Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32547
|
| Title: | 少年攻擊評估量表之信、效度研究
The Reliability and validity of the aggressive scale in adolescents |
| Authors: | 陳盈旬
Chen, Ying Xun |
| Contributors: | 許文耀
陳盈旬
Chen, Ying Xun |
| Keywords: | 工具式攻擊
反應式攻擊
關係攻擊
外顯攻擊
攻擊量表
instrumental aggression
reactive aggression
relational aggression
overt aggression
aggressive scale |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 13:23:12 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 近年來校園暴力日趨嚴重，許多研究者對此問題欲深入探討及分析。學者Dodge & Coie(1987)提出自發式攻擊及反應式攻擊作為瞭解攻擊行為的向度，且理論成因跟社會適應的表現有所不同，然而國內缺乏針對攻擊類型的研究與中文攻擊行為評估量表。因此本研究試圖透過翻譯及驗證Little & Jones等人(2003)所發展之模型與攻擊行為評估量表，以期使國內引入攻擊類型分類的模型，並使評估少年攻擊行為時能夠更精準。<br>翻譯的攻擊行為評估量表，將攻擊行為依照攻擊形式與攻擊功能分成六個分量表，分別是：純粹的外顯攻擊、反應式外顯攻擊、工具式外顯攻擊、純粹的關係攻擊、反應式關係攻擊、工具式關係攻擊；因此本量表既能夠評估外顯與關係攻擊，亦能夠評估工具式與反應式攻擊。<br>研究者以361名國中學生作為受試者，以自陳問卷蒐集所需資訊，效度驗證除了以SEM進行模型適配度分析之外，另以人際互動、負向情緒、敵意歸因與結果預期作為效標變項，進行效標關連效度之考驗。研究結果顯示此中文攻擊行為評估量表具有良好的效度。
<br>在效度驗證之外，本研究尚進一步討論攻擊形式與功能對於上述四個效標變項的解釋力，結果發現在工具性挑釁情境中，只有攻擊功能對效標具有顯著的解釋力；而在關係挑釁情境中，攻擊形式與功能均對效標有顯著解釋力。
Because violence in the campus becomes more and more serious in recent years, many reserachers want to study and analyse this probem. Dodge & Coie(1987) found theoretical and social adaptive distinction by dividing aggression into proactive aggression and reactive aggression. However, there are few studies in Taiwan and there is no the Chinese aggressive scale which is divided aggression into proactive(instrumental) aggression and reactive aggression. This research attempts to use Little et al.’s (2003) Model and to translate their aggressive scale into Chinese. With Little et al.’s Model and Chinese aggressive scale , it will be more accurate in assessing adolescent aggressive behavior.<br>According to form and function, the translated aggressive scale divides aggression into six subscales, which including: pure overt aggression, instrumental overt aggression, reactive overt aggression, pure relational aggression, instrumental relational aggression, reactive relational aggression. The aggressive scale not only can assess overt and relational aggression, but also can assess instrumental and reactive aggression.<br>The 361 research subjects were junior high school students. Necessary information was collected by using self- rated questionnaire. In order to examine the validity of the aggressive scale, this research not only evaluated model fit with SEM but also examined criterion-related validity of aggressive scale and the criterion are interpersonal index, negative emotion, hostility, and outcome expectance. The results showed the aggressive scale have appropriate validity.<br>Besides testing validity, this research further discussed if the four criterion could be explained by the form and function of aggression .The results showed the criterions in the instrumental provocative situation can be explained only by the function of aggression. However, the criterions in the relational provocative situation can be explanted by both the form and function of aggression. |
| Reference: | 王明傳、雷庚玲（2008）。華人青少年前期兒童之間接攻擊行為的反應評鑑與情緒經驗。中華心理學刊，50(1)，71-90。
林淑菁（2005）。國小高年級學生的關係性攻擊及外顯性攻擊與其友誼關係之研究。國立台中師範學院諮商與教育心理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中市。
吳淑芳（2006）。國外量表之兩階段翻譯及信、效度測試。護理雜誌，53(1)，65-71。
邱似齡（2007）。同理心對少年暴力行為區辨效力之研究。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義。
邱皓政（2004）。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北。雙葉書廊有限公司。
莊季靜（2006）。國中學生同儕攻擊者之社會訊息處理歷程研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
教育部九十三年各級學校校園事件統計分析報告（94）。台北市。教育部校園安全暨災害防救通報處理中心。
教育部九十四年各級學校校園事件統計分析報告（95）。台北市。教育部校園安全暨災害防救通報處理中心。
黃芳銘（2006）。結構方程模式：理論與應用。台北。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
黃囇莉（2005）。人際關係與人際衝突。華人本土心理學，521-114。台北遠流出版公司。
張春興（1998）。現代心理學。台北。東華。
張春興（2000）。張氏心理學辭典。台北。東華。
張淑綺（2000）。我是誰？青少年的再現----以平面媒體為例。輔仁大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
張黛眉（1990）。影響小學學童攻擊行為以致社交地位之認知相關變項。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
葉北辰（2006）。國小學童對同儕間負向言語之反應。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
蔡松瑜（2003）。國中生父母教養知覺、家庭生活適應與偏差行為之關係研究。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義。
鄭宇彣（2003）。與父母分離-個體化、貴人經驗與國中生的人我知覺、人際互動模式之關係研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
藍珮君（2006）。國中女生關係攻擊行為及意圖歸因、友誼品質、自我概念之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291-322.
Arsenio, W. F., Cooperman, S., & Lover, A.(2000). Affective predictors of preschoolers` aggression and peer acceptance: direct and indirect effects. Developmental psychology, 36(4), 438-448.
Arsenio, W. F., Gold, J., & Adams, E. (2004a). Adolescents` emotion expectancies regarding aggressive and nonaggressive events: Connections with behavior problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89(4), 338-355.
Arsenio, W. F., & Lemerise, E. A (2004b). Aggression and moral development: Integrating social information processing and moral domain models. Child Development. 75(4), 987-1002.
Bailey, C. A., & Ostrov, J.M. (2007). Differentiating forms and functions of aggression in emerging adults: associations with hostile attribution biases and normative beliefs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(6), 713-722.
Berkowitz, L. (1988). Frustrations, Appraisals, and Aversively Stimulated Aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 14, 3-11.
Bjorkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Kaukianinen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight?Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior,18, 117-127.
Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2001). Is it time to pull the plug on the hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy. Psychological Review, 108(1), 273-279.
Buss, A. H. (1961). The Psychology of Aggression. New York：Wiley.
Camodeca, M., & Goossens, F. A. (2005). Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(2), 186-197.
Card N. A., & Little, T. D. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(5), 466-480,
Coie, J.D., & Dodge, K.A. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3, pp. 779–862). Toronto: Wiley.
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., Terry, R., & Wright, V. (1991). The role of aggression in peer relations: an analysis of aggression episodes in boys` play groups. Child Development, 62(4), 812-826.
Connor, D. F. (2004). Aggression and Antisocial Behavior in Children and Adolescents: Research and Treatment. New York: The Guilford Press.
Connor, D. F., Steingard, R. J., Cunningham, J. A., Anderson, J. J., & Melloni, R. H. (2004). Proactive and reactive aggression in referred children and adolescents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 74(2), 129-136.
Crain, M. M., Finch, C. L., & Foster, S. L. (2005). The relevance of the social information processing model for understanding relational aggression in girls. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51(2), 213-249.
Crick, N. R. (1996). The role of relational aggression, overt aggression and prosocail behavior in the prediction on children’s future social adjustment. Child Development, 67, 2317-2327.
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67(3), 993-1002.
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722.
Crick, N. R., Grotpeter, J. K., & Bigbee, M. A. (2002). Relationally and physically aggressive children’s intent attributions and feelings of distress for relational and instrumental peer provocations. Child Development, 73(4), 1134-1142.
De Castro, B. O., Merk, W., Koops, W., Veerman, J. W., & Bosch, J. D. (2005). Emotions in social information processing and their relations with reactive and proactive aggression in referred aggressive boys. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(1), 105-116.
Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children`s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1146-1158.
Dollar, J., Doob, L.W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O.H., & Sears, R.R. (1939). Frustration and Aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Feshbach, S. ( 1970). Aggression. In: Mussen (E.d.), Carmichael`s manual of child psychology. Wiley; New York: pp. 159–259.
Fite, P. J., Stauffacher, K.,Ostrov, J. O., & Colder, C. R. (2008). Replication and extension of Little et al.’s (2003) forms and functions of aggression measure. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(3), 238-242.
Grotpeter, J. K., & Crick, N. R. (1996). Relational aggression, overt aggression, and friendship. Child Development, 67(5), 2328-2338.
Hartup, W. W. (1974). Aggression in childhood: Developmental perspectives. American Psychologist, 29, 336-341.
Hubbard, J. A., Smithmyer, C. M., Ramsden, S. R., Parker, E. H., Flanagan, K. D., Dearing, K. F., Relyea, N., & Simons, R. F. (2002). Observational, physiological, and self-report measures of children`s anger: Relations to reactive versus proactive aggression. Child Development, 73(4), 1101-1118.
Kempes, M., Matthys, W., de Vries, H., & van Engeland, H. (2005). Reactive and proactive aggression in children: A review of theory, findings and the relevance for child and adolescent psychiatry. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 14(1), 11-19.
Liu, J. (2004). Concept analysis: Aggression. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 25(7), 693-714.
Loeber, R., & Hay, D. (1997). Key issues in the development of aggression and violence from childhood to early adulthood. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 371-410.
Loeber, R., & Schmaling, K. B. (1985). Empirical evidence for overt and covert patterns of antisocial conduct problems: A metaanalysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13(2), 337-353.
Little, T. D., Brauner, J., Jones, S. M., Nock, M. K., & Hawley, P. H. (2003). Rethinking aggression: A typological examination of the functions of aggression . Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 343–369 .
Little, T. D., Jones, S. M., Henrich, C. C., & Hawley, P. H. (2003). Disentangling the "whys" from the "whats" of aggressive behaviour . International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 122–133.
Marsee, M. A., & Frick, P. J. (2007). Exploring the cognitive and emotional correlates to proactive and reactive aggression in a sample of detained girls. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(6), 969-981.
Mayberry, M. L., & Espelage, D. L. (2007). Associations among empathy, social competence & reactive/proactive aggression subtypes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(6), 787-798.
McAuliffe, M. D., Hubbard, J. A., Rubin, R. M., Morrow, M. T., & Dearing, K. F. (2007). Reactive and proactive aggression: Stability of constructs and relations to correlates. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167(4), 365–382.
Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2006). Reactive and proactive aggression: Similarities and differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 41,1469-1480.
Polman, H., de Castro, B. O., Koops, W., van Boxtel, H. W., & Merk, W. W. (2007). A meta-analysis of the distinction between reactive and proactive aggression in children and adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(4), 522-535.
Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(3), 310-342.
Pulin, F., & Boivin, M. (2000). Reactive and proactive aggression: Evidence of a two-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 12, 115-122.
Pulkkinen L. (1996). Proactive and reactive aggression in early adolescence as precursors to anti- and prosocial behavior in young adults. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 241-257.
Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., Stouthamer– Loeber, M., Liu., J. (2006). The reactive-proactive aggression(RPQ) questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 159-171.
Rys, G. S., & Bear, G. G. (1997). Relational aggression and peer relations: Gender and developmental issues. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43(1), 87-106.
Salmivalli, C., & Nieminen, E. (2002). Proactive and reactive aggression among school bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 28(1), 30-44.
Vitaro, F., Gendrau, P., Tremblay,R., & Oligny, P. (1998). Reactive and proactive aggression differentially predict later conduct problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 377-385. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
心理學研究所
92752018
96 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0927520181 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [心理學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
