政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/32477
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51058040      Online Users : 1007
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32477


    Title: 在電腦施測情境中，促發、警告、時間限制對降低社會期許之效果
    Reducing social desirability bias of personality scale in computer administration mode: Effects of priming, warning, and time limit
    Authors: 張軒正
    Hsuan-cheng Chang
    Contributors: 陳彰儀
    張軒正
    Hsuan-cheng Chang
    Keywords: 降低社會期許
    促發
    傳記式問卷
    測謊題警告
    時間限制
    電腦施測
    reducing social desirability
    priming
    biodata
    warning of having a lie scale
    time limit
    computer administration
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 13:12:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究欲探討在模擬甄選情境中，情境因素對降低社會期許之效果。本研究採三因子2×2×2受試者間之實驗設計，所操弄的三個獨變項為： 1.促發(priming)受試者誠實作答的傾向之有無 2.測謊題警告之有無 3.作答時間的限制之有無；依變項為社會期許正、負向題分數與三個人格測驗向度（適應性、親和性、審慎性）的分數。本研究分為研究一、研究二兩階段進行。研究一之受試者包括企業應徵者81人與國小實習老師92人，研究結果顯示：三個獨變項中，只在有「測謊題警告」情境下能顯著降低社會期許正向題的分數。「時間限制」則在無「促發」之情況下，會提升「親和性」人格之分數。針對研究一的結果，研究者改變「促發」與「時間限制」的操弄方式，其它研究程序相同，進行研究二。研究二之受試者為503位大學生，研究結果顯示：「促發」會提升社會期許負向題的分數，且在有「時間限制」、無「警告」的情況下，亦可提升「適應性」分數。「測謊題警告」可降低社會期許正向題的分數，並有降低「親和性」分數之趨勢。「時間限制」仍然沒有任何效果。

    研究者分別就研究一、研究二之結果加以討論並提出可能的解釋。此外，研究者亦嘗試驗證與討論社會期許量表中正向題與負向題之建構。最後研究者檢討本研究之限制，並對未來之研究方向提出若干建議。
    The influence of three situational factors on reducing social desirability bias under simulated selection context was investigated in 2 studies. A 2×2×2 experimental design was used in these 2 studies. The three independent variables were: 1.’’Priming’’ the honest responding tendency. 2.Warning of having a lie scale. 3.Time limit for each question. The dependent variables included: 1.Two dimension scores of social desirability scale (positive keying items and negative keying items). 2.Scores of three personality dimensions (adjustment, likeability, prudence). Subjects of study1 were 81 job applicants and 92 elementary school interns. The results indicated that “warning of having a lie scale” could reduce the scores of positive keying social desirability scale. “Time limit” increased the scores of “likeability” under “no priming” situation. According to the results of study1, the author modified the manipulations of “priming” and “time limit”, and conducted study2. The subjects of study2 were 503 college students. The results indicated that “priming” could increase the scores of negative keying social desirability scale. “Priming” also increased the scores of “adjustment” under “time limit” and “no warning” situation. “Warning of having a lie scale” could reduce the scores of positive keying social desirability scale, and also had the trend to reduce the scores of “likeability”. “Time limit” still didn’t have any main effect on dependent measures.

    Base on the results for study1 and study2, the author discussed the effects of 3 situational factors on reducing social desirability bias, and also tried to clarify the construct validity of two-dimensional social desirability scale. The author also discussed the limitations of the present research, and made some suggestions for future research.
    Reference: 參考文獻
    中文部分
    林以正、廖玲燕、黃金蘭、楊中芳 (2001)。本土社會讚許傾向的測量與歷程。華人本土心理學追求卓越計畫。
    范淑儀（1998）。自我的反省與覺察。台北：輔仁大學碩士論文。
    陳彰儀（2002）。網路應徵者填寫測驗的作假行為：情境因素與測驗類型的影響。國科會專題研究。
    黃康齡（1990）。以自陳式量表衡量業務人員人格特質之研究。台中：東海大學碩士論文。
    楊淑珍（1983）。我國大學生生理性行為之評量與分析。台北：台灣教育學院碩士論文。
    楊順興（1996）。情境焦慮、自尊對自我欺騙之影響。台北：政治大學碩士論文。
    葉光輝（1983）。人情取向、分配方式與工作表現。台北：台灣大學碩士論文。
    英文部分
    Bargh, J. A. (1982). Attention and automaticity in the processing of self-relevant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1040-1053.
    Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893-912.
    Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P., & Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditionally automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 104-128.
    Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
    Bargh, J. A., & Tota, M. E. (1988). Context-dependent automatic processing in depression: Accessibility of negative constructs with regard to self but not others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 925-939.
    Barrick, M., & Mount, M. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
    Becker, T. E., & Colquitt, A. L. (1992). Potential versus actual faking of a biodata form: An analysis along several dimensions of item type. Personnel Psychology, 45, 389-406.
    Cascio, W. F. (1998). Applied Psychology in Personnel Management (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N. J: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Crowne, D. P. & Marlowe, D. A. (1965). The approval motive. New York: Wiley
    Christiansen, N. D., Goffin, R. D., Johnston, N. G., & Rothstein, M. G. (1994). Correcting the 16PF for faking: Effects on criterion-related validity and individual hiring decisions. Personnel Psychology, 47, 847-860.
    Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of Trivial Pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 865-877.
    Doll, R. E. (1971). Item susceptibility to attempted faking as related to item characteristic and adopted fake set. Journal of Psychology, 77, 9-16.
    Douglas, E. F., McDaniel, M. A., & Snell, A. F. (1996). The Validity of Non-cognitive Measures Decays When Applicants Fake. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati, OH.
    Ellingson, J. E., Sackett, P. R., & Hough , L. M. (1999). Social desirability corrections in personality measurement: Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 84, 155-166.
    Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238.
    Fox, S., & Schwartz, D. (2002). Social desirability and controllability in computerized and paper-and-pencil personality questionnaires. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 389-410.
    Gatewood, R. D., & Field, H. S. (2001). Human Resource Selection(5th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt College Publishers.
    Greenberger, D. B., & Strasser, S. (1991). The role of situational and dispositional factors in the enhancement of personal control in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 111-145.
    Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
    Hogan, J. B., & Strokes, G. S. (1989, April). The influence of socially desirable responding on biographical data of applicant versus incumbent samples: Implications for predictive and concurrent research designs. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Boston, MA.
    Hogan, R. T. (1991). Personality and personality measurement. In M. Dunnette and L. Hough (eds.). The Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd ed.), Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
    Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effects of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581-595.
    Jones, E. E., & Sigall, H. (1971). The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitutde. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 349-364.
    Klein, C. TF., & Helweg-Larsen, M. (2002). Perceived control and the optimistic bias: A meta-analytic review. Psychology-and-Health, 17, 437-446.
    Klein, S. P. & Owens, W. A. (1965). Faking of a scored life history blank as a function of criterion objectivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 452-454.
    Kluger, A. N., Reilly, R. R., & Russell, C. J. (1991). Faking biodata tests: Are option-keyed instruments more resistant? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 889-896.
    Kluger, A. N. & Collella, A. (1993) Beyond the mean bias: The effect of warning against faking on biodata item variances. Personnel Psychology, 46, 763-780.
    McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882-888.
    McDaniel, M. A., & Timm, H. (1990, August). Lying takes time: Predicting deception in biodata using response latencies. Paper presented at the 98th Annual Convention of American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
    McFarland, L. A. & Ryan, A. M. (2000). Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 812-821.
    McGuire, W. J. (1969). Artifact in Behavioral Research, Academic Press, New York.
    McManus, M. A. (1990, April). Detection of faking on an empirically keyed biodata instrument. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Miami, FL.
    Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of experimental psychology, 90, 227-234.
    Mumford, M. D. & Stokes, G. S. (1992). Developmental determinants of individual action: Theory and practice in applying background measures. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.). Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd ed., Vol 3). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
    Ones, D., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 78, 679-703.
    Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660-679.
    Paulhus, D. L. (1986). Self-deception and impression management in test responses. In A. Angleiner & J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality Assessment via Questionnaire. New York: Springer.
    Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 160, 307-317.
    Potosky, D., & Bobko, P. (1997). Computer versus paper-and-pencil administration mode and response distortion in noncognitive selection tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 293-299.
    Richman, W. L., Kiesler, S., Weisband, S., & Drasgow, F. (1999). A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 754-775.
    Rosse, J. G.., Stecher, M. D., Miller, J. L., & Levin, R. A. (1998). The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 634-644.
    Schneider, w., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processimg: I Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
    Schrader, A. D. & Osburn, H. G. (1977). Biodata faking: Effects of induced subtlety and position specificity. Personnel Psychology, 30, 395-404.
    Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(4), 1492-1512.
    Strauman, T. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1987). Automatic activation of self-discrepancies and emotional syndromes: When cognitive structures influence affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1004-1014.
    Thompson, S. C., & Spacapan, S. (1991). Perceptions of control in vulnerable populations. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 1-21.
    Vasilopoulos, N. L., Reilly, R. R., & Leaman, J. A. (2000). The influence of job familiarity and impression management on self-report measure scale scores and response latencies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 50-64.
    Yang, C. F. (1997). Study on underlying psychological processes of social desirability scores. Unpublished manuscript.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學研究所
    90752001
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090752001
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Psychology] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    75200101.pdf14KbAdobe PDF2893View/Open
    75200102.pdf22KbAdobe PDF21070View/Open
    75200103.pdf21KbAdobe PDF21031View/Open
    75200104.pdf43KbAdobe PDF21071View/Open
    75200105.pdf112KbAdobe PDF24803View/Open
    75200106.pdf355KbAdobe PDF22870View/Open
    75200107.pdf284KbAdobe PDF23366View/Open
    75200108.pdf305KbAdobe PDF21282View/Open
    75200109.pdf47KbAdobe PDF21267View/Open
    75200110.pdf242KbAdobe PDF21366View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback