English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50823010      Online Users : 789
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33413


    Title: An Iconic-morphological Approach via Commonly-used Roots to English Vocabulary Teaching: How to Help Chinese Senior High School Students Memorize English Vocabulary
    none
    Authors: 許國鋒
    Hsu , Kuo-feng
    Contributors: 莫建清
    Mo , Chien-ching
    許國鋒
    Hsu , Kuo-feng
    Keywords: 圖像
    構詞
    常用詞根
    詞彙短期記憶
    詞彙長期記憶
    構詞察覺度
    iconic
    morphology
    commonly-used roots
    short-term memory for words
    long-term memory for words
    awareness of morphology
    Date: 2003
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 16:32:08 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討「以常用詞根輔以圖像構詞式詞彙教學法」、「常用詞根無圖像構詞式詞彙教學法」及傳統的「詞義說明式詞彙教學法」在學生的詞彙記憶上的差異;本研究亦探討學生的英文詞彙量、構詞察覺度、短期記憶、長期記憶及拼詞能力之間的相關。
    本研究的主要發現如下:接受「以常用詞根輔以圖像構詞式詞彙教學法」的學生比接受「常用詞根無圖像構詞式詞彙教學法」及傳統的「詞義說明式詞彙教學法」的學生表現出更好的構詞察覺度、短期記憶、長期記憶及拼詞能力。在這三組中,構詞察覺度較高的學生對生詞有較佳的短期記憶與長期記憶能力,反之亦然;在詞彙記憶方面,短期記憶力較佳則長期記憶力也是較佳,反之亦然;並且,一星期後的後測分數比較高的學生在一個月後的後後測分數也會比較高;再者,詞彙的短期記憶與學生英文詞彙量的差異無關,因為學生所記住的生詞都可以持續短暫的時間,但不一定能長久記憶。
    This study aims to investigate the discrepancy in the use of the iconic-morphological approach via commonly-used roots, the non-iconic morphological approach via commonly-used roots, and the traditional definition-based teaching method in vocabulary memorization. It also explores the correlation between English vocabulary size, awareness of morphology, short-term memory for words, long-term memory for words, and vocabulary spelling abilities.
    The subjects of this study are 91 third-year students studying at the National Overseas Chinese Experimental Senior High School in Taipei County. They received instruction in the iconic-morphological approach via commonly-used roots, the non-iconic morphological approach via commonly-used roots, and the traditional definition-based teaching method, respectively. In the beginning, the three groups took the same pre-test to examine their vocabulary size. Then, subjects were immediately asked to take post-test 1 to examine their awareness of morphology after receiving different instructions. Later, subjects were asked to memorize forty unknown words within twenty minutes and then to take post-test 2 to investigate their short-term memory for words. A week later, post-test 3 was held to check their long-term memory for words. A month later, they sat for post-test 4, used to explore their longer-term memory for the forty words.
    In conclusion, the study summarizes the main findings pertinent to the proposed research questions. The students who receive instruction in the iconic-morphological approach via commonly-used roots finally develop higher awareness of morphology, better short-term memory for words, better long-term memory for words, and better spelling ability than those who learn in the traditional definition-based approach or in the non-iconic morphological approach via commonly-used roots. Among the three groups, the students who display higher awareness of morphology have better short-term memory and long-term memory for words, and vice versa. Moreover, those who have better short-term memory have better long-term memory, and vice versa; those who have better one-week long-term memory for words definitely have better one-month long-term memory for words. Interestingly, students can learn words by rote for a short period of time regardless of their vocabulary size. That is, one person’s short-term memory for words is not correlated with his vocabulary size.
    Reference: Altarriba, J., & Mathis, K. M. (1997). Conceptual and lexical development in second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 36, 550-568.
    Ausubel, D. P., & Robinson, F. G. (1969). School Learning: An introduction to educational psychology. New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta, Dallas, Montreal, Toronto, London, Sydney: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, INC.
    Avila, E., & Sadoski, M. (1996). Exploring new applications of the keyword method to acquire English vocabulary. Language Learning, 46(3), 379-395.
    Barcroft, J. (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52(2), 323-363.
    Beauvillain, C. (1994). Morphological structure in visual word recognition: Evidence from prefixed and suffixed words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9 (3), 317-339.
    Beauvillain, C. (1996). The integration of morphological and whole-word form information during eye fixations on prefixed and suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language 35, 801-820.
    Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. 4th ed. London and New York: Longman.
    Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297-332.
    Carlisle, J. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically
    complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 12, 169-190.
    Carney, R. N., & Levin, J, R. (1998). Coming to terms with the keyword method in introductory psychology: A “neuromnemonic” example. Teaching of Psychology, 25(2), 132-134.
    Nagy, W., Anderson, R. C., Schommer, M., Scott, J. A., & Stallman, A. C. (1989). Morphological families in the internal lexicon. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 268-282.
    Naron, N. K. (1978). Developmental changes in word attribute utilization for organization and retrieval in free recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 25, 279-297.
    Nassaji, H. (2003). Higher-level and lower-level text processing skills in advanced ESL reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 261-276.
    Nation, I. S. P. (1982). Beginning to learn foreign vocabulary: A review of the research. RELC Journal, Vol. 13, No. 1, 14-36.
    Nation, K., Marshall, C. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2001). Phonological and sematnic contributions to children’s picture naming skill: Evidence from children with developmental reading disorders. Language And Cognitive Processes, 16(2/3), 241-259.
    Nation, P., & Coady, J. (1988). Vocabulary and reading. In R. Carter and M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp.97-110). London and New York: Longman.
    Nattinger, J. (1988). Some current trends in vocabulary teaching. In R. Carter and M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp.62-82). London and New York: Longman.
    Nelson-Herber, J. (1986). Expanding and refining vocabulary in content areas. Journal of Reading, 626-633.
    Neuman, S. B., Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2001). Phonological awareness in young children. Early Childhood Today, 15(6), 11-13.
    Oney, B., Peter, M., & Katz, L. (1997). Phonological processing in printed words recognition: Effects of age and writing system. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1), 65-83.
    Carr, E., & Wixson, K. K. (1986). Guidelines for evaluating vocabulary instruction. Journal of Reading, 588-595.
    Pastizzo, M. J., & Feldman, L. B. (2002). Does prime modality influence morphological processing? Brain and Language 81, 28-41.
    Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 90, No. 1, 25-36.
    Pressley, M. (1977). Children’s use of the keyword method to learn simple Spanish vocabulary words. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 69, No. 5, 465-472.
    Pressley, M., & Levin, J. R. (1978). Developmental constraints associated with children’s use of the keyword method of foreign language vocabulary learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 26, 359-372.
    Price, M., & Finkelstein, A. (1994). Pictures improve memory of SAT vocabulary words. Journal of Reading, Vol. 38, No. 2, 134-135.
    Prince, P. (1996). Second language vocabulary learning: The role of context versus translations as a function of proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 80(4), 478-493.
    Raimes, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, 229-258.
    Raptis, H. (1997). Is second language reading vocabulary best learned by reading? Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(3), 566-580.
    Richards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 1, 77-89.
    Roelofs, A. (1996). Serial order in planning the production of successive morphemes of a word. Journal of Memory and Language 35, 854-876.
    Chang, J. (1998). A study of Taiwanese students’ language learning styles and their relationship to EFL proficiency. The Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching in ROC, 133-142.
    Rueckl, J. G., Mikolinski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C. S., & Mars, F. (1997). Morhological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks. Journal of Memory and Language 36, 382-405.
    Sandra, D. (1994). The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9 (3),227-270.
    Saville-Troike, M. (1984). What really matters in second language learning for academic achievement? TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 2, 199-219.
    Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18, 55-88.
    Schneider, V. I., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E. (2002). What is learned under difficult conditions is hard to forget: Contextual interference effects in foreign vocabulary acquisition, retention, and transfer. Journal of Memory and Language 46, 419-440.
    Seamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., Schwartz, M. A., Jones, K. J., Lee, D. M., & Jones, S. J. (2002). Repetition can have similar or different effects on accurate and false recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 46, 323-340.
    Sharkin, B., Mohr, P., & Glover, J. A. (1983). Word obscurity and acoustic similarity in the use of the keyword mnemonic. The Journal of General Psychology, 1983, 109, 247-253.
    Sharon QI, & Rollanda, O. (2000). Comparison of phonological training procedures in kindergarten classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 226-233.
    Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000) The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 12, 219-252.
    Smith, P. T. (1995). Are morphemes really necessary? In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp.365-382). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Channell, J. (1988). Psycholinguistic considerations in the study of L2 vocabulary acquisition. In R. Carter and M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp.83-96). London and New York: Longman.
    Stahl, S. A. (1986). Three principles of effective vocabulary instruction. Journal of Reading, 662-668.
    Storkel, H. L. (2001). Learning new words: phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1321-1337.
    Swaffar, J. (1995). Review by Swaffar. Language Learning, 45(1), 177-179.
    Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, Vol. 7(4), 263-272.
    Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological process. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9 (3), 271-294.
    Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14, 638-647.
    Thelen, J. N. (1986). Vocabulary instruction and meaningful learning. Journal of Reading, 603-609.
    Thomas, D. G., Campos, J. J., Shucard, D. W., Rammsay, D. S., & Shucard, J. (1981).
    Semantic comprehension in infancy: A signal detection analysis. Child
    Deveopment, 52, 798-803.
    Chen, C. Y. (1999). The implications for sound symbolism on vocabulary teaching. The Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on English Teaching in ROC, 615-625.
    Thomas, M. H., & Wang, A. Y. (1996). Learning by the keyword mnemonic: looking for long term benefits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2(4), 330-342.
    Tinkham, T. (1997). The effects of semantic and thematic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. Second Language Research, 13(2), 138-163.
    Tsai, Shu-hwa. (1999). Chinese EFL college students’ Chinese and English lexical encoding. Thesis. National Kaohsiung Normal University.
    Tussing, A. A., & Greene, R. L. (1999). Differential effects of repetition on true and false recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 520-533.
    Twaddell, F. (1973). Vocabulary expansion in the TESOL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 7, 61-80.
    Uberti, H. Z., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2003). Keywords make the difference: Mnemonic instruction in inclusive classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(3), 56-61.
    Vachek, J. (1935). Several thoughts on several statements of the phoneme theory. American Speech, 5(4), 243-255.
    Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science, 9(4), 325-329.
    Wagner, R. K. (1986) Phonological processing abilities and reading: Implications for disabled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19(10), 623-630.
    Wang, A. Y., & Thomas, M. H. (1995). Effect of keywords on long-term retention: Help or hindrance? Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 87, No. 3, 468-475.
    Cheng, Heng-shung, Chang, Hhu-huei, Cheng, Hu-shiou, & Ku, Ieng-shiou (2002). An English reference word list for SAET and DRET. Taipei: CEEC.
    Wang, Jeng-jeng (1997). Chinese students’ strategies for guessing word meanings in context. Research Papers in linguistics and Literature of National Taiwan Normal University, 6, 111-128.
    Ward J. (1999). How large a vocabulary do EAP Engineering Students need? Reading in a Froeign Language, 12(2), 309-323.
    Wesche, M. B., & Paribakht, T. S. (2000). Reading-based exercises in second language vocabulary learning: An introspective study. The Modern Language Journal, 84(2), 196-213.
    White, T. G., Power, M. A., & White, S. (1989). Morphological analysis: Implications for teaching and understanding vocabulary growth. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 283-304.
    Wood, C. (2002). Orthographic analogies and phonological priming effects. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(2), 144-159.
    Woodard, C. (1998). When rote learning fails against the test of global economy. Christian Science monitor, 90, 7-9.
    Yu, chin-ying (1998). Gaining vocabulary incidentally while reading by EFL senior high school students in Taiwan. Thesis. National Kaohsiung Normal University.
    Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998) The development of spelling-sound relationships in a model of phonological reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(2/3), 337-371.
    Zutell, J. (1998). Word sorting: a developmental spelling approach to word study for delayed readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14, 219-238.
    Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9 (3), 341-368.
    Chialant, D., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Where is morphology and how is it processed? The case of written word recognition. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp.55-76). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Coates, R. (1999). Word structure. London and New York: Routledge.
    Cole, P., Segui, J., & Taft, M. (1997). Words and morphemes as units for lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language 37, 312-330.
    Condus, M. M., Marshall, K. J., & Miller, S. R. (1986). Effects of the keyword mnemonic strategy on vocabulary acquisition and maintenance by learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19(10), 609-613.
    Cornu, A. M. (1979). The first step in vocabulary teaching. Modern Language Journal, 63, 262-272.
    Cornwall, A. (1992). The relationship of phonological awareness, rapid naming and verbal memory to severe reading and spelling disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(8), 532-538.
    Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1994). Ways with words-Chinese students learning of English vocabulary. The Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on English Teaching, English Teachers’ Association, 15-28.
    Cronin, V., Pratt, M., Abraham, J., Howell, D., Bishop, S., & Manning, A. (1986). Word association and the acquisition of reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1-11.
    Crow, J. T., & Quigley, J. R. (1985). A semantic field approach to passive vocabulary acquisition for reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 3, 497-513.
    Cunningham, P. M. (1998). The multisyllabic word dilemma: Helping students build meaning, spell, and read “big” words. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14, 189-218.
    Danesi, M. (1988). Neurological bimodality and theories of language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 10, No. 1, 13-31.
    De Jong, P. F., & Van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(1), 51-77.
    Denning, K., & Leben, W. R. (1995). English vocabulary elements. New York: Oxford University press.
    Derwing, B. L., Smith, M. L., & Wiebe, G. E. (1995). On the role of spelling in morpheme recognition: Experimental studies with children and adults. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp.3-28). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Dixon, M., & Stuart, M. (2002). Phonological awareness improves word recall. Literacy Today, 20.
    Dole, J. A., Sloan, C., & Trathen, W. (1995). Teaching vocabulary within the context of literature. Journal of Reading, 38, 452-460.
    Everson, M. E. (1998). Word recognition among learners of Chinese as a Foreign Language: Investigating the relationship between naming and knowing. The Modern Language Journal, 82(2), 195-203.
    Fan, M. Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 222-241.
    Feldman, L. B., & Prostko, B. (2002). Graded aspects of morphological processing: Task and processing time. Brain and Language 81, 12-27.
    Fischler, I., & Bloom, P. A. (1979). Automatic and attentional process in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 1-20.
    Foil, C. R., & Alber, S. R. (2002). Fun and effective ways to build your students’ vocabulary. Intervention In School And Clinic, 37(3), 131-139.
    Freyd, P., & Baron, J. (1982). Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 21, 282-295.
    Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1991). Forgetting recognition memory with and without recollective experience. Memory and Cognition, 19, 617-623.
    Gardner, M. K., Rothkope, E. Z., Lapan, R., & Lafferty, T. (1987). The word frequency effect in lexical decision: Finding a frequency-based component. Memory and Cognition, 15(1), 24-28.
    Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1986). Relations between semantic and cognitive development in the one-word stage: The specificity hypothesis. Child Development, 57, 1040-1053.
    Goswami, U. (1991). Learning about spelling sequences: The role of onsets and rimes in analogies in reading. Child Development, 62, 1110-1123.
    Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 3, 375-406.
    Graves, M. F., & Prenn, M. C. (1986). Costs and benefits of various methods of teaching vocabulary. Journal of Reading, 596-602.
    Gruneberg, M. M. (1998) A commentary on criticism of the keyword method of learning foreign languages. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 529-532.
    Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643-679.
    Haggard, M. R. (1986). The vocabulary self-collection strategy: Using student interest and world knowledge to enhance vocabulary growth. Journal of Reading, 634-649.
    Hammill, D. D., Mather, N., Allen, E. A., & Roberts, R. (2002). Using semantics, grammar, phonology, and rapid naming tasks to predict word identification. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(2), 121-136.
    Harmon, J. M. (1998). Vocabulary teaching and learning in a seventh-grade literature-based classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 41(7), 518-529.
    Hasher, L., & Clifton, D. (1974). A developmental study of attribute encoding in free call. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 17, 332-346.
    Hay, J. (2001). Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics, 39-6, 1041-1070.
    Hell, J. G. V., & Mahn, A. C. (1997). Keyword mnemonics versus rote rehearsal: Learning concrete and abstract foreign words by experienced and inexperienced learners. Language Learning, 47(3), 507-546.
    Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 21, No. 2, 303-318.
    Higa, M. (1965). The psycholinguistic concept of “difficulty” and the teaching of foreign language vocabulary. Language Learning, Vol. ХV, No. 3 & 4, 167-178.
    Hildreth, G. (1961). Teaching reading: A guide to basic principles and modern practices. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
    Hirsh, D., & Nation, P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language, 8(2), 689-696.
    Hoffman, P. R., & Norris, J. A. (2002). Phonological assessment as an integral part of language assessment. American Journal of Speech –Language Pathology, 11, 230-235.
    Hopkins, G., & Bean, T. W. (1999). Vocabulary learning with the verbal-visual word association strategy in a native American community. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42(4), 274-281.
    Huang, T. L. (1997). A study of the necessity of vocabulary teaching. The Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on English Teaching. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., LTD.
    Hulstijn, J. H., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 327-339.
    Hung, Chien-lian (1991). Teaching vocabulary to nonnative speakers at three levels. Paper presented at the Ninth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China. 155-171.
    Iacobelli, M. (1941). The semantic discipline. The Saturday Review of Literature, 14, 16-22.
    Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
    Jacoby, L. L., & Goolkasian, P. (1973). Semantic versus acoustic coding: Retention and conditions of organization. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12, 324-333.
    James, W. (1952). The principles of psychology. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, INC.
    Johnson, B. E. (1994). The reading edge. 2nd ed. Taiwan: Bookman Books, LTD.
    Johnson, D. D., & Johnson, B. V. H. (1986). Highlighting vocabulary in inferential comprehension instruction. Journal of Reading, 622-625.
    Jullian, P. (2000). Creating word-meaning awareness. ELT Journal, Vol. 54/1, 37-46.
    Kang, Sook-hi. (1995). The effects of a context-embedded approach to second-language vocabulary learning. System, Vol. 23, No. 1, 43-55.
    Karen, I. (1991). Enhancing long-term retention of new vocabulary using visual images. Thesis. Nova University. (ED 336741).
    Klein, D. E., & Murphy, G. L. (2001). The representation of polysemous words. Journal of Memory and Language 45, 259-282.
    Knight, S. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 285-299.
    Koda, K. (1989). Effects of L1 orthographic representation on L2 phonological coding strategies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, 201-222.
    Krashen, S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 440-464.
    Laffey, D. G., & Laffey, J. L. (1986). Vocabulary teaching: An investment in literacy. Journal of Reading, 650-656.
    Laudanna, A., Burani, C., & Cermele, A. (1994). Prefixes as processing units. Language and Cognitive Process, 9(3), 295-316.
    Laufer, B. (1986). Possible changes in attitude towards vocabulary acquisition research. IRAL, Vol. ХХІV/1, 69-75.
    Laufer, B. (1990a). Ease and difficulty in vocabulary learning: Some teaching implications. Foreign Language Annals, 23, No. 2, 147-155.
    Laufer, B. (1990b). Why are some words more difficult than others? – some intralexical factors that affect the learning of words. IRAL, Vol. ХХVШ/4, 293-307.
    Laufer, B. (1991). Some properties of the foreign language learner’s lexicon as evidence by lexical confusions. IRAL, Vol. ХХІХ/4, 317-330.
    Lawson, M. J. & Hogben, D. (1996). The vocabulary-learning strategies of foreign-language students. Language Learning, 46(1), 101-135.
    Layton, L., Deeny, K., Upton, G., & Tall, G. (1998). A pre-school training program for children with poor phonological awareness: effects on reading and spelling. Journal of Research in Reading, 21(1), 36-52.
    Lehrer, A. (1990). Polysemy, conventionality, and the structure of the lexicon. Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 207-246.
    Levin, J. R., & Kaplan, S. A. (1972). Imaginal facilitation of paired-associate learning: A limited generation? Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 63, No. 5, 429-432.
    Li, En-ling. (1998). A study of the effects of word analysis on vocabulary teaching and learning in senior high school. Thesis. National Taiwan Normal University.
    Lipka, S. (2002). Reading sentences with a late closure ambiguity: Does semantic information help? Language And Cognitive Processes, 17(3), 271-298.
    Lisbeth, Dixon-krauss. (2002). Using literature as a context for teaching vocabulary. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(4), 310-318.
    Lorsbach, T. C. (1982). Individual differences in semantic encoding processes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15(8), 476-480.
    Mahony, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 12, 191-218.
    Maiguashca, R. U. (1993). Teaching and learning vocabulary in a second language: Past, present, and future directions. The Canadian Modern Language Review, Vol. 50, No. 1, 83-100.
    Martin, A. V. (1976). Teaching academic vocabulary to foreign graduate students. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 1, 91-97.
    Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Mushinski Fulk, B. J. (1990). Teaching abstract vocabulary with the keyword method: Effects on recall and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(2), 92-107.
    Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226-232.
    Meara, P. (1980). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. Language Teaching & Linguistics: Abstracts, 221-246.
    Meunier, F., & Segui, J. (1999). Morphological priming effect: The role of surface frequency. Brain and Language, 68, 54-60.
    Miller, G. A., & Gildea, P. M. (1987). How children learn words. Scientific American, 257, 94-99.
    Mo, Chien-ching (1993). The sound changes of roots and the teaching of English vocabulary. Journal of National Cheng-chi University, 66, 63-112.
    Mo, Chien-ching (1995). The role of English morphophonemic rules in spelling teaching. Paper presented at the Ninth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China, 173-210.
    Monroe, E. E., & Orme, M. P. (2002). Developing mathematical vocabulary. Preventing School Failure, 46(3), 139-142.
    Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304-330.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
    88951016
    92
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088951016
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    95101601.pdf50KbAdobe PDF21316View/Open
    95101602.pdf45KbAdobe PDF21244View/Open
    95101603.pdf67KbAdobe PDF21264View/Open
    95101604.pdf46KbAdobe PDF21359View/Open
    95101605.pdf46KbAdobe PDF21366View/Open
    95101606.pdf47KbAdobe PDF21307View/Open
    95101607.pdf69KbAdobe PDF22046View/Open
    95101608.pdf247KbAdobe PDF23573View/Open
    95101609.pdf121KbAdobe PDF21372View/Open
    95101610.pdf136KbAdobe PDF21362View/Open
    95101611.pdf73KbAdobe PDF21618View/Open
    95101612.pdf707KbAdobe PDF21679View/Open
    95101613.pdf163KbAdobe PDF22827View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback