Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32518
|
| Title: | 年齡與注意力因素對於時間估計之影響
Age, attention, and time estimation |
| Authors: | 吳美瑤
Wu,Mei-yao |
| Contributors: | 廖瑞銘
Liao,Ruey-ming
吳美瑤
Wu,Mei-yao |
| Keywords: | 時間複製
年齡與發展
雙重作業
注意力
小學生
純量計時
time reproduction
age and development
dual task
attention
elementary school student
Scalar expectancy theory |
| Date: | 2004 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 13:19:05 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 為了探討注意力與年齡因素對計時行為的影響，本實驗選用事前知道計時派典（prospective paradigm）與不涉及人為時間單位之知識的計時複製方式。針對注意力的因素，本研究採用雙重作業以操弄注意力資源集中或分散，檢測其對計時作業的影響。另針對年齡的因素，本研究比較低年級小學生、高年級小學生、及大學生成人三種不同年齡組的受試。
本研究利用四種計時作業，針對三個不同年齡層的受試進行對兩種不等的時距計時資料收集。計時作業及年齡因子的實驗設計採受試者間設計，而時距因子則採受試者內設計。研究結果發現（1）低年級組的計時準確性較高年級組或成人組差；（2）受試在雙重作業的計時表現的確較單一作業差，這個計時受干擾的結果，在複雜的雙重作業又較在簡單雙重作業明顯，且年紀愈小的受試所受干擾影響愈大；（3）三年齡層受試在雙重作業中皆有低估目標時距的現象，其中以低年級在複雜雙重作業中的低估程度最明顯；（4）低年級組的計時能力之穩定性較高年級或成人組低；（5）在無需對不斷出現之無意義刺激作偵測反應時，三年齡受試的計時準確性未受影響。
這些結果顯示計時的誤差的確隨著注意力需分派於非時間作業的增加，受試所複製的時距也隨之縮短。這項由於注意力分散所致的計時誤差在國小低年級組最明顯，但隨著年齡的成長及腦發展愈臻成熟，這項影響效果愈趨式微，致使計時的表現愈正確。
關鍵詞：時間複製、年齡與發展、雙重作業、注意力、小學生、純量計時
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the attention and age on time estimation based on the prospective timing paradigm. Four timing tasks, with different degrees of attentional requirement, were utilized to test timing of reproducing the target intervals in three groups of different ages including the lower-grade (M= 7.5 years), higher-grade (M= 11.2 years) elementary school students and adult (M= 20.1 years). The subjects in this work were asked to estimate a stimulus duration lasting for 7 or 14 s, during which they are required to either do or do not perform a concurrent non-temporal task. Thus, the experimental design for the present study was mixed with between-subject factors (age and task) and a within-subject factor (target interval). The results showed (1) the lower-grade children performed less accurate than the higher-grade children; (2) all subjects had worse timing performance in the dual-task condition than the single-task or control condition, which effect was most evident in the lower-grade children; (3) all subjects reproduced shorter interval as compared to the target interval, which effect was most apparently observed from the dual-task for the lower-grade children; (4) the lower-grade children had less reliability in timing; and (5) the effect of age on the single-task and control condition is not significant. Together, these data indicate that concurrent non-temporal task cause temporal reproduction shorter, especially under high attention demand in lower-grade children. In addition to the influence by the task complexity, the accuracy of timing estimation depends on the age.
Keywords: time reproduction、age and development、dual task、attention、elementary school student、Scalar expectancy theory(SET) |
| Reference: | 1.Allan, L. G. (1998). The influence of the scalar timing model on human timing research. Behavioural Processes, 44, 101-117.
2.Allan, L. G. & Gibbon, J. (1991). Human bisection at the geometric mean. Learning and Motivation, 22, 39-58.
3.Block, R. A., George, E. J. & Reed, M. A. (1980). A watched pot sometimes boils: A study of duration experience. Acta Psychologica, 46, 81-94.
4.Block, R. A., Zakay, D. & Hancock, P. A. (1999). Developmental Changes in human duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Review, 19, 183-211.
5.Brown, S. W. (1997). Attentional resources in timing: Interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(7), 1118-1140.
6.Brown, S. W. (1998). Automaticity versus timesharing in timing and tracking dual performance. Psychological Research, 61, 77-81.
7.Brown, S. W. & West, A. N. (1990). Multiple timing and the allocation of attention . Acta Psychologica, 75, 103-121.
8.Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: birth to adulthood. Academic Press, New York.
9.Church, R. M. (1997). Timing and temporal search. In C. M. Bradshaw & E. Szabadi (Eds.), Time and behaviour: Psychological and neurobehavioural analyses (pp. 41-78). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
10.Coull, J. T., Vidal, F., Nazarian, B. & Macar, F. (2004). Functional anatomy of the attention modulation of time estimation. Science, 303, 1506-1508.
11.Damasio, A. R. (2002). Remember when. Scientific American, 287 (3), 48-55.
12.Doehring, D.G. (1961). Accuracy and consistency of time-estimation by four methods of reproduction. American Journal of Psychology, 74, 27-35.
13.Droit-Volt, S. & Wearden, J. (2002). Speeding up an internal clock in children? Effects of visual flicker on subjective duration. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B (3), 193-211.
14.Fraisse, P. (1978). Time and rhythm perception. In EC Carterette, MP Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception (pp. 203-254). New York: Academic Press.
15.Friedman, W. J. (1990). Perception: The mind’s timekeepers. In: About time: Inventing the fourth dimension (pp. 9-26). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
16.Gautier, T., & Droit-Volet, S. (2002a). Attention and time estimation in 5- and 8-year-old children: a dual-task procedure. Behavioural Processes, 58, 57-66.
17.Gautier, T. & Droit-Volet, S. (2002b). Attentional distraction and time percepton in children. International Journal of Psychology, 37(1), 27-34.
18.Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84, 279-325.
19.Gibbon, J. (1991). Origins of scalar timing. Learning and Motivation, 22, 3-38.
20.Gibbon, J., Church, R. M. & Meck, W. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.), Timing and time perception (pp. 52-77). New York Academy of Sciences.
21.Goldberg, M. C., Maurer. D. & Lewis, T. L. (2001). Developmental changes in attention: the effects of endogenous cueing and of distractors. Developmental Sciences, 4(2), 209-219.
22.Goldstone, S. (1975). The variability of temporal judgment in psychopathology. In M. L. Kietzman, S. Sutton & J. Zubin (Eds.), Experimental approaches to psycholopathology (pp. 393-419). New York: Academic Press.
23.Grondin, S., Metthe, L. & koren, S. (1994). Motor disruption in the production of time intervals with finger taps. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(3), 460-466.
24.Guay, M. & Salmoni, A. (1988). Effect of interpolated temporal activity on temporal short-term memory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67, 743-748.
25.Ivry, R. B. & Spencer, R. M. (2004). The neural representation of time. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 225-232.
26.James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. Reprinted in: Glenview, 2nded, 1990. Scott, Foresman.
27.Klenberg, L., Korkman, M. & Lahti-Nuuttila, P. (2001). Differential development of attention and executive functions in 3-to 12-year-old Finnish children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 407-428.
28.Macar, F., Grondin, S. & Casini, L. (1994). Controlled attention sharing
influences time estimation. Memory & Cognition, 22 (6), 673-686.
29.Macar, F. (2002). Controlled attention and autonomic attention in prospective temporal judgments. Acta Psychologica, 111, 243-262.
30.Matell, M. S., Meck, W. H. & Nicolelis M. A. L. (2003). Integration of behavior and timing: anatomically separate systems or distributed processing? In W. H. Meck (Ed.), Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing (pp. 143-182). Flordia: CRC Press.
31.Mauk, M. D. & Buonomano, D. V. (2004). The neural basis temporal processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 307-340.
32.Meck, W. H. (1996). Neuropharmacology of timing and time perception. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 227-242.
33.Meck, W. H. & Malapani, C. (2004). Neuroimaging of interval timing. Cognitive Brain Research, 21, 133-137.
34.Meck, W. H. (2005). Neuropsychology of timing and time perception. Brain and Cognition, 58, 1-8.
35.Pascual –Leone, J. & Baillargeon, R. (1994). Developmental measurement of mental attention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17(1), 161-200.
36.Ridderinkof, K. R. & Van Der Molen, M. W. (1995). A psychophysiological analysis of developmental differences in the ability to resist interference. Child Development, 66, 1040-1056.
37.Sawyer, T. (2003). Allocation of attention and production of time intervals. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, 905-908.
38.Spiegel, M. R. (1961). Schaum’s outline of theory and problems of statistics. New York: Schaum.
39.Thomas, E. A. C., & Weaver, W. B. (1975). Cognitive processing and time perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 363-367.
40.Vanneste, S., & Pouthas, V. (1999). Timing in aging: the role of attention. Experimental Aging Research, 25, 49-67.
41.Verfaellie, M., Browers, D. & Heilman, K. M. (1990). Attentional processes in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus –response compatibility (pp. 261-275). North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.
42.Wearden, J. H. (1991). Human performance on an analogue of an interval bisection task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental psychology, 43B, 59-81.
43.Wearden, J. H. (1992). Temporal generalization in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 134-144.
44.Wearden, J. H., Philpott, K. & Win, T. (1999). Speeding up and (...relatively...) slowing down an internal clock in human. Behavioural Processes, 46, 63-73.
45.Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2ed ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
46.Wilkening, F., Levin, I. & Druyan, S. (1987). Children’s counting strategies for time quantification and integration. Development Psychology, 23(6), 823-831.
47.Zakay, D. (1989). Subjective time and attention resource allocation: An integrated model of time estimation. In I. Levin & D. Zakay (Eds.), Time and human cognition: A life –span perspective (pp. 365-397). Amsterdam: North Holland.
48.Zakay, D. (1992). The role of attention in children’s time perception. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 355-371.
49.Zakay, D. (1993a). The role of non-temporal information processing load and temporal expectations in children’s prospective time estimation. Acta Psychologica, 84, 271-280.
50.Zakay, D. (1993b). Time estimation methods- do they influence prospective duration estimations? Perception, 22, 91-101.
51.Zakay, D. (1998). Attention allocation policy influences prospective timing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5 (1), 114-118.
52.Zakay, D. & Block, R. A. (1996). The role of attention in time estimation processes. In M. A. Pastor & J. Artieda (Eds.), Time, internal clocks and movement (pp. 143-164). New York: Elsevier.
53.Zakay, D. & Block, R. A. (1997). Temporal cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science: American Psychological Society, 6 (1), 12-16. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
心理學研究所
90752020
93 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0907520201 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [心理學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
