政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/32078
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51657260      Online Users : 614
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32078


    Title: 擴散與行銷整合之意見領袖傳播途徑研究:限制使用塑膠袋政策個案分析
    Authors: 藍夏萍
    Lan, Hsia Ping
    Contributors: 吳瓊恩
    藍夏萍
    Lan, Hsia Ping
    Keywords: 政策行銷
    創新擴散
    意見領袖
    傳播宣導
    政策執行
    影響力
    Policy Marketing
    Diffusion of Innovations
    Opinion Leader
    Communication
    Policy Implementation
    Influence
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2009-09-14 13:04:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 著眼於全球生態與環境急速惡化之困境,環保政策成為各國政府傾力推動與執行的核心政策。企圖經由政策規劃與有效執行,達成教育社會大眾、進行社會行為變遷、保護全球生態的終極目標。環保署於2002年開始推動的限制使用塑膠袋政策即為一例。然而,限用政策通動力時至今,於2004年級2005年宣告部分政策停止執行。事實證明,限用政策之推廣與擴散受到阻礙。本研究為了尋求受阻原因,針對台北市文山區模範鄰里進行深度訪談研究,以及個案分析研究,希冀釐清限用政策執行障礙。
    本研究針對政策行銷推廣擴散之面向,結合社會學研究方案中之創新擴散模式,以及政策行銷推廣模式,發現意見領袖之傳播途徑唯一有效影響社會大眾行為習慣之管道。歸納分析Everett M. Rogers曾進行的四個成功個案,發現有效之政策推廣及執行必須長期宣導、採行非強制性政策規劃與推廣、取得意見領袖高度認同、運用實際經驗影響與溝通模式,方能有效影響社會大眾,成功進行社會行為變遷,以利各項新政策運作執行。
      本研究針對社區鄰里範圍內之研究分析得知,台北市政府進行限用政策推廣過程,未能妥適運用意見領袖傳播管道,同時礙於社會系絡與文化之差異,無法完全依循個案分析所歸納之各項成功運作因素,可能因此而導致限用政策未能達成預期目標。其中癥結包含:由上而下政策規畫可能無法運用由下而上之政策執行;限用政策未能取得意見領袖認同;政策宣導推廣時程可能過不足;強制規範性之政策規範可能引發反彈等等。因此,限用政策雖然應用了意見領袖的推廣宣導途徑,但是可能基於上述因素而導致政策推廣僅能達成部分預期目標。未來若能針對受阻因素適度修正,加強政策宣導與推廣工作,責各項環保政策可望能順利執行。
    Environmental Protection Policies play the magnificent role in the field of public policy since the environmental pollutions are getting worse and worse in the 21st Century. Environmental Protection Administration, Expectative Yuan (ROC) Taiwan had implemented the Forbidden to Use the Plastic Bag Policy since 2002 in order to protect the nature environment in Taiwan. However, part of this policy had been stop since 2004. There must some problems happened to make this policy incomplete, and this is also the research question.
    This research discovers that the Opinion-Leadership Communication Model, which is from the combination of the diffusion of innovations and public policy marketing, could be the most efficient communication path between the government and the public to implement the public policy. Through the further analysis of four successful cases adapted by Everett M. Rogers, there are several important elements, including long time to diffuse, no restricted policy, trust from the opinion leader, and experienced influence model, can make the policy implementation successful.
    The research findings offer the reasonable repressions for the fail of the Forbidden to Use of Plastic Bag. First of all, the policy marketing time is too short. Secondly, most of the local opinion leaders could not really understand this policy or even trust it. Thirdly, the bottom-up policy implementation model does not work with the top-down policy formation. Finally, the main purpose of this policy is to trigger the social change of the green shopping behavior, and the restricted policy implementation could not only fail, but also get more misunderstandings or complains from the public. The proper modifications shall direct a right way for this policy.
    "第一章、緒論 4
    第一節、研究背景 5
    第二節、研究動機與目的 6
    第三節、研究途徑與方法 8
    第四節、研究範圍與限制 9
    第五節、研究流程 10
    第二章、文獻探討 11
    第一節、政策執行 11
    第二節、創新擴散 19
    第三節、社會行銷與政策行銷 29
    第四節、政策執行、創新擴散與政策行銷之共通性 34
    第五節、溝通理論:執行擴散與行銷 37
    第六節、影響力與意見領袖 48
    第三章、研究設計 55
    第一節、研究架構 55
    第二節、訪談對象 63
    第四章、成功個案簡介 67
    第一節、哥倫比亞個案-農村現代化政策 69
    第二節、台灣個案-家庭避孕計畫 71
    第三節、韓國個案-家庭計畫政策 74
    第四節、美國個案-終結愛滋(STOP AIDS)計畫 77
    第五章、限制使用塑膠袋政策個案分析 81
    第一節、政策背景簡介 81
    第二節、審視環境系絡與議題性質 87
    第三節、開啟意見領袖途徑 88
    第四節、溝通與影響模式分析 91
    第五節、意見領袖途徑成效 94
    第六章、結論與建議 96
    第一節、研究發現 96
    第二節、未來研究方向 107
    參考文獻 108
    附錄ㄧ 117
    附錄二 136
    Reference: 中文部分
    卜正球(1999),〈提升計畫執行力之基本要素〉,《研考雙月刊》23卷4期,
    http://www.edu-on-air.org.tw/document/1907.doc 。瀏覽時間
    2007/03/31。
    王若馨、黃郁青、夏薇婷、李怡芳 譯,Matthew David and Carole D. Sutton著(2007),《研究方法的基礎》,台北:韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。
    王柏鴻 譯,愛德.凱勒&瓊.貝力 著(2003),台北:時報出版。
    丘昌泰(1995),《當代政策科學理論之研究》,台北:巨流
    朱志宏(1991),《公共政策》,台北:三民
    吳定(1994),《公共政策》,台北:華視文化股份有限公司。
    吳瓊恩
    (2005),《行政學的範圍與方法》,增訂二版,台北:五南。
    (2006),《行政學》,增訂三版,台北:三民。
    李允傑、丘昌泰合著(2003),《政策執行與評估》,台北:元照出版。
    李彩霞(1999),〈公元兩千年空中教學發展趨勢〉,《空中教學論叢》第十五集,
    究發展考核委員會。
    周鴻騰(2002),〈社會行銷於政策決策過程中之應用-以推動購物用塑膠及免洗餐具限制使用政策為例〉,國立東華大學環境政策研究所碩士論文。
    林鐘沂(1991),《公共事務的設計與執行》,台北:幼獅
    邱明祥(1999),〈政策執行組織與執行力關係之探討〉,《研考雙月刊》23卷4。
    施能傑(1999),〈政策執行的要素分析〉,《研考雙月刊》23卷4期,行政院研
    柯正峰(1999),〈我國邁向學習社會政策制定之研究─政策問題形成、政策問題形成,政策規劃及政策合法化探討〉,國立台灣師範大學社會教育研究所博士論文。
    胡龍騰(1997),〈政策行銷之理論與實踐-野生動物保育政策個案分析〉,國立中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。
    莊明貞、陳怡如 譯Corrine Glesne著(2006),《質性研究導論》,台北:高等教育文化事業有限公司。
    翁興利(2004),《政策規劃與行銷》,台北:華泰。
    翁興利、官有恆、施能傑、鄭麗嬌(1998),《公共政策》,台北:國立空中大學。
    唐錦超 譯,羅吉斯 著(2006),《創新的擴散》,台北:遠流。
    張世賢(1988),《公共政策析論》,台北:五南。
    陳向明(1999),《社會科學質性研究》。台北:五南。
    陳志銘、陳逸如 譯,羅伯.齊歐迪尼 著(2003),《透視影響力》,台北:台北陪生。
    陳定邦(1999),〈由政策的規劃與執行內涵談台灣「空中教育」政策的現況與展
    望〉。行政院研究發展考核委員會劃及政策合法化探討:國立台灣師大社教育學系博士論文。
    陳儀珍(2005),〈創新擴散之硏究 : 以個人綜合所得稅網路申報為例〉。國立
    台北大學公共行政暨政策研究所碩士論文。
    黃貝雯(2006),〈公共組織導入平衡計分卡障礙之認知研究〉。國立
    政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
    黃美珍(1996),〈公共政策創新擴散之硏究 : 臺北市資源垃圾回收計畫之個案分析〉,國立中興大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
    齊思賢 譯,葛拉威爾 著(2000),《引爆趨勢》,台北:時報出版。
    廖春霖(1963),〈意見領袖之購買行為〉,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    劉宏玲(2006),〈環境管制政策之研究-以「限制購物用塑膠袋及塑膠類(含保麗龍)免洗餐具使用政策」之執行評估為例〉,國立中興大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
    謝季芳(2001),〈政策行銷溝通程序之探討:以台北市推行垃圾費隨袋徵收政策〉,
    元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
    魏鏞等(1991),《公共政策》,台北:國立空中大學。
    英文部分
    Anderson, V. (1991) Alternative economic indicators. London:Routledge.
    Ann P. eds. (1997) Knowledge Diffusion in The U.S. Aerospace Industry, London, England, Greenwich:Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    Ardicichvili, Alexander., Page, Vaughn and Wentling, Tim. (2003) “Motivation and Barriers to Participation in Virtual Knowledge-sharing Communities of Practice”,
    Journal of Knowledge and Management, Vol 7 No. 1, pp.64-77.
    Becker, Marshal H.(1970) “Factors Affecting Diffusion of Innovation Among Health Professionals.” American Journal of public Health 60: 294-305. PH(E).
    Becker, Marshal H.(1970b) “Sociometric Location and Innovationveness: Reformulation and Extension of the Diffusion Model.” American Sociological Review 35: 262-282. PH(E).
    Berry, Frances Stokes and Berry, Willian D.(1990) “State Lottery Adpotions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.” In Paul A. Sabatier, ed., American Political Science Review 84: 395-416.
    Berry, Frances Stokes and Berry, Willian D.(2006) “Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research.” In Paul A. Sabatier, ed., The Theories of the Policy Process, 2ed. CO: Westview Press.
    Bordenave, Juan Diaz.(1976) “Communication of Agricultural Innovations in Latin America: The Need for New Model.” Communication Research.
    Borghini, Stefania. (2005) “Organizational Creativity: Breaking Equilibr ium and Order to Innovate”, Journal of Knowledge and Management, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp.19-33.
    Coleman, James S., Elihu Katz, and Herbert Menzel.(1957) “The Diffusion of an Innovation Among Physicians.” Sociometry 20: 253-270. PH(E).
    Crawford, C.B. (2005) “Effects of Transformational Leadership Organizational Position on Knowledge Management”, Journal of Knowledge and Management, Vol. 9 No. 6, pp.6-16.
    Dalkir, Kimiz (2005) Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice, Amsterdam, Boston, Heidelberg, London, New York, Oxford, Paris, Elsevier:Butterworth Heinemann.
    Dunn. W. (1994) Public policy analysis: An introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Dye, T. R. (1978) Understanding Public Policy. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Earp, Joanne L., E. Eng, M.S.O’ Malley, M. Altpeter, G. Rauscher, L. Mayne, H. F. Matthews, K. S. Lynch, and B. Gaquish. (2002) “Increasing Use of Mammography among Older, Rural African American Women: Results from Community Trial.” American Journal of public Health 92(4): 646-654. PH(E).
    Easton, D. (1965) A system analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.
    Field, J. (1994) ‘Open Learning and Consumer Culture’ Open Learning,
    Flowers, P., G. J. Hart, L. M. Williamson, J. S. Frankis, and G. J. Derr.(2002) “Does Bar-Based, Peer-Led Health Promotion Have a Community-Level Effect Amongest Gay Men in Scotland?” International Journal of STD and AIDS 13: 102-108. PH(E).
    Garvey, Bop and Williamson, Bill. (2002) Knowledge Management: Dialogue, Creativity and the Corporate Curriculum, Pearson Education, Financial Times, Prentice Hall.
    Hays, Carol E., Scott P. Hays, John O. Deville, and Peter Mulhall.(2000) “Capacity for Effectiveness: The Relationship Between Coalition Structure and Community Impact.” Evaluation and Program Planning, 23: 373-379.
    Hitt, Michael A., Black, J. Stewart and Proter, Lyman W. (2005) Management, Pearson Education International.
    Ipe, Minu. (2003) “Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework”, Human Resource Development Review, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp.337-359.
    Jenson, Jason L. (2003) “Policy Diffusion through Institutional Legitimation: State Lotteries.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory., 13: 521-541.
    Katz, Elihu.(1999) “Theorizing Diffusion: Tarde and Sorokin Revisited.” The Annals 566:144-155. C(N).
    Katz, Elihu, and Paul F. Lazarsfeld.(1955) Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication. New York: Free Press.
    Katz, E., Martin L. Levin, and Hebert Hamilton.(1963) “Traditions of Research on the Diffusion of Innovations.” American Sociological Review 28: 237-253. GS(N).
    Kegeles, S. M., R. B. Hays, and Thomas J. Coates.(1996) “The Mpowerment Project: A Community-Level HIV Prevention for Young Gay Men.” American Journal of Public Health 86: 1129-1136.
    Kelly, Jeffrey A., Debra A., Murphy, Kathleen J. Skkema, Timothy L. McAuliffe, Roger A. Roffman, Laura J. Solomon, Richard A. Winett, and Seth C. Kalichman. (1997) “Randomized, Controlled, Community-Level HIV-Prevention Intervention for Sexual-Risk Behavior Among Homosexual Men in US Cities.” Lancet 350: 1500-1505. PH(E).
    Kelly, Jeffrey A., Janet S. St. Lawrence, Yolanda E. Diaz, L. YvonneStevenson,Allen C. Hauth, Ted L. Brasfield, Seth C. Kalichman, Joseph E. Smith, and Michael E. Andrew.(1991) “ HIV Risk Behavior Reduction Following Intervention with Key Opinion Leaders of Population: An Experimental Analysis.”American Journal of Public Health. 81(2): 168-171.PH(E).
    Kelly, Jeffrey A., Janet S. St. Lawrence, Yolanda E. Diaz, L. YvonneStevenson,Allen C. Hauth, Ted L. Brasfield, Seth C. Kalichman, Joseph E. Smith, and Michael E. Andrew.(1992) “Community AIDS/HIV Risk Reduction: The Effects of Endorsements by Popular people in Three Cities.”American Journal of Public Health. 82(11): 1483-1489.PH(E).
    Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and Hebert Menzel.(1963) “Mass Media and Personal Influence.” In Wilbur Schramm, ed., The Science of Human Communication. New York: Basic Books.
    Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and Robert K. Merton.(1964) “Friendship as Social Process: A Substantive and Methodological Analysis.” In. Monroe Berger et al., eds., Freedom and Control in Modern Society. New York: Octagon.
    Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Guaudet.(1944/1948/1968)The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Election. New York: Duell, Sloan, and Pearce; New York: Columbia University Press.. New York: Basic Books.
    Limdblom, C. E. (1959) The science of muddling through, Public policy and program research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Meseguer, Govadonga. (2004) “What Role for Learning? The Diffusion of Privatization in OECD and Latin American Countries.” Tnl Publ. Dol., 24: 299—325.
    Mintron, Michael and Vergari, Ssndra. (1998) “Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of State Education Reform.” The Journal of Politics. 60: 126-148.
    Mohamed, Mirghani., Stanosky, Michael and Murry, Arthur. (2004) “Applying Knowledge Management Principles to Enhance Management, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp.127-142.
    Mooney, Christopher. (2001) “Modeling Regional Effects on State Policy Diffusion.” Political Research Quarterly., 54: 103-124.
    Nonaka, Ikujiro and Takeuchi, Hirotaka. (1995) The knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    Park, Heejun., Ribiere, Vincent and Schutle Jr., William D. (2004) “Critical Attributes of Organizational Culture That Promote Knowledge Management Technology Implementation Success”, Journal of Knowledge and Management, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp.106-117.
    Portney, K. E. (1986) Approaching public policy analysis: An introduction to Administration Review. New York: the free press.
    Rogers, Everett M.
    (1973)Communication Strategies for Family Planning. New York: Free Press. C(N).
    (1983) Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd. New York:Free Press. C(N).
    (1986)Communication Technology: The New Media in Society. New York:Free Press. C(N).
    (1994)A History of Communication Study: A Biographical Approach. New
    (2003)Diffusion of Innovations, 4rd. New York:Free Press. C(N).
    (2006)Diffusion of Innovations, 5rd. New York:Free Press. C(N).
    Sun, Peter Yih-Tong and Scott, John L. (2005) “An Investigation Barriers to Knowledge Transfer”, Journal of Knowledge and Management, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp.75-90.
    Syed-Ikhsan, Syed Omar Sharifuddin and Rowland, Fytton (2004) “Knowledge Management in A Public Organization: A Study on The Relationship Between Organizational Elements and The Performance of Knowledge Transfer”, Journal of Knowledge and Management, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp.95-112.
    Tarde, Gabriel (1903/1969)The Laws of Limitation, trans, by Elsie Clews Parsons. New York: Holt; Chicago: University of Chicago Press. GS(E).
    Tiwana, Amrit. (2002) Knowledge Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
    Tylor, W.A. (2004) “Organizational Readiness for Successful Knowledge Sharing: Challenges for Public Sector Managers”, Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 22-37.
    Weyland, Kurt. (2005) “Theories of Policy Diffusion: Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform.” World Politics., 57: 262-295.
    Wiig, Karl M. (2002) “Knowledge Management in Public Administration”, Journal of Knowledge and Management, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp.224-239.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    公共行政研究所
    94256014
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094256014
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Public Administration] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2297View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback