English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113313/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50945634      Online Users : 1019
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30277
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30277


    Title: 歐洲國家效率及生產力分析-資料包絡分析法之應用
    Authors: 林秋琴
    Contributors: 林良楓
    林秋琴
    Keywords: 資料包絡分析法
    生產力
    效率
    新興主權國家
    Industrialized European countries
    Productivity
    Data Envelopment Analysis
    Emerging countries
    Efficiency
    Date: 2003
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:35:03 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究試圖探討中東歐國家由中央集權計劃經濟轉型為市場經濟之後,對其效率及生產力之影響。本研究針對1980至2000年的歐洲國家,採用資料包絡分析法(DEA)與大邊界法(Grand Frontier)畫出所有樣本的單一效率邊界並計算其整體技術效率、純技術效率、規模效率值。
    新興主權國家的整體技術效率、純技術效率、規模效率值在經濟轉型後均降低,顯示經濟轉型後的新興主權國家的確有經濟效率低落的狀況,尤其在經濟轉型初期市場不健全、經濟體質不良使資源配置不佳。傳統工業國家的整體技術效率及純技術效率在經濟轉型後較高,規模效率經濟轉型後降低。傳統工業國家於經濟轉型後整體技術效率、純技術效率及規模效率顯著的高於轉型國家、新興主權國家。
    Malmquist生產力指數分析,結果顯示傳統工業國家在經濟轉型後顯示生產力有進步,而生產力成長主要貢獻是技術進步(innovation),但傳統工業國家技術效率變動則呈現退步現象,進一步分析原因主要是由於規模效率變動退步所致。另外選擇1993年及2000年進行比較,結果發現傳統工業國家與新興國家的生產力均退步,主要原因是技術效率變動退步,但技術有進步。
    Reference: 王俊鈞,2000,效率及生產力變動之評估-OECD國家與亞洲四小龍的實證分析,私立逢甲大學經濟學研究所碩士論文
    李文福,1998,台灣製造業生產力成長、技術進步與效率變動:Malmquist生產力指數與資料包絡分析之應用,行政院國科會科資中心
    余尚武,1990,東歐政經改變對全球經濟的影響,今日經濟,p.57-61.
    洪美蘭,2002,經濟激進轉型策略—中東歐之經驗與啟示,台北:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司
    高成彬,1990,戈巴契夫改革對東歐民主化的影響,東亞季刊,第22期(3月),p.90-100.
    張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧、吳聰敏,2000,經濟學,台北:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司
    黃旭男,1993,資料包絡法使用程序之研究及其在非營利組織效率評估上之應用,國立交通大學管理科學研究所博士論文
    單驥,1990,由遲疑到加速:1990年代歐洲單一市場推動的政治經濟觀,經濟前瞻,第17期( 1月),p.104.-107.
    詹德松,1997,經濟統計指標-兼述政府統計實務,台北:華泰文化事業有限公司
    鄭棨元,2001,歐洲聯盟簡史,台北:三民書局
    賴永梁,1986,生產效率之衡量與應用,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文
    蕭有成,1998,總要素生產力與生產技術效率之衡量評估--臺灣製造業實證分析,國立中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文
    Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiency in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30: 1078-1092.
    Bhattacharyya, A., C. Lovell, and P. Sahay. 1997. The impact of liberalization on the productive efficiency of indian commercial banks. European Journal of Operational Research 98: 332-345.
    Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen, and W. E. Diewert. 1982. The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica 50: 1393-1414.
    Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6): 429-444.
    Coelli, T.J. 1998. Productivity growth in Australian electricity generation: Will the real TFP measure please stand up. CEPA Working Paper
    Coelli, T.J. 1996. A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A data envelopment analysis (computer) program. CEPA Working Paper, Australia: University of New England.
    Delîktas, E., M. Balcilar. 2002. A comparative analysis of productivity growth, catch-up and convergence in transition economies. Proceedings of the Sixth METU Conference on Economics. Ankara
    Dimelis, S. P., and M. Dimopoulou. 2002. Evaluating Productivity Growth Measures in the EU. Economics of Planning 35: 161-181.
    Dowrick, S., and D.T. Nguyen. 1989. OECD comparative economic growth 1950-85: catch-Up and convergence. The American Economic Review, vol.79, p.1010-1030.
    Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, L. Björn, and R. Pontus. 1989. Productivity developments in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquist output index approach. Discussion paper. Southern Illinois University.89-3
    Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris, and Z. Zhang. 1994. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review 84: 67-83.
    Farrell, M. J. 1957. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General, 120(3): 253-281
    Fecher, F. and S. Perelman. 1992. Productivity growth and technical efficiency in OECD industrial activities. In industrial efficiency in six nations (Ed.) Caves, MIT press, Cambridge Massachusetts, p459-488.
    Forster, H., A. Isaksson, and T. H. Ng. 2001. Growth in Least Developed Countries: A Empirical Analysis of Productivity Change, 1970-1992. Working Paper, United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
    Lin, L. F. 2002. Deregulation and efficiency in the Taiwan life insurance industry. PH. D. dissertation, Temple University.
    Maddison, A. 1982. Phases of capitalist development, New York: Oxford University press.
    Maddison, A. 1989. The world economy in the 20th century. Paris: Organization and Development.
    Maudos, J., J. M. Paster, and L. E. Serrano. 2000. Convergence in OECD countries:technical change, efficiency and productivity. Applied Economics 32: 757-765.
    Malmquist, S. 1953. Index numbers and indifference surfaces, Trabajos de Estadística 4: 209-242.
    O’Mahony, M. 2002. Productivity and convergence in the EU. National Institute Economic Review 180 (4): 72-82.
    Perelman, S. 1995. R&D, technological progress and efficiency change in industrial activities. The Review of Income and Wealth 41(3): 349-366.
    Rao, D. S. P., and T. J. Coelli. 1998. A cross-country analysis of GDP growth catch-up and convergence in productivity and inequlity. CEPA working paper
    Ray, S., and E. Delsi. 1997. Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries: Comment. The American Economic Review 87:1033 -1039
    Shephard, R. W. 1970. Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
    Solow, Robert W. 1957. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, p.312-320
    Summers, R., and Heston, A. 1991. The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1987. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2) : 1-41.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    91353027
    92
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0913530271
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2169View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback