政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/32503
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50955241      Online Users : 952
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32503


    Title: 團隊領導對集體效能與團隊表現之影響
    Authors: 盧佩秋
    Lu, Pei-Chiu
    Contributors: 張裕隆
    盧佩秋
    Lu, Pei-Chiu
    Keywords: 團隊領導
    「民主—權威」式領導
    「主動—被動」式領導
    集體效能
    團隊表現
    團隊績效
    團隊態度
    團隊合作
    Date: 2003
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 13:16:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究目的在於探討：(1)團隊之領導模式；(2)團隊領導對團隊表現的影響；(3)團隊領導對集體效能的影響；以及(4)集體效能之中介效果。研究採問卷調查方式進行，以團隊為單位進行資料分析，有效樣本共計100組團隊，包括主管100位，團隊成員246位。研究結果顯示：（一）在團隊表現的影響方面，民主式領導的團隊表現較權威式領導的團隊來的優良；（二）在團隊表現的影響方面，主動式領導的團隊表現較被動式領導的團隊來的優良；（三）在團隊表現的影響方面，「主動—被動」對「民主—權威」不具調節作用，即「主動—被動」與「民主—權威」對團隊表現的影響無交互作用存在；（四）集體效能的一致性對於團隊表現不具有顯著的影響力，但對於團隊整體的集體效能則具有正向影響效果，即一致性高集體效能也愈高；（五）對於集體效能的影響，主動式領導所產生的集體效能高於被動式領導；（六）集體效能與團隊表現具有正向關係，當集體效能愈高時，團隊表現也愈佳；（七）集體效能在團隊領導對團隊表現的中介效果方面，僅在團隊領導對團隊績效的影響中具有中介效果，而對團隊態度與團隊合作方面，則不具有中介效果。本研究最後則針對研究結果進行綜合性討論，並針對研究討論所得之結果，提出研究的可能限制、後續相關研究建議、以及實務應用之建議。
    Reference: 壹、《中文部分》
    文 林（民82）。建立團隊：合作就是力量。台北市：麥田。
    王建忠（民90）。團隊領導與團隊效能：團隊內互動的中介效果。碩士論文，國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
    卓國雄（民89）。集體效能和團隊凝聚力對社會懈怠與拔河成績表現之影響。碩士論文，國立體育學院體育研究所。
    高三福（民）。團隊與效能：組織中的團隊與運動團隊—最近研究的回顧。組織行為在台灣：三十年回顧與展望研討會發表之論文。。
    陳彰儀（民88）。組織心理學。台北市：心理出版社。
    陳麗芳（民91）。領導型態、工作壓力、組織承諾與工作滿意度相關性之研究—以台灣和中國大陸護理人員為例。碩士論文，國立成功大學EMBA。
    張佑全（民89）。多樣化工作團隊管理型態與績效關係之研究：以引進外勞企業為例。碩士論文，國立成功大學企業管理研究所。
    張裕隆（民87）。我國「管理才能」心理測驗發展及信效度分析研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
    黃郁雯（民92）。電腦自我效能、電腦經驗及他人支持三者與電腦態度及電腦焦慮之關係。碩士論文，國立政治大學心理學研究所。
    楊俊雄（民83）。組織中團隊特性與組織變革關係之研究：以我國國營事業民營化為例。碩士論文，國立政治大學公共行政研究所。
    劉選吉（民89）。我國成棒選手自我效能和集體效能與團隊凝聚力間的關係及對運動表現的影響。碩士論文，國立台灣體育學院體育研究所。
    羅虞村（民84）。領導理論研究。台北市 : 文景出版社。
    貳、《英文部分》
    Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. S. (1998). Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-management teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 74, 33-52.
    Aspegren, R. E., (1963). A study of leadership behavior and its effects on morale and attitudes in selected elementary school. Dissertation Abstracts, 23, 3708.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychology, 37, 122-147
    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
    Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through to collective efficacy. Psycological Science, 9, 75-78.
    Barber, J. R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408-437.
    Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological reacher: Conceptual, strategic, and consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
    Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J. & Mount, M. K.(1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 3, 377-391.
    Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stodgill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, & managerial applications (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
    Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J., (1988). Prototypicality, leniency and generalized response set in rated and ranked transformational and tansactional leadship descriptions. Binghamtom: State University of New York, Center for Leadership studies.
    Baumgartel, H. (1957). Leadership style as a variable in reseach administration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 344-360.
    Beam, H. H. (1975). Effectiveness and satisfaction as a function of managerial style and technological complexity in a Navy work environment. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
    Bergum, B.O., & Lehr, D. J. (1963). Effects of authoritarianism on vigilance performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 75-77.
    Bradford, L. P., & Lippitt, R. (1945). Building a democratic work group. Personnel, 22, 3, 142-148.
    Campion M. A. & Medsker G.. J. & Higgs A.C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850.
    Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
    Chen, G. & Bliese, P. D. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 3, 549-556.
    Cohen, S. G., Ledford, Jr, G. E. (1994). The effectiveness of self-managing teams: A quasi-experiment. Human Relations, 47, 13-43.
    Cohen, S. G., Ledford, Jr, G. E. Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). A predictive model of self-managing work team. Human Relations, 49, 5, 643-676.
    Cummings, T. G. & Griggs, W. H. (1977). Works’ reactions to autonomous work groups—conditioning for functioning, differential effects, and individual differences. Organization & Administrative Science, 7, 87-100.
    Day, R. C., & Hamblin, R. L. (1964). Some effects of close and punitive styles of supervision. American Journal of Sociology, 69, 499-510.
    Earley, P. C. (1999). Playing follow the leader: Status-determining traits in relation to collective efficacy across cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 3, 192-212.
    Feltz, D. L., & Lirgg, C. D. (1998). Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 557-564.
    Farrow, D.L., Valenzi, E.R., & Bass, B. M. (1980). A comparison of leadership and situational characteristics within profit and non-profit organization. Paper, Academy of Management, Detroit.
    Gibson, C. B. (1999). Do they do what they believe they can? group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 138-152.
    Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
    Goliembiewski, R. T. (1995). Managing diversity in organizations .University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL.
    Goodman, P. S, Devadas, R., & Hughson, T. L. (1988). Group and productivity: Analyzing the effectiveness of self-managing team. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Greg .L Steward, & Charles C. Manz (1995). Leadership for self-managing work teams: A typology and integrative model. Human Relations, 48, 7, 747-770.
    Gully, S. M., Joshi, A., Incalcaterra, K. A. & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A mate-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 5, 891-832.
    Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in group: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychological Society, 32, 87-106.
    Hackman, J. R. (1986). Psychology and work: Productivity change and employment .Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
    Hackman, J. R. (1987). The psychology of self-management in organizations. In Pollack and R. O. Perloff(Eds.).
    Hater, J. J., & Bass, B. M. (1988). Supervisors’ evaluations and subordinates’ perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 695-702.
    Herbst, P. G. (1962). Autonomous group functioning and exploration in behavior theory and measurement. London: Tavistock.
    Hut, J. A., & Molleeman, E. (1998)Empowerment and team development. Team performance Management, 4, 53-66.
    James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolfe, G.(1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-309.
    Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
    Jessup, H. P. (1990). New role in team leadership. Training & Development Journal, 44, 11, 79-83.
    Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Effects of leadership style and problem structure on work group process and outcomes in an electronic meeting system environment. Personnel Psychology, 50, 121-146.
    Jonbloed, L. & Frost, P. J. (1985). Pfeffer’s model of management: An expansion and modification. Journal of Management, 11, 97-110.
    Karmel, B. (1978). Leadership: A challenge to traditional research methods and assumptions. Academy of Management Review, 3, 475-482.
    Katz, D., Maccoby, N., Gurin., & Floor, L. (1951). Productivity, supervision, and morale among railroad workers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Reseach.
    Katzenbach, J. R. & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Mckinsey & Company, Inc
    Kenny, D. A. & Voie, L.L. (1985). Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 2, 339-348.
    Klein, J. A. (1984)Why supervisors resist employee involvment. Harvard Business Review, 2, 197-204
    Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). Team leadership and development: Theory, principles, and guidelines for training learders and teams. In M. Beyerlein (Ed.), Advances in interdiscriplinary studies of work teams: Team leaderdhip, 3, 253-291. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Lam, S. S. K., Chen, X. P., & Schaubroeck, J. S. (2002). Participative decision making and employee performance in different culture: the moderating effects of allocentrism/ idiocentrism and efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 2, 352-368.
    LePine, J. A., Hanson, M. A., Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2000). Contextual performance and teamwork: implications for staffing. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 19, 53-90.
    Lester, S. W., Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, M. A, (2002). The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 2, 352-368.
    Letize, L., & Donovan, M. (1990). The supervisor’s changing role in high involvement organizations. Journal for Quality and Participation, 3, 62-65.
    Levi, D. (2001). Group dynamics for teams. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
    Lewin, K., & Lippitt, R. (1938). An experimental approach to the study of autocracy and democracy: A preliminary note. Sociometry, 1, 292-300.
    Lindell, M. K., Brandt, C. J.,& Whitney, D. J.(1999).A revised index of interrater agreement for multi-item ratings of a single target. Applied Psycholgical Measurement, 23, 2, 127-135.
    Lindslely, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20, 645- 678.
    Lippitt, R. (1940). An experimental study of the effect of democratic and authoritarian group atmospheres. University of Iowa Studies in Child welfare, 16, 43-95.
    Lippitt, R. (1943). From domination to leadership. Journal of the National Association of Women Deans and Counselors, 6, 147-152.
    Lyle, J. (1961). Communication, group atmosphere, productivity, and morale in small task groups. Human Relations, 14, 369-379.
    Mack, T. (1990). Oryx energy crop.: Energizing a bureaucracy. Forbes, 17, 76-80.
    Manz, C. C., Keating, D. E., & Donnellon, A. (1990). Preparing for organizational change to employee self-management: The managerial transition. Organizational Dynamics, 1990, 19, 2, 15-26
    Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1980). Self-management as a substitute For leadership: A social learning theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 1980, 5, 3, 361- 367.
    Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106-128.
    Martocchio, J. J., & Judge, T. A. (1997). Relationships between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: Mediating influences of self-deception and self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 187-198.
    Miner, J. B. (1973). The management process: Theory, research and practice. New York: Macmillan.
    Mischel, L. J., & Northcraft, G. B. (1997). “I think we can, I think we can…”: The role of efficacy beliefs in group and team effectiveness. Advances in group processes, 14, 177-197.
    Mullen, J. H. (1966). Personality and productivity in management. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Murnighan, J. K., & Leung, T. K. (1976). The effects of leadership involvement and importance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17, 299-310.
    Myers, J. L. (1972). Fundamentals in experimentd design. (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    O’Relly, C., & Chatman, J.(1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492-499.
    Parker, G. M. (1990). Team Player and Teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Pelz, D. C., & Andrews, F. M. (1956). Some social factors related to performance in a reseach organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 310-325.
    Phillips, J. M. & Gully, S. M. (1997).The role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal-setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 792-802.
    Price, J. L. (1968). Organizational effectiveness: An inventory of propositions. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
    Prussia, G. E., & Kinicki, A. J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied psychology, 81, 187-198.
    Quick, T. L. (1992). Successful Team Building. New York: American Management Association.
    Sadri, G., & Robertson, I. T. (1993). Self-efficacy and work related behaviour: A review and meta-analysis. Applied Psychology: A International Review, 42, 139-152.
    Saks, A. M. (1995). Longitudinal field investigation of the moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy on the relationship between training and newcomer adjustment. Journal of Applied psychology, 80, 211-225.
    Shaw, J. B.,& Barrett-Power, E. (1998). The effects of diversity on small work group processes and performance. Human Relation, 51(10), 1307-1325.
    Shaw, M. E. (1955). A comparison of two types of leadership in various communication nets. Journal of Abcdrmal and Social Psychology, 50, 127-134.
    Shonk, J. H.(1982). Working In Teams: A practical manual for improving work groups. New York: AMACOM.
    Snadowsky, A. M. (1969).Group effectiveness as a function of communication network, task complexity, and leadership style. Dissertation Abstracts International, 30, 2155.
    Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J. & Kahai, S. S. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 1, 89-103.
    Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1990). Deindividuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29,121-134
    Spector, P., & Suttell, B. J.(1957). Research on the specific leader behavior patterns most effective in influrncing group performance. Washington, DC: American Institute for Reserch.
    Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bullent, 124, 240-161.
    Steward, G. L., & Manz, C. C. (1995). Leadership for self-Managing work teams: A typology and integrative model. Human Relations, 48, 7, 747-770.
    Steward, G. L., Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P.,Jr. (1999). Team work and group dynamics. New York : John Wiley & Sons, c1999.
    Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership (1st ed.). New York: Free Press.
    Tannenbaum, A. S. (1968). Control in organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Tjosvold, D. (1988). Cooperative and competitive interdependence: Collaboration between departments to service customers. Group and Organization Studies, 13(3), 274-289.
    Torrance, E. P. (1953). Methods of conducting critiques of group problem-solving performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37, 395-398.
    Verespej, M. A. (1990) When you put the team in charge. Industry Week, 239, 23, 30-32.
    Wagel, W. H. (1987). Working and managing without supervisors. Personnel, 64, 9, 8-11.
    Wall, T. D., Kemp, N. J., Jackson, P. R., & Glegg, C. W. (1986). Outcomes of autonomous workgroup: A long-term field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 2, 280-304.
    Walton, R. E., & Schlesinger, L. A. (1979). Do supervisors thrive in participative work systems? Organizational Dynamics, 8, 3, 24-39.
    Wageman, R. (2001). How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: Design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organization Science, 12, 5, 559-577.
    Webster, J. & Martocchio, J. J. (1992). Microcomputer playfulness: development of measure with workplace implications. MIS Quarterly, 16,201-226.
    White, R. K., & Lippitt, R. (1960). Autocracy and democracy: An experimental inquiry. New York: Harper.
    Zaccaro, S. J., Blair, V., Peterson, C., & Zazanis, M. (1995). Collective efficacy. In J. E. Maddux(Ed.). New York: Plenum.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學研究所
    89752008
    92
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0897520081
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Psychology] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    52008101.pdf72KbAdobe PDF21271View/Open
    52008102.pdf131KbAdobe PDF21352View/Open
    52008103.pdf88KbAdobe PDF21235View/Open
    52008104.pdf98KbAdobe PDF21180View/Open
    52008105.pdf150KbAdobe PDF21699View/Open
    52008106.pdf279KbAdobe PDF214984View/Open
    52008107.pdf187KbAdobe PDF21691View/Open
    52008108.pdf229KbAdobe PDF24820View/Open
    52008109.pdf218KbAdobe PDF21663View/Open
    52008110.pdf122KbAdobe PDF22034View/Open
    52008111.pdf230KbAdobe PDF27336View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback