Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32924
|
| Title: | 我國大學院校招生之市場區隔與行銷策略之研究 |
| Authors: | 黃文哲
Hermes Huang |
| Contributors: | 陳木金 博士
黃文哲
Hermes Huang |
| Keywords: | 大學院校
招生市場
市場區隔
行銷策略 |
| Date: | 2002 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 14:52:22 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究旨在瞭解我國大學院校招生之市場區隔與行銷策略之現況，並依據研究結果提出結論與建議，基於研究動機，本研究歸納出以下三個研究目的；
一、瞭解大學院校招生市場中學生背景變項與特性、選校評估準則，以作為招生市場的區隔變數，並藉以瞭解大學院校招生市場區隔之現況與特性。
二、本研究意欲瞭解大學院校招生市場中學生對於選校資訊來源與重要性、學生對於大學行銷策略之重要性知覺以做為大學院校投入行銷作為的重要參考。
三、依據研究所得提出論述給予相關單位參考。
為達上述目的，本研究首先從相關文獻中探討「市場區隔」與「行銷策略」之理論，以此作為本研究之理論基礎，建構本研究之研究架構，並導出研究問題，既以自編之「我國大學院校招生之市場區隔與行銷策略之調查問卷」實施問卷調查，蒐集相關資料。主要研究對象是以台灣12所高級中學之高三學生為範圍，共回收有效問卷1355份。分別以積差相關分析、信度分析、因素分析、描述統計、集群分析、區別分析、變異數分析與事後多重比較、卡方檢定等統計方法對研究資料進行分析，主要發現如下：
一、學生在大學選校系評估準則量表得分高低依序為「設備取向」、「課程取向」、「就業取向」、「生活取向」、「經濟取向」、「聲望取向」，在六點量表上得分為5.180至4.683分，皆屬良好程度。
二、學生在大學行銷作為知覺調查量表得分高低依據為「通路策略」、「價格策略」、「產品策略」、「促銷策略」，在六點量表上得分為5.112至4.634分，皆屬良好程度。
三、不同「性別」、「就讀類組」、「高中區位」的選校系評估準則各向度上，學生有顯著差異。
四、不同「性別」、「就讀類組」、「高中區位」的大學行銷作為知覺各向度上，學生有顯著差異。
五、不同「性別」、「就讀類組」、「高中區位」在四集群學生中，皆有顯著差異。
六、不同集群學生在大學選校系評估準則上有其各自的共同傾向。
七、不同集群學生在大學大學資訊來源上有其各自的傾向。
八、不同集群學生在大學行銷作為知覺上有其各自的共同傾向。
最後依據研究結果、討論及結論，針對「教育行政機關」、「大學院系」、「高中學生」以及「未來相關研究」等四個方向提出建議，作為相關研究及實務之參考。
關鍵詞：大學院校、招生市場、市場區隔、行銷策略
A Study of the Market Segmentation and Marketing Strategies on University Recruiting Market in Taiwan
Abstract
The research is to realize the current situation of the market segmentation and marketing strategies on the University Recruiting Market in Taiwan, and to forward conclusions and suggestions according to the results. Based on the motivations, it can be categorized into four purposes:
1.to realize the current situation and the related factors of market segmentation in recruitment of students in Taiwan universities.
2.to realize the current situation and the related factors of marketing strategies of recruitment of students in Taiwan universities.
3.to present, according to the results, constructive suggestions to the administration, the universities and colleges, and the senior high school students, serving as a reference in the management of enrollment strategies.
To achieve the aims mentioned above, the research starts from exploring the theories of market segmentation and marketing strategies through related papers and articles, from which the fundamental theory is formed, the framework constructed, and the research questions derived. In order to gather related data and information, it is followed by sending out the self-made questionnaire on “the market segmentation and marketing strategies on the University Recruiting Market in Taiwan”. The researcher intends to restrict the targets within the range of senior high students in Taiwan. Thus, 1355 valid copies are collected. After the data have been carefully studied by using statistical methods of product-moment correlation analysis, reliability analysis, factor analysis, descriptive statistics, cluster analysis, discrimination analysis, analysis of variance, afterwards hierarchical comparison, chi square test, etc., the main discoveries are as follows:
1.It is noted that on the six-point rating scale of university selection criterion, the students score between 5.180 and 4.683 points, which is reasonably well.
2. .It is noted that on the six-point rating scale of university marketing behavior perception, the students score between 5.112 and 4.634 points, which is reasonably well.
3.Different background variable make a lot of difference in the university selection criteria.
4. Different background variable make a lot of difference in the university marketing strategies.
5. Different background variable make a lot of difference within the four cluster students.
6.Different cluster students have their own inclination in the university selection criteria.
7. Different cluster students have their own inclination in the university information sources.
8. Different cluster students have their own inclination in the university marketing strategies.
Finally, based on the results discussion and conclusions, the researcher advances the suggestions on “Institute of Educational Administration”, “The Universities and College in Taiwan”, “The Senior High School Students” and “Related Research in the Future”, hoping that they can be of referential value as far as related research and practice are concerned.
【keywords】University, Recruiting Market, Market Segmentation, Marketing Strategies |
| Reference: | 參考書目
【中文部分】
方世榮（民88），行銷管理學，第三版。北市，東華書局。
王俊如（民82），高等教育行銷之研究，國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文（未出版）。
林靜珊（民91），大學甄試生選校決策因素之探討，大葉大學工業關係研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
邱皓政（民82），量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。北市，五南。
胡其忠（民75），企研所認知、偏好、選擇過程之研究，國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文（未出版）。
范陽松（民77），「攻心為上，談行銷定位」，現代管理月刊，第134期，民77年3月。
高中等合譯（民88），行銷學，五南。
教育部統計處（民91：三月），中華民國大專院校概況統計—九十學年度。北市，教育部。
陳瑞萍（民89），師範校院招生行銷策略規劃之研究，國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文（未出版）。
粘長榮（民90），ADSL寬頻網路服務市場區隔與行銷策略之研究-以中華電信北區分公司網易通(HIFly)連線HiNet客戶為例，國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
黃文哲（民91），ISP廠商在台灣ADSL寬頻網路接取市場之競爭優勢與競爭策略分析，國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文（未出版）。
黃再德（民74），行銷觀念應用於大學科系招生之研究，國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文（未出版）。
黃憲仁（民81），行銷高手，眾文圖書股份有限公司。
榮泰生（民89），廣告策略，第二版。北市。五南。
歐聖榮、張集毓（1995），遊憩區市場定位之研究，戶外遊憩研究，8（3）15-45。
蕭鏡堂（民88），產業行銷學。北市，華泰書局。
嚴玉華（民91），我國技職校院研究所招生策略之研究，國立台北師學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
【英文部分】
Adler, K. (1998). Degree upgrades : a new service, a new market and a new strategy for higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 9 (1) , 11-23.
Ashar, H., & Lane, M. (1996). Focus groups help to focus the marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 7 (2), 33-41.
Bingham, F. G. (1993). Marketing the institution of higher learning : a research analysis enrollment model. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 4 (1) , 59-72. Bonnici, J. L., & Reddy, A. C. (1993). Breaking away from the pack: positioning the marketing discipline through a triangular analysis. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 4 (1) , 107-119.
Bruwer, J. de W.(1996). Marketing a public higher educational institution through target and research on its freshmen applicant and enrollee pools. South African Journal of Higher Education, 10 (2), 120-129.
Christopher H.Lovelock(1991), "Service Marketing", Prentice-HallIntrenation Editions
Coccari, R. L., & Javalgi, R. G. (1995). Analysis of students’ needs in selecting a college or university in a changing environment. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 6 (2), 27-39.
Comm, C. L., & Labay, D. G. (1996). Reposition colleges using changing student quality perceptions : an exploratory analysis. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 7 (4), 21-34.
Cox,R., & Schutte, T. F.（1969）A Look at Channel Management. Marketing Involvement in Society and The Economy. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
David A. Aaker、Gary J. Shansby（1982，May-June），Positioning Your Product，Business Horizon，56-62。
Del I. Hawkins, Roger J. Best, Kenneth A. Coney（1998），Consumer behavior : building marketing strategy，7th ed.，Boston, Mass. : McGraw-Hill, c1998
E. Jerome McCarthy, William D. Perreault, Jr（1993）, Learning Aid For Use With Basic Marketing , Journal of Marketing for Higher Education
Goldgehn, L. A. (1990). Are U.S. colleges and universities applying marketing techniques properly and within the context of an overall marketing plan? Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 3 (1) , 5-28.
Hall, M. C., & Elliott, K. M. (1993). Strategic planning for academic departments：a model and methodology. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 4 (2) , 295-307.
Hayes, T. J. (1993). Image and the university. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 4 (2), 423-425
Hekmat, F., & Heischmidt, K. A. (1993). Application of program life cycle concept for fund raising strategies in higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education , 4 (2) , 121-126.
Hills, Gerald E. and Raymond W. LaForge (1992) “Research at the Marketing Interface to Advance Entrepreneurship Theory”, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, pp.35-59.
Hilton, C. B., Motes, W. H., & Fielden, J. S. (1993). Educational recruitment ads：does prose style really count for much ?. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education , 4 (2) , 361-377.
J.Barry Mason,Hazel F.Zell（1993） "Marketing Mangement" pp.474 Mac- miUan Publishing Company, New York .
Kotler, P., & Fox, K. F. (1995). Strategic marketing for educational institutions (2ed ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N J：Prentice-Hall.
Kotler,P., "Marketing Management:Analysis,Planning,and Control Śth edition,1994.
Landrum, R. E., Turrisi, R., & Harless, C. (1998). University image : the benefits of assessment and modeling. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 9 (1), 53-68.
Leister, D. V. (1975). Identifying institutional clientele： applied metamarketing in higher education administration. Journal of Higher Education, 46 (4), 381-398.
Litten, L. H. (1980). Marketing Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education, 51 (1), 40-58.
Louis E. Boone, David L. Kurtz（1997）. Contemporary business. Fort Worth : Dryden Press.
McCarthy, Jerome E., Basic Marketing : A Managerial Approach Homewood,Illinois,Richard D.Irwin Inc.,7th ed.,1981.
Miller, P. (1990). An approach for identifying benefit segments among prospective college students. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education , 3 ( 1), 49-65.
Parameswaran, R., & Glowacka A. E. (1995). University image: an information processing perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education , 6 (2), 41- 56.
Pitt, Leyland F. and Rushieda Kannemeyer (2000) “The Role of Adaptation in Microenterprise Development: A Marketing Perspective”, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, Aug., Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.137-155.
Robert E. Steve, C.William McConkey, David L. Loudon, William E. Warren（1993）, Data Based Recruiting Strategies. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 4（1/2）,183-190.
Rosen, D. E., Curran, J. M., & Greenlee, T. B. (1998). College choice in a brand elimination framework : the high school student’s perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education , 8 (3), 73-92.
Rosen, D. E., Curran, J. M., & Greenlee, T. B. (1998). College choice in a brand elimination framework : the administrator’s perspective, Joural of Marketing for Higher Education , 8 (4) , 61-81.
Taylor, R. E., & Darling, J. R. (1991). Perceptions toward marketing higher education : do academic disciplines make a difference ? Joural of Marketing for Higher Education , 3 (2), 17-38.
Urban, G. L.& Star, S.H.（1991）, Advanced Marketing Strategy：Phenomena, Analysis, Decision, Prentice-Hall, P.134.
Villella, E. F., & Hu, M. (1990). College choice as a linking variable between recruitment and retention. Joural of Marketing for Higher Education, 3 (1), 79- 88.
Wallingford, H. P., & Berger, K. (1993). Marketing strategies for a low endowment private university in the 1990’s. Joural of Marketing for Higher Education , 4 (2) , 325-338.
Webb, M. S., Coccari, R. L., & Allen, L. Cherie (1996). Doctoral programs : what factors attract students. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education , 7 (4), 73-85.
Webb, M. S., Coccari, R. L., Allen, L. Cherie,Lado Augustine, Reichert A. K.(1997). Selection Criteria Used by Graduate Students in Considering Doctoral Business Programs Offered Private vs. Public Institutions. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education ,8(1),69-90
Weinstein, A. (1987). Market segmentation : using niche marketing to exploit new markets, Chicago : Probus .
Weissman, J. (1990). Institution images assessment and midification in solleges and universities. Journal for Higher Education Management, 6, 65-75.
Wind, Y. J. (1982). Product policy : concepts , methods and strategy, Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley .
Yavas, U., & Schemwell, D. J. (1996). Graphical representation of university image : a correspondence analysis. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education , 7 , 75-84. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
87152025
91 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0087152025 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [教育學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
