Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32935
|
| Title: | 國小校長轉型領導、學校文化取向與學校創新經營關係之研究
A Study on Relationships between Principal’s Transformational Leadership and School Cultural Preference and School Innovative Management in Elementary Schools |
| Authors: | 濮世緯
Pu, Shi-wei |
| Contributors: | 秦夢群
林邦傑
濮世緯
Pu, Shi-wei |
| Keywords: | 轉型領導
競值架構
學校創新經營
國民小學
學校文化
Transformational Leadership
Computing Values Framework
Innovative Management of School
Elementary School
School Culture |
| Date: | 2003 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 14:54:01 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究目的旨在探討國小校長轉型領導、學校文化取向與學校創新經營關係，並剖析不同背景變項、環境變項在校長轉型領導及學校知識創新行為上的差異情形；分析校長轉型領導與學校創新經營之關係；學校文化取向與學校創新經營之關係；校長轉型領導、學校文化取向對學校創新經營的交互作用關係，以及檢定本研究所假設之模式是否適配。
本研究兼採文獻分析法與問卷調查法。根據研究目的、研究問題及文獻探討，編製「國小校長轉型領導、學校文化取向與學校創新經營關係調查問卷」，然後依學校所在地區及學校規模大小，抽取台灣地區63所公私立國民小學1435位教師為對象，調查所任教學校校長轉型領導、學校文化取向與學校創新經營之實況，並探究三者間關係。本研究將校長轉型領導分為親近融合、願景與承諾、激勵共成願景、尊重信任、智識啟發與個別關懷；學校文化取向分為團隊文化、權變文化、市場文化與層級文化，而將學校創新經營分為行政管理、知識分享、外部關係、資訊科技，以及課程教學五個向度。調查結果經由內部一致性分析、因素分析、變異數分析、逐步多元迴歸分析以及線性結構關係分析（LISREL）等統計方法，加以處理分析。
本研究主要發現如下：
一、國小校長最注重之轉型領導層面以「激勵共成願景」最高，其次為「願景與承諾」以及「尊重信任」，而「個別關懷」相對較低。
二、目前學校之文化取向趨向「層級文化」與「團隊文化」；相對的重視外部環境控制之「市場文化」取向為最低。
三、在學校創新經營方面，以「課程與教學」、「資訊科技」與「行政管理」創新經營較高，「教師知識分享」與「外部關係」創新經營較為偏低。
四、國小校長運用轉型領導有助於學校創新經營之實踐；其中轉型領導之「智識啟發」、「激勵共成願景」、「願景與承諾」對整體學校創新經營最具預測效果。
五、在學校文化取向方面，以「團隊文化」與「權變文化」最有助於學校創新經營。
六、轉型領導與學校文化取向同為學校創新經營所需要。若校長轉型領導能同時配合促成有助於創新經營之團隊式、權變式學校文化風格，將更有助於學校朝向各方面創新經營實務。
七、教師所知覺校長有較高學歷、年輕以及在該校年數較長者，校長轉型領導的程度較高。
八、中型規模學校與私立學校校長轉型領導的程度較高。
九、年長、資深、兼任行政職務教師所知覺轉型領導的程度較高。
十、位於院轄市、省轄市之學校，其部分學校創新經營的程度較佳。
最後，本研究並對教育行政機關、校長、學校與未來研究提出提出以下之建議：
一、對教育行政機關之建議：
（一）校長職前與在職訓練，宜融入轉型領導相關課程。
（二）應加強校長之專業發展，以塑造良性文化與提昇學校創新績效。
（三）應適度控制學校經濟規模，以利於轉型領導之推動。
（四）應定期訪視與考核學校之創新成效，並獎勵績效卓越之經營團隊，以催化學校創新之動力。
（五）應鼓勵各區域內不同學校結合為創新之夥伴學校，彼此合作交流，營造具分享之創新社群。
二、對校長之建議：
（一）應增進校長轉型領導之智識啟發、激勵共成願景與願景與承諾層面，以發揮學校創新經營成效；應展現變革的態度與行政支持，以提高學校創新經營績效。
（二）校長於行政管理與資訊科技創新經營方面，尚需加強轉型領導之親近融合與尊重信任層面。
（三）校長宜多個別關懷年紀較輕、年資較淺，以及未兼任行政職務之教師。
（四）校長應同時使用轉型領導及有利於創新之文化取向，以增加學校創新成效。
（五）校長應展現轉型與變革的態度以及對於行政之支持，以提高學校創新經營績效。
（六）校長應積極在職進修，以提昇專業智能。
三、對學校之建議：
（一）學校外部關係創新經營層面，應增進學校動態能耐。
（二）應加強教師知識分享創新，以增進創新之可能。
四、對未來研究之建議：
（一）研究對象方面，建議擴大研究群體。
（二）研究方法方面，建議深化研究之脈絡。
（三）研究工具方面，文化取向計分方式調整，並擴充學校創新之向度。
（四）內容方面，建議以知識創新情形為主軸，並將經費之因素納入考量。
The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between principal’s transformational leadership and school cultural preference and school innovative management in elementary schools. The difference between principal’s transformational leadership and innovative management of school, principal’s transformational leadership and innovative management of school, school cultural preference and innovative management of school were tested by various demographic variables and environmental variables. Moreover, researcher probed the interaction among them and examined if the assumptive model was appropriate.
In the study, principal’s transformational leadership was respectively divided into six dimensions, there were “intimateness and integration” and “vision and commitment” and “visions inspiration” and “respect and trust” and “intellectual stimulation” and “individualized consideration”. School cultural preference, according to Competing value framework, could be divided into four quadrants—clan, adhocracy, market, and hierarchy. Schools’ innovative management were divided into five dimensions, there were “administration and management”, “knowledge sharing”, “exterior relationship”, “information and technology”, and “curriculum and teaching”. The study was proceeding with survey study as well as literature reviews. According to the result of literature review and the purposes and issues of this research, a 6-point Likert-like scale was made for data aggregation. 1435 teachers in 63 public and private elementary schools were surveyed in terms of the school size and location. Finally, 1152 data were collected and used to analyze the status quo of principal’s transformational leadership, school cultural preference and innovative management of school and the relationships among them. The data were analyzed with SPSS Version 10.0 for Windows at the 0.05 level. Statistics methods such as internal consistency, factor analysis, ANOVA, stepwise regression and LISREL were used to data analysis.
The findings of this research were listed below:
1. Most of the elementary school’s principal were emphasized on “vision invigoration”, some of them emphasized on “visions and commitment” and “respect and trust”, fewer emphasized on “individualized consideration”.
2. Hierarchy and Clan were the current culture preference of school; Market culture, which took much attention to exterior surroundings, was deserted.
3. On the innovative management of school, “curriculum and teaching” and “information and technology” and “administration and management” were scored higher than “knowledge sharing” and “exterior relationship”.
4. Principal’s transformational leadership induced to the practice of school innovative management; especially the “intellectual stimulation” and “visions invigoration” dimensions were found have higher predictive efficacy than “individualized consideration”.
5. On the school cultural preference, Clan and Adhocracy were more contributive to school innovative management.
6. The appropriateness assumptive model among principal’s transformative leadership, school cultural preference and school innovative management was considered to be fine.
7. Under the consciousness of school teachers, the principals with higher academic background, younger and more experienced did score higher on transformational leadership.
8. The principals who were in middle-sized schools and private schools did score higher on transformational leadership.
9. The schoolteachers who were older, senior, administration experienced were more perceptive to principal’s transformational leadership.
10. The schools which located at Yuan-commanded cities and province- commanded cities scored higher on school innovative management.
Based on the findings, several conclusions and recommendations were made for governmental authorities, principals of elementary schools, schools and further researchers. |
| Reference: | 壹、中文部分
王如哲（1998）。知識經濟與教育。台北﹕五南圖書出版公司。
王如哲（2000）。知識管理的理論與應用：以教育領域及其革新為例。台北﹕五南圖書出版公司。
王如哲（2001a）。知識經濟時代的學校領導能力分析。中小學校長培育、證照、甄選、評鑑與專業發展國際學術研討會。國立教育資料館主辦。
王如哲（2001b）。校園知識管理評量之微觀探討。知識管理與教育革新發展研討會。教育部主辦，國立中正大學教育學研究所承辦。
王如哲（2001c）。知識管理的理論與應用—以教育領域及其革新為例。台北：五南。
王如哲(2002a)。論教育領域的知識管理。教育政策論壇，5（1），21-39。
王如哲(2002b)。知識經濟時代的學校競爭力。台灣教育， 613，11-19。
王秀華譯，Drucker, Peter等著(1996)。領導大未來。台北：洪健全基金會。
王振鴻（2000）。國小教師對九年一貫課程之變革關注及其影響因素研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
王淑懿（2001）。知識管理在教師進修機構應用之初探性研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
王祥懿（2002）。領導者知識創造能力之研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文，未出版。
台北市政府教育局第二科（2003）。臺北市國民中學九十年度實施『教學創新九年一貫課程』執行情形檢核表2003/03/11取自 http://www.edunet.taipei.gov.tw/attach/部之學校版.doc
朱沛（1994）。組織之環境、策略、文化、結構及效能之關係研究。淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
江羽燕、林珊如（2003）。影響國小教師採用資訊科技創新教學因素之研究：以台北縣、桃園縣資訊種子國小為例。2003年創造力實踐歷程研討會（2003.3.21）。台北：國立政治大學創新育成中心。
江岷欽（1989a）。The studies on organization culture: An assessment。公共政策學報，11，235-266。
江岷欽（1989b）。組織文化研究途徑之分析。行政學報，21，65-92。
江岷欽（1993a）。組織分析。台北：五南圖書出版公司。
江岷欽（1993b）。競值途徑在組織文 化上之應用。理論與政策，30，126-143。
江岷欽（1994）。競值途徑在組織研究上之應用。中國行政，55，29-65。
何淑妃（1996）。國小校長轉型領導行為與學校組織氣氛之調查研究。國立新竹師範學院初等教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
何雍慶（1994）。我國電子資訊科技研究發展績效指標之研究。行政院國科會專題研究計畫。
吳奕廷（2002）。主管領導風格、員工知識分享意願與組織知識創造績效關聯性之研究。長榮管理學院經營管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
吳思華（2002）。從製造台灣到知識台灣。收錄於金誠等著《創新》（pp.l-10）。台北：天下文化。
吳清山（1982）。學校行政。台北：心理出版社。
吳清山（2002）。校長評鑑的實施挑戰與因應策略。教師天地，117，6-14。
吳清山（2002）。當前校長遴選制度的迷思與省思。教師天地，118，7-14。
吳清山、林天祐（1998）。教育名詞—轉型領導。教育資料研究，24，台北市：國立教育資料館，2002/01/10取自http://www.nioerar.edu.tw/basis3/24/gy18.htm。
吳菜霞（2002）。行政上如何推展創意教學。教師天地，121，29-35。
呂錘卿（2000）。國民小學教師專業成長的指標及其規劃模式之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文，未出版。
李良相（2002）。價值創新導向的經營模式創新：以M公司為例。國立交通大學高階主管管理學程碩士論文，未出版。
李芳齡譯，Peter Senge等合著（2001）。變革之舞（上）（下）。台北：天下文化。
李建樹（2003）。大學院校行政人員知識管理態度與學校組織文化、人格特質關聯之研究。國立台灣科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
李誠（2001）。什麼是知識經濟？載於李誠主編《知識經濟的迷思與省思》（pp.10-18）。台北：天下文化。
汪昭芬（2000）。組織學習、知識創造、知識蘊蓄與創新績效之關聯性研究: 科技製造業、一般製造業及服務業之實證研究。國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
周光耀（1998）。技術特質與知識創新活動之關連研究。政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
林天祐（2003）。學校經營與教育品質。2003/05/10取自：http://www.socialwork.com.hk/ artical/educate/ik5.htm
林合懋（1995）。學校主管與企業主管轉型領導之比較研究。政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
林合懋（2001）。國民小學校長的成就目標、終身學習經驗、轉型領導與其多元智慧學校經營理念之關係。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文，未出版。
林佳慧（2000）。組織內部創新氣氛與知識管理機制關係之探討。國立中史大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
林明地（2000）。校長課程領導與學校本位課程發展。載於財團法人國立台南師院校務發展文教基金會主編《九年一貫課程―從理論、政策到執行》(pp.155-183)。高雄：復文。
林明地（2002）。學校領導 : 理念與校長專業生涯 。臺北市 : 高等教育。
林明地譯，T. E. Deal & K. D. Peterson原著（1998）。學校領導：平衡邏輯與藝術。台北：五南圖書出版公司。
林珈夙（1997）。校長轉型領導、教師創意經驗、教學創新行為與學校效能之關係。政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
林偉文（2002）。國民中小學學校組織文化、教師創意教學潛能與創意教學之關係。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
林淑芬（2001）。競值架構在國中校長領導行為及學校組織文化應用之研究。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文，未出版。
林富美、徐國淦（2001）。知識經濟對勞動市場的影響。國家政策論壇，1（6），22-31。
林維林（1996）。轉換型、交易型領導行為與領導效能關係之研究：以台灣省政府建設廳為個案分析。私立東海大學公共行政學系碩士論文，未出版。
林麗寬譯，V. Jeannette & D. Gordon著 (1997)。 學習革命。台北：中國生產力中心。
邵俊豪（2002）。臺北市國民中學校長轉型領導、交易領導與學校本位管理決策類型之關係研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
范熾文（2002）。國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系博士論文，未出版。
孫本初（2000）。轉換型領導對台北市政府行政績效影響之研究。台北市 : 北市研考會。
徐作聖、邱奕嘉譯，Allan Auah原著（2000）。創新管理。台北：華泰文化。
徐振邦（2000）。國民中學學校行政混沌現象之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
徐聯恩（2003）。組織特徵與組織創新之關係：以幼稚園組織為例。2003年創造力實踐歷程研討會（2003.3.21）。台北：國立政治大學創新育成中心。
秦夢群（1997）。教育行政：理論部分。台北：五南圖書出版有限公司。
秦夢群（2001）。教育領導取向之分析。第九次教育行政論壇。嘉義：國立中正大學教育學研究所主辦。
秦夢群（2002）。教育在知識經濟時代之角色與策略。中等教育，53（3），64-83。
秦夢群、黃貞裕（2001）。教育行政研究方法論。台北：五南圖書出版有限公司。
張世其（1996）。組織結構、主管角色與新產品發展績效之研究。國立中正大學企業管理學系碩士論文，未出版。
張玉文譯（2000）。知識管理。台北：天下遠見出版。
張玉文譯，P. F. Drucker著（2000）。知識管理。台北：聯電。
張吉成（2001）。科技產業組織知識創新模式建構之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文，未出版。
張吉成、周談輝、黃文雄（2002）。組織知識創新：企業與學校贏的策略。台北：五南。
張易書（2000）。國中校長轉型領導、教師開放性/封閉型人格與學習型組織關係之研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
張明輝（2002）。學校經營與管理研究：前瞻、整合、學習與革新。台北：學富文化。
張明輝（2003）卓越校長的關鍵力。收錄於《九十二年度學校行政人員專業發展：精緻學校經營研習班手冊》（pp.37-43），台北：台北市教師研習中心。
張昭仁（2001）。國小校長轉型領導、互易領導與學校組織學習能力關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
張毓芳（2002）。台北縣市國民小學校長轉型領導與學校組織氣候關係之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
張慶勳（1995）。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之探究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
張慶勳（1996）。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文，未出版。
張曉林（1994）。行政機關中領導型態之研究。東海大學公共行政研究所碩士論文，未出版。
莊立民（2002）。組織創新模式建構與實證之研究：以台灣資訊電子業為例。國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文，未出版。
郭誌光（2001）。個人創造力、組織創新氣候、及組織創新績效之關係：台北市廣告公司為例。國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文，未出版。
陳木金（1996）。混沌現象對學校行政的啟示。教育資料與研究，9，69-75。
陳木金（1999）。混沌理論對學校組織變革因應策略之啟示。學校行政雙月刊，1，61-68。
陳木金（2000）。從奇異吸引子理論談新世紀的學校行政革新。學校行政雙月刊，5，30-44。
陳木金（2003）。學校領導研究：從混沌理論研究彩繪學校經營的天空。台北：高等教育出版社。
陳弘睿（2000）。台灣電腦網路廠商組織知識創造平台之研究。國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
陳尚興（2003）。知識管理機制、企業文化與組織創新關係之研究。靜宜大學企業管理學系碩士論文，未出版。
陳秉璋（1985）。社會學理論。台北：三民。
陳慧芬（1993）。從組織文化的觀點探討組織中的領導行為－中日兩國的比較研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文，未出版。
陳樹（1998）。領導風格與組織文化關聯性之研究。國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
陳龍彬（2000）。台灣省中區國小校長轉型領導、互易領導與教師同僚專業互享學習關係之研究。國立中正大學教育學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
陳譓森（1996）。轉換型領導對警政服務品質之影響研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文，未出版。
章雅惠（2001）。企業實施知識管理程度與領導型態、組織文化間之相關研究。私立銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
彭雅珍（1998）。國小校長領導風格、教師工作價值觀與教師組織承諾之關係研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
馮清皇（2002）。創新管理在國民小學校務經營的意涵。教師天地，117，32-42。
黃昆輝（1993）。教育行政學。台北：東華書局。
黃貞裕（2000）。教育行政方法論典範變遷之研究：實證論、後實證論與後現代主義。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
黃博聲（1998）。專業分工、知識管理與創新之關係研究。國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文，未出版。
黃傳永（1999）。校長轉型領導與家長參與學校教育之研究。東華大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
黃嘉明（2003）。完全中學經營策略之個案研究：以台北縣立清水高中為例。國立台灣科技大學管理研究所，未出版。
楊智先（2000）。教師工作動機、壓力選擇、社會互動與創造力之關係。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
詹益嘉（2001）。組織學習與知識創造關係之研究：社會資本的研究途徑。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文，未出版。
廖春文（1995）。廿一世紀教育行政領導理念。台北：師大書苑。
廖裕月（1998）。國小校長轉化領導型式與領導效能之研究：以北部四縣市為例。國立台北師範學院國民教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
趙嘉莉（2001）。以競值為基礎探討新產品發展績效。文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
齊若蘭譯，J. Collins原著（2002）。從A到A＋。台北：遠流出版社。
齊若蘭譯，P. Senge原著（1994）。第五項修練Ⅱ實踐篇—思考、演練與超越。台北：天下文化。
劉明晃（2001）。台北市國民小學校長遴選壓力與因應方式之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
劉雅菁（1998）。國民小學校長運用轉型領導之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育系碩士論文，未出版。
劉濬（2002）。組織創新氣氛與知識創造績效之研究--以資訊產業為例。彰化師範大學商業教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
歐連檔（2002）。液晶事業創新經營策略之探討：以K公司為例。國立中山大學高階經營碩士論文，未出版。
潘品昇（2000）。企業實施知識管理與電子商務關聯性之研究。大葉大學資管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
蔡啟通（1997）。組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係。國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文，未出版。
蔡進雄（2000a）。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育學系博士論文，未出版。
蔡進雄（2000b）。轉型領導與學校效能。台北市：師大書苑。
蔡榮福（2002）。國民中學學校組織文化與組織變革支持度之研究。國立政治大學公共行政研究所行政管理碩士論文，未出版。
鄭彩鳳（1996）。競值途徑應用在高中職校長領導角色、學校組織文化與組織效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育系博士論文，未出版。
鄭彩鳳（1998）。競值途徑應用在學校組織行為分析之研究。教育研究，6，53-68。
鄭博文（1997）。以競值模式比較四種多準則決策方法之研究：以醫院選擇為例。中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文，未出版。
鄭曜忠（2001）。高級中學行政主管知識管理態度、學校組織文化與學校效能關係之研究。彰化師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
樵瑟譯，Warren Bennis & Michael Mische著（2002）。組織已經在改變。臺北 ：海鴿文化。
蕭武桐（2000）。人生雙贏的磐石。台北：佛光。
蕭武桐（2002）。高階主管的管理藝術。公務人力月刊，80 ，2-4。
賴文堅（2002）。高中職知識管理之評量工具發展與實證分析。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文，未出版。
賴國茂（1995）。企業文化、產業類型與企業績效之研究。國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
閻瑞彥（1996）。競值途徑於組織效能上應用之研究：以資訊業研發部門為例。企業管理學報，39，1-19。
閻瑞彥（2000）。基層領導型態與組織效能：競值途徑觀點下之研究。國立壹北大學企業管理學系博士論文，未出版。
濮世緯（1997）。國小校長轉型領導、教師制握信念與教師職業倦怠關係之研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
濮世緯（2001）。校長轉型領導與學校興革關係之研究。收錄於黃德祥主編《教育改革與教育發展》（pp.615-681）。台北：五南圖書出版公司。
繆敏志（2000）。組織變革策略與文化對經理人工作壓力與適應影響之研究。台北：揚智。
繆敏志（2001）。從組織文化相關量化研究評析競值架構。國立政治大學學報，83，157-195。
謝文全（1993）。教育行政理論與實務。台北：文景出版社。
謝綺蓉譯，D. Zohar著（2001）。第三智慧--運用量子思維建立組織創造性思考模式。北市 : 大塊文化。
鍾瑞國（2002）。高級中學學校組織文化、行政主管知識管理態度關係之研究。教育研究資訊，10（3），71-99。
簡文娟（1999）。「組織創新氣候」評鑑量表之建立-以高科技產業為實證研究對象。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
羅錦財（2001）。國民中學校長領導角色與學校組織文化競值途徑之研究：以桃園縣為例。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
貳、英文部分
Alimo, B.(1998). Towards the development of a new transformational leadership questionnaire, Paper presented at the 24th International Congress Assessment Centre Methods, San Francisco.
Alimo, B., & Alban, R. J. (2000). The Development of a New Transformational Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational & Organization Psychology, 2001, 74(1), 1-27.
Allix, N. (2000). Transformational leadership: Democratic or despotic? Educational Management and Administration, 28(1), 7-20.
Allton, J. A. （1994）. Perspectives on the principal as a cultural leader. American Secondary Education, 23(1), 2-5.
Amabile, T. M.(1988). A Model of creativity and innovation in organization. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior(pp.123-167). Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
Amabile, T. M.(1996). Creativity in context. Co: Westview Press.
Avolio, B. J. & Gibbons, T. C.（1988）. Developing transformational leaders: a life span approach, in J.A. Conger and R.N. Kanungo (eds.), Charismatic leadership: the elusive factor in organizational effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Avolio, B. J. (1999) Full leadership development: building the vital forces in organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
Ball, S. (1987). The Micro politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. London: Methuen.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill`s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, & Managerial Applications. New York: The Free Press.
Bass, B. M. (1995). Transformational leadership radix. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 463-478.
Bass, B. M. (1996). A new paradigm of leadership: An inquiry into transformational leadership. Alexandria, Virginia: U. S. Army Research Institute for the Behavior and Social Science.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1989). Potential biases in leadership measures: how prototypes, leniency, and general satisfaction relate to ratings and rankings of transformational and transactional leadership constructs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 509-27.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership: A response to critiques. In Chemers, M. M., Ayman, R. (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (49-80). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (Eds.), (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bellum, J. M. (2003). Rogers’ innovation process in organization: Information systems implementation in educational organization. Doctoral Dissertation of University of Nebraska-Lincoln, unpublished.
Bender, L. J. （1997）. Team Organization – Learning organization: The university of Arizona four years into it. Information Outlook, 1(9), 19-22.
Bennis, W. C., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row.
Bensimon, E. M., Neumann, A., & Birnbaum, R. (1989). Making sense of administrative leadership: The “L” word in high education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 1.
Boal, K. B., ＆Bryson, J. M.(1988). Charisma and leadership：A phenomenological and structural approach. in James Gerald Hunt. Emerging leadership vistas. D.C. Heath and Company.
Boyd, W. L. (1999). Environmental pressures, management imperatives, and competing paradigms in educational administration. Educational Management and Administration, 27(3), 283-297.
Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. London: Sage Publications.
Bukowitz, W. R. and Williams, R. L.（1999） The knowledge management fieldbook. London: Prentice Hall.
Burgess,G.（1989）. Industrial organization. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York : Harper and Row.
Caldwell, B. J. & Spinks, J. M. (1998). Beyond the Self-Managing .School London: Falmer Press.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: based on the competing values framework. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Center for Educational Research and Innovation (2000). Knowledge management in the learning society. Paris: OECD.
Chadwick, L. J. (1999). A comparative analysis of transformational and transactional leadership in public school principals and their effect on school culture. Doctoral Dissertation of Regent University, unpublished.
Chirichello, M. (1999). Building capacity for change: Transformational leadership for school principals. ERIC: RIEDEC1999.
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Quarterly, 17(1), 1-16.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). Charismatic leadership. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass.
Cormier, S. F. (1997). School restructuring, transformational leadership, and teacher participation in decision-making. Doctoral Dissertation of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical Col., unpublished.
Csikzentmihalyi, M., & Wolfe, R. (2000). New conceptions and research approach to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In Heller, K. A., Monk, F. J., Sternberg, R. J. & Subotnik, R. F. (eds.), International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (pp.81-94). NY: Elsevier.
Daft, R. L.（1978）. The Innovation Organization. New York: Elsevier.
Dale, J. D. （1997）. The new American school system: A learning organization. International Journal of Educational Reform, 6(1), 34-39.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A meta-analysis of affects of determinants and moderator. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 536-555.
Damanpour, F.（1991）. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3)， 555-590。
Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organization management what they know. Boston: Havard Business School Press.
David Skyrme Associates （2000）. Knowledge management assessment, a practical tool. 2002/12/22 Retrieved from: http://www.skyrme.com/tools/index.htm
Day, C. (2000). Beyond transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 57(7) , 56-59.
Day, C., Harris. A., Hadfield. M., Tolley. Harry, & Beresford (2000). Leading schools in times of change. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (1994). The leadership paradox: Balancing logic and artistry in schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Denver, J. T. (1997). Reconciling educational leadership and the learning organization. Community College Review, 25(2), 57-63.
Dess, G. G., Lyon, D. W., & Picken, J. C. (1998). Transformational leadership: lessons from U.S. experience. Long Rang Planning, 31, 722-731.
Downton, J. V. (1973). Rebel leadership: Commitment and charisma in a revolutionary process. New York: Free press.
Duke, D. (1987). School leadership and instructional improvement. New York: Random House.
Dunk, A., & Lysons, A. F. (1997). An analysis of departmental effectiveness participative budgetary control processes and environmental dimensionality with the competing values framework: A public sector study. Financial Accountability and Management, 13(1), 1-15.
Edwards, J. (1999). LMS and headship: changing the contexts for micro politics. Educational Review, 45(1), 53-65.
Ettlie, J. E. (2000). Managing technological innovation. U.S.A.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Evers, C. W., & Lakomski, G. (1991). Knowing education administration: Contemporary methodological controversies in educational administration research. Oxford: Pergamon.
Fennell, H. A. (1999). Feminine faces of leadership: Beyond Structural-Functionalism? Journal of School Leadership, 9(3), 254-285.
Fincher, C. (1986). What is organization culture? Research in Higher Education, 24(3), 325-328.
Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., & Van Den Berg, R. (1999). Transformational leadership and the implementation of Large-Scale Innovation. Journal of Educational Administration, 37(4), 309-328.
Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos. New York: Viking Press.
Gordon, J. (1996). Organization behavior. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Grant, B. H. (1996). Transformational leadership of principals in a midsize school district in Colorado. In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Colorado State University, Colorado.
Greenfield, T. B. (1993). Theory about organization: A new perspective and its implications for schools. In T. B. Greenfield & P. Ribbins(Eds.), Greenfield on educational administration(pp.1-25). London: Routledge.
Hallinger, P. (1992) . The evolving role of American principals: From managerial to instructional to transformational leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(3), 35-48.
Halpin, A. W.,＆ Croft, G. R.（1962）.The organizational climate of school. Washington D.C：U. S. Office of Education Research Project.
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper Collins.
Hater, J. J., & Bass, B. M. (1988). Superiors, evaluations and subordinates’ perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 695-702.
Hedlund, G. (1994). A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 73-90.
Hibbard, J., and Carrillo K. M. （1998）. Knowledge Revolution. Information Week, 663, 49-52.
Higgins, J. M. (1995). The core competence : Innovation. Planning Review, 23 (6), 32-35。
Hodgkinson, C. (1991). Educational leadership: The moral art. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Holliday, T. K. (1995). Leadership style, site-based management, and academic challenge: implications for high schools. Doctoral Dissertation of University of South Carolina, unpublished.
Holt, K. (1988). The role of user in product innovation. Technovation, 12(5),53-56.
House, R. J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321-339.
House, R. J. (1977). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. Larson(Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge(pp.189-207). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support innovation: Key predictor of consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 891-902.
Howell, J. M., & House, R. J. (1992). Socialized and personalized charisma: An essay on the bright and dark sides of leadership. Unpublished manuscript, Western Business School, The University of Western Ontario.
Hoyt, R. H. (2000). Helping educational administrators learn how to respond to changing needs in inclusive schools based on the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CRAM) and transformational leadership. Doctoral dissertation of University of Houston, unpublished.
Hunt, J.G. (1991). Leadership: A new synthesis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Jantzi, D. & Leithwood, K. (1996). Toward an explanation of variation in teachers` perceptions of transformational school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(4), 512-538.
Jonasson, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kanold, T. D. (2002). The power of a learning community: Implications for leadership practices and beliefs in a learning organization. Doctoral Dissertation of Loyola University of Chicago, unpublished.
Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom : structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211
Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.
Kanungo, R. N. (ed.)(1987), Charismatic leadership: the elusive factor in organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kays, D. E. (1994). An investigation of transformational and transactional leadership styles in person social service organizations. Dissertation Abstracts International. 54, 3207A.
Keeves, J. P. (Ed.). (1988). Educational research methodology, and measurement: An international handbook. Oxford: Pergamon.
Kelm, M., Narayanan, K., & Pinches, G.(1995). Shareholder value creation during R & D innovation and commercialization stages. Academy of Management Journal , 38, 770-786.
King, M. H. (2003). Instructional leadership in the principal role: Testing the effectiveness of practices in the implementation of a curricular innovation. Doctoral dissertation of Montana State University, unpublished.
Kochan, T., Useem, M. （1992）. Transforming organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kotter, J. (1990). Leadership Differs from Management. New York, NY: Free Press.
Kuhnert, K.W., & Lewis, P. (1987). Transactional and transformational leadership: A constructive/developmental analysis. Academy of Management Review, 23, 23-36.
Lai, L. C. (1996). A meta-analysis of research on the effectiveness of leadership training programs(principals). Doctoral Dissertation of University of Wisconsin-Madison, unpublished.
Leithwood, K. (1992). The move toward transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 8-12.
Leithwood, K. (1994) . Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498-518.
Leithwood, K. (1997). Explaining variation in teachers’ perceptions of principals’ leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 35(3), 213-231.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112-126.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. ERIC: RIEJUL2000.
Leithwood, K., Tomlinson, D., & Genge, M. (1996). Transformational school leadership, In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), The International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration (pp.785-840). Dordrecht: Kluwer Acadmic.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellspring of Knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Lester, V. H. (2000). Transformational leadership and developing a professional learning community in Pajarito Elementary School. Doctoral Dissertation of The University of New Mexico, unpublished.
Lewin, A. Y., & Minton, J. W. (1986). Determining organizational effectiveness: Another look, and an agenda for research. Management Science, 32(5), 514-538.
Liebowitz, J. (2000). Building organizational intelligence: A knowledge management primer. London: CRC Press.
Liontos, L. B. (1992). Transformational leadership.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED347636）.
Lucas, S. E. (2001). Transformational leadership: Principals, leadership teams, and school culture. Doctoral Dissertation of University of Missouri-Columbia, unpublished.
Lumpkin, G. T., and Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation constructs and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1),135-172.
Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2000). Educational administration: Concepts and practices (3rd ed.). CA: Wadsworth.
Macbeath, J. (ed.)(1998). Effective school leadership: Responding to change. London: Paul Chapman.
Machnick, D. A. T. (2000). Characteristics of team ness and academic performance: A study of the relationship between elementary school leadership teams and academic achievement as measured by the percentage of students scoring at or above the 75th percentile on the 1998-1999 SAT-9 in the content area of reading. Doctoral Dissertation of University of La Verne, unpublished.
Mahony, P. & Hextall, I. (1997). Problems of accountability in reinvented government: a case study of the Teacher Training Agency. Journal of Educational Policy, 12(4), 267-278.
Malone, B. G., & Caddell, T. A. (2000). A crisis in leadership: Where are tomorrow`s principals? The Clearing House, 73(3), 162-164.
Maslowski, R. (2001). School culture and school performance: An explorative study into the organizational culture of secondary schools and their effects. Doctoral dissertation of Universiteil Twente(the Netherlands), unpublished.
Mestinsek, R. M. (2000). A comparative study of leadership characteristics of principals in charter schools and traditional schools. Doctoral Dissertation of University of San Diego, unpublished.
Michael, M. (2000). Special teachers for special needs. Technology Learning, 20 (9), 40-44.
Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). Te concept of ‘Ba’: Building a foundation for knowledge Creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40-54.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1997). A new organizational structure. In L. Prusak (Ed.), Knowledge in organizations. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Nonaka, I., Umemoto, K. & Sasaki, K. (1998). Three Tales of knowledge-creating companies. In G. Krogh, J. Roos, & D. Kleine(Eds.), Knowing in firms. London: SAGE.
Nonake, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies’ creating the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Obenchain, A. M. (2002). Organization culture and organizational innovation in not-for-profit, private and public institutions of higher education. Dissertation of Nova Southeastern University, unpublished.
OECD(1996). The knowledge-based economy. 2001/09/30Retrieved from : http://www.oecd.org/dsti/sti/s_t/inte/prod/kbe.htm.
OECD(1999). Education. Highlight of the OECD information Base, 19, 1-13.
OECD(2000). A new economy? The changing role of innovation and information technology in growth. Paris: OECD.
Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. New York: Avon Books.
Patterson, M. G., West, M.A., Lawthom, R. & Nickell, S. (1997). Impact of people management practices on business performance. London: Institute of Personal and Development.
Pauchant, T. C., Nilles, J., Sawy, O. E., & Mohrnan, A. M. (1989). Toward a paradoxical theory of organizational effectiveness: An empirical study of the competing values model. Working paper. Laval University, Administrative Science, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1988). In search in excellence: lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York: Warner Books.
Peterson, M. G., West, M. A., Lawthom, R., & Nickell, S. (1997). Impact of people management practices on business performance. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
Pielstic, C. D. (1998). The transforming leader: A meta-ethnographic analysis. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London:Routledge.
Polanyi, M. (1997). The tacit dimension. In L. Prusak (Ed.), Knowledge in Organization. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Quinn, J. B. (1999). Maximizing innovation using intellectual science and technology. In R. Ruggles & D. Holtshouse (eds.), The knowledge advantage. Oxford: Capstone.
Quinn, R. E., & McGrath, M. R. (1985). The transformation of organizational cultures: A competing values perspective. In P. J. Frost, L. F. Moore, M. L. Louis, C. C. Lundberg, & J. Martin (Eds.), Organizational culture(pp.315-334). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363-377.
Quinn, R. E., Hildebrandt, H. W., & Rogers, P. S. (1991). A competing values framework for analyzing presentational communication in management contexts. The Journal of Business Communication, 28(3), 213-232.
Quinn,R.E.,. Spreitzer, G. M and Hart, S. (1991). Challenging the assumptions of bipolarity: Interpenetration and managerial effectiveness. In S. Srivastva and R. Fry. (eds.), Executive and Organizational Continuity(pp.222-252). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Redding, J. (1997). Enhancing team performance. Academy of Human Resource Development （AHRD）Conference Proceedings, March, 6-9.
Relan, A., & Gillani, B. B. (1997).Web-based instruction and the traditional classroom: Similarities and difference. In B. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction(pp.41-66). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications .
Robbins, S. P. (1992). Organizational behavior. Englewood Clifffs, New York: A Simon & Schuster Company.
Robbins, S. P. （1996）. Organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Roueche, J. E., Baker, G. A., & Rose, R. R. （1989）. Shared vision：Transformational leadership in American community colleges. Washington, D.C.: The Community College Press.
Sage, L. A. (2000). Winning the innovation race. Canada: Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Sashkin, M. (1988). The vision leader, In Conger, J.A. & Kanungo, R. N. (Eds.), Charismatic Leadership：The Elusive Factor in Organizational Effectiveness. (pp.122-160) San Francisco: Jossey - Bass.
Schein, E. H. (1985, 1991). Organizational culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Seltzer, J. & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership: Beyond initiation and consideration. Journal of Management, 16, 693-793.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1990a). Adding value to leadership gets extraordinary result. Educational Leadership, 47 (8), 23-27.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1990b). Value-added Leadership: How to get extraordinary performance in school. N.Y.: Harcount Brance Jovanovich.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral Leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1998). Leadership as pedagogy, capital development and school effectiveness. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1(1), 37-47.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1999). Rethinking leadership: A collection of articles, K-College. ERIC: RIEMAY2000.
Sharon, A. (1997). A framework for the study of relationships between organizational characteristics and organizational innovation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 42-58.
Silins, H.(1992). Effective leadership for school reform. Journal of Educational Research, 38(4), 317-334.
Stoll, L. & Fink, D.（1996）. Changing our schools. London: Open University Press.
Storer, R. J. (1997). Leadership characteristics of public high school principals in school-based and non-school-based decision-making in Kentucky: Exploring the concept of transformational leadership. Doctoral Dissertation of University of Kentucky, unpublished.
Teece, D., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A.(1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-553.
Tichy, N. M. & Devanna, M. A. (1986). The transformational leader. Training and development Journal, July, 27-32.
Tichy, N. M. & Devanna, M. A. (1990). The transformational leader. New York: Willey.
Tripsas, M. (1997). Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence form yypesetter industry. Industrial & Corporate Change, 6(2), 341-377.
Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D.A. (1986). Organizing for innovation. California Management Review, 28(3), 74-92.
Verona, G. S., & Young, J. W. (2001). The influence of principal transformational leadership style on high school proficiency test results in New Jersey comprehensive and vocational-technical high schools. ERIC: ED454281.
Vroom(1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
Wallace, J. R. C. (1996). From vision to practice: The art of educational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Wallace, J. R. C., Engel, D. E., & Mooney, J. E. (1997). The learning school: A guide to vision-based leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Weick, K. E. (1978). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 541-542.
Weller, Jr., L. D., Hartley, S. H., & Brown, C. L. (1994). Principals and TQM: Developing vision. The Clearing House, 67(5), 298-301.
Weller, S. J. & Weller, L. D. （1997）. Using Deming’s continuous improvement model to improve reading. NASSP Bulletin, 81(589), 78-85.
Weston , K E. (2001). An examination of the relationship between transactional and transformational leadership styles and sex-role identifications of elementary school principals. Doctoral dissertation of George Washington University, unpublished.
Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new Foundation for design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Wolfe, R. A. （1994）. Organizational innovation : Review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 31 (3), 405-430
Wooderson-Person, M., & Lunenburg, F. C. (2001). Transformational leadership, student achievement, and school district. ERIC: ED458693.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. （1993）. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management, 18(2), 293-321
Wooten, W. C. (1997). An investigation using multiple measures to identify transformational leaders and differentiate them from transactional leaders and their relationship with educational innovation and performance measures in the State of North Carolina. Doctoral Dissertation of North Carolina, unpublished.
Yeung, A., Brockbank, J., & Ulrich, D.（1991）. Organizational culture and human resources practices: An empirical assessment. Research in organizational change and development . Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Yu, H. (2000). Transformational leadership and Hong Kong teachers’ commitment to change. Doctoral Dissertation of University of Toronto, unpublished.
Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in organizations. (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Zaleznik, A. (1977). Managers and leaders: Are they different? Harvard Business Review, 55, 67-78. |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
88152504
92 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088152504 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [教育學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
