Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32304
|
Title: | China`s calculus in the Asia-Pacific region: A political strategy through economic integration |
Authors: | 戈荷西 Guerra Vio, Jose |
Contributors: | 莊奕琦 Chuang, Yih Chyi 戈荷西 Guerra Vio, Jose |
Keywords: | Globalization Regionalism Economic Integration International Political Economy Hegemony Asia-Pacific RTAs and FTAs |
Date: | 2008 |
Issue Date: | 2009-09-14 13:37:29 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | With the multiple globalization processes more and deeper Economic Integration in the world is being undertaken. The Asia-Pacific region has become the most dynamic and fast growing region in the world due to the rise of China, changing dramatically the way economic and political relations are conceived across the Pacific Ocean. Beijing’s new economic moves towards integration processes are sustained by the fact that China’s economy has become significantly intertwined with other regional economies over the past two decades. From this fact also arises the motivation of this research, which tries to analyze how China’s strategy regarding economic integration across the Pacific Ocean is being planned and developed, considering not only its economic, but especially its political implications and possible strategic motives. This last aspect constitutes the main purpose of this study.
The hypothesis for this paper is based on the assumption that China is using its economic might as a means to enhance and expand its traditional sphere of influence in the Asia-Pacific region by achieving different kinds of trade arrangements. The ASEAN plus China FTA, together with the agreements between China and Australia, New Zealand and Chile are taken into account specifically; while some other possible future pacts are outlined as well. The methodological standpoint for the analysis is mainly built upon what is known as Political Economy, particularly its international or global strand, which helps to connect the world of politics and economics. The outcome for the question whether China is taking a leading role in regionalism just because of its growing need to coordinate and cooperate with other economies in order to keep its growth rate, or if it is also doing so because of its desire to enhance and further its traditional sphere of influence as a regional power; contemplates elements of both scenarios.
The structure of this thesis consists of five chapters: (1) Scope of the Study, (2) Literature Review and Theoretical Framework, (3) A Political Analysis of an Economic Issue, (4) Main Outcomes and (5) Conclusions. |
Reference: | 1. Acharya, A., (1999). “International Relations Theory and Cross-Strait Relations,” International Forum on Peace and Security in the Taiwan Strait, Taipei, Taiwan. 2. Antikiewicz A., and Whalley, J., (2004). “China’s New Regional Trade Agreements”, CATPRN Working Paper, 2004-1. (http://www.catrade.org) 3. Bergsten, F., (2007) “China and Economic Integration in East Asia: Implications for the United States”, Policy Briefs in International Economics, No. PB07-3, Washington. 4. Breslin, S., (2004). “Greater China and the Political Economy of Regionalization,” East Asia, 21(1): 7-23. 5. Broomfield, E., (2003). “Perceptions of Danger: the China threat theory,” Journal of contemporary China, 12(35): 265–284. 6. Brown, C., (2001). Understanding International Relations, Basingstoke, England; New York, NY: Palgrave. 7. Cai, K., (2005). “The China-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement and Taiwan,” Journal of Contemporary China, 14(45): 585-597. 8. Chambers, M., (2006/07). “Rising China: The Search for Power and Plenty,” in Strategic Asia 2006-07: Trade, Interdependence and Security, National Bureau of Asian Research. (http://nbr.org/publications/strategic_asia.) 9. Cheng J., and Wankun Z., (2004). Patterns and Dynamics of China’s International Strategic Behavior, in Chinese Foreign Policy: Pragmatism and Strategic Behavior; New York: M.E Sharpe. 10. Cox, R., (1987). Production, Power and World Order, New York: Columbia University Press. 11. Christoffersen, G., (1996). “China and the Asia-Pacific: Need for a Grand Strategy” Asian Survey, 36(11): 1067-1085. 12. Deng, Y., (1998). “The Chinese Conception of National Interests in International Relations,” The China Quarterly, 154: 308-329. 13. Fairclough, N., (1992). Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity. 14. Gaulier, G., Lemoine, F., and Unal-Kesenci, D., (2005). “China’s Integration in East Asia: Production Sharing, FDI & High Tech Trade," CEPII Working Paper, 2005-09. 15. Garrison, J., (2005). “China’s Prudent Cultivation of ‘Soft’ Power and implications for US Policy in East Asia,” Asian Affairs, 32(1): 25-30. 16. Gramsci, A., (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebook, London: Lawrence and Wishart. 17. Hempson-Jones, J., (2005). “The Evolution of China’s Engagement with International Governmental Organizations: Toward a Liberal Foreign Policy?” Asian Survey, (45)5: 687-701. 18. Hill, C., (2005) Assistant Secretary to the East Asian Pacific Affairs, Testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs Washington, DC (June 7, 2005). 19. Hoadley S. and Yang, J., (2007). “China’s Cross-Regional FTA Initiatives: Towards a Comprehensive National Power”, East Asian Cross-Regionalism, Pacific Affairs; 80(2): 327-348. 20. Holub, R., (1992). Antonio Gramsci: Beyond Marxism and Postmodernism, London and New York: Routledge. 21. Hong, H., (2004). “Economic Consequences of Exclusion from Preferential Trading Agreements and Free Trade Agreements in East Asia”, Taiwan Economic Forum, 2(7): 43-78. 22. Ikenberry, J., (2004) “American Hegemony and East Asian Order,” Australian Journal of International Affairs, 58(3): 353-367. 23. Jessop, B., (2004). “Critical Semiotic Analysis and Critical Political Economy,” Critical Discourse Studies, 1(1): 159-174. 24. Johnston, A., (2003). “Is China a Status Quo Power?” International Security, 27(4): 5-56. 25. Kasahara, S., (2004). “The Flying Geese Paradigm: A Critical Study of its Application to East Asian Regional Development,” United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 26. Kugler, J., (1999). “Extensions of Power Transitions: Application to Political Economy,” Pease Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 5(3). 27. Kumar, N., (2005). “Towards a Broader Asian Community: Agenda for the East Asia Summit,” Research and Information System for Developing Countries; Discussion Paper. 28. Krumm K., and Kharas, H., eds., (2003). “East Asia Integrates: A Trade Policy Agenda for Shared Growth,” Washington, DC: The World Bank. 29. Levine, S., (1984). China in Asia: The PRC as a Regional Power, in China`s Foreign Re1ations in the 1980s, Hany Harding, ed., New Haven: Yale University Press. 30. Maggi, G. and Rodriguez-Clare, A., (2005). “A Political-Economy Theory of Trade Agreements,” NBER Working Paper Series, National Bureau of Economic Research. (http://www.nber.org/papers/w11716) 31. Marsden, R., (1999). The Nature of Capital: Marx After Foucault, London: Routledge. 32. Munakata, N., (2002). “Whither East Asian Economic Integration?” CNAPS Working Paper; Brookings Institute. (www.brookings.edu/fp/cnaps/2001_munakata.htm) 33. Nye, S., (1997/98). “China’s Re-emergence and the Future of the Asia-Pacific,” Survival, 39(4): 65-79. 34. Oxley, A., (2006). “Turning Tides of Influence,” APEC Currents, Opinion Section, (http://www.apec.org.au/docs/currents0906/currents0906.html) 35. Peng, D., (2004). “Invisible Linkages: A Regional Perspective of East Asian Political Economy,” International Studies Quarterly 46(3): 436. 36. Qiu, D., (2005). “China-ASEAN Free Trade Area: Geo-economic Consideration of China’s Peaceful Rise”, Contemporary Asia-Pacific, 1. 37. Roy, D., (1996). “The China threat issue,” Asian Survey, 36(8): 758–71. 38. Roy, D., (2003). “China’s Reaction to American Predominance,” Survival, 45(3): 57-78. 39. Schiff, M. and Winter, L., (1998). “Regional Integration as Diplomacy,” The World Bank Economic Review, 12(1): 177-95. 40. Shambaugh, D., (2004/05). “China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order,” International Security, 29(3): 64-99. 41. Sheng, L., (2003). “China-ASEAN Free Trade Area: Origins, Developments and Strategic Motivations,” Singapore ISEAS working paper, 1. (www.iseas.edu.sg/vr32002/pdf) 42. Solis M. and Katada S., (2007). “Understanding East Asian Cross-Regionalism: An Analytical Framework,” Special Issue of Pacific Affairs, East Asian Cross-Regionalism; 80(2): 229-258. 43. Stubbs, R., (2002) “Asean Plus Three. Emerging East Asian Regionalism?” Asian Survey, 42(3): 440-445. 44. Sung, Y., (2005). The Emergence of Greater China, Palgrave; London. 45. Urata, S., (2004). “The Shift from ‘Market-led’ to ‘Institution-led’ Regional Economic Integration in East Asia in the late 1990s,” Waseda University 7 RIET. 46. Wang, V., (2005). “The logic of China-ASEAN FTA: Economic Statecraft of Peaceful Ascendancy,” China and Southeast Asia; Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. 47. Wu, Y., (2000). “Theorizing on Relations across the Taiwan Strait: nine contending approaches,” Journal of Contemporary China 9(25): 407–428. 48. Xia, S., (1990). “Perspectives of the Strategic Situation in the Asian-Pacific Region in the 1990s,” International Strategic Studies, 1. 49. Yang, Z., (2006). “FTAA: Impacts on China,” World Knowledge, 6. 50. Zhao, Q., (1996). Interpreting Chinese Foreign Policy, New York: Oxford University Press. 51. Zweig D. and Bi, J., (2005). “China’s Global Hunt for Energy,” Foreign Affairs, 84(5): 25-38. Other Sources • Dow Jones Business News, Sep. 14, 2002. • “Focus on East Asia and the Pacific - U.S. policy, economic and political issues.” Periodic Update that provides information about economic and political developments and US policy, US Department of State Dispatch, (April 19, 1998). • Long Yongtu, Secretary-General of the Boao Forum for Asia, at the ninth China Daily CEO Roundtable themed “China-Asia Business Partnership: Implications for multinationals,” March 30th, 2005. Conference organized by China Daily • Ong Keng Yong, Secretary-General of ASEAN. Opening address at the 2004 ASEAN Leadership Forum in Kuala Lumpur. • The Economist, Survey: China and its Region, “Smile Diplomacy: Working magic along China’s Periphery. March 29th, 2007. • United States Pacific Command, Asia Pacific Economic Update, 2005 Edition. • Wen Jiabao Speech at the opening of the East Asia Summit Leaders Dialogue, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia, 12 December 2005. • Wen Jiabao Special Message “Strengthen Confidence and Work Together for a New Round of World Economic Growth”, at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2009, 28 January 2009. • World Trade Report 2003. • Xinhua News Agency, “ASEAN Plus Three Meeting in Cambodia,” May 4, 2004. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 中國大陸研究英語碩士學程(IMCS) 95925041 97 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0959250411 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [中國大陸研究英語碩士學程(IMCS)] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 1113 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|