政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33318
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113393/144380 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51238478      線上人數 : 873
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33318


    題名: 女性特質的革命：論安•瑞克麗芙之《烏多夫堡秘辛》中感性、女權和女性獨立自主的觀點
    A Revolution in Female Manners: Sensibility, Women`s Rights and Independence in Ann Radcliffe`s The Mysteries of Udolpho
    作者: 李政慧
    Li, Zheng-hui
    貢獻者: 王心玲
    Wang, Hsin-ling
    李政慧
    Li, Zheng-hui
    關鍵詞: Ann Radcliffe
    feminism
    Gothic Novel
    sensibility
    Udolpho
    日期: 2002
    上傳時間: 2009-09-17 16:14:09 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 論文提要內容：
    本篇論文旨在探討安•瑞克麗芙之《烏多夫堡秘辛》中十八世紀女性如何藉改造自身特質，逆轉身處不平等的劣勢。同時並引用瑪麗•烏爾史東考夫特的自由女性主義來分析小說文本。在小說中，瑞氏藉由女主角的冒險故事來剖析十八世紀的女性如何在父權社會中抗拒屈從，堅持自我存在的價值和追尋個人幸福。
    本論文共分為五章。第一章概述瑞氏生平背景、作品特性、本小說之寫作背景、古今評論對本小說之評價，以及分析本文所應用的理論。第二章與第三章側重瑞氏對十八世紀之「感性」（sensibility）的分析。註1瑞氏在小說中以許多篇幅描寫「感性」對當時女性的深遠影響，並探討其正、反兩面的價值。有鑑於此，第二章討論瑞氏對「感性」強化女性膚淺、非理性等負面特質的批判。第三章探討瑞氏如何運用「感性」中知性、理性、利他三種正面價值來改變女性軟弱無能的特質。第四章乃瑞氏在小說中對於女權和女性獨立自主觀點之分析。最後一章為結論兼及小說寫作和瑞氏作品的貢獻。
    Abstract

    In The Mysteries of Udolpho Ann Radcliffe describes the story of a young, middle-class woman. She illustrates how the innocent, sensitive protagonist fights against oppression, defends her value and finds her own happiness in the male dominated world. By describing the protagonist’s opposition to subordination, Radcliffe points out the necessity of changing women’s manners. The writer of this thesis explores Radcliffe’s concern with the social inferiority of women in The Mysteries of Udolpho. The writer also applies Mary Wollstonecraft’s liberal feminist thought in her discussion of Radcliffe.
    This thesis is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is a general introduction. It includes Ann Radcliffe and her works, the critical response, the theory employed in the textual analysis, namely Wollstonecraft’s liberal feminist thought and an overview of the eighteenth-century sensibility. The second chapter focuses on Radcliffe’s attack of the false sensibility and how it distorts the nature of women. The third chapter centers on the virtuous sensibility and how it functions as the power to reverse women’s social inferiority. In the fourth chapter, the stress will be laid upon issues of marriage, property and the meaning of independent women. The concluding chapter discusses the contribution of Radcliffe as novelist.
    參考文獻: Works Cited
    Alexander, Meena. Women in Romanticism: Mary Wollstonecraft, Dorothy Wordsworth and Mary Shelly. Hamsphire and London: Macmillan, 1989.
    Anonymous. “The Mysteries of Udolpho.” British Critic 4 August 1794 : 110-21.
    Anonymous. “The Mysteries of Udolpho.” European Magazine and London Review 25 June 1794 : 433-40.
    Batchelor, Rhonda. “The Rise and Fall of the Eighteenth Century’s Authentic Feminine Voice.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 6.4 (1994) : 347-69.
    Botting, Freaud. Gothic. London and New York: Routledge, 1996.
    Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful. Ed. James T. Boulton. London: Routledge, 1958.
    Brophy, Elizabeth Bergen. Women’s Lives and the 18th-Century English Novel. Tempa: U of South Florida, 1991.
    Castle, Terry. “The Spectralization of the Other in The Mysteries of Udolpho.” The New Eighteenth Century: Theory, Politics, English Literature. Ed. Felicity Nussbaum and Laura Brown. New York and London: Methuen, 1987. 231-53.
    ---. Introduction. The Mysteries of Udolpho. By Ann Radcliffe. Ed. Bonamy Dobrée. Oxford and London: Oxofrd UP, 1998. vii-xxvii.
    ---. Explanatory Note. The Mysteries of Udolpho. By Ann Radcliffe. Ed. Bonamy Dobrée. Oxford and London: Oxofrd UP, 1998. 677.
    Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. “The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Critical Review 11 (1794) : 361-72.
    Conger, Syndy MacMillen. Mary Wollstonecraft and the Language of Sensibility. London and Toronto: Associated UP, 1994.
    Cox, Stephen. “Sensibility as Argument.” Sensibility in Transformation: Creative
    Resistance to Sentiment from the Augustans to the Romantics. Ed. Syndy McMillen Conger. London and Toronto: Associated UP, 1990. 63-82.
    Drabble, Margaret, and Jenny Stringer, eds. Oxford Concise Companion to English Literature. Oxford and New York: Oxford UP, 1996.
    Dyer, A. V. George. “The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Analytical Review 19 (1794) : 140-45.
    Ellis, Kate Ferguson. “Kidnapped Romance in Ann Radcliffe.” The Contested Castle. Urbana and Chicago: Illinois UP, 1989. 99-128.
    Enfield, William. “The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Monthly Review 15 (1794) : 278-83.
    Epstein, Heller Lynne. “Mrs. Radcliffe’s Landscapes: The Influence of Three Landscape Painters on her Nature Descriptions.” Hatrford Studies in Literature 1 (1969) : 107-20.
    Gatens, Moria. “ ‘The Oppressed State of my Sex’: Mary Wollstonecraft on Reason, Feeling and Equality.” Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory. Ed. Mary Lyndon Shanley and Carole Pateman. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991. 112-29.
    ---. Feminism and Philosophy: Perspective on Difference and Equality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991. 9-27.
    Genovese, Elizabeth Fox. Feminism Without Illusions: A Critique of Individualism. Chapel Hill: North Carolina UP, 1991.
    Graham, Kenneth W. “Emily’s Demon-Lover: The Gothic Revolution and The
    Mysteries of Udolpho.” Gothic Fictions: Prohibition/Transgression. New York: AMS Press, 1989. 163-71
    Grimshaw, Jean. “Mary Wollstonecraft and the Tensions in Feminist Philosophy.” Socialism, Feminism and Philosophy: A Radical Philosophy Reader. Ed. Sean Sayers and Peter Osborne. London and New York: Routledge. 9-26.
    Gray, Martin. A Dictionary of Literary Terms. London: Longman, 1992.
    Hume, David. Treatise of Human Nature. Ed. L A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Claredon Press, 1996. 231.
    Inchbald, Elizabeth. A Simple Story. Ed. J. M. S. Tompkins London: Oxford, 1998.
    Jacobus, Mary. “‘The Science of Herself’: Scenes of Female Enlightenment.” Romanticism, History, and the Possibilities of Gender: Re-forming Literature 1789-1837. Ed. Tilottama Rajan and Julia M. Wright. New York and London: Cambridge UP, 1998. 241-69.
    Johnson, Claudia L. Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender and Sentimentality in the 1790s Wollstonecraft, Radcliffe, Burney, Austen. Chicago: Chicago UP, 1995.
    Jones, Vivien, ed. Women in the Eighteenth Century. London: Routledge, 1990.
    Jump. Harriet Devine. Mary Wollstonecraft: Writer. London and New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994.
    Kavanaugh, Julia. “Mr. Radcliffe.” English Women of Letters: Biographical Sketches. London: 1863. 235-52.
    Kelly, Gray. “Women Novelist and the French Revolution Debate: Novelizing the
    Revolution/Revolutionizing the Novel.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 6.4 (1994) : 369-88.
    ---. English Fiction of the Romantic Period 1789-1830. London: Longman, 1989. 1-69.
    Lange, Lynda. “Rousseau and Modern Feminism.” Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory. Ed. Mary London Shanley and Carol Pateman. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991. 95-111.
    Lewis, Matthew G. The Life and Correspondence of M. G. Lewis I (1839) : 122-24.
    London, April. “Ann Radcliffe in Context: Making the Boundaries of The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Eighteenth-Century Life 10 (1979) : 34-57.
    Mackenize, Catriona. “Reason and Sensibility: The Idea of Women’s Self-Governance in the Writings of Mary Wollstonecraft.” Hypatia 8 (1993) : 35-55.
    Miles, Robert. Ann Radcliffe: The Great Enchantress. Manchester and New York: Manchester UP, 1995.
    Milton, John. Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained. New York and London: Signet, 1968.
    Myers, Mitzi. “Sensibility and the ‘Walk of Reason’: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Literary Reviews as Cultural Critique.” Sensibility in Transformation: Creative Resistance to Sentiment from the Augustans to the Romantics. Ed. Syndy McMillen Conger. London and Toronto: Associated UP, 1990. 121-44.
    Poovey, Mary. “Ideology and The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Criticism. 21.4 (1979) : 307-331.
    Pope, Alexander. An Essay on Men. Ed. Wolfgang Breidert. Hamburg: Meiner, 1993.
    Radcliffe, Ann. The Mysteries of Udolpho. Ed. Bonamy Dobrée. Oxford and London: Oxford UP, 1998.
    ---. “On the Supernatural in Poetry.” New Monthly Magazine 16 (1826) : 145-52.
    Reeve, Clara. The Old English Baron: A Gothic Story. Ed. James Trainer. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1977.
    Rogers, Deborah D., ed. The Critical Response to Ann Radcliffe. Westport, Connecticut and London: Greenwood Press, 1994.
    Rousseau, Jean Jacques. Émile. Trans. Barbara Foxley. London and New York: Everyman, 1957.
    Sambrook, James. The Eighteenth Century: The Intellectual and Cultural Context of Engligh Literature 1700-1789. New York: Longman, 1986.
    Shaftesbury, Anthony. “Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times.” Ed. Benjamin Rand. The Life, Unpublished Letters, and Philosophical Regimen of Anthony, Earl of Shaftesbury. London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1900. 403.
    Skinner, Gillian. Sensibility and Economics in the Novel, 1740-1800. New York: Macmillan, 1999.
    Spacks, Patricia Meyer. “Fathers and Daughters: Ann Radcliffe.” Desire and Truth. Chicago and London: Chicago UP, 1990. 147-74.
    Stoler, John Andrew. Ann Radcliffe: The Novel of Suspense and Terror. New York: Arno Press, 1980
    Todd, Janet, Sensibility. London and New York: Methuen, 1986
    ---. “‘The Great Enchantress’: Ann Radcliffe.” The Sign of Angellica: Women, Writing and Fiction 1660-1880. New York: Columbia UP, 1989. 253-72.
    Tompkins, J. M. S. The Popular Novel in England 1770-1800. Lincoln: Nebraska UP, 1961.
    Varma, Devendra. P. The Gothic Flame. New York: Russell and Russell, 1996.
    Voller, Jack G. The Supernatural Sublime. Northern: Illinois UP, 1994.
    Wang, Orrin N. C. “The Other Reasons: Female Alternative and Enlightenment Discourse in Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.” The Yale Journal of Criticism 5 (1991) : 129-49.
    Wardle, Ralph M. “The Intellectual and Historical Background of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.” A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Ed. Carol H. Poston. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company, 1975. 202-07.
    Whiting, Patricia. “Literal and Literary Representation of the Family in The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Eighteenth Century Fiction 8.4 (1996) : 485-501.
    Wollstonecraft, Mary. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Ed. Carol H. Poston. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company, 1975.
    ---. “A Vindication of the Rights of Men.” Ed. Janet Todd. A Wollstonecraft Anthology. UK: Polity Press, 1977. 64-83.
    ---. “Thoughts on the Education of Daughters.” Ed. Vivien Jones. Women in the Eighteenth Century. London: Routledge, 1990. 110-11.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學研究所
    87551008
    91
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0087551008
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    55100801.pdf12KbAdobe PDF2907檢視/開啟
    55100802.pdf10KbAdobe PDF2819檢視/開啟
    55100803.pdf13KbAdobe PDF2822檢視/開啟
    55100804.pdf44KbAdobe PDF2904檢視/開啟
    55100805.pdf62KbAdobe PDF21537檢視/開啟
    55100806.pdf47KbAdobe PDF21350檢視/開啟
    55100807.pdf56KbAdobe PDF21410檢視/開啟
    55100808.pdf55KbAdobe PDF21189檢視/開啟
    55100809.pdf22KbAdobe PDF21921檢視/開啟
    55100810.pdf24KbAdobe PDF21782檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋