政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/32397
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113392/144379 (79%)
Visitors : 51222781      Online Users : 869
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32397


    Title: 老人居住安排選擇因素分析-代間關係之探討
    Authors: 曾瀝儀
    Contributors: 張金鶚
    曾瀝儀
    Keywords: 老人
    居住安排
    代間關係
    社會交換
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-14 13:53:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 根據戶口普查資料顯示約六成的老人與子女同住，而這樣的比例日益下降，在華人社會中，老人與子女同住隱含著孝道的象徵，但隨著現代化社會的變遷，此現象逐漸轉變。過去老人居住安排的研究多著重於老人狀況之衡量與選擇，而未討論到子女的影響，因此本研究試圖從「兩代」的屬性探討老人居住安排選擇的影響因素。此外，「三代同鄰」的居住安排係兼顧兩代可以互相照顧且各自擁有自由和私密的居住空間，此課題在過去少有討論，本文亦將該居住方式獨立討論，以期能充分了解兩代的互動關係對於老人居住選擇之影響。
    本文以多項羅吉特模型實證分析華人家庭動態資料庫（PSFD）2004年的資料，選取主樣本為已婚子女之樣本。研究結果顯示：在老人的屬性中，喪偶、教育程度低以及無工作者會偏好與子女同住，尤其老年女性喪偶的影響效果最大，使其獨居的機率降低50%；在主樣本的屬性中，當住宅為父母所有、有學齡前小孩、主樣本教育程度高會使兩代同住機率增加。因此對於老人而言，同住是身心狀況下降的較佳選擇；然而對於子女而言，同住是基於「交換」勞務所產生的居住安排。最後，本文並發現「同鄰」者多為身心狀況良好的老人且多與已婚兒子相鄰而居的狀況，顯示父系傳統對於華人家庭的深刻影響。
    According to the census report of population and housing of Year 2000 in Taiwan, about sixty percent of the elderly live with their children, but this situation is decreasing. In Chinese society, the elderly living with their children symbolize the culture of filial piety. With the change of modern society, the phenomenon is changing. Previous researches about the elderly living arrangement pay much attention to the characteristics of the elderly, rather than the influences of children. Therefore, this study attempts to explore the influence factors of the living arrangement between the elderly and their children. Moreover, the “neighboring living arrangement” of the elderly and their children makes the two generations not only could take care of each other, but also possess free and private residential spaces by themselves. This issue wasn’t discussed in the past, so this study also discusses this living arrangement of the two generations in order to realize the influence of intergenerational interaction on the choices of the elderly living arrangement.
    This study uses multi-nominal logistic regression model to analysis the data of Panel Study of Family Dynamics（PSFD）in 2004. The empirical results shows, the widowed , with low education attainment and unemployed elderly prefer to live with their children. The widowed characteristic especially plays stronger marginal effect, which decreases the probability of living alone fifty percents for the elderly. Housing owned by parents, with under school- age grandchildren and highly educated children would increase the probability of co-residence of two generations. For the elderly, when he (she) is unhealthy or being single, co-residence with children is the better choice. However, for the children, co-residence is based on the “exchange” for elderly labor forces to take care of under school- age children. Finally, this study finds that the healthy elderly prefer to choose neighboring living arrangement with their children, and especially neighbor to their married son. It is implied that the influence of patriarchy culture on Chinese family.
    Reference: 王濟川、郭志剛（2003）Logistic迴歸模型－方法及應用，台北：五南。
    沙依仁（1996）高齡學，台北：五南。
    伊慶春（1985）台灣地區不同家庭型態的偏好及其含意，台大社會學刊，17：1-14。
    伊慶春、陳玉華（1998），奉養父母方式與未來奉養態度之關聯，人口學刊，19：1-32。
    林鶴玲、李香潔（1999）台灣閩、客、外省族群家庭中之性別資源配置，人文及社會科學集刊，11（4）：475-528。
    胡幼慧（1995）三代同堂－迷思與陷阱，台北：巨流。
    張明正（1996）台灣地區高齡人口結構之變遷與老人經濟之自立性，楊文山、李美玲主編，人口變遷、國民健康與社會安全，台北：中央研究院人文社會科學研究所。
    連賢明（1994）台灣老人的居住選擇，國立台灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
    陳淑美（2000）家戶住宅調整決策與區位選擇之研究－兼論女性的影響力分析，國立政治大學地政研究所博士論文。
    陳淑美、張金鶚（2003）三代同堂家庭遷徙決策之研究，人文及社會科學集刊，16（2）：325-349。
    陳淑美、張金鶚、陳建良（2004）家戶遷移與居住品質變化關係之研究－台北縣市實證分析，住宅學報，13（1）：51-68。
    陳肇男（1999）90年代台灣地區老人之居住安排，胡勝正主編，老人問題與政策研討會論文集，台北：孫運璿基金會。
    陸洛、陳欣宏（2002）台灣變遷社會中老人的家庭角色調適及代間關係之初探，應用心理研究，14：221-249。
    章英華（1994）台灣的家庭研究：從家戶組成到家人關係，社區發展季刊，68：35-40。
    楊靜利（1999）老年人之居住安排－子女數量與同居傾向因素之探討，人口學刊，20：167-183。
    楊靜利、陳寬政（2002）臺灣地區子女離家的原因與步調，人口學刊，25：120-144。
    葉光輝（1998）年老父母居住安排的心理學研究，中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，83：121-168。
    謝美娥（2002）失能老人與成年子女照顧者對失能老人遷居的歷程與解釋：從家庭到機構，社會政策與社會工作學刊，6（2）：7-61。
    簡文吟（2001）父系社會下的從女居現象-台灣與上海的比較研究，婦女與兩性學刊，12：65-94。
    簡文吟、伊慶春（2001）台灣家庭的動態發展：結構分裂與重組，人口學刊，23：1-47。
    羅紀瓊（1987）近十年台灣地區老人家庭結構變遷的研究，台灣經濟預測，18（2）：83-107。
    Aguilera, M. B. 2004. “Deciding Where to Retire：Intended Retirement Location Choices of Formerly Undocumented Mexican Migrants.” Social Science Quarterly 85（2）:340-359.
    Becker, G. S. 1996. Accounting for Tastes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Bengtson, V. L., E. O. Burgess and T. M. Parrott. 1997 “Theory, Explanation, and a Third Generation of Theoretical Development in Social Gerontology.” The Journal of Gerontology 52B（2）:P72-87.
    Bian, F., J. R. Logan, and Y. Bian. 1998. “Intergenerational Relations in Urban China：Proximity , Contact, and Help to Parents.” Demography 35（1）:115-124.
    Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: J. Wiley.
    Brown, J. W., J. Liang., N. Krause., H. Akiyama., H. Sugisawa, and T. Fukaya. 2002. “Transition in Living Arrangement among Elders in Japan：Does Health Make a Difference？” The Journal of Gerontology 57B（4）:209-219.
    Chen, P.C., and J. M. Wilmoth. 2004. “The Eeffects of Residential Mobility on ADL and IADL Limitations among the Very Old Living in the Community.” The Journals of Gerontologist 59（3）:164-172.
    Clark, D.E., T.A. Knapp, and N.E.White. 1996. “Personal and Location Specific Characteristics and Elderly Interstate Migration.” Growth and Change 27:327-351.
    Conway, K.S., and A. J. Houtenville. 2003. “Out with the Old, In with the Old：A Closer Look at Younger Versus Elderly Migration.” Social Science Quarterly 84（2）:309-328.
    De Jong, G.. F., J. M. Wilmoth, J. L. Angel., and Cornwell, G.. T. 1995. “Motives and the Geographic Mobility of Very Old Americans.” Journal of Gerontology 50B（6）:395-404.
    Duncombe, W., M. Robbins, and D. A. Wolf. 2003. “Place Characteristics and Residential Location Choice among the Retirement-age Population” The Journals of Gerontologist 58（4）:244-252.
    De Vos, S., and Y. J. Lee. 1993. “Change in Extended Family Living among Elderly People in South Korea,1970-1980.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 41(2):377-393.
    Hendricks, J. 1995 “Exchange Theory in Aging.” edited by G. Maddox, The Encyclopedia of Aging （2nd ed.）.New York: Springer.
    Homans, G.C. 1958 “Social Behavior as Exchange” American Journal of Sociology 63:597-606.
    Kallan, J. E. 1993. “A Multilevel Analysis of Elderly Migration，Social Science Quarterly” 74:403-416.
    Lawton, M. P. 1982. Aging and the environment：theoretical approaches. New York:Springer.
    Lawton, M. P, and L. Nahemow. 1973. Psychology of adult development and aging. Washington: American Psychological Association.
    Lee, Y. J., W. L. Parish, and R. J. Willis. 1994. “Sons, Daughters, and Intergenerational Support in Taiwan.” American Journal of Sociology 99（4）:1010-1041.
    Lin, I. J., N. Goldman., M. Weinstein., Y. H. Lin., T. Gorrindo, and T. Seeman. 2003. “Gender Differences in Adult Children’s Support of Their Parents in Taiwan.” Journal of Marriage and Family 65（1）:184-200.
    Litwak, E., and C. F.Longino. 1987. “Migration Patterns among the Elderly：A Developmental Perspective.” The Gerontologist 27:266-272.
    Raschick, M., and B. Ingersoll-Dayton. 2004. “The Costs and Rewards of Caregiving among Aging Spouses and Adult Children.” Family Relations 53（3）:317-325.
    Roger, C. C. 1995. “Health Status Transition of the Elderly, by Residential Location：1984 to 1990.” Family Economics Review 8（4）:18-28.
    Silverstein, M., and D. L. Zablotsky. 1996. “Health and Social Precursors of Later Life Retirement-Community Migration.” The Journals of Gerontology 51B（3）:150-156.
    Silverstein, M., and J. J. Angelelli. 1998. “Older Parents’ Expectations of Moving Closer to Their Children.” The Journals of Gerontology l53（3）:153-163.
    Silverstein, M., S. J. Conroy, H. Wang., R. Giarrusso., and V. L. Bengtson. 2002. “Reciprocity in Parent-child Relations over the Adult Life Course.” The Journal of Gerontology 57B（1）:3-13.
    Speare, A., R.Avery., and L.Lawton. 1991. “Disability, Residential Mobility, and Changes in Living Arrangement.” The Journals of Gerontology 46（3）:133-142.
    Spitze, G.., and J. R. Logan. 1989 “Gender Difference in Family Support.” Gerontology 29:108-113.
    Spitze, G.., J. R. Logan., and J. Robinson. 1992. “Family Structure and Change in Living Arrangements among Elderly Nonmarried Parents.” The Journals of Gerontology 47（6）:289-296.
    Sussman, M. B., J. N. Cates, and O.T. Smith. 1970. Inheritance and the Family. New York: Sage.
    Wilmoth, J. M. 1998. “Living Arrangement Transitions among America’s Older Adults.” The Gerontologist 38（4）:434-444.
    Wilmoth, J. M. 2000. “Unbalanced Social Exchanges and Living Arrangement Transitions among Older Adults.” The Gerontologist 40（1）:64-74.
    Won, Y. H., and G.. R. Lee. 1999. “Living Arrangement of Older Parents in Korea.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 30（2）:315-327.
    Zhang, Q. F. 2004 “Economic Transition and New Patterns of Parent-Adult Child Co-residence in Urban China” Journal of Marriage and Family 66（5）:1231-1245.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    93257002
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093257002
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Land Economics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2361View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback