), Language and communication (pp.2-27). New York: Longman
    Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
    Chambers, F. (1997). Seeking consensus in coursebook evaluation. ELT Journal, 51 (5), 29-35.
    Chang, Y. L. (1996). Discussion on children’s English teaching and learning principles. Caves English Teaching, 10, 9-15.
    Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second-language skills: Theory and practice. Florida:
    Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
    Chen C.T. (2002). Textbook selection for senior high school students in Greater Taipei area. MA, Graduate Institute of English, National Taiwan Normal University, 2002.
    Cunningworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. London:
    Eeinemann.
    Cunningworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Heinmann.
    Dubin, F. , & Olsbtain, E. (1986). Course design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Forrester, J. W. (1970). Understanding the counter-intuitive behavior of social systems’ in The Open Systems Group, in Systems Behavior (3rd ed.), 1981. London: Paul Chapman.
    Freeman, Y. S., & Freeman, D. E. (1992). Whole language for second language learners. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
    Gall, M. D. (1981). Handbook for evaluating and selecting curriculum materials. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
    Gary, P.D. (1992). Consumers of textbooks: Concerns from the classroom. In John G. H. (Eds.), The textbook controversy: Issues, aspects and perspectives (pp. 137-145). US: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    Gini, Carol Sisco. (2000). “Whole Language─Integrating the skills with young learners.” The Conference on the Training of Elementary School EFL Teachers.
    Goodman, K. (1986). What’s whole in whole language. Portsmouth, N. H.: Heinemann. Harmer, J. (1991). The practice of English language teaching. New York: Longman.
    Howatt, A. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University
    Press.
    Hutchinson, T. & Torres, E. (1994). The textbooks as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315-328.
    Hymes, D. (1971). On communicative competence, Philadelphia, University of
    Pennsylvania Press.
    Johns, A. M. (1985). Some principles of materials design of the world around us. TESOL Newsletter 19:1,7.
    Johnosn, K. (1983). Communicative syllabus design and methodology. Oxford: Pergamon.
    Larsen-Freeman, D. (1982). The what of second language acquisition. In Hines &
    Rutherford, (Eds.), On TESOL, 107-128.
    Liao, X. (1996). Chinese Learners’ Communicative Incompetence: Causes and
    Solutions. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed 400 684.
    Koh, L. (1992). From Base to Action: Bridging the Gap between Language and
    Communication Textbooks and the Professional World. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed 400 684.
    Ministry of Education (2004). General guidelines of Grade 1-9 Curriculum of
    elementary and junior high school education … English version. Ministry of Education.
    Muther, C. (1985). What every textbook evaluator should know. Education Leadership, 42(7), 4-8.
    Nunan, D. (1989). The learner-centered curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Richards, J. C., and Rodgers, T. (1986). Approaaches and methods in language teaching.New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Richards, J. C., and Rodgers, T. (1987). Method: Approach, design and Procedure. In M. H. Long & J. C. Richards (eds.). Methodology in TESOL: A book of readings. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
    Rivers, W. (1981). Teaching foreign language skills (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
    Savignon, S. J. (1983). Communicative competence: theory and classroom practice─texts and contexts in second language learning. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
    Sheldon, Leslie E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42 (4), 237-246.
    Sheldon, Leslie E. (ed.) (1987). ELT textbooks and materials: Problems in evaluation and Development. Oxford: Modern English Publications
    Skierso, A. (1991). Textbook selection and evaluation. In M, Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (2nd ed.). (pp. 432-453). New York: Heinle and Heinle.
    Tandlichova, E. (1995). Coursebook evaluation in teacher training in Slovakia. MLT, 4, 47-65.
    Taylor, B. P. (1983). Teaching ESL: Incorporating a communicative, student-centered component. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 69-88.
    Thompson, G. (1996). Some misconceptions about communicative language teaching. ELT Journal, 50(1), 9-15
    Tulley, M. & Farr, R. (1990). Textbook evaluation and selection. In D. L. Elliott& A. Woodward (eds.), Textbooks and schooling in the United States (pp. 162-177). Chicago: The national society for the study of education.
    Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional Syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Wilkins, D. (1985). Some issues in communicative language teaching and their relevance to the teaching of languages in secondary schools. In K. Johnson & D.
    Porter (eds.). Perspectives in communicative language teaching. London: Academic Press.
    Williams, D. (1983). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. ELT Journal, 37 (3),251-255.
    Yalden, J. (1989). Principles of course design for language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    中文參考書目
    張祝芬 (民83 年)。國中教科書選用制度之研究。台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    施玉惠 (民 89 年)。國小英語教材之評審—資格審vs 選用審。第十七屆中華民國英語文教學研討會論文集。台北：文鶴。
    張碧玲 (民89年)。 國民中學英語教師對溝通式教學觀之信念研究。台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    教育部(MOE)。 2001a。 國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要：語文學習領域。
    教育部(MOE)。 2001a。 國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要：六大議題。
    教育部(2004)。九年一貫課程。2004年2月17日，取自//teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/brief1.php
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
    90951020
    94
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090951020
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    95102001.pdf49KbAdobe PDF21031檢視/開啟
    95102002.pdf81KbAdobe PDF21138檢視/開啟
    95102003.pdf34KbAdobe PDF21419檢視/開啟
    95102004.pdf86KbAdobe PDF21792檢視/開啟
    95102005.pdf91KbAdobe PDF21323檢視/開啟
    95102006.pdf1079KbAdobe PDF21240檢視/開啟
    95102007.pdf45KbAdobe PDF21032檢視/開啟
    95102008.pdf125KbAdobe PDF22237檢視/開啟
    95102009.pdf157KbAdobe PDF21271檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋