English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113325/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51160918      Online Users : 902
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31947


    Title: 美國最低稅負制與非現金捐贈行為
    Alternative Minimum Tax and Non-Cash Donations -- An Empirical Study in the U.S
    Authors: 梁師韻
    Liang, shin-yun
    Contributors: 羅光達
    梁師韻
    Liang, shin-yun
    Keywords: 最低稅負制
    捐贈行為
    差異中的差異分析
    Alternative Minimum Tax
    donation behavior
    Differences-in-Differences
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-14 12:35:27 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討美國最低稅負制與個人非現金捐贈行為的關係。1993年時美國對於最低稅負制做稅制上之修正,將非現金捐贈之扣抵稅額以購入成本計算修改為以公平市價計算;此一稅制上的改變,正提供一個相當適合研究的時機,可以對非現金捐贈部分進行深入了解。所以本研究以美國內地稅務局在1989年及1995年的橫斷面個人申報所得稅資料庫,並採用差異中的差異分析法,來探討最低稅負制度對於非現金捐贈行為的影響,並加入可能會影響非現金捐贈的解釋變數,包括:所得、財富、年齡、婚姻、扶養親屬人數等變數。

    經實證結果發現,最低稅負制度對於非現金捐贈行為效果顯著且正向,即代表1993年美國稅制從以購入成本計算扣抵額修正為以公平市價計算扣抵額,此政策能夠誘發民眾對非現金捐贈金額增加,至於解釋變數上經實證結果發現,當所得及財富越高之納稅人,對非現金捐贈金額越高,在婚姻及年齡方面,已婚者及年齡較大者在捐贈金額上為多;至於扶養親屬人數方面,對於捐贈金額影響是不顯著的。
    This thesis is focus on the relation of the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) and Non-Cash Donations (NCD). The America amended the AMT in 1993. It changed the NCD-deduction calculation from cost to fair value. This revolution gave a good time for researching about NCD. So, this report took the individual tax database from Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in 1989 to 1995 for example. And used Differences-in-Differences (DID) way to discuss the infect of NCD from AMT. Besides, this research added some NCD variables including of income, wealth, age, marriage, numbers of dependent.

    The empirical result showed that the AMT had obvious and positive effect on NCD behavior. It represented that the AMT policy change in 1993 could cause the NCD increase. The more income and wealth had more NCD amount. People married and elderly people offered more donation than single and young. The numbers of dependent had no obvious effect on donation.
    Reference: 李美枝、丁興祥、陳皎眉(1988),《社會心理學》,國立空中大學。
    李茂興、余伯泉(1995),《社會心理學》,台北,楊智文化。
    吳世英(2003),「租稅制度與個人捐贈行為」,《財稅研究》,35(3),頁1~15。
    林世銘(2005),《建立我國所得稅最低稅負制度之研究》。財政部賦稅署委託研究計畫。
    林雅莉(1998),《非營利組織募款之研究》。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
    林裕盛(2005),稅制改革的起步-所得稅最低稅負制度,48期財稅園地財政部財稅人員訓練所報導。
    林慧修(2002),《部分負擔對不同種類醫療服務之影響分析》。陽明大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文。
    候佳雯(2005),《「糖尿病醫療服務改善方案」試辦計畫對第二型糖尿病人醫療資源利用之影響》。台灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文。
    時蓉華(1996),《社會心理學》,台北,東華書局。
    財政部稅務入口網,「所得基本稅額條例」,http://www.etax.nat.gov.tw/
    陳玉惠(2005),《最低稅負制公平性與效率性之研究》。高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所碩士論文。
    陳厚任(2004),《藥品部分負擔政策對癲癇病人之影響》。台灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文。
    陳勇達(2004),《所得來源與個人捐贈行為之實證分析-以台灣地區為例》。台北大學財政學系碩士論文。
    張隆宏(2000),《台灣綜合所得稅之實證研究》。台北大學經濟學系博士論文。
    曾巨威、朱琇妍(2004),「最低稅負制之介紹與相關問題研究」,《財稅研究》,36(6),頁14~33。
    蔡淑鈴(2004),《醫療利用、死亡與失業:在經濟不景氣之下實證研究》。陽明大學公共衛生研究所博士論文。
    謝春福(2004),《醫療給付效益提昇計劃前後馬祖地區民眾醫療利用與費用之分析》。台灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文。
    Auten, G. E., J.M. Clike and William Randolph (1992), “ The Effects of Tax Reform on Charitable Contributions,” National Tax Journal,45(3), 267-290
    Barrett, K.S. (1991), “ Panel Data Estimates for Charitable Giving: A Synthesis of Techniques,” National Tax Journal, 44(3), 365-381
    Bertrand, Marianne, Duflo, Esther and Mullainathan, Sendhil (2004),“How Much Should We Trust Difference-in-Difference Estimates?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1),249-275.
    Blau, G. J., and K.B. Boal (1987), “Conceptualizing How Job Involvement and Organizational Commitment Affect Turnover and Absenteeism,” Academy of Management Review, 12, 2, 288-300.
    Boulding, W., A. Kalra , R. Staelin and V. A. Zeithaml (1993), “A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions,” Journal of Marketing Research ,30, 3, 7-27.
    Broman, A.J. (1989), “Statutory Tax Reform and Charitable Contributions: Evidence from a Recent Period of Reform,” The Journal of the American Tax Association, 10, 7-12.
    Burman L.E., William G. Gale, Jeffrey Rohaly and Benjamin H. Harris (2002), “The Individual AMT: Problems and Potential Solutions,” National Tax Journal, 55, 555-596.
    Card, D. and A.B. Krueger (1994),“Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania,” American Economic Review, 84, 772-793.
    Card, D. and D. Sullivan (1988), “Measuring the Effect of Subsidized Training Programs on Movements in and out of Employment.” Econometrics, 56(3), 497-530.
    Chua, Vincent C.H. and C.M. Wong (1999), “Tax Incentives, Individual Characteristics and Charitable Giving in Singapore,” International Journal of Social Economics, 26(12), 1492-1504.
    Clotfelter, Charles (1985), Federal Tax Policy and Charitable Giving, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Clotfelter, Charles and Eugene Steuerle (1981), Charitable Contributions, in Henry Aaron and Joseph Pechman, eds., How Taxes Affect Economic Behavior, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution
    Eissa, N. (1995),“Taxation and Labor Supply of Married Women: The Tax Reform Act of 1986 as a Natural Experiment,” NBER Working Paper, NO.5023.
    Gujarathi, M. J. and K. B. Samir (1998), “Minimum Alternative Tax in India: Lessons to be Learned from the Foreign Use of Alternative Minimum Tax,” The International Tax Journal, 24, 64-77.
    Homans, G. S. (1961), Social Behavior: Its Element Forms. N.Y.: Harcourt, Brace.
    Kerbs, D.L. (1970), “Altruism-An Examination of the Concept and a Review of the Literature” Psychological Bulletin, 73, 258-302.
    Kolter, P. and A. R. Andreasen (1996), “Strategies Marketing for Nonprofit Organizaion,” 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Macarov, D.
    Meyer, Bruce. D (1994),“Natural and Quasi-Experiment in Economics,” NBER Technical Working Paper NO.170
    Mixer, J.R. (1993), “Principles of Professional Fundraising: Useful Foundations for Successful Practice,” San Francisco: Jossey – Bass Publishers, 211-217.
    Moffitt, Robert A. and Mark O. Wilhelm (2000), “Taxes and Labor Supply Decisions of the Affluent,” In Does Atlas Shrug? The Economic Consequences of Taxing the Rich. Edited by J. Slemrod. New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 193-234.
    O"Neil, Cherie J., Richard Steinberg, G. and Rodney Thompson (1996), “Reassessing the Tax-Favored Status of the Charitable Deduction for Gifts of Appreciated Assets,” National Tax Journal, 49(2), 215-233.
    Pope, T. R., K. E. Anderson, J. L. Kramer (2002),“Comprehensive, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey,” Prentice Hall`s Federal Taxation 2003
    Randolph, William C. (1995), “Dynamic Income, Progressive Taxes and the Timing of Charitable Contributions,” Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), 709-738
    Saxton, Jim (2001), “The Alternative Minimum Tax For Individuals: A Growing Burden,” Staff Report,Joint Economic Committee, May.
    Severy, L.J. (1974), “Comment: On the Essence of Altruism,” Journal of Social Issues, 30, 189-194.
    Steinberg, Richard (1990), Taxes and Giving: New Findings, Voluntas, 167-172.
    Thibaut, J.W. and H.H. Kelley (1959), The Social Psychology of Groups, New York: Wiley.
    - (1978), Interpersonal Relations: A theory of Interdependence, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
    Triest, Robert K. (1998), “Econometric Issues in Estimating the Behavioral Response to Taxation: A Nontechnical Introduction,” National Tax Journal, 51(4), 761-772.
    Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2000), Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College.
    Wu, Shin-Ying (2001), “The Role of the Alternative Minimum Tax in Improving the Estimation of Tax Effects,” Seminar paper, the Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, October, Taipei.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    94921023
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094921023
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2300View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback