政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33333
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50828494      線上人數 : 928
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33333


    題名: 旅行面面觀：以德勒茲閱讀《愛麗絲夢遊仙境》
    Aspects of Travel: A Deleuzian Reading of Alice`s Adventures in Wonderland
    作者: 黃玲毓
    Huang,Ling-yu
    貢獻者: 胡錦媛
    Hu,Chin-yuan
    黃玲毓
    Huang,Ling-yu
    關鍵詞: 卡洛
    《愛麗絲夢遊仙境》
    旅行
    德勒茲
    遊牧學
    變成
    伊斯蘭
    時空性
    Lewis Carroll
    Alice`s Adventures in Wonderland
    travel
    Deleuze
    nomadology
    becoming
    Islam
    spatiotemporality
    日期: 2007
    上傳時間: 2009-09-17 16:17:59 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 在路易斯‧卡洛（Lewis Carroll）的小說《愛麗絲夢遊仙境》（Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, 1865）中，愛麗絲是個透過夢境冒險於地底的旅行者。在她的旅行中，愛麗絲一直無法掌握仙境中各種事物的意義，而產生了「怪誕」（the uncanny）觀感，因為仙境中的事物總是一方面打破、另一方面卻怪誕地指涉地面上的世界。本論文擬從「旅行時空性」、「旅行本質」與「愛麗絲做為旅行者」三個面向去解讀愛麗絲旅行的涵意。<br>本論文第一章為總論性質的介紹。第二章從心理學潛意識分析討論文學中的「幻見」（fantasy）與「奇幻文學」（fantasy literature）中的旅行主題。本論文主張潛意識與現實息息相關，愛麗絲夢境中的旅行因而帶有真實色彩。本論文以法國哲學家德勒茲（Gilles Deleuze）的「遊牧」（nomadology）與「變成」（becoming）理論為基礎，結合伊斯蘭（Syed Manzurul Islam）從德勒茲理論延伸出的旅行理論，為小說中的旅行主題帶出新的觀點與視野。<br>第三章分析仙境的時空性（spatiotemporality）與時空性對愛麗絲的旅行者角色的影響。伊斯蘭將旅行者分成兩類：遊牧旅行者（nomadic traveler）與靜止旅行者（sedentary traveler）。遊牧旅行者脫離現在（the present），在平滑空間（smooth space）中進行其「變成」過程；靜止旅行者則只侷限於有限時間中，在固著空間（rigid space）的特定路線移動。因此，旅行的時空性影響旅行者成為遊牧旅行者或靜止旅行者。本論文指出，仙境的多重時空性供給愛麗絲成為遊牧旅行者的機會。<br>第四章著重探討愛麗絲的旅行本質與她的旅行者角色，從分析愛麗絲與他者的相遇情形、她的旅行速度與移動，到她在地底世界的「變成」過程。愛麗絲在仙境的「變成他者」（becoming-other）有待商榷，她不斷地侷限自己於維多利亞（the Victorian）的規範中，無法「與他者相遇」（encounter the other），無法以緊密的速度（speed of intensity）進行「去畛域化」（deterritorialization）。儘管仙境的時空特性促使愛麗絲往遊牧旅行的路線前進，但是她缺少擺脫過去記憶與偏見的決定性動作。愛麗絲的旅行擺盪在「變成他者」、成為遊牧旅行者的邊緣地帶。<br>愛麗絲的旅行既不是靜止旅行，也不是遊牧旅行；她有自己獨特的旅行風格，總是擺盪在靜止旅行者與遊牧旅行者的角色之間。她沒有像遊牧旅行者一樣「變成他者」；她處於無止盡的「變成（遊牧）旅行者」（becoming-(nomadic) traveler）過程中。
    In Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (1865), Alice is a traveler, adventuring in the fantastic underground under the framework of her dream. Alice’s failure to grasp sense in Wonderland and her constant suspicion of things and inhabitants make her travel an uncanny one, for events in Wonderland always disturb but uncannily refer to those of the above world. This thesis attempts to explore the secrets of Alice’s travel lurking in the dream scenario, identifying and explicating her role as a traveler in the miraculous Wonderland from three aspects of travel: traveling spatiotemporality, the nature of travel and the traveler herself.<br>Chapter One is a condense, general introduction to the whole thesis. Chapter Two discusses the psychoanalytical theory of the unconscious, the theory of fantasy in literature, and the motif of travel in fantasy literature. The inseparable relationship between the unconscious and the reality will be introduced first. It is this relationship that makes Alice’s travel in her dreamland being effective and possible in the real world. Employing the Deleuzian theory, this thesis takes Gilles Deleuze’s ideas on “nomadology” and “becoming” as the main theoretical framework. Being accompanied with Syed Manzurul Islam’s ideas on the ethics of travel, which is derived from the Deleuzian theory, this thesis takes a step further to develop a new perspective on travel account.<br>Chapter Three deals with the spatiotemporality of Wonderland, analyzing its spatiotemporal nature and the way it influences Alice’s role as a traveler. Islam divides traveler into two categories—a nomadic traveler and a sedentary traveler. A nomadic traveler is one who eludes the present, undergoing the process of becoming-other on the smooth space, whereas a sedentary traveler is one who travels on pre-set routes of the rigid space within limited temporality. Therefore, the spatiotemporality of a travel will affect the kind of a traveler Alice would be. The multiple spatiotemporality of Wonderland provides Alice with a good foundation to become a nomadic traveler.<br>Chapter Four concentrates on Alice’s travel and her role as a traveler, analyzing her encounter with the other, her traveling speed and movement, and her becoming in the fantastic underground world. Alice is problematic in becoming-other, since she keeps being captive in the representation of norms received from the Victorian overground which makes encounter with the other and deterritorialization with intensity of speed impossible. Although the spatiotemporality of Wonderland pushes Alice forward to the process of a nomadic travel, she lacks a final move to shake off the confinement of the past memories and preconceptions. Alice is on the brink of becoming-other as a nomadic traveler.<br>Alice’s travel is neither a sedentary nor a nomadic one; she has a travel of her own, always vacillating between a sedentary traveler and a nomadic traveler. As a sedentary traveler, she is not becoming-other as a nomadic traveler, but on the process of becoming-(nomadic) traveler.
    參考文獻: “Aeon.” Wikipedia: the Free Encyclopedia. 20 Apr. 2007. Wikimidia Foundation. 3 May 2007 < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeon >.
    Auerbach, Nina. “Alice and Wonderland: A Curious Child.” Modern Critical Views: Lewis Carroll. Ed. and Introd. Harold Bloom. New York and Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers, 1987. 31-44.
    ---. “Falling Alice, Fallen Women, and Victorian Dream Children.” English Language Notes 20.2 (1982): 46-64.
    Baum, Alwin L. “Carroll’s Alices: The Semiotics of Paradox.” Modern Critical Views: Lewis Carroll. Ed. and Introd. Harold Bloom. New York and Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers, 1987. 65-81.
    Bivona, Daniel. “Alice the Child-Imperialist and the Games of Wonderland.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 41.2 (1986): 143-171.
    Blanton, Casey. Travel Writing: The Self and the World. New York; Twayne Publishers, 1997.
    Braidotti, Rosi. “Teratologies.” Deleuze and Feminist Theory. Ed. Ian Buchanan and Claire Colebrook. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000. 156-172.
    Carroll, Lewis. The Annotated Alice: Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking Glass. Illus. John Tenniel. Introd. and Notes Martin Gardner. London and New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1999.
    ---. “Preface.” The Penguin Complete Lewis Carroll. Illus. John Tenniel. Introd. Alexander Woollcott. Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1982. 461-472.
    Cohen, Eileen Z. “Alex in Wonderland, or Portnoy’s Complaint.” Twentieth century Literature 17.3 (1971): 161-168.
    Colebrook, Claire. “Introduction.” Deleuze and Feminist Theory. Ed. Ian Buchanan and Claire Colebrook. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000. 1-17.
    Conley, Verena Andermatt. “Becoming-Woman Now.” Deleuze and Feminist Theory. Ed. Ian Buchanan and Claire Colebrook. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000. 18-37.
    De Certeau, Michel. “Montaigne’s ‘Of Cannibals’: The Savage ‘I’.” Heterologies: Discourse on the Other. Fwd. Wlad Godzich. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1986. 67-79.
    Defoe, Daniel. Robinson Crusoe: An Authoritative Text, Contexts, Criticism. 1719. Ed. Michael Shinagel. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1994.
    Deleuze, Gilles. “Lewis Carroll.” Essays Critical and Clinical. Trans. Daniel W. Smith and Michael A. Greco. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997. 21-22.
    ---. The Logic of Sense. Ed. Constantin V. Boundas. Trans. Mark Lester. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.
    Deleuze, Gilles, and Claire Parnet. Dialogues II. Trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. London and New York: Continuum, 1977.
    Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brain Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
    Driscoll, Catherine. “The Little Girl.” Vol. III of Deleuze and Guattari: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. Ed. Gary Genosko. London and New York: Routledge, 2001. 1464-1479.
    Evans, Dylan. An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. London and New York: Routledge, 1996.
    Feldstein, Richard. “The Phallic Gaze of Wonderland.” Reading Seminar XI: Lacan’s Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Ed. Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink and Maire Jaanus. Albany: State University of New York, 1995. 149-174.
    Flieger, Jerry Aline. “Becoming-Woman: Deleuze, Schreber and Molecular Identification.” Deleuze and Feminist Theory. Ed. Ian Buchanan and Claire Colebrook. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000. 38-63.
    Forster, E. M. A Passage to India. 1924. Taipei: Bookman Books, 1984.
    Freud, Sigmund. “The Dream and the Primal Scene.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 17. Ed. James Strachey. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis, 1981. 29-47.
    ---. “The ‘Uncanny’.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 17. Ed. James Strachey. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis, 1981. 219-56.
    Frye, Northrop, Sheridan Baker, George Perkins, and Barbara M. Perkins. The Harper Handbook to Literature. New York: Longman, 1997.
    Gabriele, Mark. “Alice in Wonderland: Problem of Identity-Aggressive Content and Form Control.” American Imago: Studies in Psychoanalysis and Culture, 39.4 (1982):369-389.
    Gardner, Martin. “Introduction to The Annotated Alice.” The Annotated Alice: Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking Glass. London and New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1999. xiii-xxii.
    ---. “Introduction to More Annotated Alice.” The Annotated Alice: Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking Glass. London and New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1999. xxiii-xxviii.
    Gilead, Sarah. “Magic Abjured: Closure in Children’s Fantasy Fiction.” Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (PMLA) 106.2 (1991): 277-293.
    Gordon, Jan B. “The Alice Books and the Metaphors of Victorian Childhood.” Lewis Carroll. Ed. and Introd. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1987. 17-30.
    Gorham, Deborah. “Women and Girls in the Middle-Class Family: Images and Reality.” The Victorian Girl and the Feminine Ideal. London: Croom Helm, 1982. 3-13.
    Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. “Geographical Basis of History.” The Philosophy of History. Pref. Charles Hegel. Trans. J. Sibree. London and New York: The Colonial Press, 1900. 79-102.
    Islam, Syed Manzurul. The Ethics of Travel: From Macro Polo to Kafka. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1996.
    Jackson, Rosemary. Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion. London and New York: Routledge, 1988.
    Kaplan, Caren. Questions of Travel: Postmodern Discourses of Displacement. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1996.
    Kristeva, Julia. Strangers to Ourselves. Trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991
    Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1977.
    ---. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1978.
    Leed, Eric J. The Mind of the Traveler: From Gilgamesh to global Tourism. New York: Basic Books, 1991.
    Massey, Irving. “Aspects of Metamorphosis in Alice.” The Gaping Pig: Literature and Metamorphosis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976. 76-97.
    Massumi, Brian. A User’s Guide to Capitalism and Schizophrenia: Deviations from Deleuze and Guattari. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1992.
    Ovid. “Metamorphoses”. Trans. Allen Mandelbaum. The Norton Anthology of World Masterpieces. Ed. Sarah Lawall et al. 7th ed. Vol. 1. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1998. 899-943.
    Patmore, Coventry Kersey Dighton. The Angel in the House. London: John W. Parker and Son West Strand, 1854.
    Petersen, Calvin R. “Time and Stress: Alice in Wonderland.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 46:3 (1985): 427-433.
    Rabkin, Eric S. The Fantastic in Literature. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1976.
    Rackin, Donald. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass: Nonsense, Sense, and Meaning. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1991.
    ---. “What You Always Wanted to Know about Alice but were Afraid to Ask.” The Victorian Newsletter 44 (1973): 1-5.
    Sherer, Susan. “Secrecy and Autonomy in Lewis Carroll.” Philosophy and Literature 20 (1996): 1-19.
    Shires, Linda M. “Fantasy, Nonsense, Parody, and the Status of the Real: The Example of Carroll.” Victorian Poetry 26.3 (1988): 267-283.
    Shukin, Nicole. “Deleuze and Feminisms: Involuntary Regulators and Affective Inhibitors.” Deleuze and Feminist Theory. Ed. Ian Buchanan and Claire Colebrook. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000. 144-155.
    Todorov, Tzvetan. The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre. Trans. Richard Howard. Fwd. Robert Scholes. New York: Cornell University Press, 1975.
    Van den Abbeele, Georges. “Introduction: The Economy of Travel.” Travel as Metaphor: From Montaigne to Rousseau. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1992. xiii-xxx.
    Wang, Sophia Wei. “Disrupting the Ladders of Hierarchy: Metamorphosis in Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass.” MA Thesis. Taipei: Providence University, 2000.
    Warner, Marina. “Doubling.” Fantastic Metamorphoses, Other Worlds: Ways of Telling the Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. 161-203.
    Wolfreys, Julian. “Alice: An Architecture of Knowledges? or, Identities in Dispute.” The Rhetoric of Affirmative Resistance: Dissonant Identities from Carroll to Derrida. London: Macmillan Press, 1997. 35-69.
    Žižek, Slavoj. The Plague of Fantasies. London and New York: Verso, 1997.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學研究所
    93551014
    96
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093551014
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    55101401.pdf45KbAdobe PDF2974檢視/開啟
    55101402.pdf12KbAdobe PDF2810檢視/開啟
    55101403.pdf12KbAdobe PDF21020檢視/開啟
    55101404.pdf11KbAdobe PDF2794檢視/開啟
    55101405.pdf77KbAdobe PDF21478檢視/開啟
    55101406.pdf15KbAdobe PDF2964檢視/開啟
    55101407.pdf42KbAdobe PDF28086檢視/開啟
    55101408.pdf134KbAdobe PDF21743檢視/開啟
    55101409.pdf149KbAdobe PDF22339檢視/開啟
    55101410.pdf103KbAdobe PDF21633檢視/開啟
    55101411.pdf84KbAdobe PDF21117檢視/開啟
    55101412.pdf25KbAdobe PDF21840檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋