Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33005
|
| Title: | 拉崗主體理論及其教育意涵之研究 |
| Authors: | 蔣興儀 |
| Contributors: | 馮朝霖
蔣興儀 |
| Keywords: | 拉崗
心理分析
教育學
自我
主體
Jacque Lacan
psychoanalysis
pedagogy
ego
subject |
| Date: | 2004 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 15:04:24 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究探究拉崗的無意識主體理論，並根據拉崗所進行的心理分析實踐，闡述其中的教育意涵。拉崗以「回歸弗洛伊德」為取向，針對自我心理學之「自我」概念提出批評，他在「鏡子階段」論述中指出：自我之形塑乃是以想像的疏離同一性之運作方式，構成了自我與擬似者之間的錯識結構。當想像域關聯於倫理學時，拉崗將超我的概念轉化為一種客觀的裝置，即極權式的執鞭者能夠以自身之工具化作為藉口，迫使受害者在痛苦和羞辱中達到其自身之主體化的目標。為了分解想像性自我的鈕結，拉崗以象徵的功能提出了無意識主體的理論。他透過對索緒爾之語言學的轉借，使得文字不再具有符號的指義功能，而是進行著記號的指延純粹運作性。主體因而不再是意義的主人而被文字化為符指，在轉代詞「我」所呈現的陳述主詞與宣告主體的分離與分裂當中，主體乃是具有大它者之激進異質性的無意識主體。據此，在教育意涵中，拉崗以大它者之功能所進行的至高實踐，不但修正了鏡像之無限性的非本真實踐，並且鑽透了鏡映之哲學循環的本真實踐，而使得教育學之論述維繫於分析師的「存在之匱乏」此一政策。
Based on Lacanian psychoanalytical practice, this research discusses his theory of subject of the unconscious and tries to elaborate latter’s implication of education. Along the path of “Return to Freud”, Lacan criticizes the concept of Ego that is the theoretical core of ego psychology. He traces the genesis of ego back at the mirror-stage and describes the imaginary structure of ego as following: narcissitic formation of the ego is the result of misrecognition between ego and the semblable. When combining the Imaginary with Ethics, Lacan retranslates Freudian concept of superego as the objectivized equipment, and analyzes fully the totalitarian effect of this objectivization that refuses its subjectivization. Totalitarian subject is the pure instrument in his instrumentalization, and forces the pain and humiliation onto the victim to help him to accomplish his subjectivization. In order to untie the knot of the Imaginary, Lacan locates the theory of subject of unconscious in the Symbolic. Borrowing Saussure’s structural linguistics, Lacan paralizes the signifying function that is constitutive of totality of Sign, and emphasizes the pure operativity of the signifier with a hole. Between subject of statement and subject of enunciation, shifter “I” introduces the division in the subject. In what gapes, subject is the radical heterogeneity of unconscious subject. Centered on this function of Other, Lacan not only rescues analysis from its inauthentic practice, he also maintains training discourse in his policy of “lack of being”. The latter founds the supreme practice that brings the full educational implication. |
| Reference: | Arrivé, Michel (1992). Linguistics and Psychoanalysis: Freud, Saussaure, Hjelmslev, Lacan and Others (James Leader, Trans.). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Barratt, Barnaby B. (1993). Psychoanalysis and the Postmodern Impulse: Knowing and Being since Freud`s Psychology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bencivenga, Ermanno (1990). The Discipline of Subjectivity: An Essay on Montaigne. Princeton University Press.
Benveniste, Emile (1971). Problems in General Linguistics (Mary Elizabeth Meek, Trans.). Coral Gables, Fla., University of Miami Press.
Boothby, Richard (2001). Freud as Philosopher: Metapsychology after Lacan. New York: Routledge.
Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel (1991). Lacan: the Absolute Master (Brick Douglas, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bowie, Malcolm (1979). “Jacques Lacan,” in Structuralism and Since: From Lévi- Strauss to Derrida. (John Sturrock, Ed.). Oxford University Press.
Bullock, Alan & Stallybrass, Oliver (Eds.) (1977). The Fontana dictionary of modern thought. Taiwan: [s.n.].
Evans, Dylan (1996). An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. London; New York: Routledge.
Feldstein, Richard, Fink, Bruce & Jaanus, Maire (Eds.) (1995). Lacan’s Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. State University of New York Press.
Feldstein, Richard, Fink, Bruce, & Jaanus, Maire (Eds.). (1996). Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan`s Return to Freud. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Felman, Shoshana (1987). Jacques Lacan and the Adventure of Insight: Psychoanalysisi in Contemporary Culture. Harvard University Press.
Fink, Bruce (1995). The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Freud, Anna (1960). Psychoanalysis for Teachers and Parents (Barbara Low, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Freud, Sigmund (1900). The interpretation of Dream, SE V. London: Hogarth Press.
Freud, Sigmund (1912). “Notes on the Concept of the Unconscious in Psychoanalysis,” SE XII. London: Hogarth Press.
Freud, Sigmund (1914). “On Narcissism: An Introduction,” SE XIV. London: Hogarth Press.
Freud, Sigmund (1919). “The ‘Uncanny,’” SE XVII. London: Hogarth Press.
Freud, Sigmund (1920). Beyond the Pleasure Principle, SE XVIII. London: Hogarth Press.
Freud, Sigmund (1923). The Ego and the Id, in The Freud Reader (Peter Gay Ed.). New York; London: Norton , 1989.
Freud, Sigmund (1925). “Preface to Aichhorn’s Warward Routh,” SE XIX. London: Hogarth Press.
Freud, Sigmund (1927). The Future of an Illusion, SE XXI. London: Hogarth Press.
Freud, Sigmund (1930). Civilization and Its Discontent, SE XXI. London: Hogarth Press.
Freud, Sigmund (1940). An Outline of Psycho-Analysis, SE XXIII. London: Hogarth Press, 1964.
Gallop, Jane (1985). Reading Lacan. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press.
Grosz, Elizabeth (1990). Jacques Lacan: A Feminist Introduction. Landon: Routledge.
Habermas, Jürgen (2000). “From Kant to Hegel and Back again: The Move Towards Detranscendentalization,” in European Journal of Philosophy, 7:2.
Hartmann, Heinz (1939). Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation. New York: International Universities Press, 1958.
Horkheimer, Max & Adorno, Theodor W. (2001). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments (John Cumming, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
Jacobson, Roman (1971). “Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb,” in Selected Writings, Vol.II: Word and Language. The Hague: Mouton.
Johnson, Barbara (1977). “The Frame of Reference: Poe, Lacan, Derrida,” in Yale French Studies, vol.55-56, pp.457-505.
Kant, Immanuel (1909). Kant`s Critique of Practical Reason and Other Works on the Theory of Ethics (Thomas Kingsmill Abbott, Trans.). London: Longmans Green.
Kant, Immanuel (1914): Kant`s Critique of Judgement (J. H. Bernard, Trans.). London: Macmillan.
Kurzweil, Edith (1980). The Age of Structuralism: Levi-Strauss to Foucault. New York: Columbia University.
Lacan, Jacques (1964). “Position of the Unconscious,” in Lacan’s Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis (Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink & Maire Jaanus, Eds.). State University of New York Press, 1995.
Lacan, Jacques (1966). Écrits. Paris: Seuil.
Lacan, Jacques (1970) “The Insistence of the Letter in the Unconscious,” in Structuralism (Jacques Ehrmann, Ed.; J. Miel, Trans.). Farden City; New York: Anchor Books.
Lacan, Jacques (1977). Écrits: A Selection (Alan Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Norton.
Lacan, Jacques (1978). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-analysis (Jacques-Alain Miller, Ed.; Alan Sheridan, Trans.). London: Hogarth Press, New York W. W. Norton.
Lacan, Jacques (1988a). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book I: Freud`s Papers on Technique (Jacques-Alain Miller, Ed.; Alan Sheridan, Trans.). New York: W.W. Norton.
Lacan, Jacques (1988b). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book II: The Ego in Freud`s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis (Jacques-Alain Miller, Ed.; Sylvana Tomaselli, Trans.). Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
Lacan, Jacques (1989). “Kant with Sade” (James Swenson, Trans.). in October 51, pp.55-75.
Lacan, Jacques (1990). Television: A Challenge to the Psychoanalytic Establishment (Denis Hollier, Rosalind Krauss, Annette Michelson, Trans.). London; New York: W. W. Norton.
Lacan, Jacques (1992). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book VII: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis (Jacques-Alain Miller, Ed.; Dennis Porter, Trans.). New York: Norton.
Lacan, Jacques (1993). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book III: The Psychoses (Jacques-Alain Miller, Ed.; Russell Grigg, Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton.
Lacan, Jacques (1998). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book XX: On Feminine Sexuality: the Limits of Love and Knowledge (Jacques-Alain Miller, Ed.; Bruce Fink, Trans.). New York: Norton.
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe (1990). Heidegger, Art and Politic (Chris Turner, Trans.). Oxford & Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
Laplanche, Jean, & Pontalis, Jean-Bertrand (1967). The Language of Psychoanalysis (Donald Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). London: Hogarth Press.
Lemaire, Anika (1977). Jacques Lacan (David Macey, Trans.). London; Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Levinas, Emmanuel (1979). Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (Alphonso Lingis Trans.). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and Duquesne University Press.
Lewis, C.T. & Short, C. (1955). A Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon.
Macey, David (1988). Lacan in Contexts (Anne Tomiche, Trans.). London; New York: Verso.
Marini, Marcelle (1992). Jacques Lacan: the French Context (Anne Tomiche, Trans.). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1964). The Primacy of Perception: And Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics (James M., Ed.). Northwestern University Press.
Muller, John P., & Richardson, William J. (1982). Lacan and Language: A Reader’s Guide to Écrits. International Universities Press, Inc.
Nancy, Jean-Luc, & Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe (1992). The Title of Letter: a Reading of Lacan (Francois Raffoul, David Pettigrew, Trans.). State University of New York Press.
Nancy, Jean-Luc (2001). “Das unendliche ende der psychoanalyse” [Electronic version]. Journal of European Psychoanalysis, 12-13, Winter-Fall. from http://www.psychomedia.it/jep/number12-13/nancy.htm, Retrieved June , 2005.
Payne, Michael (1993). Reading Theory: an Introduction to Lacan, Derrida, and Kristeva. Oxford; Cambridge: Blackwell.
Peters, F. E. (n.d.). Greek Philosophical Terms: A Historical Lexicon.
Quinet, Antonio (1995). ‘The Gaze as an Object’, in Reading Seminar XI: Lacan`s Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis (Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink, & Maire Jaanus, Eds.). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Ragland-Sullivan, Ellie (1986). Jacques Lacan and the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Roudinesco, Elisabeth (1990). Jacques Lacan & Co.: A History of Psychoanalysis in France. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Roudinesco, Elisabeth (1997). Jacques Lacan (Barbara Bray, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Samuels, Robert (1993). Between Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: Lacan`s Reconstruction of Freud. New York: Routledge.
Saussure, Ferdinand de (1964). Course in General Linguistics (Wade Baskin, Trans.). London: Peter Owen.
Schneiderman, Stuart (Ed. & Trans.) (1980). Returning to Freud: Clinical Psychoanalysis in the School of Lacan. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.
Swenson, James B. JR. (1989). “Annotations to ‘Kant with Sade.’” in October 51, pp.76-104.
Usher, Robin & Edwards, Richard (1994). Postmodermism and Education. Landon: Routledge.
Weber, Sameul (1991). Return to Freud: Jacques Lacan’s Dislocation of Psychoanlysis (Michael Levine, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Weedon, Chris (1987). Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Oxford; New York: B. Blackwell.
Wilden, Anthony (1994). Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis. Baltimore; London: the Johns Hopkins University Press.
Žižek, Slavoj (1989). The Sublime Object of Ideology. Landon; New York: Verso.
Žižek, Slavoj (1995). The Metastases of Enjoyment: Six Essays on Woman and Causality. London; New York: Verso.
Žižek, Slavoj (1999). “Kant with (or against) Sade,” in The Žižek reader (Edmond Wright, Trans.). Oxford; Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
Zupančič, Alenka (1998). “The Subject of Law,” in Cogito and the Unconscious (Slavoj Žižek, Ed.). Duke University Press.
Zupančič, Alenka (2000). Ethics of the Real: Kant, Lacan. London; New York: Verso.
文德爾班(Windelband, Wilhelm)(1998)。西洋哲學史（羅達仁譯）。台北：商務印書館。
方漢文(2000)。后現代主義文化心理：拉康研究。上海︰上海三聯書店。
卡勒(Culler, Jonathan)(1992)。索緒爾（張景智譯）。台北市：桂冠。
史壯柏格(Stromberg, Roland N.) (1993)。近代西方思想史（蔡申章譯）。台北市：桂冠。
布洛克(Bullock, Alan)、斯塔列布拉斯(Stallybrass, Oliver)（編著）(1988)。現代思潮辭典（李瑞華譯）。出版地不詳。
布魯格（編著）(1989)。西洋哲學辭典（項退結編譯）。台北：華香園出版社。
弗洛伊德(Freud, Sigmund)(2000)。文明及其缺憾，載於圖騰與禁忌（邵迎生、楊韶剛譯）。台北縣：知書房。
米勒(Miller, David)、波格丹諾(Bogdanor, Vernon)（編）(1987)。布萊克維爾政治學百科全書。
佛洛伊德(Freud, Sigmund)(1989)。文明及其不滿（賴添進譯）。臺北市：南方叢書出版，學英總經銷。
佛洛依德(Freud, Sigmund)(1989)。夢的解析（賴其萬、符傳孝譯）。台北市：志文。
佛洛姆(Fromm, Erich)(1981)。為自己而活（陳秋坤譯）。台北：大地出版社。
克莉絲•維登(Chris, Weedon)(1994)。女性主義實踐與後結構主義理論（白曉紅譯）。台北：桂冠。
利伯特(Liebert, Robert M.)、韋士奈爾森(Wicks-Nelson, Rita)、卡爾(Kail, Robert V.) (1991)。發展心理學（游恆山編譯）。臺北：五南。
李幼蒸(1998)。欲望倫理學：弗洛伊德和拉康。嘉義縣大林鎮：南華管理學院出版，臺北市：紅螞蟻總經銷。
李德爾(Leader, Darian)、葛羅維斯(Groves, Judy)(1998)。拉岡（龔卓軍譯）。臺北縣新店市：立緒文化。
沙利文(Sullivan, Harry Stack)(2000)。精神病學的人際理論（韋子木、張榮皋譯）。台北市：昭明。
沙特(Sartre, Jean-Paul)(1990)。想像心理學（李一鳴譯）。台北市：結構群。
汪暉(1988)。做為哲學人類學的弗洛伊德理論。台北：遠流。
帕普利(Papalia, Diana E.)、歐茨(Olda, Sally Wendkos)(1994)。兒童發展（黃慧真譯）。台北：桂冠。
拉康(Lacan, Jacques)(2000)。拉康選集（褚孝泉譯）。上海︰上海三聯書店。
拉普朗虛(Laplanche, Jean)、彭大歷斯(Pontalis, J. B.)(2000)。精神分析辭彙（沈志中、王文基譯）。臺北市：行人出版。
殷鼎(1990)。理解的命運。臺北：東大圖書。
索緒爾(Saussure, Ferdinand de)(2001)。普通語言學教程（高名凱譯）。北京：商務印書館。
康德(Kant Immanuel)(1982)。康德的道德哲學（牟宗三譯註）。臺北市：臺灣學生書局。
教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。
梁濃剛(1992)。回歸弗洛依德。台北：遠流。
笛卡兒(1987)。我思故我在（錢志純編譯）。台北：志文。
傅偉勳(1984)。西洋哲學史。台北：三民書局。
萊特(Wright, Elizabeth)(2002)。拉岡與後女性主義（楊久穎譯）。臺北市：貓頭鷹出版。
馮朝霖(2000)。教育哲學專論：主體、情性與創化。台北市：馮朝霖出版，元照總經銷。
黃武雄(1994)。童年與解放。台北︰人本教育基金會。
蒙田(Montaigne, Michel de)(1997)。蒙田隨筆集：中卷（馬振騁、徐和瑾、潘麗珍、丁步洲等譯）。台北：商務。
潘恩(Payne, Michael)(1997)。閱讀理論︰拉康、德希達與克麗絲蒂娃導讀（李奭學譯）。台北︰書林。
蔡美麗(1995)。維納斯之變顏：理性與感性論文集。台北：允晨文化。
盧梭(Rousseau, Jean Jacques)(1991)。愛彌兒（李平漚譯）。台北：五南。
薩福安(Safouan, Moustafa)(2001)。結構精神分析學：拉康思想概述（懷宇譯）。天津：天津社會科學院出版社。
薩德(Sade, Marquis de)(2000)。臥房裡的哲學（陳蒼多譯）。台北：新雨。 |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
88152501
93 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0881525011 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [教育學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
