政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/31895
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113311/144292 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50943457      線上人數 : 944
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31895


    題名: 臺灣警察專科學校學生人格特質、工作價值觀與組織認同相關性之研究
    作者: 張麗美
    Chang, Li-Mei
    貢獻者: 孫本初
    葉毓蘭


    張麗美
    Chang, Li-Mei
    關鍵詞: 臺灣警察專科學校
    專科警員班正期組
    基層特考班
    內外控人格特質
    工作價值觀
    組織認同
    日期: 2004
    上傳時間: 2009-09-14 12:29:18 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 摘 要
    成功的人力資源管理策略，方能有效提昇組織效能，而組織能否「得才」，為組織效力，更是影響組織成功與否之關鍵。組織投注大量資源培育人才，冀望成員對組織忠誠及有所貢獻，是以個人與組織的適配性，對組織及個人生涯發展而言，具有密不可分之重要性。
    人力晉用與教育訓練功能整合，對於「警政再造方案」具關鍵性影響力，本研究以臺灣警察專科學校專科警員班第23期正期組行政警察科，及93年基層行政警察特考班學生為研究對象，探討學生人格特質、工作價值觀與組織認同之相關性，透過問卷調查蒐集資料，取得有效樣本937份，利用獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數、卡方檢定、皮爾森相關係數及迴歸分析等統計方法，分析結果發現：
    一、在人格特質方面：55%學生人格特質較多傾向於內控型。
    二、工作價值觀及組織認同之知覺情形
    (一)社會地位：53%覺得警察工作是受社會大眾尊重，有良好的聲譽與地位。
    (二)利他：79%認為警察工作是深具利他價值的，可以服務人群，伸張正義、濟弱扶傾，可為社會做些有意義的事，
    (三)安全：79%對於警察工作的安全性深感擔心，顯示學生個人及家人對於其從事警察工作之身體安全均感到擔憂。
    (四)休閒：僅有46%覺得從事警察工作可以有自己的假期，安排休閒活動與陪伴家人，可見警察工作之休閒價值普遍偏低。
    (五)自我實現：62%覺得從事警察工作得以發揮自我的能力與抱負。
    (六)經濟：78%覺得警察工作的待遇，符合其經濟需求，對於警察工作的薪資待遇，普遍感到滿意。
    (七)升遷：約有69%滿足於警(隊)員的職務，顯示出「升遷」對將近七成的學生之工作價值觀而言，並非首要追求目標。
    (八)組織認同：70%對警察組織感到認同。
    經統計77%以上學生表示服務期滿仍願留任警職；畢業分發意願以專業警
    察單位最高佔33.1%，其次為警察局或分局的內勤單位佔30.3%。
    三、各項檢定結果分析
    (一)在人格特質方面：僅「有無親屬任職警界」在人格特質上，有顯著差異情形存在。
    (二)在工作價值觀方面：「班期」、「役別」、「年齡」、「入校前教育程度」、「有無親屬任職警界」及「任職警界親屬人數」之不同，在工作價值觀上，有顯著差異情形存在。
    (三)在組織認同方面：「班期」、「役別」、「年齡」、「有無親屬任職警界」，在組織認同程度上，有顯著差異情形存在。
    (四)對於各變項之相關分析，「人格特質」及「工作價值觀」與「組織認同」均有顯著相關，人格特質與工作價值觀，亦有顯著相關。
    (五)學生服務期滿後之留任意願與個人基本屬性之「班期」、「役別」、「年齡」、「入校前的教育程度」、「親屬任職警界」、「父親職業」，有關聯性存在。
    (六)學生分發意願與個人基本屬性之「性別」、「役別」、「親屬任職警界人數」、「父親職業」，有關聯性存在。
    四、組織認同的預測力
    對於整體學生、正期組學生、基層特考班、男性學生而言，均以「自我實現」預測力最佳，「利他」及「社會地位」次之，對女性學生則以「利他」預測力最佳，「社會地位」次之。

    關鍵詞：臺灣警察專科學校、專科警員班正期組、基層特考班、
    內外控人格特質、工作價值觀、組織認同。
    Abstract
    A successful management strategy of human resource can usually result in a great increase in the efficiency and effectiveness of an organization. But more often than not, the key factor that directly leads to its success is whether the organization can gain the necessary “brain”. Thus, the good fitness between the organization and its members, are vital to the development of the organization and its members’ careers.
    Recruit the manpower and the integration between the function of education and training are influentially important to police reform program. This study that bases
    on 937 valid samples from the survey of the 23rd phase Junior Police Officer of Administration Police Department of Taiwan Police College and 2004 Junior Special Examination for Police Officer are aiming to discuss the relativity of personalities, work values and Organizational Commitment. Through t-test, One Way ANOVA, Chi Square, Pearson`s Contingency Coefficient and Regression Analysis, etc. the results of this study are as follows:
    1. Personalities：55% of the samples are internal control.
    2. Work values and Organizational Commitment
    a. Social status：53% of the students think policeman is publicly respected and reputable
    b. Altruism：79% think that they are altruism, Being a policeman could serve people, righteous and is meaningful to the society.
    c. Safety：79% feel insecure about the safety of being a policeman, which shows the surveyed students and their families are all worried about the safety of being a policeman.
    d. Recreation：Only 46% think policemen can have their own vacation, recreational activities and time with their family, which shows the value for leisure of policemen is low.
    e. Self-fulfillment：62% think being a policeman can achieve their goals in life.
    f. Financial need：78% think what they earn can afford what they need. They show average satisfaction for their salary.
    g. Promotion chance：69% feel contented to be a policeman. Getting promoted is not a main pursuit in their work value.
    h. Organizational Commitment：70% identify with the police organization.

    In the survey, more than 77% are willing to continue their job after they have finished their compulsory term. According to the intention of dispatch program after graduation, the professional police units is account for 33.1 %，the rate of regular office units of police bureau or station is 30.3%。
    3. The test results:
    a. Personality: Only “whether or not relatives work for the police” makes an obvious difference.
    b. Work values: “classes”, “service term”, ”age”, “the education before getting into the Taiwan Police College Student”, “whether or not relatives work for the police” and “the number of relatives who work for the police” cause differences in this aspect.
    c. Organizational Commitment: “classes”, “service term”, ”age”, and “whether or not relatives work for the police” and “How many relatives works for the police” cause differences in this aspect.
    d. To analyze the correlation among different variables, we find that personalities, work values, and Organizational Commitment are significantly different at α=.05 level. so are the personalities and work values.
    e. The willingness to continue their job after tenure is over is relative to “classes”, “service term”, ”age”, “the education before getting into the Taiwan Police College Students”, “whether or not relatives work for the police” and “their father’s occupation”
    f. The desired work is relative to class”, “service term”, ”age”, “the education before getting into the Taiwan Police College Students”, “the number of relatives who work for the police” and “their father’s occupation”
    4. Predictability of Organizational Commitment
    To either all the tested students, Junior College Classes, Junior Special Examination for Police Officer, or male students, the predictability of self-fulfillment works best. Next come altruism and social status. The predictability of altruism works best to female students and then the social status.
    參考文獻: 參考文獻
    一、中文部分
    丁虹(1987)。企業文化與組織承諾的關係研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
    內政部警政署(2003)。警政白皮書。台北：內政部警政署。
    王保進（1999）。視窗版與行為科學研究。台北：心理出版社。
    王叢桂(1993)。「三個世代大學畢業工作者的價值觀」，本土心理學研究，第2期，頁206-250。
    朴英培(1988)。工作價值觀、領導型態、工作滿足與組織承諾關係之研究，－以韓國電子業為例。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    牟素雯(2002)。人力成本精簡方案和員工個人特質，對工作態度與生涯規劃認知相關研究－以新竹科學園區積體電路產業為例。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    吳秀照(1986)。臺灣省各縣市社政單位組織特性與社政人員組織融入之研究。東海大學社工研究所碩士論文，頁18。
    吳明隆(2005)。SPSS 統計應用學習實務-問卷分析與應用統計。台北：知城。
    吳秉恩(1986)。組織行為學。台北，華泰書局。
    Super, D. E. (1980). A Life-Space Approach to Career Development. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52,129-148.
    Super, D.E. (1970). Manual For the Work Values Inventory. Chicago: Riverside Publishing Company.
    Taveggia, T. C. & T. Ziemba. (1978). A Study of the Central Life Interests and Work Attachments of Male and Female Workers, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol,12. pp.305-320.
    Tiggemann, M. ＆ A. H. Winefield. (1989) Predictors of Employment, Unemployment and Further Study Among School-Leavers. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 213-221.
    Van der Velde, M. E. G., J. A. Feij., ＆ H. Van Emmerik. (1998). Chang in Work Values and Norms among Dutch Young Adults: Ageing or Societal Trends？. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22,55-76.
    Wanous, J. P. (1992). Organization Entry: Recruitment Selection, Orientation and Socialization of Newcomers. (2nd ed.) Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
    Weiner, Y. (1982). Commitment in Organization: A Normative View. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 420-429.
    Wilpert, B. ＆ Maimer, H. (1994). Work Meanings in International Perspective. Paper, WORC Symposium, Values and Work: Tilburg University.
    Wollack, S., J. G. Goodate., J. P. Witjing., ＆ P. C. Smith. (1971). Development of the Survey of Work Values. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(4), 331-338.
    Zytowdki, D.G. (1994). A Super Contribution to Vocational Theory: Work Values. The Career Development Quarterly, 43(1), 25.
    吳秉恩譯(2002)。分享式人力資源管理。台北，翰蘆圖書。
    Zytowski, D. G. (1970). The Concept of Work Values. Vocational Guidance Quarterly 18, pp.176-186.
    吳冠儒(1999)。員工工作價值觀、專業承諾、情感承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究－以高科技企業員工為例。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    吳癸受(1992)。公務人員的激勵與組織認同之研究。人事法制創作徵文得獎作品輯編，第七輯。台北：銓敘部。
    吳鐵雄(1996)。工作價值觀量表之編製研究。行政院青年輔導委員會編印。
    呂勝瑛(1996)。兩岸員工價值觀、工作倫理與組織向心力的比較研究，兩岸三地人力資源管理比較與整合學術研討會論文集。
    李元墩、鐘志明(2001)。企業文化、員工工作價值觀及組織承諾之關聯性研究-以台灣地區主要集團企業為例。長榮學報，第4卷，第2期，頁1-18。
    李宗勳(2002)。警大與警專之分與合的探討－一個社會工程再造的議題，中央警察大學行政警察學系學術研討會論文集。
    李長貴(1975)。組織心理學。台北，台灣中華書局。
    李冠儀(2000)。國小教師對學校組織氣候、知覺工作價值觀與專業承諾之相關研究，國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    李華璋(1994)。「工作價值觀在生計諮商上的應用」，輔導季刊，第2卷，第30期，頁33-40。
    林孟彥譯(2003)。管理學。台北：華泰。
    林益慶(2003)。國小教師選擇教職的理由之研究。臺灣教育社會學研究，第3卷第1期，頁77-114。
    林瑞欽(1980)。師範生任教職志之理論與實徵研究。高雄，復文圖書。
    邱淑媛(1993)。工作價值觀對員工工作態度及工作表現之影響研究。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    洪紹榮(2003)。組織認同、領導風格與海外派遣員工工作投入關係之研究。大葉大學國際企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
    唐大均（2001）。工作價值與工作特性影響我內稽人員工作投入與離職傾向的探討，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    唐遠榮(1986)。要徑與目標理論在組織承諾研究之應用－論我國高級科技人員的忠誇與滿足感。企銀季刊，卷10期2，頁17。
    夏林清、游慧卿(1984)，「工作價值觀問卷介紹與初步修訂報告」，測驗與輔導，第60期，頁1030-1036。
    徐善德(1997)。高職教師工作價值觀組織承諾與教學效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    張□逕(2004)。室內設計個人居家工作者內外控人格特質、性別角色態度與工作生活品質關係之研究。樹德科技大學學報，第6卷，第2期，p101-104。
    張潤書(1985)。組織行為與管理。台北：五南。
    梁雙蓮(1984)。中央行政機關公務人員組織認同的研究。國立臺灣大學政治學研究所博士論文。
    許士軍(1994)。邁向21世紀的管理。台北：地球。
    陳安瀅(2002)。政治知覺對組織負面影響的干擾因素－以工作滿足為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    陳瑞麟、趙美齡譯(2004)。組織行為。台北：學富文化。
    陳福來(1980)。臺灣省鄉鎮市公所公務人員組織認同之研究。東海大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
    陳銘宗(1994)。工作價值觀及其形成歷程之探討。輔仁大學應用心理學系碩士論文。
    曾浚添(2003)。社會工作在警政機關運用之研究。警學叢刊，第34卷，第2期，頁72-88。
    黃同圳、薛婉婷(1998)。「慎選人格特質」與「改善工作設計」何者為重？勞資關係論叢，第7期，頁125-152。
    黃貴祥(2001)。技術學院教育工作環境知覺、工作價值觀與工作滿足和教學表現之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    黃雅真(1995)。研究發展人員之人格特質、工作價值觀與報酬類型關係之研究。東海大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    黃翠紋(2000)。警察工作壓力之探討。中央警察大學學報，第37期，頁99-124。
    楊國樞(1982)。「中國人的性格與行為:形成及蛻變」，中華心理學刊，第23期，頁39-56。
    劉兆明(1995)。「工作價值觀及其形成歷程之探討」，應用心理學報，第1期，頁73-103。
    劉勤章、馬心韻(2002)。我國警察組織教育訓練與人力資源發展。中央警察大學行政警察學系學術研討會論文集。
    蔡孟翰(2001)。中年教師覺知教育改革壓力、工作價值觀與生涯發展需求之關係研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文。
    鄭臻妹(2001)。內外控人格特質工作特性及工作績效之分析研究－以台灣高科技產業員工為例。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    鄭韻玫(2001)。中年生涯轉換者工作價值觀轉化學習之研究。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文。
    羅世輝、湯雅云(2003)。內外控人格特質與授權賦能認知對工作滿足之影響－以金融保險業為例。人力資源管理學報，春季號，第3卷第1期，頁004-006。
    二、英文部分
    Allport, G. (1961). Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, p.28.
    Angle, H. & James L. Perry (1981). An Empirical Assessment of Organizational Commitment and Organizational Effectiveness, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.26, pp.1-13.
    Arnold, S. Tannenbaum, Control and Effectivness in a Voluntary Organization American, Journal of Sociology, Vol.67, pp.33-46.
    Brett, J. M. (1982). Job Transfer and Well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67,450-463..
    Brewster, S. M. (1968).〝A Map for the Analysis of Personality and Politics〞, Journal of Social Psychology, Vol.24 No3. pp.15-28.
    Brown, M. (1971). Identification and Some Conditions of Organization Involvement, pp.349.
    Brown, D. (2002). The Role of Work and Cultural Values in Occupational Choice, Satisfaction and Success: A Theoretical Statement. Journal of Counseling and Development, 80(1),48-56..
    Connor, P. E. ＆ Becker, B. W. (1975). Values and The Organization Suggestions for Research. Academy of Management Journal, 18,550-561.
    Day, D, V., ＆ Silverman, S. B. (1989). Personality and Job Performance: Evidence of Incremental Validity. Personnel Psychology, 42,25-36.
    Dose, J. J. (1997). Work Values: An Integrative Framework and Illustrative Application to Organizational Socialization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(3), 219-240.
    Dov, E. (1994). Gender and Work Values : A Comparative Analysis. The Jouranl of Social Psychology,134(2), 201-212.
    Feather, N. T. (1990). The Effects of Unemployment of Work Values and Motivation. In U. Kleinbeck, H. H. Quast, H. K. Thierry ＆ H. Hacker (Eds.),Work Motivation, (pp.201-229), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
    Glisson, C. & Dcerick, M. (1988). Predictors of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Human Service Organizations, Adminisstrative Science Ouarterly, Vol.33, pp.61-81.
    Greenstein, F. I. (1968).〝Harold D. Lasswell´s Concept of Democratic Character〞, Journal of Politics, Vol.30. pp.696-709.
    Hall, D. T. & B. Schneider. (1972). Correlates of Organizational Identification S Function of Carres Pattern and Organizational Type, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.17, pp.340-350.
    Holland, J. L. (1985). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environment (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.:Prentice-Hall.
    Isralowitz, R. E., ＆ Singer, M. (1986). Unemployment and Its Impact of Adolescent Work Theory and Research. In S. D. Brown ＆ R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of Counseling Psychology，(pp.178-215).New York: Wiley.
    Johnson, M. K. (2002). Social Origins, Adolescent Experiences, and Work Values Trajectories During the Transition to Adulthood. Social Forces,80, 1307-1341.
    Judge, T. A., ＆ R. D. Bretz. (1992). Effects of Work Values on Job Choice Decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 261-271.
    Kalleberg, A. L. (1977). Work Values and Job Rewards： A Theory of Job Satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 42,124-143.
    Kantor, R. M. (1968). Commitment and Social Organization: A Study of Commitment Mechanisms in utopian Communities, American Sociological Review, 33:499-517.
    Krau, E. (1983). The Attitudes Toward Work in Career Transitions. Journal of Vocational Behavior,23,270-285.
    Kren, L. (1992). The Moderating Effects of Locus of Control on Performance Incentives and Participation. Human Relations, 45(9):991-1012.
    Lefcourt, H. M. (1972). Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement Revisited: Rcecnt Developments. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progressive Experimental Personality Research:6. New York: Academic Press.
    Morris, J. & J. Daneil Sherman. (1981). Generalizability of an Organizational Commitment Model, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.24, pp.512-526.
    Morris, J. & R. M. Steers. (1980). Structural Influences on Organizational Commitment, Journal of Vocation of Behavior, Vol.17,pp.50-57.
    Morris, J. H. & J. D. Sherman. (1981). Generalizability of and Organizational Commitment Model, Academy Of Management, Vol.24, pp.512-526.
    Nadler, D. A. ＆ Tushman, M. L. (1980). A Model for Diagnosing Organizational Behavior. Organizational Dynamics: 35-51.
    Nicholson, N. (1984). A Theory of Work Role Transitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29,172-191.
    Nicholson,W. M., ＆ J. Arnold. (1987). Identity Changes as Outcomes of Work-Role Transitions. In T. Honess ＆ K. Yardley (Eds.), Self and Identity: Perspectives across the Life Span: (pp.287-303). London: Routledge.
    Nord, W. R., A. P. Brief., J. M. Atieh., ＆ E. M. Doherty. (1988). Work Values and The Conduct of Organizational Behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 1-42.
    Porter, J. M., R. M. Steers., R. T. Mowday., & P. V. Boulian. (1974). Organization Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Among Psychiatric Technicians, Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.
    Pryor, R. G. L. (1979). In Search of A Concept: Work Values. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 27, 250-256.
    Randall, D.M. (1987). Commitment and The Organization: The Organization Man Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 462.
    Reichel, A., Y. Neumann., ＆ A. Pizam. (1981). The Work Values and Motivational Profiles of Vocational, Collegiate, Nonconformist, and Academic Students. Research in Higher Education, 14,187-199.
    Robbins, S. P. (1996). Organizational Behavior: Concept, Controversies, and Applications (7th ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Robbins, S. P. (1993). Organizational Behavior: Controversies and Applications, 6th ed , New Jersey: Prentice Hall International Edition.
    Rodeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, Attitudes and Values. San Francisco, CA： Jossey-Bass.
    Roe, R. A. ＆ Ester, P. (1999). Values and Work: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 1-21.
    Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Hunman Values. New York: Macmillan.
    Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized Expectancies of Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcemtnt. Psychology Monograph, 80, 1014-1053.
    Sang, M. Lee. (1971). An Empirical Analysis of Organizational Identification, Academy of Management Journal, 14:213-266.
    Schwartz, S. H. (1992).Universals in The Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
    Steers, R. E. (1977). Antecedents and Outcomes Of Organizational Commitment, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.22, pp.46-56.
    Sheldon, M. E. (1971). Investments and Involvemtents as Mechanisms Producing Commitment to The Organization,Administrative Science Quarterly,16:143-150.
    Simon, H. A., D.W. Smithburg, & V. A. Thompson. (1950). Public Administration N. Y., PP.94-100.
    Stevens, J. M.,. J. M. Beyer, & M. Horrisn. (1978). Trice, Assessing Personal Role and Organizational Predictors of Managerial Commitment, Academy of Management Review, Vol,21,pp.380-396.
    Strauss, G., Some Notes on Power-Equalization in Harold J. Leavitt(ed). (1961). The Social Science of Organizations: Four Perspectives, Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall.
    Super, D. E. (1970). Work Values Inventory. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    92921051
    93
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0092921051
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2337檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋