政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33279
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50964131      Online Users : 938
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33279


    Title: 新聞訪談之「語用技巧」分析：以前提概念為例
    On Pragmatic Strategies in News Interviews
    Authors: 葉方珣
    Yeh,Fanghsun
    Contributors: 臧國仁
    葉方珣
    Yeh,Fanghsun
    Keywords: 前提
    問問題
    新聞訪談
    語用學
    丟面子問題
    前設
    presupposition
    questioning
    news interview
    pragmatic
    face-threatening acts
    presumption
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 15:57:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在討論新聞記者如何運用語用學之「前提」概念來引導受訪者回答，藉由「丟面子問題」質疑並挑戰受訪者「答非所問」之迴避回應。個案研究以一則平面政經新聞報導為言說分析之例，從主張與前提兩個語言單位來探究前提在訪談問答間扮演何種角色與功能。
    相關語言學文獻討論曾指出記者前提影響受訪者之回應面向。本文進一步認為，記者訪談前提往往誘導受訪者針對該前提回應(而非針對問題本身)，並藉助記者的背景知識與訪談對話以預設前提並挑戰受訪者。
    歸納個案文本的言說分析與個案記者訪談後，本研究發現，記者前提所產生的命題確實影響並誘導受訪者回應，並以記者的前設知識來探討前提技巧如何獲得受訪者更多、更深入的回應。整理上述提問、回應模式，本研究擬出語用前提作為「問好問題」之言談方法及雙方互動的橋樑，盼能提供訪談者一套語言策略。
    The goal of this research aims to explore how pragmatic presuppositions in news interviews influence the interaction of interlocutors, conducted by discourse analysis on assertions and presuppositions within each pair of questioning. By identifying the face-threatening questions which ends up leading the interviewee to non-reply responses, the case study concentrates on one public-figure interview in attempts to unveiling the tactics of placing presuppositions, added by the in-depth interview with the journalist of the case to take the speaker’s meaning into account.
    The result of this research enabled the author to discover the interaction of presupposition in the form of propositions between the interlocutors that leads the interviewee’s response to challenge the journalist’s presuppostions. The researcher also found evidences indicating the presumption of the journalist produces presuppostion as well as the response, which enables this research to develop a pragmatic strategy of news interview based on the use of presuppositions.
    Reference: 江靜之(2006)。〈尋找理想的廣電新聞訪問者：論述角度之探析〉。政治大學新聞所博士論文。
    周世箴譯(2006)。《我們賴以生存的譬喻》。台北：聯經。(原書Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. [1980]. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.)
    俞明瑤(2003)。〈新聞訪談提問之立足點研究〉。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    翁維薇(2000)。〈新聞訪問之追問研究－以模糊及迴避回答為例〉。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    徐炳勳譯（1995）。《套出真相》，台北：卓越文化。(原書Huber, J. T. & Diggins, D. [1991]. Interviewing America’s Top Interviewers: Nineteen Top Interviewers Tell All About What They Do. Secaucus. NJ: Carol Pub. Group.)
    張文強（2005）。〈新聞工作的常規樣貌：平淡與熱情的對峙〉。《新聞學研究》，第八十四期：1-40。
    臧國仁(1999)。《新聞媒體與消息來源：媒介框架與真實建構之論述》。台北：三民。
    臧國仁、鍾蔚文（1994）。〈記者如何問問題〉。臧國仁主編，《新聞學與術的對話》。台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所。
    Arminen, I. (2000). On the Context Sensitivity of Institutional Interaction. Discourse & Society, 11(4), 435-458.
    Bekalu, M. A. (2006). Presupposition in News Discourse. Discourse & Society, 17(2), 147-172.
    Biagi, S. (1986). Interviews That Work: A Practical Guide for Journalists. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    Boudier, S. (1988). Toward a History of the Question. In M. Meyer (Ed.), Question and Questioning (pp. 9-35). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    Bull, P. (1994). On Identifying Questions, Replies, and Non-replies in Political Interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13: 115-31.
    Bull, P. E. & Mayer, K. (1993). How Not to Answer Questions in Political Interviews. Political Psychology, 14: 651- 66.
    Cheng, M. (2002). The Standoff – What is Unsaid ? A Pragmatic Analysis of the Conditional Marker “if”. Discourse Studies, 13(3), 309-317.
    Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
    Clayman, S. & Heritage, J. (2002). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Dillon, J. T. (1990). The Practice of Questioning. New York: Routledge.
    Ekstrom, M. (2001). Politicians Interviewed on Television News. Discourse & Society, 12(5): 563-584.
    Fasold, R. W. (1990). Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
    Feldstein, M. (2003). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(2), 470-471.
    Frege, G. (1952). On Sense of Reference. In P. T. Geach and M. Black (Eds.) Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 56-78.
    Grundy, P. (2000). Doing Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Hajicova, E. (1983). On Some Aspects of Presuppositions of Questions. In F. Kiefer (Ed.), Questions and Answers (pp. 85-96). Boston: D. Reidel Publishing.
    Harris, S. (1991). Evasive Action: How Politicians Respond to Questions in Political Interviews. In P. Scannell (Ed), Broadcast Talk (pp. 76-99). London: Sage.
    Heritage, J. (1997). Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (pp. 222-244). London: Sage.
    Heritage, J. & Greatbatch, D. (1991). On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interview. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis (pp. 91-137). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    Jiang, XiangYing. (2006). Cross-cultural Pragmatic Differences in US and Chinese Press Conferences: the Case of North Korea Nuclear Crisis, Discourse & Society, 17(2): 237-57.
    Joshi, A. K. (1983). Varieties of Cooperative Responses in Question-Answer Systems. In F. Kiefer (Ed.), Questions and Answers (pp. 229-240). Hingham, MA: Kluwer Academic.
    Jucker, A. H. (1986). News Interviews: A Pragmalinguistic Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publication.
    Karttunen, L. (1973). Presuppositions of Compound Sentences. Linguistic Inquiry, 4, 169-93.
    Katz, J. J. & Fodor, J. A. (1963). The Structure of a semantic theory. Language, 39, 170-210.
    Kiefer, F. (1983). Introduction. In F. Kiefer (Ed.), Questions and Answers (pp. 1-8). Boston: D. Reidel Publishing.
    Kiefer, F. (1988). On the Pragmatics of Answers. In M. Meyer (Ed.), Questions and Questioning (pp. 255-279). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    Koshik, I. (2003). Wh-questions Used as Challengers. Discourse Studies, 5(1), 51-77.
    Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    Levinson, S. C. (1995). Three Levels of Meaning. In F. R. Paulmer (Ed.), Grammar and Meaning: Essays in Honor of Sir John Lyons (pp. 90-115). Cambridge, UK: Cup.
    Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Lipari, L. (winter, 1996). Journalistic authority: Textual strategies of Legitimation. Journalism Quarterly, 73 (4), 821-834.
    Lorda, C. U. & Miche, E. (2006). Two Institutional Interviews : Jose Maria Aznar and Jacques Chirac on the Iraq Conflict. Discourse Society, 17(4): 447-472.
    Napoli, D. J. (1996). Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Platt, J. (2002). The History of the Interview. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of Interview Research: Context & Method (pp. 33-54). London: Sage.
    Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    Roth, A. L. (2005). ‘Pop Quizzes’ on the Campaign Trail: Journalists, Candidates, and the Limit of Questioning. Harvard International Journal of Press/politics, 10(2), 28-46.
    Russell, B. (1905). On Denoting. In J. Mackie & P. Mackie (Eds.), Logic and Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Saeed, J. I. (2003). Semantics (2nd Ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
    Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
    Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. New York : Cambridge University Press.
    Schlick, M. (1988). Unanserable Questions ? In M. Meyer (Ed.), Questions and Questioning (pp. 36-40). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford : Basil Blackwell.
    Stenstrom, A. Brita. (1988). Questioning in Conversation. In M. Meyer (Ed.), Question and Questioning (pp. 304-326). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. New York: Longman.
    Thornborrow, J. (2001). Questions, Control and the Organization of Talk in Calls to a Radio Phone-in. Discourse Studies, 3(1), 119-143.
    Vandenbergen, S. & Marie, A. (1996). Image-Building Through Modality: The Case of Political Interviews. Discourse & Society, 7(3), 389-415.
    Wimmer, R. D. & Dominick, J. R. (2003). Mass Media Research: An Introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    Wooffitt, R. (2001). Researching Psychic Practitioners: Conversation Analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor and S. J. Yates (Eds.) Discourse as Data. London: Sage, pp. 49-92.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    新聞研究所
    93451009
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0934510091
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Journalism] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    009101.pdf45KbAdobe PDF2838View/Open
    009102.pdf64KbAdobe PDF2957View/Open
    009103.pdf66KbAdobe PDF29935View/Open
    009104.pdf64KbAdobe PDF2793View/Open
    009105.pdf881KbAdobe PDF22664View/Open
    009106.pdf93KbAdobe PDF21073View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback