政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33423

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33423

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50827105 線上人數 : 756

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 外國語文學院 > 英國語文學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/33423

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33423

題名:	以IEARN為主之專題導向式跨國互動EFL學習：以兩個國中班級為例之個案研究 IEARN as Project-based Telecommunication Activities for EFL Learning: A Case Study on Two Junior High Classrooms
作者:	林淑媛 Lin, Shu Yuan
貢獻者:	招靜琪 Chao, Chin Chi 林淑媛 Lin, Shu Yuan
關鍵詞:	專題導向式學習英語學習通訊科技資訊科技電腦輔助語言學習九年一貫課程 project-based learning EFL telecommunication information technology (IT) computer-assisted language learning (CALL) Grade 1-9 Curriculum
日期:	2006
上傳時間:	2009-09-17 16:33:27 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本質性個案研究目的在探討以國際教育網路社群IEARN進行專題導向式跨國互動EFL學習的英語教學設計。該學習方式與教學模式特性諸多符合九年一貫課程改革理念。然而，在國內文獻及研究顯示，極少英語教師進行專題式網路教學設計。本研究個案是國中兩名英語教師與其班導學生為期兩年半的跨國文化專題學習。從個案訪談與課室觀察中發現，資訊科技融入英語教學，教師具備高度科技能力並非必要考量，而是教學策略、班級經營、師生合作為首務。依據個案進行專題式導向學習過程中所面臨的挑戰與完成的歷程，研究者對教師、學校主管、教育當局與社會提出建言，以求改善與進步。這項教學革新並非只是順應課程改革，更是為了發展學生全面的學習與實踐終身學習為目標。 The purpose of this research is to understand the challenge of project-based telecommunication activities through the IEARN for EFL learning. The learning methods and teaching strategies of project-based learning (PBL) conform to the rationale of Grade 1-9 Curriculum reform. However, literature showed that very few EFL teachers became involved in PBL with information technology for instruction. This research, conducted as a case study in the qualitative methodology, describes how two junior high school English teachers and their homeroom students implemented PBL through international network and how they developed cross-culture awareness in half and two years. It was found that successful EFL learning infused with information technology relied much more on pedagogy, class management and teacher-student collaboration than on teacher`s computer skills. Based on the challenges and implement revealed in the process of PBL through telecommunication activities, the researcher gave suggestions to teachers, school administrators, educational authority and community for further improvement. The instructional innovation not only met educational reform standards but also developed EFL students` holistic learning in a lifelong fashion.
參考文獻:	English References Andrews, C. (2000). Project-oriented use of the World Wide Web for teaching and learning culture. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(4-5), 357-376. Bailey, K. (1996). The best laid plans: Teachers’ in-class decisions to depart from their lesson plans. In K. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom (pp. 15-40). New York: Cambridge University Press. Barson, J., & Debski, R. (1996). Calling back CALL: Technology in the service of foreign language learning based on creativity, contingency and goal-oriented activity. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawaii symposium (pp. 49-68). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center. Beach, R., & Myers, J. (2001). Inquiry-based English instruction: Engaging students in life and literature. New York: Teachers College Press. Beckett, G. H. (2005). Academic language and literacy socialization through project-based instruction: ESL student perspectives and issues. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 15(1), 191-206. Beckett, G. H., & Slater, T. (2005). The project framework: A tool for language, content, and skills integration. ELT Journal 2005, 59(2). 108-116. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2000). Process and product in problem-based learning (PBL) research. In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning, A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 185-195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26 (3 & 4), 369-398. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc. Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Walker, D. (1993). Introduction: Understanding learning from experience. In D. Boud, R. Cohen, & D. Walker (Eds.), Using experience for learning (pp. 19-59). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press. Warschauer, M., & Meskill, C. (2000). Technology and second language learning. In J. Rosenthal (Ed.), Handbook of undergraduate second language education (pp. 303-318). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Warschauer, M., Shetzer, H., & Meloni, C. (2000). Internet for English teaching. Alexandria, VA: TESOL. Wenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 515-537. Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Wilkenson, T. W., & Sherman, T. M. (1996). Telecommunications-based distance education: Who`s doing what? Educational Technology, 21(11), 54-59. Wolk, S. (1994). Project-based learning: Pursuits with a purpose. Educational Leadership, 52(3). 42-45. Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and method (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Chinese References 張武昌、周中天、陳純音、葉錫南、林正昌、許月貴(Chang, V. et al.) (2003)。國民中學學生基本學力測驗英語雙峰現象暨改進措施。台北：教育部。 Breen, M. P. (1985). Authenticity in the language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 6, 60-70. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 張彥宇 (Chang, Y. Y.) (2003)。運用資訊融入教學之研究 (A study of integrating information technology into instruction–a case of conducting senior high school English make-up course on K12 Digital School)。國立高雄師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。高雄。鄭瑪麗 (Cheng, M. L.) (2004)。國小資訊教育融入網路英語專題學習之個案研究 (Case study of integrating internet projects to informational technology curriculum for elementary school students)。國立台北師範學院兒童英語教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。台北。姜禮能 (Chiang, L. N.) (2002)。國小教師對於資訊融入教學之變革關注與相關因素研究 (A Study on elementary school teachers` concern about the innovation of integrating information technology into classroom teaching)。國立花蓮師範學院國小科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。花蓮。邱志忠 (Chiu, Z. Z.) (2002)。國小教師運用資訊科技融入學科教學之教學策略研究 (A study of instruction strategies of primary school teachers infusing Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovation in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-325). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. information technology into academic subjects)。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文，未出版。高雄。周柏雯 (Chou, B. W.) (2004)。國中英語教師對九年一貫課程之態度與實踐 (Junior high school EFL teachers` attitudes toward Grade 1-9 Curriculum and their classroom practice)。國立政治大學英語教學碩士在職專班碩士論文，未出版。台北。朱桂美 (Chu, K. M.) (2004)。台南市國中英語教師應用網際網路於教學之調查研究 (A survey of junior high school English teachers` application of the internet in Tainan City)。國立高雄師範大學英語學系碩士論文，未出版。高雄。行政院 (Executive Yuan) (2005)。挑戰2008：國家發展計畫 (Challenge 2008-National Development Plan. Taiwan)。2005年1月31日修正。2007年6月12日取自行政院經濟建設委員會網站：http://www.cepd.gov.tw/business/business_sec2.jsp?linkid=146&parentLinkID=7。謝佩君 (Hsieh, P. C.) (2003)。職前教師進行資訊科技融入專題導向學習態度之研究 (A study of pre-service teachers’ attitude toward information technology integrated project-based learning)。國立嘉義大學教育科技研究所碩士論文，未出版。嘉義。胡雅玲 (Hu, Y. L.). (2003)。國小六年級學童參與英語專題學習活動之個案研究 (A case study of the participation of English project-based learning for 6th grade elementary school students)。屏東師範學院教育科技研究所碩士論文，未出版。屏東。黃純敏、程玉秀、林秀珍 (Huang, C. M., Cheng, Y. H., & Lin, H. C.) (2004)。國中英語教師課程意識研究：九年一貫課程之回應 (A study on junior high English teachers’ curriculum consciousness: Responses to the Grades 1-9 Curriculum reform in Taiwan)。台北。英語教學，28(4)，21-44。黃燕芬 (Huang, Y. F.) (2002)。中學英語教師資訊融入英語教學認知、關注階層、行為及相關因素之研究 (A study of high school English teachers` behavior, concern, cognition, and other factors of integrating information technology into English instruction)。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。高雄。林煌凱 (Lin, H. K.) (2002)。國中教師教學創新接受度與資訊科技融入教學關注階層之相關研究 (A study of junior high school teachers` innovativeness and concern of integrating information into instruction)。國立高雄師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。高雄。 Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). London and New York: Longman. 林良駿 (Lin, L. J.) (2004)。台南縣國民小學教師指導學生專題研究之現況分析 (An analysis of students’ project-based research supervised by teachers in the elementary schools of Tainan county)。國立臺南大學特殊教育學系碩士班碩士論文，未出版。台南。教育部 (MOE) (1998)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。1998年9月30日公布。台北：教育部。教育部 (MOE) (2001)。教育部資訊教育基礎建設計畫 (Plan on Information Education Infrastructure)。台北：教育部。教育部 (MOE) (2004)。九年一貫課程綱要總綱英文版 (General Guidelines of Grade 1-9 Curriculum of Elementary and Junior High School Education)。2004年2月27日修正公告。台北：教育部。教育部 (MOE) (2006a)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要--語文學習領域（英語）。2006年3月10日修正。台北：教育部。教育部 (MOE) (2006b)。國民小學及國民中學學生成績評量準則。2006年5月10日修正公告。台北：教育部。徐新逸 (Shyu, S. Y.) (2001)。如何利用網路幫孩子成為研究高手？網路專題式學習與教學創新。台灣教育，607，25-34。徐新逸 (Shyu, S. Y.) (2002)。中小學網路專題式學習之教學設計。教育新思維與創新。台北：心理出版社，411-422。曾俊傑 (Tzeng, J. J.) (2002)。方案英語教學。敦煌英語教學雜誌，35，45-49。鄒慧英 (Tzou, H. Y.) (2001a)。從九年一貫課程的統整原則談專題學習。載於台南師院教授群合著，九年一貫課程新思維，129-164。台南：翰林。 Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. 鄒慧英 (Tzou, H. Y.) (2001b)。另類的統整主題教學—專題學習。國教之友，52(2)，3-11。吳振賢 (Wu, J. S.) (2002)。教師網路融入教學態度、網路融入教學行為及其相關因素之研究 (A study on teachers’ attitude and behaviors toward integrating network into instruction)。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文，未出版。台北。楊淑晴 (Yang, S. C.) (2000)。網路化英語專題學習之實證研究。教育研究資訊，8(1)，78-97。葉家睿 (Yeh, C. R.) (2002)。花蓮縣國民中學教師利用網路資源融入教學行為之研究 (Studying the behavior of teachers integrate internet resources into instruction in junior high school of Hualien County in Taiwan)。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系在職進修碩士班碩士論文，未出版。台北。 Bruner, J. S. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton. Buckley, F. J. (2000). Team teaching: What, why and how? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Bush, M. D., & Terry, R. M. (Eds.). (1997). Technology-enhanced language learning. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company. Campbell, A. P. (2003). Weblogs for use with ESL classes. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(2) (February). Retrieved May 16, 2006, from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Campbell-Weblogs.html Chao, C. (2004). CALL opens language learning windows in Taiwan. Essential Teacher, 1(3). 22-25. Alexandria, VA: TESOL. Chao, C. (2006). How WebQuests send technology to the background: Scaffolding EFL teacher professional development in CALL. In P. Hubbard & M. J. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 220-234). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chard, S. C. (1998). The project approach: Making curriculum come alive. NY: Scholastic. Chiquito, A. B., Meskill, C., & Renjilian-Burgy, J. (1997). Multiple, mixed, malleable media. In M. D. Bush & R. M. Terry (Eds.), Technology-enhanced language learning (pp. 47-76). Chicago: National Textbook Company. Collins, A. (1988). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology (Technical Report No. 6899). BBN Labs Inc., Cambridge, MA. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator: The Professional Journal of the American Federation of Teachers, 15(3), 6-11, 38-46. Retrieved April 12, 2006, from http://www.21learn.org/arch/articles/brown_seely.html Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Dale, E. (1969). Audiovisual methods in teaching (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, NY: Dryden Press. Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. The School Journal, 54 (3), 77-80. Diehl, W., Grobe, T., Lopez, H., & Cabral, C. (1999). Project-based learning: A strategy for teaching and learning. Boston, MA: Center for Youth Development and Education, Corporation for Business, Work, and Learning. Douglas, B. H. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman. Egbert, J., Chao, C., & Hanson-Smith, E. (1999). Computer-enhanced language learning environments: An overview. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 1-13). Alexandria, VA: TESOL. Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. NY: Oxford University Press. Frommer, J. G. (1998). Cognition, context, and computers: Factors in effective foreign language learning. In A. M. Judith (Ed.), New ways of learning and teaching: Focus on technology and foreign language education (pp. 199-223). AAUSC Issues in Language Program Direction. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books. Gardner, H. (1995). “Are there additional intelligences? The case for the naturalist intelligence.” Howard Project Zero. Cambridge, MA: President and Fellows of Howard College. Grabe, M. (2006). Integrating technology for meaningful learning (5th ed.). New York : Houghton Mifflin. Grant, M. M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases and recommendations. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 5 (Winter). Retrieved May 28, 2006, from http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/win2002/514/index.html Griffiths, C., & Parr, J. M. (2001). Language-learning strategies: Theory and perception. ELT Journal Volumes, 55(3), 247-254. Hadley, A.O. (2000). Teaching language in context (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle. Han, S., & Bhattacharya, K. (2001). Constructionism, learning by design and project based learning. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on: Learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved on May 28, 2006, from http://itstudio.coe.uga.edu/ebook/ Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (1995). Critical characteristics of situated learning: Implications for the instructional design of multimedia. In J. Pearce & A. Ellis (Eds.), Learning with technology (pp. 235-262). Parkville, Vic: University of Melbourne. Harris, J. H., & Katz, L. G. (2001). Young investigators: The project approach in the early years. New York: Teachers College Press. Hubbard, P., & Levy, M. J. (2006). The scope of CALL education. In P. Hubbard & M. J. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 3-20). Philadelphia: John Benjamis. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mind tools for schools: Engaging critical thinking (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Kenning, M. M., & Kenning, M. J. (1990). Computers and language learning: Current theory and practice. Chichester: Elllis Horwood. Knoll, M. (1997). The project method: Its vocational education origin and international development. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 34(3), 59–80. Retrieved April 28, 2005, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v34n3/Knoll.html Kobayashi, M. (2003). The role of peer support in ESL students` accomplishment of oral academic tasks. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(3), 337–368. Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, W. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5) (May), 483–497. Krashen, S. (2003). Dealing with English fever. Paper presented at the Twelfth International Symposium on English Teaching. Retrieved April 18, 2006, from: http://www.sdkrashen.com/articles/fever/ Krashen, S., & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Laffey, J., Tupper, T., Musser, D., & Wedman, J. (1998). A computer-mediated support system for project-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1), 73–86. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Levis, J. M., & Levis, G. M. (2003). A project-based approach to teaching research writing to nonnative writers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 46(3), 210–220. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Little, D. (2001). How independent can independent language learning really be? In J. A. Coleman, D. Ferney, D. Head, & R. Rix (Eds.), Language learning futures: Issues and strategies for modern languages provision in higher education (p. 30-43). London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching (CILT). Long, M. H. (1983). Input and second language acquisition theory. Paper presented at the Tenth University of Michigan Conference on Applied Linguistics. Also retrieved in Gass, S. M. & Madden, C. G. (Eds.). (1995). Input In Second Language Acquisition (pp. 377-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Markham, T., Larmer, J., & Ravitz, J. (2003). Project-based learning: A guide to standards-focused project based learning for middle and high school teachers (2nd ed.). Novato, CA: The Buck Institute for Education. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, London: Sage. Miller, W. L., & Crabtree, B. F. (1992). Primary case research: A multimethod typology and qualitative road map. In B. J. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 3-28). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Mishra, S., & Sharma, R. C. (2005). Interactive multimedia in education and training. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing. Mohan, B., & Beckett, G. H. (2003). A functional approach to research on content-based language learning: Recasts in casual explanations. The Modern Language Journal, 87(3), 421-432. Moursund, D. (1999). Project-based learning using information technology. OR: ISTE Publications. Murphy-Judy, K. A. (1997). The use of the World Wide Web in teaching foreign languages. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 403-406). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications, Inc. Newell, R. J. (2003). Passion for learning: How project-based learning meets the needs of 21st century students. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Education. Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 589-613. O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press. O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A.U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Russo, R. P., & Küpper, L. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), 557-584. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle. Papert, S. (1993). The children`s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books. Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. NY: Ablex. Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage. Perkins, D. N. (1991). What constructivism demands of the learner. Educational Technology, 31(9), 19-21. Piepho, H.-E. (1981). Establishing objectives in the teaching of English. In C. N. Candlin (Ed., Trans.), The communicative teaching of English: Principles and an exercise typology. London: Longman. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ryan, A. (1995). John Dewey and the high tide of American liberalism. New York: W. W. Norton. Sandholtz, J. H. (2000). Interdisciplinary team teaching as a form of professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(3), 39-54. San Mateo County Office of Education. (n.d.). Retrieved March 3, 2006, from http://www.trinity.edu/~mkearl/gender.html Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 113-125. Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1992). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. New York: Teachers College Press. Simkins, M. (1999). Project-based learning with multimedia. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 28(4), 10-13. Simkins, M., Cole, K., Tavalin, F., & Means, B. (2002). Increasing student learning through multimedia projects. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development. USA. Smith, M. A. (2005). Autonomy and project-based language learning: Factors mediating autonomy in project-based CALL. PhD thesis, Faculty of Education: Language Literature and Arts Education, The University of Melbourne. Solomon, G. (2003). Project-based learning: A primer. [Electronic Version] Technology & Learning, 23(6), 20-28. Stoller, F. L. (2002). Project work: A means to promote language and content. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 106-119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 66-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: The Autodesk Foundation. Retrieved May 12, 2006, from http://www.bie.org/tmp/research/researchreviewPBL.pdf Thomas, J. W., Mergendoller, J. R., & Michaelson, A. (1999). Project-based learning: A handbook for middle and high school teachers. Novato, CA: The Buck Institute for Education. U.S. Department of Education. (1995). Technology and Education Reform: Technical Research Report. Retrieved March 6, 2006, from U.S. Department of Education Website: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/SER/Technology/ch8.html Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Translation newly revised & edited by A. Kozulin. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Published originally in Russian in 1934. Warschauer, M. (Ed.). (1995). Virtual connections: On-line activities and projects for networking language learners. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center. Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp.3-20). Tokyo: Logos International. Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31, 57-71.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班 90951012 95
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090951012
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[英國語文學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
95101201.pdf		47Kb	Adobe PDF2	1072	檢視/開啟
95101202.pdf		51Kb	Adobe PDF2	1113	檢視/開啟
95101203.pdf		38Kb	Adobe PDF2	1005	檢視/開啟
95101204.pdf		83Kb	Adobe PDF2	1151	檢視/開啟
95101205.pdf		51Kb	Adobe PDF2	1715	檢視/開啟
95101206.pdf		104Kb	Adobe PDF2	1438	檢視/開啟
95101207.pdf		78Kb	Adobe PDF2	1167	檢視/開啟
95101208.pdf		639Kb	Adobe PDF2	1556	檢視/開啟
95101209.pdf		74Kb	Adobe PDF2	1143	檢視/開啟
95101210.pdf		75Kb	Adobe PDF2	1285	檢視/開啟
95101211.pdf		267Kb	Adobe PDF2	1466	檢視/開啟
95101212.pdf		117Kb	Adobe PDF2	1876	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋