政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33090

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33090

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51028263 Online Users : 980

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Communication > EMA Program in Communication > Theses > Item 140.119/33090

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33090

Title:	「名人政治」的新聞框架－馬英九不同從政時期新聞報導之比較 How newspapers frame political celebrity? The case of Ma Ying-jeou
Authors:	邱宜儀 Chiu,Yi-Yi
Contributors:	蘇蘅 Su,Herng 邱宜儀 Chiu,Yi-Yi
Keywords:	民主新聞媒體名人政治新聞框架馬英九 democracy news media celebrity politics news frame Ma Ying-jeou
Date:	2007
Issue Date:	2009-09-17 15:28:40 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究以政治人物馬英九為例，探討台灣主要報紙是否出現「名人政治」現象，並探討「名人政治」的新聞框架為何？有何主要特質？呈現的方式是否和傳統政治新聞報導不同？研究對象為自由時報、聯合報及中國時報三家報紙從馬英九從擔任台北市長起至卸任國民黨主席止的新聞報導。以等距抽樣法抽取864則新聞進行分析。研究發現三家主要報紙報導馬英九新聞時都出現「名人政治」的新聞框架，其中以「政治風格」的框架最為顯著，報紙重視政治姿態、品行道德的領導能力描述，另外，報紙也常用「背景故事」把名人私領域的生活面向帶入公領域。「馬英九現象」和「個人特質」、「背景故事」和「社會互動」等框架的論述密切相關，因此確實減少了公共政策或政治議題的報導數量，不過不同報紙的框架仍有差異，隨著馬英九政治位置的重要性，名人政治的新聞框架也有所變化。但就馬英九這位政治人物來說，台灣主要報紙確實出現個人特質和政治風格鮮明的「名人化」現象。 In a time when it is commonplace for political celebrities to garner media attention as much media attention for their political performance as for their particular personal life. The author wanted to analyze a famous political figure Ma Ying-jeou to learn the process of celebrification coupled with Gans description of the norms of news reporting, the following indicators would suggest celebrification of political content. The author used the news stories from three major newspapers in Taiwan as sample to find out elements of a celebrity that would attract the journalists as well as media organizations. The result showed that the strategies were utilized to sell the political celebrity was similar to those of the Western media.
Reference:	一、中文部分王石番（1991）。《傳播內容分析法》。臺北：幼獅。王建雄（2006）。《政務決策與落實過程中政治庸俗化之影響－以台灣中程施政計畫中高教改革為例》。東海大學政治學系碩士論文。王家俊（2006年10月17日）。〈李敖：馬英九軟弱　國民黨倒閣案放水〉，《中央社》。上網日期：95年10月20日，取自http://news.sina.com/cna/101-102-101-101/2006-10-16/20151420390.html 王渡（2002）。《馬英九現象》。臺北：普天。王慧馨（2005）。《二○○四年報紙報導總統選舉新聞的政治偏差》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。江孟穎（2003）。《首長形象建構之研究 - 以台北市與高雄市政府新聞稿為例》。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。朱錦華（2005年12月13日）。〈政治偶像，媒體寵兒〉，《民生報》（香港），A3版。余紀忠（2000）。〈精勤惕勵，無私無懼——五十年的信念與秉持〉。收錄在中國時報編《中國時報五十年》，頁5-21。台北：中國時報社。谷玲玲（2006）。〈傳統報業及電子報發展前景〉，《行政院新聞局2006出版年鑑》。上網日期：97年2月10日，取自http://www.gio.gov.tw/info/publish/yearbook/95/02-05.htm 李人豪（2005）。〈電視新聞中立法委員表演行為比例探討：非選舉與選舉期比較〉，《2005年中華傳播學會年會》，臺北縣深坑。上網日期：96年2月2日，取自：http://ccs.nccu.edu.tw/2005students.htm 李人豪（2005）。〈政治人物表演行為之媒體再現：以立法委員的電視新聞報導為例〉。國立政治大學廣播電視學研究所碩士論文。李東展（2005）。《喬丹商品收藏迷的資訊尋求行為研究》。世新大學資訊傳播研究所碩士論文。林文益譯（1997）。《政治傳播學》。台北：風雲論壇。（原書McNair B. [1995].An Introduction to Political Communication. London: Routledge.）林瑜霜（2002）。《二○○二年台北市長選舉候選人新聞媒體守門研究》。私立中國文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文。金溥聰 (1997)。〈報紙的形象設定效果研究：以民國八十三年台北市長選舉為例〉，《新聞學研究》，55: 203-223。吳璧如（2003）。《「總統形象塑造之研究--以陳水扁總統之媒體呈現為例」》。東吳大學政治學系碩士論文。袁千雯（2005）。《時尚消費、名人效應的閱聽人接收分析」》。國立台灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。徐子樵（2006年10月19日）。〈本土味馬英九就欠這一味〉。《新台灣新聞周刊》。上網日期：95年10月24日，取自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/marticle/url/d/a/061003/12/4wm0.html 徐子樵（2006年10月19日）。〈泛藍共主洗牌？施明德等著收割〉《新台灣新聞週刊》。上網日期：95年10月20日，取自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/marticle/url/d/a/061012/12/59hl.html 孫哲、沈國麟 (2002）。〈美國政治中的媒體與國會選舉〉。《美國研究》。2: 66-78。唐梅江（2003）。〈政治媒體化：當代西方媒體與政治關係的型態分析〉，《求索》，1: 90-92。馬維敏（2001年2月20日）。〈馬維敏專欄－馬英九的機會與危機〉，《中國時報》。上網日期：95年10月24日，取自 http://news.chinatimes.com/Chinatimes/senior/rd-seniorcontent/0,2127,17060201+172001021902588,00.html 倪鴻祥（2001年8月19日）。〈馬英九南下輔選政治行情看漲〉，《東森新聞報》。上網日期：95年8月1日，取自http://gb.ettoday.com.tw/2001/08/19/141-554728.htm 康若曄 (2006年3月22日)。。〈馬英九赴美資格考蘇貞昌島內拚政績〉。《亞洲時報》。上網日期：96年2月11日，取自http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/6/3/22/n1263211.htm 范陵嘉（2005年12月4日）。〈國民黨大贏泛藍共主態勢底定馬直奔2008大位〉。《聯合報》，A3版。范陵嘉（2006年6月2日）。〈蘇揆掌權馬討不到便宜〉。《聯合報》，A4版。邱金蓮（2003）。《旅館業服務接觸之研究— 管理者、員工及顧客觀點之比較》。大葉大學事業經營研究所碩士班論文。黃少梅（2002）。《前總統李登輝卸任後之媒體形象－以聯合報、中國時報、自由時報三大報相關事件報導之分析》。國立臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。黃兆慧（2005年9月）。〈馬英九靠耳語戰當選？〉。《動腦雜誌》。上網日期：95年8月6日，取自http://magazine.sina.com.tw/brain/353/2006-01-09/21541165.shtml 黃秀（1998）。《政治人物在大眾傳播媒介中的形象研究--以台視,中視,民視,及無線衛星電視台對陳水扁報導為例》。國立政治大學廣播電視學系碩士論文。黃忠榮（2006年1月7日）。〈馬副主委的主張馬主席忘光光？〉。《自由時報》。上網日期：96年2月11日，取自http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2006/new/jan/7/today-fo3.htm 黃振家譯（2003）。《大眾媒體研究》。台北：學富文化。（原書Wimmer, R. D., & J. R. Dominick [1983]. Mass media research: An introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.）黃國樑、唐孝民（2006年6月10日）。〈7百天後的馬英九…還是問號〉，《聯合晚報》，4版。黃惠鈴（1997）。《報紙如何報導總統選舉新聞》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。曾薏蘋（2006年10月23日）。〈李：扁執政六年不合格都為私利〉，《中國時報》，A2版。郁嬿如（1996）。《國際媒體對中華民國總統大選的報導－以紐約時報、國際論壇報為例》。淡江大學大眾傳播學系碩士論文。張玉玲（2006）。《臺灣報紙對319槍擊事件的新聞報導之研究─比較聯合報、中國時報、蘋果日報、自由時報》。世新大學新聞研究所碩士論文。許國賢（2005）。〈民主的政治成本〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，17(2)：271-297。游淑惠、楊少騏（2006年10月5日）。〈馬科長就祇會「依法行政」〉，《中國時報》。上網日期：95年10月24日，取自http://news.chinatimes.com/Chinatimes/newslist/newslist-content/0,3546,130501+132006100500933,00.html 葛永光（2005年9月）。〈國民黨主席選舉－意義與挑戰〉，《台灣民主季刊》，2(3): 125-131。陳文浩（2002年10月15日）。〈「慢」跑、「軟」網何罪之有？－吳淑珍女士批馬，運動迷傷感〉，《國政評論》，教文（評）091-156號。上網日期：95年9月29日，取自http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/EC/091/EC-C-091-156.htm 楊鎮全（2006年10月23日）。TVBS-N新聞。台北：TVBS。陳函謙（2006年9月15日）。〈政績66.7分獲頒畢業證書議員要馬英九進總統府深造〉，《中國時報》，C2版。陳芸芸、劉慧雯譯（2004）。《特新大眾傳播理論》。台北：韋伯文化出版社。( 原書McQuail, D. .[2000]. Mass Communication Theory, 4th ed. London：SAGE Publications. 陳裕仁（2003）《名人代言人與產品相關度之研究》。輔仁大學大眾傳播學研究所碩士論文。陳詩婷（2006年3月28日）。〈心結不再？王金平：大家對他有好感就是馬英九現象〉，《東森新聞報》。上網日期：95年9月3日，取自http://news.yam.com/ettoday/politics/200603/20060328406894.html 陳憶寧（2004）。〈媒體議題與公眾議題演化過程之探討：以2002年台北市長選舉為例〉，《新聞學研究》，81:125-126。陳憶寧（2002）。〈公共議題之遊戲框架初探：以核四議題為例〉，《新聞學研究》。72: 85-117。繆宇綸（2006年8月10）。〈就任一週年「馬英九主席」的問題〉，《中國時報》。上網日期：95年9月3日，取自http://news.chinatimes.com/Chinatimes/newslist/newslist-content/0,3546,110101+112006081000690,00.html 謝佳珍（2006年7月13日）。〈周玉蔻自我推銷選市長不貪不涉弊〉，《中央社》。上網日期：95年10月20日，取自 http://times.hinet.net/news/20060713/polity/59ef01ef51e0.htm 謝銘金（2004）。《品牌名稱、公關報導、名人代言及消費者知識對品牌聯想與顧客回應之研究－以生技化妝保養品為例》。國立台灣大學企業管理系碩士論文。蔡筱穎譯（2000）。《布赫迪厄論電視》。台北：麥田。（原書Bourdeu P.[1996]. Sur la television. Paris: Liber editions.）鄭瑞城(1991)。〈從消息來源途徑詮釋近用媒介權：台灣的驗證〉，《新聞學研究》第45期。薛支川（2005）。〈”硬新聞娛樂化”失誤類型分析及對策〉，《上饒師範學院學報》，2: 112-114。羅文輝、鍾蔚文（1992） <報紙與電視如何報導民國八十年的選舉>，《亞洲協會專題研究報告》。蕭振輝（1997）。《報紙報導政黨形象之研究--以聯合報，中國時報，自由時報為例》。中國文化大學新聞學系研究所碩士論文。蘇蘅（2001年）。《報紙新聞「小報化」的趨勢分析》。（國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，NSC 89-2412-H-004-031）。臺北：國立政治大學新聞系。〈「挑戰國民黨，挑戰2008，馬英九出任國民黨第六任國民黨主席」火線話題系列報導〉（無日期）。上網日期：96年6月2日，取自中央廣播電台網頁：http://www.rti.org.tw/big5/topic/taiwan/kmt01/5-3.html 〈呂秀蓮：學歷接近但行政經歷比馬英九高〉（2007年5月2日）。上網日期：96年6月2日，取自中央社網頁：http://www.rti.org.tw/big5/topic/taiwan/kmt01/5-3.html 二、英文部分 American Institute for Political Communication. (1970). Anatomy of a crucial election. Washington, D. C.: American Institute for Political Communication. Ankersmit, F. R. (1990). De navel van de geschiedenis. Groningen: Historische Uitgeverij. Ankersmit, F.R. (1996). Aesthetic politics. Stanfordl: Stanford University Press. Ankersmit, F. R. (1997). History and tropology : The rise and fall of metaphor. Berkeley: University of California Press. Ankersmit, F. R. (2002). Aesthtic politics : political philosophy beyond fact and value. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Almond, Gabriel A. and G.. Bingham Powell, Jr. (1966). Comparative politics : A development approach. Boston: Little Brown Company. Baym, N. (2000). Tune in, log on: Soap, fandom and online community. London: Sage. Bennett, W. L. (2003). Lifestyle politics and citizen-consumers: identity, communication and political action in late modern political. In J. Corner & D. Pels (Eds.), Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity, cynicism (pp. 41-66). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.　 Berlson, B.（1952）. Conntent analysis in communication research. Glencoe, Ill. : The Free Press. Beck, U. and Beck-Gerrnsheim, E. ( 2002 ). Individualization. London: Fontana. Breed, W. (1955). Social control in the newsroom: A functional analysis. Social Forces , 33 : 326-355. Campell, A. (1966). Interpreting the presidential victory, in M. C. Cunnings Jr. (Ed.), The national election of 1964. Washington, D. C.: The Brookings Institution. Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Corner, J. (2003). Mediated persona and political culture. In J. Corner & D. Pels (Eds.), Media and the restyling of politics: consumerism, celebrity, cynicism (pp. 67-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.　 Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). Behavioral dimensions of charismatic leadership. In J. A. Conger & R. N. Kanungo (Eds.), Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness (pp. 78–97). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Crick, B. (2002). Democracy: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Downing, M. (1980). American TV drama-men, women, sex, and love, in M. J. Voigt and G. J. Hanneman( Eds.), Progress in communication science ( vol.Ⅱ ). New Jersey: Ablex. Dowd, M. (2000). Liberties: Tin cup cuple. New York Times, September 24. Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing US coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41 (4), 6-26. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58. Hendrickson and Wilkins (April 30, 2007). The Political is the personal: Celebritizing politicians in the 21st Century. Student papers on program at 2007 International Communication Association Conference. http://www.journalism.missouri.edu/news/2007/04-30-ica-conference.html Gamson, J. (1994). Claims to fame: Celebrity in contemporary America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Gamson, W. A. and Modigliani, A (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology 95(1), 1-37. Gamson, W. A. (1984). What’s news : A game simulation of TV news. NY: The Free Press. Gans, H. (1979). Deciding what’s news : A study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon Books. Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press. Giorgetti, C. (2001).‘Dress, politics, and fashion, 1960- 80’, in L. Cheles and L. Sponza(Eds.), The art persuation : Political communication in Italy from 1945 to the 1990s. Manchester: Manchester Unviersity Press. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkley: University of California Press. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday. Grossberg, L., Nelson, C., and Treichler, P. A. (Eds.), (1992). Cultural studies. New York and London: Routledge. Hallin, D. C. and Macini, P. (1984). Political structure and representational form in US and Italian TV news, Theory and Society , 13(40): 829-850. Holmes, M. (2000). When is th the personal political? The president`s penis and other stories. Sociology 34(2), 305-321. Holsi, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Horton, D, and Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observation on intimacy at a distance. In G. Gumpert & R. Cathcart (Eds.), Inter/Media Interpersonal communication and the media world (1979, ed.) . 32-55. House, R.J., and Howell, J.M., (1992). Personality and charismatic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 3(2): 81-108. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291. Kerlinger, Fred N. (1986). Foundation of behavior research. New York : Holy, Rinehart and Winston. Kleinrensink, J. (2001). Partijen zonder ideologie geven LN de ruimte, Volkskrant, June 12. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis : An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage publications. Kwon, Up. (1992). Organizational culture and relational role behaviors in service encounters: an empirical test of relationship retailing. Doctoral dissertation. The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL. Isaak, A. C. (1981). Scope and methods of political science, (3d ed.). Illinois: The Dorsey Press. Lawrence, R. G. (2000). Game-framing the issues: Tracking the strategy frame in public policy news. Political Communication, 17, 93-114. Lee-Mashment, J. (2001). The marriage of politics and marketing, Political studies, 49(4): 692-713. Lipton, J. (1981). Soap opera are for real, in B. Cole(ed.). Television Today. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. Marshall, P. D. (1997). Celebrity and power. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. McGrath, J. E. and McGrath, M. F. (1962). Effects of partisanship on perceptions of political figures, Public Opinion Quarterly, 26 : 236-248. McLaren, M. (2000). Ignore these nasty politicians, London needs an independent voice. Independent, Febuary 8, Accessed at http:// news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=9816 (April 5, 2007) Meyer, T. (2002). Media democracy: How the media colonise politics. Cambridge: Polity. Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Miller, A., Wattenberg, M. and Malanchuk, O. (1986). Schematic assesments of presidential candidates. American Political Science Review. 80, 521-540. Muir, K. (2005). Media darling and falling stars: Celebrity and reporting of political leaders. Westminster Papers in Communication Culture. 2(2), 54-71. Mumford, L. S. (1995). Love and ideology in the afternoon: Soap ppera, women, and television genre. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Newcomb, H. (1974). TV: The most popular Art. N.Y. : Anchor Books. Nimmo, D. and Savage, R. L. (1976). Candidates and their images: Concepts, methods, and findings. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publishing Company, Inc. Ober, J. (1989). Mass and elite in democratic Athens. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Olson, David M. (1994). Democratic legislative institutions. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc. O’Sullivan, T., Hartley, J., Saunders, D., Montgomery, M., and Fiske, J. (1994). Key conception in communication and cultural studies (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge. Pan, Z. D., and Kosicki. G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10 (1), 55-75. Pels, D. (2003). Aesthetic representation and political style: Re-balancing identity and difference in media democracy. In J. Corner and D. Pels (Eds.), Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity, cynicism (pp. 41-66). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.　 Polsby, Nelson W. (1968). The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives. American Political Science Review, 62( 3) ,144-68 Postman, N. (1987). Amusing ourselves to Death . London: Methuen. Rawnsley, A. (2000). Tony’s still winning the rating war. Observer, July 9. Accessed at http:// observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,6903/341470,00.html (April 5, 2007) Rapoport, A. (1969). A System-theoretic view of content analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Renshon, S. A. (1995). The Clinton presidency: Campaigning, governing and psychology of leadership. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Renshon, S. A. (1996). The psychological assesment of presidential candidates. New York: New York University Press. Ress, L. (1992). The myth of the leader. London: Methuen. Rhee, J. W. (1995). The interaction between news frames and an interpreter’s schemata: A theory and a simulation. Paper presented to the AEJMC convention, Washington, D.C. Rojek, C. (2001). Celebrity. London: Reaktion Books Ltd. Rubin, R. B., and McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31, 279-292. Samuels, A. (1993). The political psyche. New York & London: Routledge. Samuels, A. (2001). Politics on the couch: Citizenship and the Internal Life. London: Profile books. Sartori, G. (1987). The theory of democracy revisited. Chatham: Chatham House Publishers. Schlesinger, P. (1990). Rethinking the sociology of journalism: Source strategies andthe limits of media-centrism. In M. Ferguson (Ed.), Public communication: The new imperatives (pp. 61-83). London: Sage Ltd. Schumpeter, J. (1976). Socialism and democracy. (Ed.), T.B. Bottomore. New York: Harper Torchbooks. Secord, Paul F. and Carl W. Backman. (1974). Social psychology. (2d ed). Tokyo: McGraw-Hill. Semetko, H. A., and Valkenburg, P.M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50 (2, Spring), 93-109. Shabad, G. and Andersen, K. (1979). Candidate evaluations by men and women. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43: 18-35. Sheafer, T. (2001). Charismatic skill and media legitimacy：An actor-centered approach to understanding the political communication competition. Communication Research, 28(6), 711-736. Shils, E. (1965). Charisma, order, status. American Sociological Review, 30, 199-213. Shoemaker, P. J., and Reese, S. D. (1991). Mediating the message: Theories of influence on mass media content. NY: Longman. Shusterman, R. (1992). Pragmatist aesthetics: Living beauty, rethinking art. Oxford: Blackwell. Silvera, D. H., and Austad, B. (2004). Factors predicting the effectiveness of celebrity endorsement advertisements. European Journal of Marketing, 38(11/12) , 1509-1526 Storey, J. (2001). Culture theory and popular culture: An introduction. New York: Prentice Hall. Street, J. (1997). Politics and popular culture. Cambridge: Political press. Street, J. (2000). Aesthetics, policy and politics of popular culture. Cultural Studies, 3(1): 27-43. Street, J. (2003). The celebrity politician: Political style and popular culture. In J. Corner & D. Pels (Eds.), Media and the restyling of politics: consumerism, celebrity, cynicism (pp. 85-98). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.　 Street, J. (2004). Celebrity politicians: Popular culture and political representation. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 6( 4), 435-452. Susman, T. (2006). Stars take new leading roles: Celebrities seek a deeper part in global campaigns for social justice. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News. Jun. 19, p. 1. Thompson, J. (1995). The media and mordernity. Cambridge: Polity. Thompson, J. B. (2000). Political scandal: Power and visibility in the media age . Cambridge: Polity. van Zoonen, L. (1998).‘Finally I have my mother back’: Politicians and their families in popular culture. Harvard Journal of Press / Politics, 3(1) , 48-64. Van Zoonen, L. (2005). Entertaining the citizen: When politics and popular culture converge. New York: Rowman & Littlefield. Weiskel, T. C. (2005). From sidekick to sideshow－Celebrity, entertainment, and the politics of distraction. American Behaviour Scientist, 491(3), 393-409. West, D. M., and Orman, J. M. (2002). Celebrity politics. New York: Prentice Hall. Wolfsfeld, G. (1991). Media and political conflict. Cambridge university press. Zolo, D. (1992). Democracy and complexity. Cambridge: Polity.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學傳播學院碩士在職專班 94941009 96
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094941009
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[EMA Program in Communication] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
100901.pdf		44Kb	Adobe PDF2	1469	View/Open
100902.pdf		77Kb	Adobe PDF2	1524	View/Open
100903.pdf		81Kb	Adobe PDF2	1931	View/Open
100904.pdf		69Kb	Adobe PDF2	1890	View/Open
100905.pdf		193Kb	Adobe PDF2	2296	View/Open
100906.pdf		362Kb	Adobe PDF2	2689	View/Open
100907.pdf		218Kb	Adobe PDF2	5848	View/Open
100908.pdf		409Kb	Adobe PDF2	1821	View/Open
100909.pdf		129Kb	Adobe PDF2	1758	View/Open
100910.pdf		165Kb	Adobe PDF2	2586	View/Open
100911.pdf		172Kb	Adobe PDF2	2262	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback