政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/30204
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50973966      線上人數 : 885
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30204


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30204


    題名: 會計師產業專精度與盈餘品質關聯性之研究-以中國大陸為例
    作者: 賴巧雰
    貢獻者: 金成隆
    賴巧雰
    關鍵詞: 產業專精度
    審計品質
    Auditor`s industry specialzation
    Audit quality
    日期: 2006
    上傳時間: 2009-09-11 17:27:00 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究欲探討在中國大陸審計市場中，會計師事務所產業專精度對於審計品質之影響，並進一步研究不同城市層級之產業專精度對於審計品質有無差別。
    研究結果顯示，在產業專家以特定產業客戶在會計師事務所客戶組合中所佔比率之定義下，無法發現由產業專家會計師事務所查核之公司，其審計品質較佳；但進一步考慮城市層級因素後，實證結果發現城市會對產業專精度造成影響，支持假說二，審計品質較佳。造成此結果之可能係因掛靠制度及政府之尋租行為所造成中國審計市場分割與分散特性，且使得上市公司對事務所的選擇並不重視其審計品質的高低，而是更看重會計師事務所的掛靠單位，使得中國會計師事務所無法發展整體之產業專家。
    The objective of this thesis is to examine whether auditor’s industry specialization at the city-level affects the audit quality in China. In addition, we classify industry auditor expertise at the city level into the following two groups, and further investigate whether the association between industry expertise and audit quality differs between these two groups: (1) Directly Controlled Municipalities or locations of Stock Exchange (therefore DCM); (2)non-Directly Controlled Municipalities or non locations of Stock Exchange (non-DCM).
    The empirical results find no statistically significant association between audit quality and industry specialization at the city level in China. However, the results document that the association between industry expertise and audit quality are more pronounced for the DCM group than for the non-DCM, consistent with our prediction.
    參考文獻: 王振林，2002，政府規範對審計服務供求的影響：中國證券市場的證據，中國註冊會計師（3月）：26-30。
    宋建波與陳華昀，2005，我國註冊會計師審計與上市公司盈餘管理之研究，財經問題研究，第256期（3月）： 87-90。
    李爽與吳溪，2002，審計師變更的監管思想、政策效應與學術含義-基於2002年中國註冊會計師協會監管措施的探討，會計研究，第181期 (11月)：32-36。
    張瑜，2000，關於註冊會計師行業的發展現狀和趨勢，湖南財政與會計，第261期（7月）：27-28。
    張蓉與吉濤，1994，我國註冊會計師制度的發展與完善，北京商學院學報，第57期：50-53。
    張前，2005，我國獨立審計市場失靈的原因探析，審計月刊，第197期：12-13。
    徐政旦、尤家榮與謝國新，1994，中國註冊會計師制度的發展和展望，財會通訊，增刊：19-26。
    鄒先芝，2006，我國審計市場的特徵及啟示，經濟師，第2期：243-244。
    黎志剛，2001，會計師事務所脫构改制後若干問題的思考，財經理論與實踐，第22卷（11月）：78-80。
    劉運國與麥劍青，2006，論四大會計師事務所的審計質量-來自中國證券市場的初步證據，中山大學學報，第46卷第3期：118-123。
    劉海英、張宏林與周文鋼，2000，山東工業大學學報社會科學版，第54期：52-53。
    劉嘉雯與王泰昌，2005，繼續經營有重大疑慮審計意見：第33號公報審計準則公報之影響，管理學報，第22卷第4期：525-548。
    楊時展，1995，中國註冊會計師制度的沿革與發展，財會通訊，第177期：11-13。
    ______，1995，中國註冊會計師制度的沿革與發展，財會通訊，第178期：21-23。
    ______，1995，中國註冊會計師制度的沿革與發展，財會通訊，第179期：14-15。
    葉向陽與盛軍鋒，2003，論我國會計師事務所組織形式選擇，北京工商大學學報（社會科學版），第18卷第4期：43-45。
    蔡春、黃益建與趙莎，2005，關於審計質量對盈餘管理影響的實證研究-來自滬市製造業的經驗證據，審計研究，第2期：3-10。
    陳濤與張雁翎，2006，審計師的行業專業水平對盈利信息質量的約束作用研究，管理現代化，第5期：7-11。
    謝軍與李明輝，2003，論會計師事務所選擇的信號傳遞功能，當代財經，第219期：114-118。
    Ashbaugh, H., R. LaFond, and B. W. Mayhew. 2003. Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review 78(July): 611-639.
    Balsam, S., J. Krishnan, and J. S. Yang. 2003. Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22(September): 71-97.
    Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fruad. The Accounting Review 71(October): 443-465.
    Becker, C., M. Defond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earning management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15: 1-24.
    Bedard, J., and S. Biggs. 1991. The effect of domain-specific experience on evaluation of management representation in analytical procedures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 10: 77-95.
    Carcello, J. V., D. R. Hermanson, and H. F. Huss. 1995. Temporal changes in bankruptcy-related reporting. Auditing 14(Fall): 133-143.
    Chen, J. P., X. Su, and R. Zhao. 2000. An emerging markets reaction to initial modified audit opinions: Evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange. Contemporary Accounting Research 17(Fall): 429-455.
    Chen, J. P., A. Shome, and X. Su. 2001. How is audit quality perceived by big 5 and local auditors in China? A preliminary investigation. International Journal of Auditing 5: 157-175.
    Chen, J. P., S. Chen, and X. Su. 2001. Profitability regulation, earnings management, and modified audit opinions: Evidence from China. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 20(September): 8-30.
    Chen, G., M. Firth, N. Gao, and O. Rui. 2005. Do ownership structure and governance mechanisms have an effect on corporate fruad in China’s listed firms? Working paper.
    Chen, G. 2006. Positive research on the financial statement fruaf factors of listed companies in China. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing 2 (June): 25-34.
    Chio, Jong-Hag, R. K. Doogar, and A. R. Ganguly. 2004. The riskiness of large audit firm client portfolios and changes in audit liability regimes: Evidence from the U.S. audit market. Contemporary Accounting Research 21(Winter): 747-785.
    Craswell, A., J. Francis, and S. Taylor. 1995. Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (December): 297-322.
    Craswell, A., D. J. Stokes, and J. Laughton. 2002. Auditor independence and fee dependence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33: 253-275.
    DeAngelo, L. 1981. Auditor size and auditor quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3(December): 183–199.
    Dechow, P., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70 (January): 193-225.
    DeFond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (January): 145-176.
    ____________, and K. Subramanyam. 1998. Auditor changes and discretionary accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 25: 35-67.
    ____________, T. J. Wong, and S. Li. 1999. The impact of improved auditor independence on auditor market concerntration in China. Journal of Accounting and Economics 28: 269-305.
    ____________, J. Francis, and T. Wong. 2000. Auditor industry specialization and market segmentation: Evidence from Hong Kong. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 19(Spring): 49-66.
    Degeorge, F., J. Patel, and R. Zeckhauser. 1999. Earnings management to exceed thresholds. The Journal of Business 72: 1-33.
    Eichenseher, J., and P. Danos. 1981. The analysis of industry-specific auditor concentration: Towards an explanatory model. The Accounting Review 56(July): 479-492.
    Fan, P. H., and T. J. Wong. 2005. Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Accounting Research 43(March): 35-72.
    Ferguson, A., J. Francis, and D. Stokes. 2003. The effects of firm-wide and office-level industry expertise on audit pricing. The Accounting Review 78: 429-448.
    Firth, M., L. L. Mo, and M. K. Wong. 2005. Financial statement frauds and auditor sanctions: An analysis of enforcemen actions in China. Journal of Businese Ethics 62: 367-381.
    Francis, J., E. Maydew, and H. C. Sparks. 1999. The role of big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 18: 17-34.
    ¬¬¬________, K. Reichelt, and D. Wang. 2005. The pricing of national and city-specific reputation for industry expertise in the U.S. audit market. The Accounting Review 80(January): 113-136。
    Healy, P., 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7(April): 85-107.
    Li, C., F. M. Song, and S. M. L. Wong. 2004. Audit firm Size effects in China’s emerging audit markets. Working Paper, the University of Hong Kong.
    Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29(2): 193-228.
    Johnson, P., K. Jamal, and R. Berryman. 1991. Effects of framing on auditor decisions. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (October): 75–105.
    Kennedy, P. 2003. A guide to econometrics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Kothari, S.P., A. Leone, and C. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (February): 163-197.
    Krishnan, G. 2003. Does Big 6 auditor industry expertise constrain earnings management? Accounting Horizons 17 (Supplement): 1-16.
    ___________. 2006. The association between Big 6 auditor industry expertise and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance Supplement: 1-16.
    Palmrose, Z. V. 1986. Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 24(1): 97-110.
    Reynolds, J. K., and J. R. Francis. 2001. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30(4): 375-400.
    Schipper, K., and L. Vincent. 2003. Earnings quality. Accounting Horizons 17 (Supplement): 97-110.
    Wang, Q., T. J. Wong, and L. Xia. 2005. State ownership, institutional environment and auditor choice: Evidence from China. Working Paper, the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
    Zhang, Y. 2006. Law, corporate governance, and corporate scandal in an emerging economy: Insights from China. Working Paper, Peking University.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    94353039
    95
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094353039
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2250檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋