政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/32880
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51588162      Online Users : 838
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32880


    Title: 新住民子女幼教教師教學經驗分析之個案研究
    Authors: 謝妃涵
    Contributors: 簡楚瑛
    謝妃涵
    Keywords: 多元文化教育
    新住民子女教育
    多元文化教學觀點
    教學困境與解決策略
    Multicultural education
    Education for new immigrants’ children
    multicultural teaching perspectives
    teaching difficulties and resolving strategies
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 14:46:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 台灣新興的跨國婚姻熱潮使得由台灣男性與東南亞籍女性組成的新住民家庭漸多,新住民子女現今多就讀幼稚園與國小低年級,新住民子女教育的研究多為小學階段其學業成就等能力,研究取樣差異使結果大相逕庭,對新住民子女幼教老師本身的研究缺乏,故研究者將研究重點放在新住民子女幼教老師。本研究採質性研究法,探討兩位背景相當的幼教老師教學。目的在瞭解多元文化教學觀點有哪些、持不同教學觀點老師之教學困境、解決策略有何不同,並深入探討其觀點與困境、策略之間的關係。資料蒐集採深度訪談法,用三階段編碼分析資料,研究對象是從9位教師的訪談中分析出最符合同化觀點的小慧老師與涵化觀點的小芳老師。
    研究結果如下:(1)透過文獻探討歸納出多元文化教育場域中有兩類教學觀點,一為同化觀點,一為涵化觀點,兩者分別對低社經地位與少數族群學生學習成就低落原因的解釋、文化有無優劣、文化融合有不同的主張。(2)兩位老師皆面臨的教學困境有語言、家庭、課程方面,小芳老師尚有幼兒方面的困境。新住民幼兒說話腔調使教師聽不懂,小慧老師致力矯正其口音與腔調、小芳老師則是課後請教家長;此乃因小慧老師持有同化教育中官方語言教育的觀點。(3)新住民子女的學習與行為較依賴老師,小慧老師認為新住民子女的學習較差乃因其本身文化不利、新住民沒有教育下一代的能力,所以請父親輔導其課後學習,而母親監督就好,不需參與輔導;小芳老師則肯定新住民的教育能力、並認為新住民子女行為問題是家庭文化與學校文化之間落差使然,故充分與家長溝通,調整母親工作時間使其有時間教育孩子。(4)小慧老師認為新住民文化是低落的,且不需要傳承、新住民沒有能力傳承其文化,故在課程中沒有東南亞文化教材,而在教授台灣文化教材時發生幼兒經驗不足無法團討的困難;小芳老師認為新住民有教育能力、並認為雙重文化是優勢,於是請新住民子女分享其回東南亞的經驗、設計相關文化主題活動。(5)小芳老師班級中的新住民子女感到自卑時,她會鼓勵其尊重母親原生文化以增加幼兒自信。最後建議教師應培養反思能力、建立多元文化教育觀點量表。
    The new immigrant families have increased with the surge of cross-cultural marriages between Taiwanese and Southeast Asian spouses, most of whose children study in kindergartens and elementary lower grades. Sampling may result in significantly distinct analyses on learning capabilities of those elementary children, and researches on their preschool teachers are relatively absent; therefore, the study focuses on preschool teachers and applies the qualitative research to 2 teachers of similar backgrounds in order to explore which perspectives in multicultural education field, explore the variations on teaching difficulties and resolving strategies of teachers with dissimilar education perspectives and to discover the relationship between both. The study includes in-depth interview for data collection and three-stage coding for data analysis, and selects Teacher Hue and Teacher Feng respectively matching assimilation and acculturation perspectives out of 9 interviewees as research targets.
    The study reveals the following findings: (1) assimilation and acculturation perspectives in multicultural education fields through documentation induction, stand different on reason explanations for lower social and economic positions and learning achievements of the minority students, cultural superior or inferior quality, and cultural integration, (2) two teachers have teaching difficulties in terms of language, family, and course, as well as kid issues only for Feng, and when getting confused of kid’s expressions, Hue with official language prospective in assimilation education is devoted to correcting assent and pronunciation while Feng consulting parents after school, (3) those students used to rely on teachers on learning and behavior, and Hue contributes inferior learning capability to disadvantaged culture background and education ability of new immigrants and suggests home learning assistance of father and supervision of mother instead of after school programs while Feng considers cultural gap between family and school resulting in their behavior issues and emphasizes communications with parents to enhance mother’s education, (4) education difficulties on their involving in discussion in grass-root course happen to Hue who believes no necessity for heritage of inferior Southeast Asian culture and absence of heritage potential of new immigrants, and thus ignores Southeast Asian culture in teaching materials while those children are welcome to share their alien experiences and design relevant cultural activities by Feng who accepts education capability of new immigrants and ensures advantages of dual culture, and (5) Feng encourages those children feeling inferior to respect mothers’ culture, enhancing their confidence. The study eventually suggests that teachers shall cultivate retrospective potentials and establish multicultural education perspective inventories.
    Reference: 【中文部分】
    王瑞勳(2004)。大陸和外籍新娘婚生子女適應與學習能力探究。台灣教育雙
    月刊,626,25-31。
    多元世界的教與學(朱瑛、蔡其蓁譯)(2004)。台北:心理。(原著出版
    年:1998年)
    李亦園、歐用生(1992)。我國山胞教育之方向定位與課程內容設計研究。台
    北:教育部教育研究委員會。
    成露茜(2005)。移民與多元文化教育。學生輔導季刊,97,74-83。
    江亮演、陳燕禎、黃稚純(2004)。大陸與外籍配偶生活適應之探討。社區發
    展季刊,105,66-89。
    江雪齡(1997)。多元文化教育。台北:師大書苑。
    邱玉琦(2004)。美國幼兒多元文化教育發展之初探。國立台東大學幼兒教育
    學系碩士班碩士論文,未出版,台東。
    郭生玉(2001)。心理與教育研究法。台北:精華書局。
    吳芝儀、劉秀燕(2004)。跨文化衝擊下外籍新娘家庭環境極其子女行為表現
    之研究。國立嘉義大學:外籍與大陸配偶子女教育輔導學術研討會論文
    集,117-148。
    吳雅玲(2005)。新住民子女的學前教育契機。師友月刊,13-16。
    林清江(1997)。多元文化教育與教育改革。多元文化教育的理論與實際國際
    學術研討會論文集,64-102。
    林璣萍(2004)。台灣新興的弱勢學生---外籍新娘子女學校適應現況之研
    究。國立台東大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台東。
    周秀潔(2004)。外籍配偶子女的學校適應—教師的覺知與應對。國立台灣師
    範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    柯淑慧(2004)。外籍母親與本籍母親子女學業成就之比較研究。國立台北師
    範學院幼兒教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    莊明貞(1993)。美國多元文化教育的理念與實施。中國教育學會:多元文化
    教育,225-250。
    宮莉虹(2001)。當漢族老師遇到原住民孩子---看兩位幼稚園教師如何將泰
    雅文化融入單元課程與教學中。國立新竹師範學院幼兒教育研究所碩士論
    文,未出版,新竹。
    個案研究法(尚榮安譯)(2001)。台北:弘志文化。(原著出版年:1994
    年)
    教育研究的批判民俗誌(鄭同僚等譯)(2004)。台北:高等教育。(原著
    出版年:1996年)
    畢恆達(2006)。教授為什麼沒告訴我。台北:學富。
    陳美如(2000)。多元文化課程的理念與實踐。台北:師大書苑。
    陳湘琪(2004)。國小一年級外籍配偶子女在智力、語文能力及學業成就表現
    之研究。國立台南師範學院教師在職進修幼教碩士學位班,未出版,台
    南。
    陳麗華(1996)。減低族群偏見的課程與教學。國立花蓮師範學院主編,多元
    文化與原住民教育課程與教學發展學術研討會論文集。121-155。
    陳寶玲(1997)。國小教師的多元文化教育觀點之研究---從族群關係面向探
    討。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮。
    陳雅惠(2005)。外籍配偶子女發展與教育問題之探討。國教世紀,216,
    77-82。
    徐藝華(2005)。他們不是過客---努力紮根的新台灣子民。師友,441,
    26-33。
    高德義(2000)。原住民教育的發展與改革。載於張建成(主編),多元文化
    教育:我們的課題與別人的經驗(3-42頁)。台北:師大書苑。
    夏曉鵑(2000)。資本國際化的國際婚姻—以台彎的「外籍新娘」現象為例。
    台灣社會研究季刊,39,45-90。
    夏曉鵑(2002)。游離尋岸:資本國際化下的「外籍新娘」現象。台北:台灣
    社會研究雜誌社。
    夏曉鵑(2005)。解開面對新移民的焦慮。學生輔導季刊,97,6-27。
    翁麗芳(2004)。「新台灣之子/女」的托教問題:多元教養文化研究。北縣
    成教,23,25-30。
    單文經(2000)。加拿大多元文化政策與教育作法。載於張建成(主編),多
    元文化教育:我們的課題與別人的經驗(199-225頁)。台北:師大書
    苑。
    譚光鼎(1997)。近五十年台灣原住民教育研究之評析。載於台灣師範大學教
    育學系(主編),多元文化教育的理論與實際國際學術研討會論文集
    (64-102頁)。台北:台灣師範大學教育學系。
    譚光鼎(1998)。原住民教育研究。台北:五南。
    譚光鼎(2000)。澳洲多元文化教育。載於張建成(主編),多元文化教育:
    我們的課題與別人的經驗(227-256頁)。台北:師大書苑
    黃玉娟(2004)。蘭嶼島上漢族教師的生命故事:一個教育民族誌研究。慈濟
    大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮
    黃政傑(1993)。多元文化教育的課程設計途徑。中國教育學會主編,多元文
    化教育,343-373。台北:台灣書店。
    黃琪璘、江雪齡(1995)。台灣準教師的社會多元文化觀之探討。國教之聲,
    28(3),27-35。
    黃瑞琴(2004)。質的教育研究方法。台北:心理。
    楊承達、劉興漢(2005)。面對外籍配偶人口成長的因應之道。載於何福田
    (主編),外籍配偶師資培育講義(71-98頁)。台北:國立教育研究院
    籌備處。
    楊淑朱、邢清清、翁慧雯、吳盈慧、張玉巍(2004)。雲林縣外籍女性配偶子
    女在校狀況之調查研究,嘉義大學:外籍與大陸配偶子女教育輔導學術研
    討會。
    蔡雅玉(2001)。台越跨國婚姻現象之初探。國立成功大學經濟研究所碩士論
    文,未出版,台北。
    蔡榮貴、黃月纯(2004)。台灣外籍配偶子女教育問題及其因應策略。台灣教
    育雙月刊,625,32-37。
    蔡榮貴、楊淑朱、賴翠媛、黃月純、余坤煌、周立勳(2004)。外籍配偶子女
    就讀國民中小學學習表現與學校輔導措施現況調查。國立嘉義大學,外籍
    與大陸配偶子女教育學術輔導研討會論文集,208-239。
    質性研究概論(徐宗國譯)(1997)。台北:巨流。(原著出版年:1990
    年)
    劉茹敏(2005)。國小教師對外籍配偶子女的刻板印象及接納態度之研究 :
    從多元文化教育觀點。國立台南大學教育學系輔導教學研究所碩士論文。
    未出版,台南。
    盧秀芳(2003)。在台外籍新娘子女家庭環境與學校生活適應之研究。國立政
    治大學學校行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    謝慶皇(2003)。外籍配偶子女學業成就及其相關因素之探討。國立台南師範
    學院教師在職進修特殊碩士學位班,未出版,台南。
    鍾佩娟(2002)。原住民地區教師的教育實踐:以雲海國小為例。國立花蓮師
    範學院多元文化教育研究所,未出版,花蓮。
    鐘鳳嬌、王國川(2004)。外籍配偶子女的語文、心智能力發展與學習狀況調
    查研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系教育月刊,23,231-258。
    【英文部分】
    Aching, G.(1996). Disciplines and their discomforts:The
    challenges of study and service abroad. In K. J. Mayberry
    (Eds. ), Teaching what you’re not.(pp. 285-307). NY:
    New York University.
    Anderson, J.M.,(1985). Perspectives on the healthy of
    immigrant women:A feminist analysis. Advances in Nursing
    Science,8(1), 61-76.
    Banks, J. A. (1993). The Canon Debate, Knowledge
    Construction, and Multicultural Education. Educational
    Researcher, 22(5), 4-14.
    Banks, J. A. (1994a). An introduction to multicultural
    education. Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
    Banks, J.A.(1994b). Multiethnic education:Theory and
    practice(3rd ed.). Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
    Banks, J.A.(1996). Multicultural education transformative
    knowledge & action historical and contemporary
    perspective. N.Y.: Teachers College, Columbia University.
    Banks, J.A.(2004). Multicultural education:
    Characteristics and Goals. In Banks, J. A. and Banks, C.
    A. M.(Eds.), Multicultural Education: Issues and
    Perspectives(5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
    Baruth, L. G., & Manning, M. L (Eds.). (1992).
    Multicultural education of children and adolescents.
    Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
    Billings, L. G. (1992). Culturally Relevant Teaching:The
    Key to Making Multicultural Education Work. In C. A. Grant
    (Eds.), Research&multicultural education:From the
    margins to be mainstream(pp. 106-121). London: The
    Falmer.
    Brofenbrenner, U., (1979).The Ecology of Human
    Development:Experience by Nature and Design. Cambridge,
    MA:Harvard University Press.
    Corson, P.J.(1998). Anti-bias education in early
    childhood:Preparing teachers for diversity. Unpublished
    doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
    Condit, C.M.(1996). Theory, Practice, and the battered
    (Woman)Teacher. In K. J. Mayberry. In K. J. Mayberry
    (Eds. ), Teaching what you’re not.(pp. 155-176). NY:
    New York University.
    Curry, R.(1996). Daughters of dust, the white woman
    viewer, and the unborn child. In K. J. Mayberry. In K. J. Mayberry(Eds. ), Teaching what you’re not.(pp. 335-
    354). NY:New York University.
    Davis, B. M.(2006). How to teach students who don’t look
    like you---culturally relevant teaching strategies.
    California:Corwin.
    Dibernard, B.(1996). Teaching what I’m not:An able-
    bodied woman teachers literature by women with
    disabilities. In K. J. Mayberry. In K. J. Mayberry
    (Eds. ), Teaching what you’re not.(pp. 131-154). NY:
    New York University.
    Gaitan, C. D.(2006). Building culturally responsive
    classrooms:A guide for k-6 teachers. California:Corwin.
    Garmon, M.A.(2004). Changing preservice teachers’
    attitudes/beliefs about diversity:What are the critical
    factors? Journal of teacher education, 55, 201-213.
    Greenfield, P.M., & Cocking, R. R.(1995). Cross-Cultural
    Roots of Minority Child Development:A new paradigm for
    developmental psychology. Teaching thinking, 17(3), 1-5.
    Gordon, M.M.(1964). Assimilation in American Life:The
    Role of Race, Religion and National Origins. New York:
    Oxford University Press.
    Heller, C. W.(1996). A paradox of silence:Reflections of
    a Man who teaches women’s studies. In K. J. Mayberry. In
    K. J. Mayberry(Eds. ), Teaching what you’re not.(pp.
    228-240). NY:New York University.
    Hooks, B.(1994). Teaching to transgress:education as the
    practice of freedom. London:Routledge.
    Johnson, J. S.(1996). No middle ground?Men teaching
    feminism. In K. J. Mayberry. In K. J. Mayberry(Eds. ),
    Teaching what you’re not.(pp. 85-106). NY:New York
    University.
    Karamcheti, I.(1996). Caliban in the classroom. In K. J.
    Mayberry. In K. J. Mayberry(Eds. ), Teaching what
    you’re not.(pp. 85-106). NY:New York University.
    Kyriakides, L., Campbell, R. J.& Christofidou, E.(2002).
    Generating criteria for measuring teacher effectiveness
    through a self-evaluation approach:a complementary way
    of measuring teacher effectiveness. School effectiveness
    and school improvement, 13(3), 291-325.
    Lamons, G. L.(1996). “Young man, tell our stories of how
    we made it over”:Beyond the politics of identity. In K.
    J. Mayberry. In K. J. Mayberry(Eds. ), Teaching what
    you’re not.(pp. 259-284). NY:New York University.
    Larke, P. J.(1990). Cultural Diversity Awareness
    Inventory:Assessing the Sensitivity of Pre-service
    Teachers. Action in Teacher Education, Fall(3), 23-30.
    Lynch, L.(1983). The Multicultural Curriculum. London:
    Batsford.
    Peterson, N. J.(1996). Redefining America:Literature,
    Multiculturalism, Pedagogy. In K. J. Mayberry. In K. J.
    Mayberry(Eds. ), Teaching what you’re not.(pp. 23-
    46). NY:New York University.
    Pallas, A., Natriel, G.&McDill, E. L.(1989). The
    changing nature of the disadvantaged population:current
    dimensions and future trends. Educational researcher, 18
    (5), 16-22.
    Powers, J. M.(1996). The outsider’s gaze. In K. J.
    Mayberry. In K. J. Mayberry(Eds. ), Teaching what
    you’re not.(pp. 70-84). NY:New York University.
    Murphy, B. C. T(1980). A rationale for multicultural
    and multiethnic curriculum in early children education:
    assessment of inservice and preservice teachers attitudes
    toward selected concepts of ethnicity. Unpublished
    doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
    Nieto, S.(1996). Affirming diversity:The sociopolitical
    context of multicultural education (2nd ed.).N.Y.:
    Longman.
    Romanowski. H. M.(2002). Meeting the unique needs of the
    children of migrant farm workers. The clearing house. 77
    (1), 27-34.
    Ruffini, G.(1983). Employment equity and Euroethics
    Perspectives, 40-44.
    Schofield, J.W.(1995). Improving intergroup relations
    among students. In J.A. Banks(Ed.). Handbook of
    research on multicultural education. 635-646. New York:
    Simon & Schuster Macmilian.
    Slavin, R.E.(1995). Cooperative learning and intergroup
    relations. In J.A. Banks(Ed.).Handbook of research on
    multicultural education. 628-634. New York:Simon &
    Schuster Macmilian.
    Sleeter, C., & Grant, C.(2003). Making choices for
    multicultural education:Five approaches to race, class,
    and gender(4th ed.). New York:Wiley.
    Tiedt, P.L.&Tiedt, I.M.(1986). Multicultural teaching:A
    handbook of activities, information, and resources.(2 nd
    ed). Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
    Volk, D. & Long, S.(2005). Challenging myths of the
    deficit perspective:Honoring children’s literacy
    resources. Young Children, 60(6), 12-19.
    Wang, L. H.(2004). Kindergarten teachers` attitudes
    toward multicultural education in Taiwan. Unpublished
    doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University:
    United States ---Pennsylvania.
    Winkler, B. S.(1996). Straight teacher/Queer classroom:
    Teaching as an ally. In K. J. Mayberry. In K. J. Mayberry
    (Eds. ), Teaching what you’re not.(pp. 47-69). NY:
    New York University.
    Yeung, A. S. W.(2006). Teachers’ conceptions of
    borderless. Educational research for policy and practice,
    5, 33-53.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    幼兒教育所
    93157004
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093157004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Early Childhood Education] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    15700401.pdf38KbAdobe PDF21124View/Open
    15700402.pdf90KbAdobe PDF21122View/Open
    15700403.pdf110KbAdobe PDF21222View/Open
    15700404.pdf83KbAdobe PDF21015View/Open
    15700405.pdf139KbAdobe PDF22007View/Open
    15700406.pdf326KbAdobe PDF27469View/Open
    15700407.pdf290KbAdobe PDF26314View/Open
    15700408.pdf360KbAdobe PDF21748View/Open
    15700409.pdf122KbAdobe PDF21370View/Open
    15700410.pdf77KbAdobe PDF21596View/Open
    15700411.pdf126KbAdobe PDF22310View/Open
    15700412.pdf88KbAdobe PDF21542View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback