政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/30479

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/30479

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51296884 Online Users : 843

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Executive Master of Business Administration > Theses > Item 140.119/30479

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30479

Title:	政府機構轉換資訊科技基礎設施的歷程 Adopting and Implementing IT infrastructure: A Case Study of the Transformation Process in a Government Agency
Authors:	汪其芬 Wang, Chi-Fen
Contributors:	李昌雄 Lee, Tsang Shiung 汪其芬 Wang, Chi-Fen
Keywords:	資訊科技基礎設施歷程模式電子化政府組織變革突破性改變策略形成策略執行 Information Technology infrastructure Process model e-Government Organizational Change Radical Change Strategic formulation Strategic implementation
Date:	2004
Issue Date:	2009-09-11 17:59:50 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	轉換資訊科技基礎設施一如佈建好的房舍遷移重蓋，其涉及的轉換是全面且浩大的工程。在面臨公元二千年危機僅餘兩年的時間，在當時微軟作業平台尚不成熟，國內資訊科技基礎設施轉換成功案例尚不多見，組織內部人員對有關技術一知半解，資訊部門未能有效處理問題等情境下，高階主管採行轉換資訊科技基礎設施策略，將主機移除轉換至區域網路伺服器環境，並重新開發所有應用資訊系統。如此大工程高風險的策略及如此困頓的情境，如何順利進行？轉換資訊科技基礎設施涉及組織層面極廣而複雜。包括硬體、軟體、程序、制度、人員等。有關機器設備或可一次更新，惟設置於新機器設備上的核心應用資訊系統，則需逐步開發及調整。有關設備、系統及制度標準，如何與組織需求及業務融合發揮效能，更需人員觀念的轉變與不斷的學習，其所需之時間都不是一朝一夕能見其成效。所以轉換資訊科技基礎設施要看的是它的歷程，由時間的演變可以看出轉換資訊科技基礎設施對組織的影響，也可以看出其互動的關聯性。本研究採用個案研究法，觀察經濟部國際貿易局這個成功案例如何進行資訊科技基礎設施的轉換。該個案有幾個特徵：一、政府機構；二、面臨內外危機及電子化政府的壓力；三、採行的技術策略，對組織而言是一種全面性、突破性（Radical change）的改變，技術無法累積，必需重新學習。鑑於轉換資訊科技基礎設施歷程十分冗長而複雜，為能有系統的描繪個案，本文採取一般性研究架構（內容、情境及歷程），並輔以「問題解決」觀點描繪轉換資訊科技基礎設施的歷程。又為能適當控制研究資訊量，本文分三大問題（如何形成策略並開始執行？如何整合資訊並推廣應用？資訊部門與人員如何轉型？），加以描述及分析。有關歷程的特徵，則引用江志浩（1999）所推導出的組織歷程模式—計畫性模式、適應模式、浮現模式加以檢視。該模式係以「問題解決」的二個元素「設定解決問題的目標」、「進度控制與資源配置」，檢視三種歷程模式的特徵及差異。此外，本文並對問題解決者（高階主管、資訊經理、執行團隊）在此歷程中所扮演之角色及其影響加以探索。本研究發現，轉換資訊科技基礎設施的歷程無法以單一的歷程模式加以描繪。轉換資訊科技基礎設施的歷程涉及一組相關問題的解決，通常在大眾印象中多只看到硬體設施的建置及導入，極易忽略真正困難的問題在於人員觀念的轉變與不斷的學習。由於這些隱藏的問題，整個歷程會出現一些意想不到的狀況。本研究可作為實務界導入資訊科技基礎設施、組織變革及組織創新的參考；對於涉及長達七年轉換歷程的資料，還可以提供未來學術界研究之基礎。 Adopting and implementing Information Technology (IT) infrastructure , like the removing already-built premises for reconstruction, involves a comprehensive and massive conversion. Less than two years before the Y2K crisis, when the Microsoft platform had not been fully developed, there were only a few successful cases of domestic IT infrastructure adoption and implementation. Moreover, Internal personnel of organization was not proficient with the related technology, and IT department was not able to effectively handle the issues; however , top management adopted a strategy of IT infrastructure conversion by switching the mainframe to Local Area Network servers and then re-developing all the application information systems. How did they successfully implement this strategy amidst such a massive re-engineering, and with high-risk information technology ? In reality, IT infrastructure adoption and implementation involves extremely broad and complicated levels, including hardware, software, procedures, systems, personnel, and so on. Machines and equipment can be updated at once, but the core application information systems installed on new machines and equipment must be sequentially developed and adjusted. To achieve the desired effects, people especially, need to change their ways of thinking and learn constantly if they want their equipment, systems, and system standards to be aligned with the needs and business goals of the organization. However, results cannot be achieved in a short time. Therefore the IT infrastructure adoption and implementation process needs to be studied longitudinally. With respect to time, we can see the impact of IT infrastructure adaptation on organizational changes and its interactive association. This study uses the case study approach to observe how the Bureau of Foreign Trade of the Ministry of Economic Affairs in Taiwan has successfully adopted and implemented IT infrastructure. This case is characterized by the following properties: (1) It is a government organization; (2) It encountered internal and external challenges and pressure to launch an “e-Government;” and (3) It used technological strategies, which are comprehensive and radical changes to organization, so that the technologies involved were unable to be accumulated and needed be relearned. As it is a very long and complicated process to adopt and implement IT infrastructure, this article uses a general research framework (consisting of contents, context, and processes), supplemented by “problem solving”, to systematically describe the IT infrastructure adoption and implementation process. Moreover, with the hope of properly controlling the information for this research, three major issues are described and analyzed: (1) How to formulate and implement strategies; (2) How to integrate and apply information; and (3) How to transform the information system department and its personnel. Additionally, the characteristics of a transformation process can be studied using the organizational process model derived by Chiang Chi-ku (1999), comprising of a planned model, an adaptive model, and an emergent model. This organizational process model studies the properties and differences of these three process models using the two components of “problem solving” —“goal setting for problem solving” and “status control and resource allocation.” Moreover, this article also studies the roles played by the problem solvers (i.e., top management, information manager, and the executive team) in these processes and their effects. According to the findings of this study, the process of adopting and implementing IT infrastructure can’t be described as a single process. Moreover, it involves solutions to a series of related problems. Generally speaking, most people only recognize the construction and implementation of hardware, but easily disregard the real difficulty in personnel’s conceptual change and constant learning. Due to these hidden problems, some unexpected conditions may appear throughout the transformation process. Hence, this research can be taken as a reference for the business sector in adopting and implementing of IT infrastructure, organizational change, and organizational innovation. Moreover, it can also provide the basis for future academic research of the data involving a seven-year-long adaptation process. "第一章緒論 1-1 第一節研究背景與動機 1-1 第二節研究問題 1-2 第三節研究範圍 1-3 第四節　研究流程 1-4 第二章文獻探討 2-1 第一節資訊科技基礎設施（IT Infrastructure） 2-2 一、何謂資訊科技基礎設施 2-2 二、資訊科技基礎設施的發展與影響 2-4 三、轉換資訊科技基礎設施策略的形成與執行 2-6 四、轉換資訊科技基礎設施的風險 2-8 五、轉換資訊科技基礎設施的成功因素 2-9 第二節轉換資訊科技基礎設施與組織之關係 2-12 一、組織理論模型 2-12 二、轉換資訊科技基礎設施與組織要素的關係 2-15 三、因應組織變革的方法 2-16 四、政府組織與電子化政府 2-18 第三節轉換資訊科技基礎設施與人員之關係 2-19 一、變革推動者的特質與挑戰 2-20 二、高階主管、資訊經理及執行團隊 2-21 第三章理論模式與研究架構 3-1 第一節組織的歷程模式 3-1 第二節研究架構 3-3 一、問題解決的歷程觀點 3-5 二、問題解決的內容觀點 3-7 三、問題解決的情境觀點 3-7 第四章個案研究 4-1 第一節研究方法 4-1 第二節研究設計 4-1 一、分析單元與層次 4-2 二、研究個案的選擇與數目 4-2 第三節資料蒐集 4-2 第四節資料分析 4-3 第五節研究品質 4-4 第五章個案描述與分析 5-1 第一節個案背景說明 5-1 一、經濟部國際貿易局簡介 5-1 二、經濟部國際貿易局資訊部門簡介 5-2 第二節個案描述 5-5 一、如何形成策略並開始執行？ 5-6 二、如何整合資訊並推廣應用？ 5-14 三、資訊部門與人員如何轉型？ 5-21 第三節個案分析 5-27 一、轉換資訊科技基礎設施的歷程觀點—理論模式分析 5-27 二、轉換資訊科技基礎設施的歷程觀點綜合討論 5-31 三、三種關鍵人物的角色及影響 5-33 第六章結論與建議 6-1 第一節結論 6-1 一、本研究探討的問題 6-1 二、探討個案的心得 6-6 第二節研究限制 6-10 第三節研究貢獻 6-11 第四節未來研究建議 6-11 附　　件：附件一：名詞解釋附件-1 附件二：轉換資訊科技基礎設施重新建置之應用系統說明附件-2 附件三：政府機構轉換資訊科技基礎設施研究資料來源表附件-8 附件四：個案研究之訪談附件-9 參考文獻一、中文參考書目二、西文參考書目政府機構轉換資訊科技基礎設施的歷程圖　目　錄圖 1-1：研究流程圖 1-4 圖 2-1：Nolan的階段理論 2-5 圖 2-2：策略調準模型 (Strategic Alignment Model) 2-10 圖 2-3：資訊科技對組織變革的影響因素 2-14 圖 3-1：一般性研究架構 3-3 圖 5-1：經濟部國際貿易局組織架構 5-2 圖 5-2：資訊部門組織架構 5-3 圖 5-3：貿易局轉換資訊科技基礎設施示意圖 5-5 圖 5-4：歷程觀點示意圖 5-6 圖 5-5：轉換資訊科技基礎設施應用系統架構圖 5-8 圖 5-6：高階主管授予資訊經理之資源 5-34 政府機構轉換資訊科技基礎設施的歷程表　目　錄表 2-1：Scott Morton組織理論模型構面 2-14 表 2-2：轉換資訊科技基礎設施與組織變革要項對照表 2-15 表 2-3：因應組織變革的方法 2-17 表 2-4：高階主管、資訊經理、執行團隊之角色 2-23 表 3-1：以「問題解決」貫串研究架構與歷程模式 3-5 表 3-2：本研究架構 3-9 表 3-3：三種歷程模式比較 3-9 表 5-1：1997年貿易局資訊科技基礎設施一覽表 5-4 表 5-2：如何形成策略並開始執行之要項及時間 5-6 表 5-3：如何整合資訊並推廣應用之要項及時間 5-14 表 5-4：資訊部門與人員如何轉型之要項及時間 5-21 表 5-5：轉換資訊科技基礎設施資訊部門的改變 5-26
Reference:	一、中文參考書目〔01〕王晃三、顧志遠（2000），「問題解決學」〔02〕江志浩（1999），「探索國內績優廠商如何進行涉及跨組織協調的企業程序再工程」，國立中央大學資訊管理學系碩士論文〔03〕行政院資訊推展發展推動小組編著（1996），政府業務電腦化報告書〔04〕行政院資訊發展推動小組（1998），政府業務電腦化報告書-邁向二十一世紀的電子化政府。台北：行政院研考會〔05〕汪正洋（1999），「行政機關推動流程再造之研究--以戶政單一窗口業務為例」，東海大學公共行政學系碩士論文〔06〕周光耀（1998），「技術特質與知識創新活動之關連研究—以航太業與化工業為例」，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文〔07〕林水波、陳志瑋（1999），「顧客導向的政府再造策略」，政治科學論叢，10期，319-354頁〔08〕林震岩、林士傑（1998），「台灣企業採用Intranet之現況分析」，第十三屆全國管理信息學術會議〔09〕許世杰（1997），「由技術典範觀點看資訊系統開發知識之發展」，國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文〔10〕許育彰（2001），資訊科技策略與資訊科技基礎建設對企業資源規劃之影響」，國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所碩士論文〔11〕郭家隆（1997），http://ecophilia.fo.ntu.edu.tw/essay/essay/1998-0306.html 〔12〕陳光榮（1999），「提振傳統產業競爭力之策略與政策建議」，元智大學企業管理學系副教授〔13〕陳貞夙（2000），「以資訊時代組織轉型觀點建構企業資訊基礎建設的理論模型」，國立臺灣大學資訊管理研究所博士論文〔14〕溫在正（2001），「問題解決歷程之架構分析研究」，中原大學工業工程研究所碩士論文〔15〕榮泰生（1997），「策略管理學（第四版）」，華泰書局，臺北〔16〕劉裕元（2003），「護理高級職業學校組織變革之研究—以一所私立護理職校的轉型為例」，銘傳大學公共管理與社區發展研究所在職專班碩士論文二、英文參考書目〔01〕 Anderson P. and Tushman, M.L.（1990）,”Technological discontinuities and dominant designs—a cyclical model of technological change”, Administrative science, Quarterly, 35, 604-633 〔02〕 Applegate, P.O., & Zawacki, R.A.（1997）,”A Balanced Approach to IT Transformation”, Information systems management 〔03〕 Applegate, L.M., McFarlan, F.W. & Mckenney, J.L.（1999）,”Corporate Information Systems Management”, Text and Cases, 5th ed., Irwin 〔04〕 Bartholomew, D. & Caldwell, B.（1995）,”New priorities.”, Information week, pp. 14-15. 〔05〕 Bergamaschi ,Walter and Ongaro, Edoardo（2001）,”Evaluating the organizational impact of ICT for the development of the information system in hospitals”, Ospedale Maggiore Polyclinic of Milan and Bocconi University and School of Management, Milan 〔06〕 Boar, Bernard H. （2001）,”The art of Strategic Planning for Information Technology”, 2nd ed., Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 〔07〕 Broadbent, M., Weill, P. and Clair, D.S.（1999）,”The Implications of Information Technology Infrastructure for Business Process Redesign”, MIS Quarterly. Vol. 23. Iss. 2, pp. 159-182 〔08〕 Buckley, J.W., Buckley, M.H. and Chiang , H.F.（1976）,”Research Methodology & business Decisions”, national association accountants 〔09〕 Byrd, T.A. & Turner, D.E.（2000）,”Measuring the Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure:Exploratory Analysis of a Construct”, Journal of Management Information System. Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 167-208 〔10〕 Campbell, D.T. （1965）,”Variation and Selective Retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution”, In Barringer, Herbert R., Blanksten, George I. and Raymond W. Mack（eds.）,”Social Change in Developing Areas”, Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company 〔11〕 Clark, Charles E; Cavanaugh, nancy C; Brown, Carol V; Sambamurthy, V（1997）,” Building Change Readiness Capabilities in the IS Organization : Insights From the Bell Atlantic Experience”, MIS Quarterly; Dec 1997;21,4 〔12〕Christensen, Clayton M.（1995）,”The Innovator’s Dilemma –When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail”, Havard Business School Press, 「創新的兩難」,吳凱琳譯,商周出版〔13〕 Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D.（1990）,”Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Volume 35, pp 128-152 〔14〕 Cummings, T.G. and Huse, E.F.（1989）,”Organization Development and change”, West publishing Company 〔15〕 Damanpour, F. and Evan W.M.（1984）,”Organizational innovation and Performance: The Problem of ‘Organization Lag’”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, Sep. 1984, pp. 392-409 〔16〕 Dawson Patrick（1994）,”Organizational Change: A Processual Approach”, London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 1994. 〔17〕 DeSanctis, G. & Poole, M.S.（1994）,”Capturing the Complexity in the Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory”, Organization Science, May 1994, pp. 121-147 〔18〕 Dess, Gregory D. and Beard, Donald W.（1987）,”Dimension of Organizational Task Environment’, Administration Science, Quarterly 29, pp.52-73 〔19〕 Dosi, Giovanni.（1982）,” Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change”, Research Policy. 11 (3) 147-62. 〔20〕 Duncan, Nancy Bogucki.（1995）,”Capturing Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: A study of resource characteristics and their measure”, Journal of Management Information Systems. Armonk: Fall 1995. Vol. 12, Iss. 2; p. 37 〔21〕 Edmondson, Amy C; Winslow, Ann B; Bohmer Richard M J; Pisano Gary P （2003）,”Learning How and Learning What: Effects of Tacit and Codified Knowledge on Performance Improvement Following Technology Adoption”, Decision Sciences. Atlanta: Spring 2003. Vol. 34, Iss. 2; p. 197 〔22〕 Fleck, J.（1994）, “Learning by trying: the implementation of configurational technology”, Research Policy, Vol. 23, pp. 637-52. 〔23〕 Francis, C.A.; King, J.; DeWitt, J.; Bushnell, J. and Lucas, L. （1990）“Participatory Strategies for Information Exchange”, American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 5(4):153-60. 〔24〕 Frieberger, Paul & Swaine , Michael（2000）,”Fire in the Valley: The Making of the Personal Computer”, New York：McDraw-Hill,PP.20 〔25〕 Friedlander, F. & Brown, L. D.（1974）, “Organization Development”, Review of Psychology 〔26〕 Frow, M., Hamilton, L. and Hulse,T.（1996）,”Groupware at the Bank of Montreal’, Virtual Workgroups, pp.13-18 〔27〕 Goodman, P.S. and Kurke, L.B. （1982）,”Studies of Change in Organizations: A Status Report”, in Goodman, P.S. et al.（Eds.）, “Change in Organizations”, Jossey-bass, Inc., pp. 1-46 〔28〕 Hackman, J.R.,”Work Design” in Hackman, J.R. and Suttle, J.L.（1977）,”Improving Life at work”, Santa monica, CA:Doodyear, pp. 96-162 〔29〕 Hatch, C. (1988), “Flexible Manufacturing Networks: Cooperation for Competitiveness in a Global Economy”, The Corporation for Enterprise Development, Washington, DC, pp. 10-23. 〔30〕 Hax , A.C. & Majluf, N.S.（1991）,”The strategy Concept and Process: A Pragmatic Approach ”, Prentice-Hall, Inc. 〔31〕 Henderson, J. and Venkatraman, N. （1993）, “ Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations", IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1,pp. 4-16 〔32〕 Hill, C.W.L. & Jones, G.R.（1995）,”Strategic Management : An Integrated Approach”, 3rd Edition, Houghton Mifflin 〔33〕 Hodge, B.J. and Anthony, W.P.（1991）,” Organization Theory: A Strategic Approach”, Allyn and Bacon, Inc. 〔34〕 Huff, R.（1995）, “Client/Server technology: Is it a bill of goods?”, Information Strategy: The Executive’s Journal, pp. 21-8 〔35〕 Kayworth, T.R., Chatterjee, D. and Sambamurthy, V.（2001）,”Theoretical justification for IT infrastructure investments”, Information Resources management Journal. Vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 5-14 〔36〕 Keller, K. and Mathieson, K.（1995）,”client/Server at Chrysler: adding to the solution set”, Journal of End user Computing, Vol. 7 no. 3, pp. 29-33 〔37〕 Kenny, J. (2002),” Managing innovation in educational institutions”, Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 359-376. 〔38〕 Koopman John C.（1999）,”Effective alignment: Strategy cannot succeed without it”, The Canadian Manager, Vol. 24, Fall 1999, pp. 14-15 〔39〕 Lai, V.S. & Guynes, J.L.（1997）,”An Assessment of the Influence of Organizational Characteristics on Information Technology Adoption Decision: A Discriminative Approach”, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management, Vol. 44, No.2 〔40〕 Leavitt, H.J.（1965）,”Applied Organization Change in industry: Structural, Technological and Humanistic Approaches”, in Handbook of Organizations, ed. James G. March（Skokie, III.:Rand McNally）,pp. 1144-1168 〔41〕 Leonard-Barton, Dorothy and Deschamps, Isabelle（1988）,”Managerial Influence in the Implementation of New Technology”, management Science, Vol 34. No. 10 〔42〕 Leonard-Barton, Dorothy（1988）,”Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization”, Research Policy（17）,pp.251-267 〔43〕 Lewis, A. C. （2003）,” New hope for educational research?”, Phi Delta Kappan, 84(5), 339-340 〔44〕 Liebmann, L.（1995）,”Case study: bantam Doubleday Dell, writing the book on change”, LAN, pp. 163-8 〔45〕 Lindberg,Per（1994）,”Management of uncertainty in AMT implementation : The case of FMS”, Logistics Information Management. Bradford: 1994. Vol. 7, Iss. 5; pg. 10 〔46〕 Lucas, Henry C. （1999）,”Information Technology and The Productivity Paradox”, Oxford University Press 〔47〕 Markus, M.L. & Robey, D.（1988）,”Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in theory and Research”, Management Science,（34:5）, May 1998, 583-598 〔48〕 McDaniel, Reuben R. Jr.; Jordan, Michelle E. and Fleeman, Brigitte F.（2003）,”Surprise, Surprise, Surprise! A Complexity Science View of the Unexpected”, Health Care Management Review; Jul-Sep 2003; 28,3 〔49〕 McFarlan, F.W., McKenny, J.L. & Pyburn, P.（1983）,”The information archipelago-Plotting a Course”, Harvard business Review, Jane 1983 〔50〕 Mckenny, James L., Mason, Richard O. and Copeland, Ducan C.（1995）, “Waves of changes”, Havard Business School Press,「資訊科技競爭優勢」,許舜青,陳曉開譯,遠流出版公司〔51〕 Mintzberg H. and McHugh, Alexandra（1985）,”Strategy Formation in an Adhocracy”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 30, No.2 〔52〕 Mintzberg, H.（1994）,”The Structuring of Organizations”, 3rd Prentice-Hall, Englewood 〔53〕 Mutsaers,E.j., van der Zee, H. and Giertz , H.（1998）, “The evolution of IT” , Information Management and Computer Security , Vol 6 No.3,pp.115-26. 〔54〕 Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1974), “Neoclassical vs evolutionary theories of economic growth: critique and prospectus”, The Economic Journal, December, pp. 886-905. 〔55〕Nolan, Richard L.（2000）,”Information Technology Management from 1960-2000”, A Nation Transformed by Information, edited by A. Chandler, Jr, J. Cortada, Oxford University Press, 2000 〔56〕 Orlikowski, wanda J and Hofman, J Debra（1997）,”An Improvisational Model for Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies”, Sloan Management review, Winter 1997,38,2 〔57〕 Robey, D. and Newman, M.（1992）, ”A Social Process Model of User Analyst Relationships,” MIS Quarterly, June 1992 〔58〕 Rosen, David.（1992）,”Rightsizing: Not Just an IT Fad”, Computing Canada. Willowdale: Jul 20, 1992. vol. 18, Iss. 15 〔59〕 Rosenberg, N.（1982）,”Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics”, Cambridge University Press 〔60〕 Rygo, E.（1996）,”Upper hand”, Client/Server Computing, pp. 34-8 〔61〕 Sahal, D.（1981）,” Patterns of Technological Innovation”, Reading, Massachusetts. Addison- Westley. 〔62〕 Santosus, M.（1995）,”Distributing the wealth”, CIO, pp. 42-52 〔63〕 Scott Morton, Michael S.（1991）,” The Corporation of the 1990s: Information Technology and Organisational Transformation.”, New York Oxford: Oxford University Press 〔64〕 Silver, Mark S, Markus, M Lynne, Beath, Cynthia Mathis., “The information technology interaction model: A foundation for the MBA core course”, MIS Quarterly. Minneapolis: Sep 1995. Vol. 19, Iss. 3; p. 361 (30 pages) 〔65〕 Simon, H.A.（1958）,”Administrative Behavior, 2nd ed.”, Macmillan 〔66〕 Sonnenwald, D.H. (1999),”Evolving perspectives of human information behaviour: Contexts, situations, social networks and information horizons”, In Wilson, T.D. & Allen, D.K. (Eds.), “Exploring the Contexts of Information Behavior” (pp. 176-190.) London: Taylor Graham. 〔67〕 Teece, David J; Pisano, Gary and Shuen, Amy. （1997）, “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18:7, 1997, pp. 507-533. 〔68〕 Venkatraman, N.（1991）,”IT-Induced Business Transformation: From Automation to Business Scope Redefinition”, Sloan Management Review, Winter 1991. 〔69〕 Watad, Mahmoud M. & DiSanzo, Frank J.（1998）,“Transforming IT/IS infrastructure and IS personnel issues” , Business Process Management Journal. Bradford: Vol. 4, Iss. 4; pg. 322 〔70〕 Yetton, P.W., Johnston, K.D. and Craig, J.F. (1994),”Computer-Aided Architects: A Case Study of IT Strategic Change”, Sloan Management Review, Summer 1994, pp. 57-67 〔71〕 Yin, R. (1994),” Case study research: Design and methods”, (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing 〔72〕 Yukl, G. (1994),” Leadership in Organizations”, (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Description:	碩士國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程(EMBA) 90932619 93
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090932619
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Executive Master of Business Administration] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
index.html	0Kb	HTML2	277	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback