政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/31824

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Master for Eminent Public Administrators > Theses > Item 140.119/31824

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31824

Title:	統一發票制度之評估研究 An Evaluation of the Uniform Invoice System
Authors:	呂春熹
Contributors:	施能傑呂春熹
Keywords:	統一發票加值稅租稅課徵政策工具執行評估 uniform invoice VAT tax imposition performance evaluation policy instrument
Date:	2005
Issue Date:	2009-09-14 12:20:59 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	統一發票制度是政府課徵營業稅之主要工具，實施期間長達50多年。在此期間我國營業稅制從主要的總額型發展演進到加值型營業稅制，而此徵收工具迄今仍受重視，其應有獨特之處，值得評估研究。本研究主要是從兩個方向著手，第一部分是就統一發票制度之性質、制度內容及執行，評估其達成租稅政策目標之程度；第二部分係比較國際間實施加值稅國家的經驗，檢視此一工具之重要性，以及其改進空間或有其他可行的替代工具。本研究根據政策工具理論，從政策內容、執行組織、標的團體及環境之層面，及政策工具性質，從效能性、效率性、公平性、易用性及社會支持性之指標，予以評估，認為作為營業稅徵收工具的統一發票，以其高強制性及直接性，低自動性及可見性，其徵收效率並未比其他稅目之徵收工具高，容易造成稽徵人員依賴，另外其取得外界之支持亦呈現不定。至於加值稅實施之國際經驗比較部分，經考量經濟開發成長情形及資料取得之難易性，選取新加坡、英國、澳洲作為比較對象，並由各國稅制規劃、稅收統計，以及稽徵成效作相對性比較之基礎。評估結果顯示以新加坡及英國實施成效最佳，而統一發票作為加值稅稽徵工具之我國績效最低。研究總結，發現統一發票制度在稅收成長雖有助益，然因執行低效率，以及租稅減免過多，破壞中性原則，未能達成確實課稅之宗旨，惟仍具改進空間，是以本研究最後提出從制度簡化及加強執行兩方面之具體改進建議。 The Uniform Invoice System (UIS) has been a main instrument for the collection of business tax in the last fifty years. Present research on an evaluation of this system has taken two major directions. The first is to evaluate the nature, design and execution of the local system, according to its achievement of the goals of tax policy; the second is to compare international experience in the imposition of Value-Added Tax. The purpose of the research on the local system is to examine the necessity of UIS, and see whether there is still room to improve it or if there are any alternatives. The research uses indexes such as effectiveness, efficiency, equity, usability, and social support to survey the following aspects of the system: policy, administrative agencies, target group, and environment. The conclusion from this part shows that the UIS, with its nature of high coerciveness and directness, but low automaticity and visibility, has failed to operate to a high degree of efficiency as other taxes, and it has not been easy to obtain support from society. In addition, the success of the UIS has led to inertia on the part of the competent authorities, and less active auditing. The purpose of as research of international experience is to make a comparison between Singapore, UK, Australia, and Taiwan, focusing on the design of collection mechanism, tax revenue, and efficiency of administration. The results show that Taiwan, with UIS peculiar to itself has not produce a better performance. The conclusion of the research of local and international systems indicates that the performance of the UIS did not meet the goals as the government expected, owing to its low efficiency and an erosion of the tax base from too much tax exemption. Finally, the research suggests two ways to improve the system: simplification and strengthening of the enforcement.
Reference:	中國租稅研究會，民90年，中華民國稅務通鑑（上冊），台北：中國租稅研究會。李允傑、邱昌泰，民88年，政策執行與評估，台北：中華電視公司。李杏翠，民90年，稅捐稽徵機關作業基礎成本制度之設計與規劃，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。林華德，民80年，「加值稅對健全我國稅務行政的貢獻」，財稅研究，第23卷第3期，頁1-16。林華德，民84年，當代財政學，台北：大中國圖書公司。林正流，民75年，新制營業稅成本效益分析，國立政治大學財政研究所。吳金柱，民90年，「海峽兩岸發票制度之比較」，實用稅務第321期，pp88-93。吳德章，民77年，我國營業稅逃漏型態及防制方法之研究，中國文化大學經濟研究所碩士論文。徐偉初、王正，民80年，財政學，台北：空中大學。財政部賦稅革新小組，民86年，改進統一發票之管理制度，台北：財政部。財政部賦稅署，民94年，關稅與內地稅聯合查緝專案小組執行簡報資料。翁興利、施能傑、官有垣、鄭麗嬌，民89年，公共政策，台北：空中大學。陳妙香，民93年，「臺灣地區統一發票給獎辦法之研究」，財稅研究，第36卷第5期，頁136-155。黃源春，民77年，「本省實施新制營業稅概況」，臺灣省稅務局，民國77年3月號，頁11-13。張兆順，民63年，我國統一發票制度之研究，國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。張佳州，民86年，我國統一發票制度對中小企業之影響，東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。張文蘭，民80年，政策工具類型化與評估之研究，國立政治大學政治學研究所碩士論文。經濟部中小企業處，民86年，中小企業開立統一發票制度廢除之評估及規劃研究報告，台北：經濟部。鄭宗典、陳瀛國、邵培坪、邱政茂，民78年，加值型營業稅制度，台北：三民書局。賴怡文，民83年，統一發票制度存廢問題之研究，東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。歐陽峰，民85年，從組織與管理觀點談我國內地稅稽徵制度之改革，義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 Chen, Huey-Tsyh, 1990, Theory-Drive Evaluation, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Dunn, William N., 1994, Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall. Ebrill, Liam, Michael Keen, Jean-Paul Bodin, and Victoria Summers, 2002, The Allure of the Value-added Tax, Finance and Development, Volume 39, Number 2, International Monetary Fund. Hood, Christopher C. 1983, The Tools of Government, H.K.: The Macmillan Press. Leman, Christopher K., 1989, The Forgotten Fundamental: Successes and Excesses of Direct Government in L. M. Salamon, (eds.) Beyond Privatization, Washington D. C.: The Urban Institute Press. Peters, B. G, Levine, C. H., and Thompson, F. J., 1990, Public Administration, Glenview, IL.: Scott. Linder, Stephen H., Peters, B. Guy, 1990, Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts, Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 35-58. McDonnell, Lorraine M., and Elmore, Richard F., 1987, Getting the Job Done: Alternative Policy Instrument, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 133-152. Rossi, Peter H. and Howard E. Freeman, 1993, Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, CA: Sage. Salamon, Lester M. and Lund, Michael S., 1989, The Tools Approach: Basic Analytics in L. M. Salamon, (eds.) Beyond Privatization, Washington D. C.: The Urban Institute Press. Salamon, Lester M., 2002, The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action, New York: Oxford University Press. Schenk, Alan, 1993, Goods and Services Tax: The Canadian Approach to Value-added Tax, Ontario: CCH Canadian Limited. Schenk, Alan and Oliver Oldman, 2001, Value Added Tax: A comparative Approach, with Materials and Cases, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers. Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen, 1990, Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools, Journal of Politics, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 510-529. Shome, Parthasarathi, 1995, Tax Policy Handbook, Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund. Tait, Alan A., 1988, Value Added Tax: International Practice and Problems, Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund. Weiss, Carol, 1998, Evaluation Research: Methods for Studying Programs and Policies, Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程 89921018 94
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088921018
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Master for Eminent Public Administrators] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
index.html	0Kb	HTML2	451	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...