English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113392/144379 (79%)
Visitors : 51212692      Online Users : 904
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32903


    Title: 兒童公平分配概念之研究:性別與情境差異取向
    A Study of Children`s Distrubutive-Justice Conception
    Authors: 李昭明
    Lee,Chao-Ming
    Contributors: 林佩蓉
    倪鳴香

    李昭明
    Lee,Chao-Ming
    Keywords: 公平分配
    兒童
    性別
    情境
    Distributive Justice
    Children
    Gender
    Context
    Date: 2004
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 14:49:01 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: William Damon於1975年提出「兒童積極性正義發展階段」的概念與測驗方式,但是Damon在發展概念之初,並未針對性別與情境差異兩項可能影響兒童進行公平分配時的判斷的因素進行探究,因此,本研究希望能瞭解台灣兒童是否會因為本身的性別不同,或因為面對的情境不同,而影響他們在判斷公平分配時的決定。研究工具的設計是以Willian Damon所發展出來的「兒童積極性正義概念發展階段」為基礎,並參考國內外過去的相關研究,重新設計一套「兒童公平分配概念發展測驗」,並選取台北地區40名5至6歲的兒童進行施測。本研究結果顯示:1.不同性別兒童在公平分配的概念上並沒有顯著差異;2.兒童在面對不同的情境時,對於公平分配判斷的原則會有顯著差異;3.兒童的性別差異與情境差異並未出現交互作用。
    William Damon proposed the concept and testing ways of “Children developmental stages of Positive-Justice” in 1975, but on that time, he didn’t focus on the two possible variables—gender and context differences—of the judgement of children’s distributive justice further. Therefore, this study attampts to understand whether Taiwanese children would modify their judgements of distributive justive because of their gender or the contexts they involve in. The design of the research methods is based on “Childen developmental stage of Positive-Justice” which Damon has developed, and the overseas and domestic researches relating to distributive justice before, and then redevelopes a new test of “the Development of Children Distributive-Justice Concept”. In addition, there are 40 children between 5-year-old and 6-year-old in Taipei sampled to participate in the study. The result of the study reveals: 1. there is no significant difference on the judgements of distrubitive jutice concept in different children’s gender;2. The principles of judging distributive justice for children show have significant difference because of different contexts which children involved;3. The interaction of children’s gender and contexts in judging distributive justice doesn’t have significant difference.
    Reference: 方富熹、王文忠、D.M. Keats(1996)。北京兒童對獎賞公平性的社會認知發展。本土心理學研究,5,234-263。
    肖巍譯(1999)。不同的聲音:心理學理論與婦女發展。北京市:中央編譯出版。(原著出版年:1982年)。
    沈六(1998)。社會學習論的道德發展觀與教育。公民訓育學報,7,27-65。
    沈六(2002)。道德發展的家庭脈絡因素。公民訓育學報,11,1-37。
    李昭明、施淑君(1999)。兒童公平概念發展之研究。台北市立師範學院幼兒教育學系學士論文,未出版。
    無名氏(無日期)。兒童公平概念的發展。2002年9月27日,取自http://tacocity.com.tw/fish2020/0010.html
    林春雄(1994)。青少年公平分配概念發展及其相關因素之研究。國立台北師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。台北市:東華出版。
    李雄揮譯(1990)。倫理學。台北市:五南出版。(原著出版年:1963年)
    苗力田編(1999)。亞里士多德選集:倫理學卷。北京市:中國人民大學。
    徐澄清(1998)。道德認知與判斷的發展。健康世界,6,17-21。
    張玉華編譯、孫效智校訂(無日期)。正義與公平。2002年12月20日,取自http://210.60.194.100/life2000/ethic_discuss/ethic_dis_79/BOARD.HTM
    張春興(1994)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:東華出版。
    張蓓莉、蘇芳柳(1996)。比較國小聽覺障礙學生從不同角度讀話結果之研究。師大學報,41期,53-65。
    陳瑩娟(2004)。學齡前兒童性別認知發展之研究。國立高雄師範大學性別教育言界所碩士論文,未出版。
    鄧志松(無日期)。分配的正義。2003年5月12日,取自http://ceiba.cc.ntu.edu.tw/demo_theo_prac/database/Distributive_Justice.html
    歐陽教(1983)。道德判斷與道德教學。台北市:文景出版。
    簡楚瑛(1995)。我國兒童公平分配概念之發展及其相關因素之研究。教育研究資訊,3(2),94 -115。
    劉碧如譯(1986)。兒童道德判斷。台北市:五洲出版。
    蘇永明(1996)。郭耳堡的道德認知發展論評析。教育研究所集刊,37,155-170。
    Adams, J. S.(1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2., pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
    Blake, C. & Cohen, H.(1984, August). A meta-analysis of sex differences in moral development. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
    Bronfenbrenner, Urie(1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Canary, D. J., & Emmers-Sommer, T. M., with Faulkner, S.(1997). Sex and gender differences in personal relationships. New York: The Guilford Press.
    Crawford, M., & Chaffin, R.(1997). The meaning of difference: Cognition social and culture context. In Paula J. Caplan, Mary Crawford, Janet Shibley Hyde & John T. E. Richardson, Gender differences in human cognition(pp. 81-130). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Damon, W.(1975). Early conceptions of positive justice as related to the development of logical operations. Child Development, 46, 301-312.
    Damon, W.(1977). The social world of the child. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, Equality, And Need:What Determines Which Value Will be Used The Basis For Distributive Justice? Journal Of Social Issues, 31, pp. 137-150.
    Enright, R. D., Franklin, C. C., & Manheim, L. A.(1980). Children`s distributive justice reasoning: A standardized and objective Scale. Developmental Psychology, 16, 193-202.
    Enright, R. D., Bjerstedt, A., Enright, W. F., Levy, V. M., Jr., Lapsley, D. K., Buss, R. R., Harwell, M., & Zindler, M. (1984). Distributive justice development: cross-cultural, contextual and longitudinal evaluations. Child Development, 55, 1737-1751.
    Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (1982). Why justice? Normative and instrumental interpretations. In Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L.(Eds.), Equity and justice in social hebavior. (pp. 437-469). New York:Academic Press.
    Kahn, A.(1972). Reactions to generosity or stinginess from an intelligent or stupid work partner. A test of equity theory in a direct exchange relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 116-123.
    Kohlberg, L.(1984). Essays on moral development, Vol.Ⅱ: The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. New York: Harper & Row.
    Kohlberg, L. & Colby, A. with Abrahami, A.(1987).The measurement of moral judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Krebs, D. L., Vermeulen, S. C.(1994). Gender and perspective differences in moral judgment and moral orientation. Journal of Moral Education, 23(1), 17-26.
    Lisi, A. V. M. & Watkins, C. & Vinchur, A.(1994). The effect of relationship on children’s distributive justice reasoning. Child Development, 65, 1694 –1700.
    Maccoby, E. E. & Jacklin D. B.(1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Maccoby, E. E.(1980). Social development: Psychological growth and the parent-child relationship. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    Miller, Scott. A.(1998). Developmental research methods. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Murphy-Berman, V. & Berman, J. J. & Sinhg, P. & Pachauri, A. & Kumar, P.(1984). Factor affecting allocation to needy and meritorious recipients: A cross-culture comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1267-1272.
    Piaget, J.(1932/1997). The moral judgment of the child(Marjorie Gabain, Trans.). New York: Free Press Paperbacks.(Original work published 1932).
    Rothbart, M. K. & Others.(1986). Gender differences in moral reasoning. Sex Roles, 15(11-12), 645-653.
    Sampson, E. E. (1975). On justice as equality. Journal of social issues, 1975, 31, pp. 45-64.
    Shaffer, D. R.(2000). Social and personality development(4th ed.). CT: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
    Sigelman, C. K. & Waitzman, K. A.(1991). The development of distributive justice orientation: Contextual influences on children’s resource allocations. Child Development, 62, 1367-1378.
    Sigelman, Carol K. & Shaffer, David R.(1995/2001). Life-span human development. U.S.A.: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
    游恆山(譯)。發展心理學。台北:五南。
    Thorkildsen, T. A.(1989). Pluralism in children’s reasoning about social justice. Child Development, 60, 965-972.
    Waibel, C.(2001). Kohlberg and Gilligan’s stages of ethical development. Retrieved July 7, 2002, from http://cda.mrs.umn.edu/~waibelc/IS1091/IS1091kohlbergandgilligan.html
    Wark, G. R., & Krebs, D. L.(1996). Gender and dilemma differences in real-life moral judgment. Developmental Psychology, 32(2), 220-230.
    Windmiller, M. & Lambert, N. & Turiel, E.(1980). Moral development and socialization. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    幼兒教育所
    90157001
    93
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0901570011
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[幼兒教育研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    57001101.pdf123KbAdobe PDF21376View/Open
    57001102.pdf86KbAdobe PDF21345View/Open
    57001103.pdf68KbAdobe PDF21441View/Open
    57001104.pdf88KbAdobe PDF21385View/Open
    57001105.pdf248KbAdobe PDF21504View/Open
    57001106.pdf462KbAdobe PDF24058View/Open
    57001107.pdf406KbAdobe PDF21775View/Open
    57001108.pdf215KbAdobe PDF21434View/Open
    57001109.pdf112KbAdobe PDF21279View/Open
    57001110.pdf106KbAdobe PDF22824View/Open
    57001111.pdf411KbAdobe PDF21727View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback