政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/30261
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造访人次 : 51673210      在线人数 : 525
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30261


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30261


    题名: 私募應募人種類與經營績效之探討
    作者: 張荷君
    贡献者: 張清福
    張荷君
    关键词: 私募
    應募人
    經營績效
    Private placement
    Private placement investor
    Performance
    日期: 2008
    上传时间: 2009-09-11 17:33:17 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究探討私募對企業經營績效之影響,分別檢驗五種類型應募人之私募,其企業經營績效是否因私募而獲得顯著改善。本文採用配對t檢定,檢驗當應募人分別為策略投資人、內部人、積極投資人、消極投資人及單一投資人時,公司之經營績效於私募前後一年是否有顯著差異,並以營運現金流量報酬率、資產報酬率、股東權益報酬率及公司價值作為績效指標進行迴歸分析,探討不同類型應募人之私募,對經營績效之影響有何不同。
    實證結果發現,私募會因應募人之不同,而對經營績效產生不同的影響。當應募人為策略投資人、內部人、積極投資人或單一投資人時,公司私募後一年的經營績效比私募前一年的績效好,表示當應募人為該四類投資人時,四項經營績效衡量指標皆顯示,私募會正面影響公司之經營績效;而當應募人為消極投資人時,私募對公司營運現金流量會造成負面的影響。
    This study classifies private placement investors into five types including strategic investors, insiders, active investors, passive investors, and single investors to investigate whether firm performance has been improved after issuing private placement. I use two-sample paired t-test to examine whether the performance is different between pre-placement and post-placement under each type of private placement investors, and use regression approach to analyze the impact of private placement investors on firm performance measured by operating cash flow returns, returns on assets, returns on equity, and Tobin’s Q.
    The evidence shows that the impact on performance varies with private placement investors. Firms have better performance after issuing private placement when the private placement investors are strategic investors, insiders, active investors, and single investors. On the contrary, when the private placement investors are passive investors, firms have poorer operating cash flow returns.
    參考文獻: 中文部分
    呂季蓉,2005,台灣上市上櫃公司私募之研究—論私募對象之影響,國立中山大學財務管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
    林嘉慧,2007,台灣上市公司私募股權現況與績效之探討,東吳大學商學院企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    張文魁,2006,股權結構對私募發行公司價值影響之分析,國立政治大學財務管理學研究所碩士論文。
    梁晏慈,2007,論私募公司之折價發行、宣告效果及長期績效表現,淡江大學財務金融學系碩士班。
    許雪芳,2003,上市上櫃公司私募之研究,國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
    陸潤生,2005,私募宣告之資訊內涵,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
    陸瀛謙,2008,私募折價幅度及私募前後異常報酬,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
    英文部分
    Allen, J. W., and G. M. Phillips. 2000. Corporate equity ownership, strategic alliances, and product market relationships. The Journal of Finance 55 (December): 2791-2815.
    Barclay, M. J., C. G. Holderness, and D. P. Sheehan. 2007. Private placements and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Corporate Finance 13 (September): 461-484.
    Barclay, M. J., C. G. Holderness, and D. P. Sheehan. 2001. The block pricing puzzle. Working paper, Simon School of Business.
    Chu, S. M., G. H. Lentz, and E. Robak. 2005. Comparing the characteristics and performance of private equity offering frims with seasoned equity offering firms. Journal of Economics and Management 1 (January): 57-83.
    Cronqvist, H., and M. Nilsson. 2005. The choice between rights offerings and private equity placements. Journal of Financial Economics 78 (November): 375-407.
    Chung, K. H., and S. W. Pruitt.1994. A simple approximation of tobin`s q. Financial Management 23 (Autumn): 70-74.
    Demsetz, H., and K. Lehn. 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93 (December): 1155-1177.
    Gillan, S. L. and L. T. Starks. 2000. Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics 57 (August): 275-305.
    Hertzel, M. G., M. Lemmon, J. Linck, and L. Rees. 2002. Long-run performance following private placements of equity. Journal of Finance 57 (December): 2595-2617.
    Hertzel, M. G., and R. L. Smith. 1993. Market discounts and shareholder gains for placing equity privately. Journal of Finance 48 (June): 459-485.
    Healy, P. M., K. G. Palepu, and R. S. Ruback. 1992. Does corporate performance improve after merges? Journal of Financial Economics 31 (April): 135-176.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (October): 305-360.
    Jensen, M. C. and R. S. Ruback. 1983. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11 (April): 5-50.
    Krishnamurthy, S., P. Spindt, V. Subramaniam, and T. Woidtke. 2005 Does investor identity matter in equity issues? Evidence from private placements. Journal of Financial Intermediation 14 (April): 210-238.
    Leland, H., and D. H. Pyle. 1977. Information asymmetric, financial structure and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance 32 (June): 371-388.
    Lindenberg, E. and S. Ross. 1981. Tobin`s q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business 54 (January): 1-32.
    Myers, S. C. and N. Majluf. 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics13 (June): 187-221.
    Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation. Journal of Financial Economics 20 (January-March): 293-315.
    Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy 94 (June): 461-488.
    Tobin, J., and W. C. Brainard. 1977. Asset markets and the cost of capital. Economic progress: Private values and public policy, 235-262. Amsterdam, North-Holland.
    Wruck, K. H., and Y. Wu. 2009. Relationships, corporate governance, and performance: Evidence from private placements of common stock. Journal of Corporate Finance 15 (February):30-47.
    Wruck, K. H. 1989. Equity ownership concentration and firm value: Evidence from private equity financings. Journal of Financial Economics 23 (June): 3-28.
    Wu, Y. 2004. The choice of equity-selling mechanisms. Journal of Financial Economics 74 (October): 93-119.
    Wahal, S. 1996. Pension fund activism and firm performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31 (March): 1-23.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    96353046
    97
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096353046
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2277检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈