政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/31821
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113325/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51178211      線上人數 : 914
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31821


    題名: 大台北地區國中英語教師對教科書之意見及使用現況之研究
    On the use of current english textbooks in greater Taipei area
    作者: 李桂禎
    Li, Guei Jhen
    貢獻者: 張郇慧
    Claire Chang, Hsun Huei
    李桂禎
    Li, Guei Jhen
    關鍵詞: 國中
    教科書
    junior high school
    textbook
    日期: 2007
    上傳時間: 2009-09-14 12:18:07 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究旨在探討大台北地區國中英語教師對國中英語教科書的意見和使用現況。本研究的對象為台北市、台北縣及基隆市的300位國中英語教師。研究者以問卷為資料蒐集工具，共回收問卷264份，其中262份為有效問卷，主要採用描述性統計分析。
    主要研究發現摘要如下：
    1.翰林及康軒出版社所出版的英語教科書為目前大台北地區最廣為採用的兩套教材。大致而言，各校英語教學研究會有權決定使用那一套教科書。教師選擇教科書時的主要三項考量依序為內容優劣，程度適中，及教師手冊與習作的設計能達到輔助教學之目的。除了主要使用的教科書外，大多數教師採用補充教材。最主要的兩種補充教材依序為自編教材及英語教學雜誌。
    2.大多數教師對英語教科書的出版特性、學習內容、學生習作、教師手冊及補充教材感到滿意。大多數教師指出學生程度差異過大是教學時最常遇到的困難。
    3.大多數教師認為使用現行教科書的學生較使用國編本的學生對教材內容更感興趣。教師對現行教科書較滿意；而學生也更喜愛現行教科書。許多教師認為使用現行教科書的學生在聽說方面較使用國編本的學生表現更佳；許多教師認為使用現行教科書的學生在文法及書寫方面較使用國編本的學生表現退步。
    4.許多教師認為最好由國立編譯館編寫國編本教科書，但也有近乎相等數量的教師認為國編本及民編本並行最佳。多數教師認為全國使用同一版本教科書是最佳的教科書選用方式；因此多數教師對大台北地區於九十七學年度起使用單一版本教科書持正面態度。
    本研究有助於了解國中英語教科書的使用現況和意見。最後依據研究結論，對教育行政機關、出版社、教師、未來研究提出建議。
    The purpose of the study is to explore junior high school teachers’ opinions of current English textbooks and their usage in greater Taipei area. The participants of the study were 300 junior English teachers from greater Taipei area. The instrument used in this study was a questionnaire. The data was analyzed by means of descriptive statistics.
    The findings of this study are summarized as follows:
    1.Han-lin and Kang-xüan are the two top widely- used English textbook. On the whole, the English Teaching Committee of each individual school has the power to decide which set of textbooks to be adopted. The top three considerations in textbooks selection are the overall content, suitable level of difficulty, and whether the design of teachers’ manuals and students’ workbooks facilitating instruction. Most of the teachers utilize supplementary materials in addition to their existing textbooks. The top two resources they use to enhance students’ learning are self-produced supplementary materials, and English teaching magazines.
    2.Most of the teachers are satisfied with the layout, contents, students’ workbooks, teachers’ manuals and supplementary materials. Lots of the teachers point out teaching students with highly diverse competence is the main problem in their teaching.
    3.Most of the teachers observe that students who use current textbooks are more interested in the contents than students who used centralized textbooks. In general, current textbooks are satisfactory to most of the teachers and more appropriate to students compared to centralized ones. Many of the teachers sense that students who use current textbooks are better in listening and speaking than students who used centralized textbooks, while a certain number of the teachers feel that students who used centralized textbooks outperform those who use current textbooks in grammar and writing.
    4.For most of the teachers, it is best for National Institute for Compilation and Translation to develop and generate centralized textbooks. However, an equal number of the teachers consider it is best for the commercial produced textbooks to be used in conjunction with the centralized textbooks. The most ideal way of adopting junior high school English textbooks is to use the same set of textbooks. Hence, the majority of the teachers support the local governments’ (including Taipei City, Taipei County and Keelung City governments) policy to use the same English textbooks.
    The study provides an understanding of teachers’ opinions on the usage of junior high school English textbooks. Some pedagogical implications are offered for the educational authorities, the textbook publishers, and English teachers.
    參考文獻: REFERENCES
    Ariew, R. (1982). The textbook curriculum. In T. V. Higgs (Ed.), Curriculum, Competence, and the Foreign Language Teacher. The ACTFL Foreign Language Education Series (pp. 11-33). Hastings-on Hudson, NY: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 210 908).
    Armstrong, J., &Bray, J. (1986). How can we improve textbooks? ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 292208.
    Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. (3rd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (4th Ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
    Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd Ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
    Brumfit, C., & Johnson, K. (1979). The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
    Chan, Y. W. (2004). Junior high school English teachers’ ideas of current English textbooks in Tainan County. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
    Chen, C. H. (2000). Senior high school teachers’ perceptions of the new English teaching materials and their usage in southern Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
    Chen, C. S. (2003). Reflections of elementary school teachers on the use of English
    Ko, T. M. (2005). A study of factors for senior high English teachers in the greater Taipei area in textbook selection. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University.
    Koh, L. (1992). From Base to Action: Bridging the Gap between Language and Communication Textbooks and the Professional World. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed 400 684.
    Kon, J. H. (1995). Teachers’ curricular decision making in response to a new social studies textbook. Theory and Research in Social Education, 23(2), 121-146.
    Lan, S. T. (2003). Textbook reform policy in Taiwan: evolution and future trends. Journal of the National Institute for Compilation and Translation, 31, 3-11.
    Larsen-Freeman, D. (1986). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Leu, M. H. (2004). The use and evaluation of teaching materials of vocational high
    schools in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal
    University.
    Li, H. C. (2003). Predictive evaluation, use, and retrospective evaluation of an EFL textbook by junior high school teachers: A case study in Taipei. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Li, J. T. (2002). Poor children give up studying English as soon as they enter junior
    high school. United Newspaper, Sep.28, 2002.
    Li, M. K. (1997). A new look at communicative language teaching: Prospects for Taiwan, ROC. National Chengchi University Journal, 75, 257-283.
    Lin, S. M. (2006). An evaluation of the junior high school English textbooks newly adopted in 2003. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University.
    Lin, Y. H. (2004). An analytical study on provisionary editions of junior
    high school English textbooks in Kaohsiung City. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
    Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Macian, J. L. (1986). An analysis of state adopted foreign language textbook used in first and third year high school Spanish classes. Foreign Language Annals, 19(2), 103-118.
    Markee, N. (1997). Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    McCutcheon, G. (1980). How do elementary school teachers plan? The nature
    Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (1986). Approaches and methods in language
    of planning and influences on it. Elementary School Journal, 81 (1), 4-23.
    Northern Illinois UP.
    Melrose, R. (1991). The communicative syllabus—a systemic-functional approach to language learning. England: Printer Publishers Limited.
    Met, M. (1996). Middle schools and foreign languages: A view for the future. ERIC
    Digest. http://www.cal.org/ericcl/digest/metoooo2.html
    Ministry of Education. (1997). White Paper on Marching Forward to a Learning Society. Taipei: MOE.
    Ministry of Education. (2000). Tentative General guidelines of Grade 1-9 Curriculum of elementary and junior high school education. Taipei: MOE.
    Ministry of Education. (2003). English Teaching Manuals for Junior High and
    Elementary School Teachers. http://teach.eje.edu.tw/main.php
    Ministry of Education. (2004). General guidelines of Grade 1-9 Curriculum of
    teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    elementary and junior high school education. Taipei: MOE.
    Ministry of Education. (2008). Summary of Education at All Levels, S.Y. http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/b0013/b.xls
    Munby, J. (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Muther, C. (1985). What every textbook evaluator should know. Education
    Leadership, 42(7), 4-8.
    Nunan, D. (1989). The learner-centered curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge
    University Press.
    O’Neill, R. (1982). Why use textbooks. ELT Journal, 36(2), 104-111.
    Osborn, J. H., Jones, B. F., & Stein, M. (1985). The case for improving textbooks. Educational leadership, 42 (7), 9-16.
    Quintero, P. & Troncoso, C.R. (2001). Working session: the matter of selecting
    Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    material. Retrieved from the British Council Website:
    http: //www.britishcouncil.org/colombia/english/english/pquintero-crico.doc
    Revell, J. (1979). Teaching techniques for communicative English. Hong Kong: Macmillan Publisher Ltd.
    Rowntree, D. (1997). Making materials-based learning work. London: Kogan Page.
    Savignon, S. J. (1983). Communicative competence: theory and classroom practice─texts and contexts in second language learning. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
    Savignon, S. J. (1991). Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL Quarterly, 25 (2), 261-277.
    Sheldon, Leslie E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42 (4), 237-246.
    Shih, Y. H. (2000). English textbook evaluation in elementary school. A collection of papers presented in the Seventeenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China, Taipei: the Crave Publishing Co., Ltd
    Shih, Y. H. (2001). Communicative language teaching. English Teaching, 25(3), 5-19.
    textbooks in Taipei City. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung
    Skierso, A. (1991). Textbook selection and evaluation. In M, Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. (2nd Ed.). (pp.432-453). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
    Stodolsky, S. S. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago, IL: University Chicago Press.
    Taipei County (2008). A news release from Taipei City, Taipei County and Keelung City Government on the result of using the same textbook in junior high school. http://ppk.tp.edu.tw/elect/970526.pdf
    Tamir, P. (1985). Content analysis focusing on inquiry. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17 (1), 87-94.
    Taylor, B. P. (1983). Teaching ESL: Incorporating a communicative, student-centered
    component. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 69-88.
    Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (1998). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Tucker, C. A. (1975). Evaluating beginning textbooks. English Teaching Forum, 13 (3), 355-361.
    Tulley, M., & Farr, R. (1990). Textbook evaluation and selection. In D. L. Elliott & A. Woodward (Eds.), Textbooks and schooling in the United States (pp.
    162-177). Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.
    Normal University.
    Wade, S. E., & Moje, E.B. (2000). The role of text in classroom learning. In M. L.
    Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Person (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research
    (3rd Ed., pp. 609-627). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, INC.
    Wang, C. C. (2004). Pre-school English teachers’ perceptions and use of the
    pre-school English textbooks in Tainan City. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung
    Normal University.
    Wang, R. L. (2003). The adoption and teachers’ perceptions of the reviewed English instructional materials in junior high school in Kaohsiung City. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
    Wei, C. L. (2001). Applications of networked computers to TEFL. English Teaching and Learning, 25(3), 55-63.
    Westbury, I. (1990). Textbooks, textbook publishers, and the quality of the school. In D. L. Elliott & A. Woodward (Eds.), Textbooks and schooling in the United States (pp.1-22). Chicago, IL: The University of
    Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional Syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Chen, C. T. (2002). Textbook selection for senior high school students in greater Taipei area. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Wilkins, D. (1985). Some issues in communicative language teaching and their
    relevance to the teaching of languages in secondary schools. In K.
    Johnson & D. Porter (Eds.). Perspectives in communicative language
    teaching. London: Academic Press.
    Wolfe, L. G. (1982). Focus on these 4 factors to affect what students learn. Updating School Board Policies, 13(6), 1-3.
    Yalden, J. (1983). The Communicative Syllabus: Evolution, design, and implementation. Oxford: Pergamon.
    Yang, C. F. (2005). A study on the selection and use of Elementary school English textbooks in central Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taichung University.
    Yang, L. Z. (1988). Development and application of a communicative theory based
    model for evaluation junior high EFL teaching materials in the Republic of
    China. Unpublished dissertation: Indiana University.
    Chen, Y. J. (2004). A study of junior high school English teachers’ perceptions on currently-used reviewed English textbooks in Chiayi County. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chungcheng University.
    Yore, L. D. (1991). Secondary science teachers’ attitudes toward and beliefs about Science reading textbook. Journal of Research in Science, 28, 55-72.
    Young, M. J., & Riegeluth, C. M. (1988). Improving the textbook selection process. Indiana: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation Bloomington.
    Yu, C. C. (1996). The problems of elementary school curriculum and their resolutions. A collection of papers presented in the Conference in National Hualien University of Education. (pp. 65-108). Hualien: National Hualien University of Education.
    Cheng, S. J. (1992). Unveiling textbooks. Journal of National Institute of Educational Resources and Research, 18, 1-7.
    Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    Christenbury, L., & Kelly, P. P. (1994). What textbooks can and cannot do. English Journal, 83 (3), 76-80.
    Chung, M. C. (2003). A study of the senior high school EFL teachers’ beliefs in
    materials compilation, selection, and use. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education.
    Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann.
    Dai, D. W. Y. (2000). English teaching materials and teaching methods in elementary school. Taipei: Crane.
    Deng, J. W. (2003). Textbooks liberalization and the analysis of the related questions.
    Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 6(1), 27-42.
    Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51 (1), 36-42.
    Eraut, M. (Ed.) (1989). The international encyclopedia of educational technology.
    England: Pergamon Press.
    Farr, R., Tulley, M. A., ＆ Powell, D. (1987). The evaluation and selection of basal readers. The Elementary School Journal, 87 (3): 267-281.
    Finocchiaro, M., & C. Brumfit. (1983). The functional-notional approach: From
    theory to practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Gall, M. D. (1981). Handbook for evaluating and selecting curriculum materials. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
    Gower, R., Philips, D., & Walters, S. (1995). Teaching practice handbook. Oxford:
    Heinemann.
    Grant, N. (1987). Detailed Evaliation. Making the most of your textbook. New York: Longman.
    Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses: A guide for teachers. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers
    Halliwell, S. (1992). Teaching English in primary classroom. New York: Longman.
    Harmer, J. (1991). The practice of English language teaching. New York: Longman.
    Harmer, J. (1998). How to teach English: an introduction to the practice of English language teaching. England: Longman.
    Hasman, M. A. (2000). The role of English in the 21st century. English Teaching Forum, 1, 2-5.
    Heyneman, S. P., Farrell, J. P., & Sepulveda-Stuardo, M. A. (1981). Textbooks and achievement in developing countries: what we know. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13(3): 227-246.
    Howatt, A. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Hsieh, H. M. (1998). A study on the English textbook’s current usage status and
    perceptions of English teachers in industrial vocational high schools.
    Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education.
    Hsu, H. F. (2003). Senior high school English teachers’ perceptions of the new English teaching materials and their usage in northern Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
    Huang, C. Y. (2002). A study of the current English teaching situation and opinion
    of teachers in elementary schools. Unpublished master’s thesis, National University of Tainan.
    Huang, H. S. (2004). Textbook selection and the capabilities of teachers for teaching English in Tao-Yuan County. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Hsinchu University of Education.
    Huang, L. W (2003). Vocational high school teachers’ perceptions and use of the English textbooks in southern Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
    Huang, S. C. (2001). An Authentic-material-based course design on resume writing for EFL students. English Teaching. 25(4), 52-69.
    Huang, Z. J. (2002). Since the textbooks are published freely. Kang-xüan Education,
    27. http://www.knsh.com.tw/magazine/01/027/2702.asp
    Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp269-293). Baltimore: Penguin.
    Johns, A. M. (1985). Some principles of materials design of the world around us. TESOL Newsletter, 19(1), 7.
    Kitao, K. (1997). Selecting and developing teaching/learning materials. The Internet
    TESL Journal, 4(4).
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
    92951019
    96
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0929510192
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2522檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋