政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33122
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113325/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51169813      Online Users : 759
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33122


    Title: 產品類型與新奇屬性類型之產品不一致性對產品再認和態度的影響-以消費者創新性為調節變項
    The effects of incongruity of product type and novel attributes type on product recognition and product attitude: Using consumer innovativeness as a moderator
    Authors: 蘇相穎
    Su, Cathy
    Contributors: 張卿卿博士
    蘇相穎
    Su, Cathy
    Keywords: 新奇屬性
    產品不一致性
    消費者創新性
    novel attributes
    product incongruity
    consumer innovativeness
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 15:33:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 市場上新奇的產品層出不窮，廠商想盡辦法要對產品添加新奇的屬性來達到差異化，但是真正能夠藉由添加新奇屬性在市場上找到利基的廠商卻是少之又少。問題是否出在消費者在面對與既有基模不一致的新產品時，無法理解和吸收資訊？上述現象引發了研究者的興趣。本研究藉由操弄不同類型的產品和新奇屬性，觀察其所產生的產品不一致性對於消費者的產品再認和產品態度有何影響；同時也探討消費者本身的人格特質-消費者創新性，會不會影響消費者對產品的態度。

    以往研究均認為增加產品不一致性可以提高消費者對於產品的回憶和再認，但本研究卻發現，提高產品的不一致性並無法讓人留下較為深刻的印象，因此產品不一致性與再認之間的關係可能仍有待後續研究做進一步的釐清。另外，雖然產品類型和新奇屬性類型無法產生交互作用，並藉由提升產品不一致性來影響產品態度，但是「產品類型」在影響產品不一致性且進而提升產品態度上的確是扮演著重要的角色。其中「功能性商品」不管是搭配上何種類型的新奇屬性，產品態度都顯著高於「享樂性商品」與新奇屬性的搭配。由此可知，如果廠商想要在市場上推出新奇的產品，選擇功能性的商品來切入可能比較有利，而且在操弄產品不一致性時也必須要格外小心，雖然新奇的屬性可以提升消費者對產品的評價，但是新奇性同時也會增加產品的不一致性，一旦產品不一致性過高，反而會造成消費者對於產品的負面觀感。
    There are numerous novel products in the market; consequently marketers have been fighting their way to achieve product differentiation by adding novel attributes to the products, yet it is still rare to see marketers that can actually discover niche by adding novel attributes to products. Does the problem lies in how consumers percept and absorb the information of advertisements? The phenomenon above arouses my curiosity to delve into the relation between product incongruity and consumer evaluations. This study examines what influences product incongruity has on product recognition and product attitude by manipulating different types of products and novel attributes, and the moderating role of consumers’ personality is also examined to see whether consumer innovativeness have effects on product attitude or not.

    The past researches tend to believe that raising product incongruity is beneficial to enhancing product recall and product recognition. However, the result shows that raising product incongruity is of no help to leave deep impression in the products. Thus the relation between product incongruity and product recognition needs to be further clarified by future researches. Additionally, although product types and novel attributes do not interact to have effects on product incongruity and further boost product attitude, ‘product type’ indeed plays a crucial role on boosting product incongruity and enhancing product attitude. Not only product type leads to positive effects on the products, but consumers are apt to give more positive evaluations to utilitarian product than hedonic product, regardless of what novel attributes the products have. In that case, it seems to be more profitable to choose utilitarian products if marketers want to launch novel merchandise. In spite of the fact that adding novel attributes leads to positive product attitude, novelty also leads to more product incongruity that may undermine consumers’ attitude toward the product. The result seems to suggest that marketers have to be extraordinarily cautious when manipulating product incongruity.
    Reference: 中文部分
    李美華等人編譯（2004）。《社會科學研究方法》。台北：時英。（原書：Babbie, E. [2001]. The practice of social research. Wadsworth.）
    朱怡璇（2005）。《從個體的享樂與實用消費價值，探討廣告訴求呈現、產品功能屬性對廣告說服效果的影響—以科技產品為例》。國立政治大學廣播電視學研究所碩士論文。
    李佳淩（2004）。《消費者特性、消費者創新性與新產品採用關係之實證研究》。台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    李彥弘（2002）。《消費者特性與網路使用經驗對網路購物之影響－以上海、台北學生為例》。中央大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
    范勻瑄（2005）。《從個人差異看商品設計美感的效果--以消費者商品美感中心性(CVPA)為例》。國立政治大學廣告研究所碩士論文。
    鄭雅瑄（2005）。《產品包裝不一致性對包裝吸引力及產品評價之影響：產品類別及自我監控調和效果之探討》。元智大學國際企業學系碩士論文。
    英文部分
    Aaker, D. A., Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 27-41.
    Batra, R., Ahtola, O. T. (1990). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159-170.
    Baumgartner, H., Steenkamp, E. M. (1996). Exploratory consumer buying behavior: conceptualization and measurement. Research in Marketing, 13(1996), 121-137.
    Bayus, B. L., Im, S. (2003). An Empirical Study of Innate Consumer Innovativeness, Personal Characteristics, and New-Product Adoption Behavior. Journal of the
    Academy of Marketing Science, 31(1), 61-73.
    Berlyne, D. E., Craw, M. A., Salapatek, P. H., Lewis, J. L. (1963). Novelty, complexity, incongruity, extrinsic motivation, and the GSR. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(6),560-567.
    Broniarczyk, S. M., Alba, J. W. (1994). The role of consumer’s intuitions in inference making. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 393-407.
    Campbell M. C., Goodstein, R. C. (2001). The moderating effect of perceived risk on consumers’ evaluations of product incongruity: preference for the norm, Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 439-449.
    Carpenter, G. S., Glazer, R., Nakamoto, K. (1994). Meaningful brands from meaningless differentiation: the dependence on irrelevant attributes. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(August), 339-350.
    Citrin, A. K., Sprott, D. E., Silverman, S. N., and Stem, D. E. (2000). Adoption of internet shopping: the role of consumer innovativeness. Industrial Management + Data Systems, 100(7), 294.
    Cotte, J., Wood, S. L. (2004). Families and innovative consumer behavior: a triadic analysis of sibling and parental influence. Journal of Consumer Research,31(2).78-86
    Coulter, K. S. (1998). The effects of affective responses to media context on advertising evaluations. Journal of Advertising, 27 (4), 41-52.
    Cox, D. S., Locander, W. B. (1987). Product novelty: does it moderate the relationship between ad attitudes and brand attitudes? Journal of Advertising, 16(3), 39-44.
    Deutskens, E., Jong, A., Ruyter, K, Martin W. (2006). Comparing the generalizability of online and mail surveys in cross-national service quality research, Marketing Letters, 17, 119-136.
    Dhar, R., Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 60-71.
    Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.
    Einhorn, H. J., Hogarth, R. M. (1986). Decision making under ambiguity. The Journal of Business, 59(4), 225-250.
    Fiske, Susan. T. (1982). Schema-triggered affect: Applications to social perception. Affect and Cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates, 55-78.
    Furnham, A., Gunter, B., and Richardson, F. (2002). Effects of product-program congruity and viewer involvement on memory for televised advertisements. Journal of
    Applied Social Psychology, 32 (1), 124-141.
    Goldsmith, R. E. (2001). Using the domain specific innovativeness scale to identify innovative internet consumers, Internet Research, 11(2), 149-158.
    Goldsmith, R. E., Hofacker, C. F. (1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3)209-221
    Heckler, S. E., Childers, T. L. (1992). The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal and visual information: what is incongruency? Journal of Consumer Research, 18(March), 475-492.
    Hirshman, E. C. (1980). Innovativeness, novelty seeking and consumer creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 283-295.
    Hirschman, E. C., Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92-101.
    Hirunyawipada, T., Paswan, A. K. (2006). Consumer innovativeness and perceived risk: implications for high technology product adoption, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(4), 182-198.
    Houston, M. J., Childers, T. L., & Heckler, S. E. (1987). Picture-word consistency and elaborative processing of advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research,24(4), 359-369.
    Huber, J., McCann, J. (1982). The impact of inferential beliefs on product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 324-333.
    Hudson, E. S. (2004). The pretrial evaluation of innovative, new products: The effect of schema incongruity on the processing and effectiveness of advertising, and the evaluation of innovative, new attributes, Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
    Hynes, N., Lo, S. (2006). Innovativeness and consumer involvement in the Chinese market. Singapore Management Review, 28(2), 31-46.
    Jagre, E., Watson, J. J., & Watson, J. G. (2001). Sponsorship and congruity theory: a theoretical framework for explaining consumer attitude and recall of sponsorship event. Advances in Consumer Research, 28(1), 439-445.
    Johnson, B. (2006, November 20). Consumers cite past experience as the No. 1 influencer when buying. Advertising Age, p21.
    Joseph, B., & Vyas, J. S. (1984). Concurrent validity of a measure of innovative cognitive style. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 12(1), 159-175.
    Kamins, M. A., Marks, L. J., and Skinner, D. (1991). Television commercial evaluation in the context of program induced mood: congruency versus consistency effects. Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 1-14.
    Kempf, D. S. (1999). Attitude formation from product trial: distinct roles of cognition and affect for hedonic and functional products. Psychology & Marketing, 16(1), 35-50.
    Lageat, T., Czellar, T., and Laurent, G. (2003). Engineering hedonic attributes to generate perceptions of luxury: Consumer perception of an everyday sound. Marketing Letters, 14(2), 97–109,
    Lane, V. R. (2000). The impact of ad repetition and ad content on consumer perceptions of incongruent extensions. Journal of Marketing, 64(2), 80-91.
    Mandler, G.., Marget, S. C., Susan, T., and Fiske, H. (1982). The structure of value: accounting for taste. Paper presented at the Affect and Cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates, 22
    Manning, K. C., Bearden, W. O., Madden, T. J. (1995). Consumer innovativeness and the adoption process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(4), 329-345.
    Meyers-Levy, J., Louie, T. A., Curren, M. T. (1994). How does the congruity of brand names affect evaluations of brand name extensions? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 46-53.
    Meyers-Levy, J., Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 39-54.
    Midgley, D. F., Dowling, G. R. (1978). Innovativeness: the concept and its measurement, Journal of Consumer Research, 4(2), 229-242.
    Midgley, D. F., Dowling, G. R. (1993). A longitudinal study of product form innovation: the interaction between predispositions and social messages, Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4), 611-625.
    Moe, W. W., Fader, P. S. (2001). Modeling hedonic portfolio products: a joint segmentation analysis of music compact disc sales. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 376-385.
    Moore, R. S., Stammerjohan C. A., Coutler, R. A. (2005). Banner advertiser-web site congruity and color effects on attention and attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 71-84.
    Mooreman, M., Neijens, P. C., Smit, E. G. (2002). The effects of magazine-induced psychological responses and thematic congruence on memory and attitude toward the ad in a real-life setting. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 27-40.
    Mukherjee, A. (1998). The effect of novel attributes on product evaluation explaining consumer resistance to technological innovation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
    Mukherjee, A., Hoyer , W. D. (2001). The effect of novel attributes on product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 462-472.
    Sujan, M., Bettman, J. R., & Sujan, H. (1986). Effects of consumer expectations on information processing in selling encounters. Journal of Marketing Research, 13(November), 346-353.
    Sundar, S. S. (1999). Effect of source attribution on perception of online news stories. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(1), 55-68
    Venkatraman, M. P. (1991). The impact of innovativeness and innovation type on adoption. Journal of Retailing, 67(1), 51-67.
    Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., and Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude, Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310-322.
    Woods, W. A. (1960). Psychological dimensions of consumer decision. Journal of Marketing. 24(1), 15-19.
    Wilkie WL. (1990) Consumer Behavior, 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
    網站部分
    二十三區購物網網站。http://www.zone23.com.tw/
    名人3C量販網站。http://www.mren.com.tw/
    〈創市際市場研究顧問網站新聞室〉。上網日期：。取自：創市際市場研究顧問公司網站：
    http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_12_20_06.html
    〈創市際市場研究顧問網站新聞室〉。上網日期：。取自：創市際市場研究顧問公司網站：
    http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_11_13_06.html
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    廣告研究所
    94452004
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094452004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Advertising] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    200401.pdf46KbAdobe PDF21206View/Open
    200402.pdf203KbAdobe PDF2998View/Open
    200403.pdf73KbAdobe PDF21069View/Open
    200404.pdf134KbAdobe PDF21044View/Open
    200405.pdf93KbAdobe PDF21095View/Open
    200406.pdf258KbAdobe PDF25857View/Open
    200407.pdf93KbAdobe PDF23288View/Open
    200408.pdf292KbAdobe PDF21903View/Open
    200409.pdf278KbAdobe PDF21360View/Open
    200410.pdf159KbAdobe PDF21404View/Open
    200411.pdf85KbAdobe PDF21796View/Open
    200412.pdf1731KbAdobe PDF22224View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback