政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/30867
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51568918      Online Users : 344
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Advanced MBA, NCCU > Theses >  Item 140.119/30867
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30867


    Title: 由個案分析探討Web 2.0 網站平台對傳統行銷思維的影響
    Analyzing the effects of Web 2.0 interfaces on traditional marketing strategies and practices based on case studies
    Authors: 朱翊菲
    Contributors: 洪順慶
    朱翊菲
    Keywords: 行銷概念
    市場導向
    市場研究
    市場區隔
    市場定位
    品牌體 驗
    消費者決策
    Web 2.0
    7P
    marketing concepts
    market orientation
    market research
    market segmentation
    position
    brand experience
    consumer decision making
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2009-09-14
    Abstract: 因應Web 2.0 的關鍵技術及應用發展,傳統行之多年的行銷思維及作法開始面臨極大挑戰。過去沒有人可以想像消費者能在網站上公開評價商品,或直接發表對特定品牌的體驗;也無法想像主題式社群網站能集結社群、部落格的心得文可以影響消費者行為;品牌的行銷活動比過去更多元且富創意,為的就是吸引消費者的眼球注意力;企業甚至願意花時間經營網站社群,為這群利基消費者發展新品牌及產品線。這些現象的背後,反映出我們所處的行銷環境已大不如前,而消費者、企業與品牌之間的關係改變,無疑地,Web 2.0是促成改變的關鍵原因之一。企業面臨網路科技所帶來的思維轉型,該如何有效因應,並調整其行銷思維及作法,是本研究欲探討的重點。
    由於現有文獻或研究多半以Web 2.0 對企業單一構面的影響,或是針對特定產業的深入研究,缺乏全面性且多元的比較研究。因此本研究採用探索性研究法的個案研究法,以文獻探討內容為本,並透過深度訪談法獲取第一手資訊,以發展出行銷 2.0 與傳統行銷的比較命題。
    經過文獻探討與個案分析後,本研究歸納出九個命題:
    1、Web 2.0 平台有助企業體現市場導向思維。
    2、Web 2.0 時代的消費者握有行銷研究的主導權,並由他們決定如何建立關係。
    3、Web 2.0 時代下,網路使用者因應共同的興趣及目標聚集形成社群,而企業也開始將主題式社群作為市場區隔的依據。
    4、Web 2.0 網站平台較能幫助企業有效評估區隔。
    5、Web 2.0 網站平台有助廠商蒐集並了解消費者意見,共同打造符合需求的市場定位。
    6、Web 2.0 增加企業與消費者的接觸點,也增加 7P 行銷組合的內涵及作法。
    7、行銷2.0 不再是企業單方面由上而下決定品牌內涵,而是由企業與消費者共同打造品牌體驗與價值。
    8、Web 2.0 平台強化消費者角色本質的轉變,由孤立變為聯合、由無知變為資訊靈通、由被動變為主動。
    9、Web 2.0 平台將傳統單向線性的消費者決策模式,轉變為完整迴圈式的流程。

    研究發現,Web 2.0 平台賦予消費者十足的空間及舞台,在商業體系中扮演更積極主動的角色,他們不再一味接受企業透過大眾傳媒所傳遞的訊息,反而開始握有行銷研究的主導權,主動調查有興趣的產業及品牌。而消費流程也不再是單次決策,其購後評價及心得也透過Web 2.0 平台反饋,繼續影響其他消費者的購物行為。Web 2.0 在企業與消費者之間扮演的中介角色,不僅讓雙方在對等的平台上良性互動外,也化解過去因為資訊不對稱所造成的誤解及無效率。而消費者行為的種種轉變,對於企業未來在決定市場區隔、目標市場以及行銷組合7P 等均有決定性的影響。
    企業不只要妥善經營實體環境的公共關係,虛擬網絡世界的關係也得花心思好好打理,尤其必須掌握科技及網絡世界的溝通經驗,讓網路使用者中的意見領袖發揮其影響力和說服力,為品牌發言也為品牌形象加值,在每個接觸點都不能放過與消費者互動的機會,因為他們也是共同打造品牌體驗的重要角色。未來的行銷是接觸點戰爭,能夠在與消費者的接觸點出奇制勝、良性互動並獲得有利情報的企業,才有機會扭轉劣勢,力創新局。
    In recent years traditional marketing concepts have been evolving and encountering great challenges due to the online applications commonly described as Web 2.0 or social
    community websites. No one had foreseen that consumers would evaluate products or services directly after purchase on the thematic social media and publish their brand experience openly through Internet. No one had expected that the thematic social media or Blogs could appeal and gather so many members and opinions towards specific topics,
    which might influence consumers’ decision. Nowadays, marketers are rushing to integrate various forms of social media into marketing planning and are highly motivated
    to initiate more attractive and creative events to appeal the consumer`s eyes. Some enterprises are even willing to develop new product line or sub-brand to fulfill the
    customer’s needs. Therefore, due to the emergence of Web 2.0, the current marketing environment is quite different than what we are accustomed to. The relations and power
    structure between customers and brands have been changing. This research focused on how the enterprises reacted to the Web 2.0 technology and changed their mindset, especially marketing concepts and practices.
    Since there exists no generally accepted definition and demarcation of the term Web 2.0, the majority of studies have been focusing only on changes in certain industries or
    specific effects that Web 2.0 has brought to marketing. Therefore, we adopted a more general perspective based on previous results and conducted case studies to gather
    first-hand information and real practice from the industry. Further, we developed and concluded 9 points and made a comparison table (traditional marketing concept versus
    marketing concepts in Web 2.0 era) to clarify the differences of marketing concepts between traditional and Web 2.0-driven marketing.

    The key results of the research are:
    1. Web2.0 helps enterprises to better form their marketing strategy and because all the departments within the organization can gather valuable information from each
    interaction point with the customers. Therefore, the consensus and responsiveness is achieved more easily, which means the Market Orientation concept could be realized.
    2. Consumers in Web 2.0 era are capable of initiating market research and it is the consumer, rather than the enterprise, that decides how and with which company relations are built up.
    3. Web users form communities due to common interests and objectives in Web 2.0 era, and the industries have begun to segment the market based on the different communities.
    4. Web 2.0 applications help the enterprises efficiently evaluate if the market segmentation is effective and worthy of investment.
    5. Web 2.0 mechanism support the enterprises to gather information and know more about the consumer insights, and also enables the two parties (enterprise and consumers) to collaborate and create the right market positions.
    6. Web 2.0 not only increases the interacting points for enterprises and consumers, but also enriches the insights and possibilities of marketing-mix 7Ps (Product/Price/Place/Promotion/People/Physical environment/Process).
    7. In Marketing 2.0 era the enterprise could not decide the essence of brands top down, but have to co-create the value and experiences of brands with the customers.
    8. Web 2.0 platform enhance the change of the consumer inner character and behavior, from isolation to union, from ignorant to well-informed, from passive to proactive.
    9. Web 2.0 platform transformed the traditional consumer decision-making from one way process to completed circles, where individual experience as valuable feedback influences the decisions of other consumers via Web 2.0 applications.

    As a consequence, the Web 2.0 is affecting not only the field of technology development but also the domains of business strategy and marketing practice. The Web 2.0 platform empowers the consumer and enables them to play more proactive and aggressive roles in the business system. The consumers do not just accept the message from mass media any more, but initiate marketing research themselves, investigating the brands and industries which they are interested with. The purchase decision making is
    not single and one way process as the personal comments that are disseminated and discussed on the Web 2.0 platforms keep on influencing other consumers’ behavior. The intermediate role that Web 2.0 plays between enterprises and consumers enables new and equal interactions, diminishing the misunderstanding and inefficiency resulted from the past asymmetric information that was mostly dictated by the enterprises. What comes
    along with the changing consumer behavior is a revolution in market segmentation, target, position and marketing-mix (7Ps).
    As Web 2.0 is not a clear-cut concept, some researchers have been regarding it as a mere temporary phenomenon that has emerged with new technology. However, its effects on marketing and wide public acceptance suggest that Web 2.0 is here to stay.
    Indeed, Web 2.0 has a substantial effect on consumer behavior and has contributed to an unprecedented customer empowerment. Therefore in the future, marketers have to
    pay more attention and put more effort to co-exist and communicate with a powerful customer instead of old-fashioned pushing marketing. Especially the enterprise should capitalize on the experience gained from the Web 2.0 platforms, utilizing the influences and convictions that web opinion leader possess to advocate for the brand. They should not disregard the many interaction points that could build up the brand experience with the consumers. Only those who could capitalize on Web 2.0 applications to gain more insight on consumer behavior, could win the ultimate victory and survive in the extremely competitive marketing war.
    第一章緒論.............................................................11
    第一節 研究動機........................................................................ 11
    第二節 研究目的............................................................................................................................................. 13
    第二章 文獻探討..........................................................14
    第一節 行銷定義與行銷管理......................................................................................................................... 14
    第二節 WEB 2.0 與行銷2.0............................................................................................................................ 17
    一、 Web 2.0 的定義特性......................................................................................................................... 17
    二、 Web 2.0 的關鍵技術......................................................................................................................... 20
    三、 行銷2.0.............................................................................................................................................. 21
    第三節 消費者的轉變.................................................................................................................................... 26
    第三章 研究方法..........................................................31
    第一節 研究流程............................................................................................................................................ 32
    第二節 資料蒐集方式.................................................................................................................................... 34
    第四章 個案簡介與特質分析................................................35
    第一節 愛評網IPEEN ..................................................................................................................................... 35
    第二節 URCOSME 化妝品使用心得分享網站............................................................................................... 41
    第三節 好康挖挖哇DIGWOW......................................................................................................................... 46
    第四節 毛寶企業部落格”SIMPLE LIFE@MAOBAO”...................................................................................... 51
    第五節 《KHS BIKE SCHOOL》&校長部落格.............................................................................................. 60
    第五章 研究發現與命題成立................................................65
    第一節 命題成立與個案佐證.......................................................................................................................... 65
    第二節 命題比較表格.................................................................................................................................... 86
    第六章 研究結論與建議....................................................95
    第一節 研究結論............................................................................................................................................. 95
    第二節 針對個案操作的實務建議............................................................................................................... 102
    第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議................................................................................................................ 108
    參考文獻...................................................................109
    附錄--個案採訪題綱.........................................................112
    Reference: 中文部分
    1. James F. Engel, Roger D. Blackwell, Paul W. Miniard, 王志剛、謝文雀編譯,「消費者行為」,華泰文化,1995。
    2. 唐.泰普史考特(Don Tapscott), 安東尼.威廉斯(Anthony D. Willams),王怡文譯,「維基經濟學」,商智文化出版,2007。
    3. 王曉玟,「網路行銷 M型大戰開打」,第六屆e世代行銷王,天下雜誌。
    4. 江芳儀,「網路內容由使用者提供的Web2.0網站之價值共創與創新事業模式研究」,政治大學科技管理研究所論文,2007。
    5. 李廷芳,「Web2.0線上影音產業以YouTube為核心之龍捲風暴分析 The “Inside the Tornado " Analysis of Web2.0 Online Video Industry, Core Case: YouTube」,政治大學科技管理研究所論文,2008。
    6. Anderson, Chris,李明等譯,「長尾理論:打破80/20法則的新經濟學」,天下文化出版, 2006。
    7. 余信賢,「Web 2.0環境下客戶關係管理之個案硏究:以微軟公司為例」,政治大學資訊管理研究所論文,2007。
    8. Christopher Lovelock, Jochen Wirtz, 周逸衡、凌儀玲譯,「服務業行銷」,華泰文化,2005。
    9. 邱志聖,「行銷研究實務與理論應用」,智勝出版,2007。
    10. 吳瑞華,「30歲生日的台灣品牌 - 為什麼我們要做部落格?」,2008-10-01
    11. 吳瑞華,「分享簡單有品味的生活提案-我們如何經營Simple Life部落格」,2008-10-08
    12. 吳瑞華,「與同好一起聚會的美好體驗-擁有秒殺課程的eggshell講堂」,2008-10-15
    13. 吳瑞華,「每天敲開eggshell,都有美好生活」,2008-10-22
    14. 吳瑞華,「eggshell生活提案及生活製品」,2008-10-29
    15. 吳瑞華,「6個打造企業部落格的小祕訣」,2008-11-05
    16. 林安平,「行銷2.0」,天下雜誌出版,2007。
    17. 林宏達,「破壞王來了!」,商業周刊第 972 期。
    18. 柯特勒 (Kotler, Philip),高登第譯,「科特勒談行銷 如何創造、贏取並主宰市場」,遠流出版,2000。
    19. 柯特勒 (Kotler, Philip),陳琇玲譯,「水平行銷:引爆產品競爭力的思考革命」,商周出版,2005。
    20. 洪順慶,「行銷學」,福懋出版,2006。
    21. 洪順慶,「台灣品牌競爭力 台灣企業從代工走向自創品牌的策略」,天下雜誌出版,2006。
    22. 傑若米.萊特(Jeremy Wright),洪慧芳譯,「部落格行銷:百萬顧客同步發聲,開啟雙向溝通的新消費時代」,麥格羅.希爾出版,2006。
    23. 高彬原,「愛評網美食寶庫 Google青睞」,2008-06-19
    24. 約瑟夫.派恩(B. Joseph Pine II), 詹姆斯.吉爾摩(James H. Gilmore), 夏業良、魯煒譯,「體驗經濟時代」,經濟新潮社出版,2003
    25. 栗四維,「Web 2.0 超科技改寫企業進化史」,數位時代第一五八期。
    26. 陳品均,「Web 2.0應用服務策略行動之研究」,臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文,2006。
    27. 陳格雷,「走向營銷2.0」,2007-07-01
    28. 陳怡如,「企業網站out 企業部落格正in!」 2008-01-14,電子商務時報。
    29. 陸佩芝,「檢舉 iPeen愛評 美食也搭上web2.0」,2008,電子商務時報ECTIMES。
    30. 經濟部技術處,「WEB 2.0創新應用案例集 : 科技化服務新趨勢」,財團法人資訊工業策進會出版,2006。
    31. 潘彥廷,「部落格的品牌社群經營與購買意願之關係研究」,政治大學廣播電視學研究所碩士論文,2007。
    32. 數位時代,「2008台灣Web 100總排名」,2008,3月號。
    33. 盧諭緯,「完全解讀Web2.0專刊」,數位時代第134期,2006。
    34. 盧昭燕,「最佳部落格行銷創意獎—Simple Life@mao bao」,第六屆e世代行銷王,天下雜誌。
    35. Prahalad, C. K. and Ramaswamy, V.,顧淑馨譯,「消費者王朝--與顧客共創價值」,天下雜誌出版,2003。
    36. 龔仁文編輯,經濟部技術處,「WEB 2.0:網路上有錢,創意在裡面」,財團法人資訊工業策進會出版,2006。
    37. Aug 9,「社群網站只能靠流量過活?iPeen愛評網拼出社群新玩法」,2007-11-19。
    38. Mr. 6 ,「Simple Life企業部落格,不笑曲線的肥沃淨土」,2007-04-25。
    39. Mr. 6,「美食『網』的發展得托付於美食『王』?」,2007-01-29。
    40. Scott Cook(史考特,庫克),「使用者『奉獻』新趨勢--志工幫你拼事業」,哈佛商業評論,10月號,第1-12頁,2008。
    英文部分
    1. Ajay K. Kohli and Bernard J. Jaworski (1990), “Market Orientation: The Construct,Research Propositions and Managerial Implications” Journal of Marketing, pp.1-18.
    2. Andrew Keen Michael Laskoff (2007) , “What To Do About Web 2.0”, Brandweek 48 No.28 p.24.
    3. Benson P. Shapiro (1988), “What the Hell Is Market Oriented,” Harvard Business Review, pp. 119-125.
    4. Brad Kenney(2007), “Manufacturing 2.0”, Industry Week 256 No.7 pp.38-40,42.
    5. Cliffs, NJ .Efthymios Constantinides and Stefan J. Fountain (2008), "Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues," Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, Vol.9, No.3, pp.231-244.
    6. David Sabol (2007), “Will We Get Web 2.0 Right?”, Associations Now supp Guide to Technology Solutions.
    7. Helen Leggatt (2007), “More marketers to use social networking tactics in 2007”BizReport : Social Marketing, March 13.
    8. James F. Engel, Roger D. Blackwell, Paul W. Miniard(1995) Consumer Behavior,8th ed., The Dryden Press.
    9. James Gilden (2006), “Travel websites gain visitors by offering more than low prices,” the Los Angeles Times.
    10. Kotler, P. (2003), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control, 11th ed., Prentice-Hall International Editions, Englewood.
    11. Randy Schueller and Perry Romanowski (2007), “Web 2.0 and the Cosmetic Industry” Global Cosmetic Industry 175 NO.2.
    12. Rebecca Harris (2007), “Marketing 2.0”, Marketing Magazine 112 No.8 19, 22-4 April 30.
    13. Richard Karpinski (2007),”Measuring relationships”, B to B 92 No.3 pp.19-20.
    14. Robert F.Lusch, Stephen L.Vargo, Matthew O’Brien (2007), Competing through service: insights from service-dominant logic, Journal of Retailing, pp.5-18.
    15. Stephen L. Vargo & Robert F. Lusch (2004), “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68, pp.1–17.
    16. Sue Hildreth (2007) , “Web 2.0 Goes Corporate”, Computerworld (Framingham, Mass.) 41 No.23.
    17. The McKinsey Quarterly (2007) , “How business are using Web 2.0: A McKinsey global survey”.
    18. Tim O’Reilly (2005),“What Is Web 2.0”,
    http://tim.oreilly.com/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
    19. Valarie A. Zeithaml, Mary Jo Bitner(2003), ”Services Marketing: International Customer Focus Across the Firm,”, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Irwin.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    管理碩士學程(AMBA)
    95362005
    97
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0953620051
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Advanced MBA, NCCU] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2533View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback