Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30286
|
| Title: | 我國資訊電子業智慧資本內部報導之研究－兼論策略之影響以及與外部報導之比較 |
| Authors: | 卓貽婷 |
| Contributors: | 王文英
卓貽婷 |
| Keywords: | 智慧資本內部報導
智慧資本外部報導
策略
資訊電子業
Internal intellectual capital reporting
External intellectual capital reporting
Strategy
Electronic industry |
| Date: | 2004 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-11 17:36:02 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 在這個知識經濟時代中，智慧資本是組織競爭優勢的關鍵所在，因此企業會希望透過內部智慧資本報導來監督智慧資本的發展與執行，不過，隨著企業所採取策略的不同，將影響所重視與所需的智慧資本，並進而造成智慧資本報導內容也將會因策略的不同而有所差異。此外，從企業的市場價值與帳面價值背離情況愈趨嚴重來看，也瞭解到傳統財務報表已無法提供給外部資訊使用者有關企業未來獲利潛力之有用資訊，而為解決此問題並提昇財務報表的價值攸關性，應有必要提供智慧資本外部報導予外部資訊使用者。
鑑於企業對內部與外部智慧資本報導需求之與日俱增，政府機構與學術界也開始積極探討智慧資本內部與外部報導架構之議題，並提出內部智慧資本報導需揭露較詳細的組織流程與程序等資訊；而外部智慧資本報導因基於可靠性、可比較性與企業競爭力之考量，所揭露之內容則不需太詳細且應偏重組織活動與流程的結果。故本研究之主要目的係探討企業所需之內部智慧資本報導內容為何，與外部智慧資本報導內容有何不同，以及是否會隨所採策略不同而有所差異。
本研究係以我國資訊電子業之上市與上櫃公司為研究對象，並採取問卷調查法與統計分析法來找出企業管理者認為智慧資本內部與外部報導所應包含之內容，發現之結果如下：
一、企業基於內部管理目的，所重視及所需之智慧資本報導內容有「基礎 設施能力」、「研發能力」、「營運流程管理」、「提昇人力資源品 質之能力」、「拓展新客戶之能力」、「員工勝任能力」、「客戶服 務系統之完善程度」、「客戶獲利力」等八個因素構面。
二、企業認為智慧資本內部報導與智慧資本外部報導之內容應有差異。
三、企業基於內部管理目的，所重視及所需之智慧資本報導內容會因採取 策略之不同而有所差異。
In this knowledge-based economy, intellectual capital is the key factor to help business get its competitive advantage. Therefore, business hopes to use internal intellectual capital reporting to monitor the development and execution of intellectual capital. The different strategies will influence the need of intellectual capital and also contribute to the difference of intellectual capital reporting. Besides, while the gap between market value and book value becomes larger, traditional financial statement becomes insufficient for external users. To solve this problem and increase the relevance of financial statement, it is necessary to provide external intellectual capital reporting to external users.
In view of the increasing need of internal and external intellectual capital reporting, the government and scholars began to explore the issues of external and internal intellectual capital reporting structure actively. They also propose that internal intellectual capital reporting should disclose more detail business processes and procedures, etc.; On the other hand, external intellectual capital reporting doesn’t need detailed disclosure, but should emphasize on the outcomes of business activities and processes based on reliability, comparability, and competitiveness. The objective of this study is to find out the intellectual capital reporting of different reporting purposes and strategic types.
In this study, both questionnaire survey and statistics analysis are used. The public firms in the electronic industry are the objects of the thesis. We found that:
1. Managers think that internal intellectual capital reporting includes the infrastructure ability, research and development ability, operation processes management, the ability to increase human resource quality, the ability to increase a number of clients, the qualified ability of employees, the completeness of customer service system, and the customer profits.
2. Managers think that internal intellectual capital reporting and external intellectual capital reporting are different.
3. Internal Intellectual capital reporting is affected by strategic types. |
| Reference: | 一、中文參考文獻
吳思華、黃宛華、賴鈺晶，1999，智慧資本衡量因素之研究－以我國軟體業為例，科技管理年會暨科技管理論文之研討會。
吳思華、賴鈺晶、顏妙如，2000，網際網路智慧資本衡量與發展措施研究，經濟部工業局軟體五年發展計畫。
吳靜怡，2003，我國奈米科技產業關鍵成功因素及競爭策略之研究－以半導體製造業為例，國立交通大學管理科學學程未出版碩士論文。
周文賢，2002，多變量統計分析SAS/STAT使用方法，台北：智勝文化。
洪仲瑜，2003，產業及策略對智慧資本之影響－以我國資訊電子業及金融服務業為研究對象，國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
郭美玲，2004，智慧資本外部報導之研究－以資訊電子及金融服務業為對象，國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
資策會，2001，我國產業智慧資本先導性個案研究，財團法人資訊工業策進分包學術機構研究計畫期末報告。
饒祥浩，2002，從企業、分析師及會計師觀點論資訊電子業智慧資本資訊之揭露，國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
二、英文參考文獻
CIMA. 2002. How to management intellectual capital. Businessline 18(Feb): 1-5.
Edvinsson, L., and M. S. Malone. 1997. Intellectual Capital: Realizing your Company’s True Value by Finding it’s Hidden Brainpower. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
Grant, R. M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 33(3): 114-135.
Hope, J., and T. Hope. 1997. Competing in the Third Wave: The Ten Key ManagementIssues of the InformationAge. Harvard Business School Press.
Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 2004. Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Leitner, K., and C. Warden. 2004. Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organisations: Specifics, lessons learned and perspectives. Management Accounting Research 15: 33-51.
Lim, L. L.K., and P. Dallimore. 2004. Intellectual capital: Management attitudes in service industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5(1): 181-194.
Mavrinac, S., and T. Siesfeld. 1998. Measures that matter: an exploratory investigation of investor`s information needs and value priorities. OECD.
MERITUM. 2001. Guidelines for Managing and Reporting on Intangibles(Intellectual Capital Report).
Miles, R., and C. Snow. 1978. Organizational Strategy, Structure ,and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Miller, M., B. D. DuPont, V. Fera, R. Jeffrey, B. Mahon, B. M. Payer, and A. Starr. 1999. Measuring and reporting intellectual capital from a diverse Canadian industry perspective:experience,issues and prospects. OECD.
Ministry of Economic Affairs. 1999. Pilot Project- Balancing Accounts with Knowledge. The Hague.
Ordóñez de Pablos, P. 2002. Evidence of intellectual capital measurement from Asia, Europe and the Middle East. Journal of Intellectual Capital 3(3): 287-302.
Ordóñez de Pablos, P. 2005. Intellectual capital reports in India: Lessons from a case study. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6(1): 141-149.
Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press.
Shapiro, C., and H. Varian. 1999. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Slater, S. F., E. M. Olson, and V. K. Reddy. 1997. Strategy-based performance
measurement. Business Horizons 40(July-August): 37-44.
Stewart, T. A. 1997. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
Stickler, M. J. 1996. Strategy: The key to financial payback from reengineering. Hospital Material Management Quarterly 18(1): 10-16.
Sveiby, K. E. 1997. The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-based Asset. New York: Berrett-Koehler Publishing Group, Inc.
Treacy, M., and F. Wiersema. 1995. The Discipline of Market Leaders: Choose your Customers, Narrow your Focus, Dominate your Market. MA: Addison-Wesley.
van der Meer-Kooistra, J., and S. M. Zijlstra. 2001. Reporting on intelletual capital. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 14(4): 456-476. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
92353005
93 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923530051 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 268 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
