English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51583854      Online Users : 806
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30243
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30243


    Title: 企業以XBRL格式申報財務資訊與公司治理因素之關連性研究
    Authors: 張宏宇
    Contributors: 諶家蘭
    張宏宇
    Keywords: 公司治理
    延伸性企業報導語言
    中國大陸
    Corporate governance
    XBRL
    China
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:31:15 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究以中國大陸2001至2007年於上海證券交易所之上市企業共98家,包括於2003年率先參與XBRL申報計畫之企業共49家,以及其他未採用XBRL申報財報之49家企業作為對照組進行實證分析,以探討中國大陸率先以XBRL格式申報財務資訊的企業群組,相較於非以XBRL格式申報之企業群組,是否企業對於採用XBRL之決策中會受到自身公司治理因素構成與表現影響,使率先採用之企業與非率先採用企業之公司治理因素有顯著之差異,並進一步探究各公司治理構面與採用XBRL之關連性。本研究於整理相關文獻後,根據國內外文獻之公司治理因素之評等架構,並將公司治理因素之變數分為董監事組成、股權結構、管理型態、與大股東介入股市等四個構面。
    本研究之實證結果顯示,董監事組成、股權結構、管理型態與大股東介入股市構面皆對公司治理有整體或部份顯著的影響。以個別因素觀之,則發現監事規模、最大股東持股比、次大股東持股比、董事長與總經理是否兼任與大股東股權質押比具有顯著相關,代表監事規模越高,最大股東及次大股東持股比例越低,董事長與總經理兼任情形較高,或者股權質押比越低時,會增加企業率先採用XBRL申報財務資訊之可能性。
    This paper examines whether early and filers of financial information in XBRL format demonstrate superior corporate governance relative to their non-adopting peers. The corporate governance was composed of the composition of director and supervisor, ownership structure, administration style and pledge. Data of 98 listing companies from Shanghai Stock Exchange in China and nine corporate factors are used in our logistic regression model.
    The empirical analysis implies that board member structure, ownership structure, administration style and pledge -related factors have significant association with the adoption of XBRL in China.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    王大維,2002,台灣工商業可延伸性企業報告語言分類標準之建立,國立台灣大學會計學系碩士論文。
    牛延苓,2001,股權結構、董事會組成與公司績效關係之研究─以高科技產業與傳統產業為例。國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    工商時報,2008.8.7,財報跨國揭露XBRL成新勢力(三版)。
    台灣證券交易所,2008,XBRL簡介及國際應用現況,台灣證券交易所簡報。
    台灣證券交易所,2008,可延伸企業報告語言﹙XBRL)讓看財務報表變簡單了:財務報表的國際共通語言—XBRL,證交資料,第556期:14-37。
    林宥吟,2002,延伸性企業報告語言之產業應用-以資產管理產業為例,私立中原大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    林尚志,2003,我國公司治理評等指標建立之研究,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    李永銘,2003,XBRL合併財務報表分類標準之建立與應用,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
    何里仁,2003,公司治理之資訊透明度與績效評核關聯性之研究,逢甲大學會計與財稅所碩士論文。
    沈慧娟,2002,中國大陸公司治理結構之探討,東吳大學會計系碩士論文。
    易芙瑛,2002,影響企業導入可延伸性企業報告語言(XBRL)之因素探討,私立中原大學會計系碩士論文。
    吳昱璟,2002,資訊科技投資對企業生產力變動、生產效率與財務績效影響之研究,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
    吳長春,2004,公司治理與經營績效之研究-以上市櫃銀行業、金融控股公司為例,國立台北大學國際財務金融碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    80
    周國華,2008,XBRL格式財務報告-重要進展、技術架構、申報模式及分析工具介紹,財務報告分析課程講義。
    徐詩雲,2006,公司資訊透明度與財務預測制度對財務預測準確度之影響,屏東科技大學企業管理系所碩士論文。
    陳國泰、周濟群、陳柏任與王大維,2001,會計報告電子化傳遞的利器-XBRL一,會計研究月刊,第187期,( 6月):36-42。
    陳國泰、周濟群、陳柏任與王大維,2001,會計報告電子化傳遞的利器-XBRL二,會計研究月刊,第188期,( 7月):67-73。
    陳國泰、周濟群、陳柏任與王大維,2001,會計報告電子化傳遞的利器-XBRL三,會計研究月刊,第189期,( 8月):116-120。
    陳淑珠,2005,公司治理、公司價值與投資人關係關聯性之研究-以台灣上市公司之投資人為研究對象,靜宜大學管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    陳玲菁,2007,公司治理與流程再造對公司績效之影響,國立中正大學會計與資訊科技所碩士論文。
    陳嶢睜,2003,應用Web Services與XBRL於企業財務報告資訊之系統模型研究,私立中原大學會計系碩士論文。
    莊佩蓁,2006,公司治理與股價關聯性之研究─採用Ohlson模型,東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    莊閔傑,2008,XBRL之應用對資訊揭露影響之研究,私立大葉大學會計資訊學系碩士論文。
    張志裕,2005,董事會特性、資訊揭露與經營績效之關連性研究,私立中原大學企業管理學系研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    馮政武,2005,公司治理與經營績效關聯性之研究-以上市櫃食品業為例,國立台北大學國際財務金融碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    游惠珍,2004,中國大陸國有企業公司治理之探討,國立政治大學財政研究所未出版碩士論文。
    81
    葉銀華、李存修與柯承恩,2002,公司治理評等系統,商智文化出版社,台灣台北。
    楊培文,2002,公司治理研究-以中國大陸上市公司為例,國立台灣大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
    黃仁羿,2003,可運算的延伸性企業報告應用於不同會計原則間轉換之研究,國立中正大學會計研究碩士論文。
    詹家鴻,2003,XBRL應用於我國會計資訊市場之研究─以客製化財務報導為例,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
    蘇啟文,2007,公司治理與盈餘保守性,輔仁大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。
    蔡英棠,2005,企業資訊透明化評鑑系統之關鍵指標探討,中華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
    廖聖慧,2003,公司治理與負債資金成本之關係,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    闕月玲,2006,公司治理與公司投資-以台灣上市電子公司為例,輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
    英文文獻
    Aiyesha, D. E. Y. (2008). Corporate Governance and Agency Conflicts, Journal of Accounting Research, 46: 1143.
    Barnhart, W. W., Marr, M. W. & Rosenstein, S. 1994. Firm Performance And Board Composition: Some New Evidence, Managerial And Decision Economics, 15(3), Pp. 329–340.
    Baysinger, B. D. & Butler, H. 1985. Corporate Governance And The Board Of The Directors: Performance Effects Of Changes In Board Composition, Journal of Law, Economics, And Organization, 1(1), Pp. 101–124.
    Bhattacharya, S., And Premuroso, R.F. 2008. Do Early And Voluntary Filers of Financial Information In XBRL Format Signal Superior Corporate Governance And Operating Performance? International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 9(1): Pp.1-20.
    Bovee, M., M. Ettredge, R. P. Srivastava, And M. A. Vasarhelyi. 2002. Does The Year 2000 XBRL Taxonomy Accommodate Current Business Financial-Reporting Practice? Journal of Information Systems 16(Fall): 165-182.
    Botosan, C. A. 1997. Disclosure Level And The Cost of Equity Capital. The Accounting Review, 72(3), Pp. 329-349.
    Camfferman, K. And Cooke, T. 2002. An Analysis of Disclosure in Annual Reports of U.K. And Dutch Companies, Journal of International Accounting, 1, Pp. 28–60.
    Cheng, C. 1998. A Study of The Motivation And Constraint Mechanisms of The Management of The State-Owned Enterprises, Journal of Finance And Economics, (1), Pp. 27–31.
    Chen, X. Y. and Yuan, H. Q. 1998. A Study on Financial Accounting Problems During Reorganizations Of Listed Companies, Accounting Research Journal, 10(1), Pp.
    83
    5–13.
    Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W. & Larcker, D. F. 1999. Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, And Firm Performance, Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), Pp. 371–406.
    Cooke, T. E. 1989. Voluntary Corporate Disclosure By Swedish Companies. Journal of International Financial Management And Accounting, 1, Pp.171-195.
    Larcker, David F., Richardson, Scott A. and Tuna, A. Irem. 2007. Corporate Governance, Accounting Outcomes, and Organizational Performance, The Accounting Review, 82: Pp.963.
    Debreceny R, Gray G. 2001.The production and use of semantically rich accounting reports on the Internet: XML and XBRL. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2(1), Pp. 47–74.
    Debreceny R, Chandra A, Cheh JJ, Guithues-Amrhein D, Hannon NJ, Hutchison PD, et al. 2005. Financial reporting in XBRL on the SEC`s EDGAR System: a critique and evaluation. Journal of Information Systems, 19(2) , Pp.191–210.
    Gang, W. (2007). Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance and Company Performance in China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 13, Pp. 519-545.
    Gompers P, Ishii J, Metrick A. 2003. Corporate governance and equity prices. Quaterly Journal of Economics, February, Pp.107–55.
    Huang, H. and J.-J. Zhao .2008. Relationship between Corporate Governance and Financial Distress: An Empirical Study of Distressed Companies in China. International Journal of Management, 25: 654-664.
    Jean Jinghan, C. 2004. Corporatisation Of China`s State-Owned Enterprises And Corporate Governance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 1, Pp. 82-93.
    Jeffrey R. Cohen, Ganesh Krishnamoorthy, and Arnold M. Wright. 2002. Corporate governance and the audit process. Contemporary Accounting Research ,19(4): 573.
    84
    Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency Costs And Free Cash Flows, Corporate Finance And Takeovers, American Economics Review, 76(2), Pp. 323–329.
    Jensen, M. C. 1993. The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, And The Failure Of Internal Control Systems, Journal of Finance, 48(4), Pp. 831–880.
    Kane, G. D. & Meade, N. L. 1998. Ratio Analysis Using Rank Transformation, Review Of Quantitative Finance And Accounting, 10(1), Pp. 59–74.
    Klein, A. 1998. Firm Performance And Board Committee Structure, Journal Of Law And Economics, XLI(2), Pp. 275–303.
    Langnan, C. and L. Weibin . 2007. Corporate Governance And Fraud: Evidence From China. Corporate Ownership & Control, 4: 139-145.
    Liu, S. 2005. Corporate governance and development: the case of China. Managerial & Decision Economics, 26: 445-449.
    Lee, C. H., 2005. A Study Of The Factors Influencing The Willingness of Enterprise To Adopt XBRL–Using of TTF Model As Example. Dissertation, National Cheng Kung University, Kaohsiung.
    Pinsker, R., And Li, S. 2008. Costs And Benefits of XBRL Adoption: Early Evidence. Communications of The ACM ,51(3), 47-50.
    Prowse, Stephen D. 1998. The Structure of Corporate Ownership In Japan, Journal of Finance, 47 (4), Pp. 1121–1140.
    Qi, D., Wu, W. & Zhang, H. 2000. Shareholding And Corporate Performance of Partially Privatized Firms: Evidence From The Listed Chinese Firms, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 8(4), Pp. 587–610.
    Sappington, D. & Stiglitz, J. 1987. Privatization, Information, And Incentives, Journal Of Policy Analysis And Management, 6(4), Pp. 567–582.
    Shanmugasundaram, S. 2008. Convergence of Corporate Governance Practices: The Case of China. Journal of Corporate Governance, 7: 7-17.
    85
    Shleifer, A.&Vishny, R.W. 1994. Politicians And Firms, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), Pp. 995–1025.
    Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W. 1997. A Survey Of Corporate Governance, Journal of Finance, 52(4), Pp. 737–775.
    So, W., And Weverka, P. 2008. XBRL For Dummies. Tarrytown, NY: Hitachi.
    Xbrl.Org. 2002. XRBL: Understanding The XML Standard For Business Reporting And Finance; [White Paper, Www.Xbrl.Org].
    Xu, X. & Wang, Y. 1999. Ownership Structure And Corporate Governance In Chinese Stock Companies, China Economic Review, 10(1), Pp. 75–98.
    Xue, J. F. 2001. Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance And Corporate Performance. Phd Dissertation, Shanghai University of Finance And Economics.
    Xu, X. & Wang, Y. 1999. Ownership Structure And Corporate Governance In Chinese Stock Companies, China Economic Review, 10(1), Pp. 75–98.
    Zhou, M. & Wang, X. 2000. Agency Cost And The Crisis Of China’s SOE, China Economic Review, 11(4), Pp. 297–317.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    96353006
    97
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096353006
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2517View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback