English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114503/145531 (79%)
Visitors : 53436881      Online Users : 1167
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30201
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30201


    Title: 企業專利管理與內部報導之個案研究
    Authors: 陳貞佑
    Contributors: 王文英
    陳貞佑
    Keywords: 專利
    專利管理
    專利報導
    內部報導
    patent
    patent management
    patent reporting
    internal reporting
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:26:43 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來,企業的核心競爭力來源已逐漸由有形資產轉變為無形資產。而在眾多無形資產中,又以專利權代表著企業研發創新能力,而具有高度資訊意涵。但在目前針對專利管理面向的研究中,尚未有針對企業如何對整體專利化流程進行有效管理並結合評估、報導專利成果的完整架構,故本研究採用個案研究法,並輔以個案公司內部問卷之方式,探討企業如何有效建立專利管理與內部報導機制,並達成以下結論:
    一、企業專利管理架構乃從企業整體策略出發,連結專利策略,並根據專利策略發展出專利管理制度與內部報導機制;透過專利管理制度可促進內部報導項目目標之達成,而透過內部報導項目可評估專利管理制度之成果。
    二、運用個案公司內部問卷調查,篩選出27項重要之專利內部報導項目。
    三、透過與個案公司實地訪談,彙整出八大項專利管理制度與作法,並進一步分為一般性專利管理制度與策略性專利管理制度
    四、將內部報導項目進一步分為量化指標與非量化指標兩種專利報導方式;量化指標乃透過數量化資訊將實際值與目標值進行比較;而非量化指標又可分為兩種報導方式,一是運用描述本期管理做法並與上期比較以評估管理成果,另一種方式是發放問卷並報導問卷結果,透過本期與上期問卷結果的比較來評估管理成果。
    五、透過專利報導項目與企業實際之管理做法相互比較後,分析個案公司之三項管理缺口。
    Recently the competitive resources of the enterprise is switching from tangible assets to intangible assets. Among those intangible assets, patents represent the R&D and innovation abilities of the business, and include high valued infromations. However there is short of complete framework of patent management and patent internal reporting system in those patent-relative research areas. Therefore, this study use case study research, and is supported by the questionnaire to show how could the enterprise use valid management and reporting system to achieve great patent results. The conclusions of this study are the followings:
    First, the patent management framework is established from the business strategy to patent strategy, and develop the relative patent management and internal reporting systems. Use the patent management to achieve the reporting objectives; use the patent reporting ways to evaluate the management performance.
    Second, use the internal questionnaire to select twenty-seven important internal reporting items.
    Third, through the interviews with the target company summarize eight patent management ways, and classify them to general and strategic management ways.
    Fourth, there are two reporting methods. One is quantification items, using quantified information and compare to the earlier stage to show the management results; the other is non-quantification items, describing the management conditions or reporting questionnaire results and compare to the earlier stage to evaluate the management performance.
    Fifth, according to the comparisons of the reporting items and management ways, this study analyse three management gaps of the target company.
    Reference: (一)中文文獻
    王文英與張清福,2004,智慧資本影響績效模式之探討:我國半導體業之實證研究,會計評論,第39期(7月):89-117。
    王立偉,2002,不同類型製造業內企業市場價值與帳面淨值差異之研究,東海大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
    王癸元,2002,人力資本、智慧財產與企業價值關係之研究-以資源基礎論之觀點,國立中正大學企業管理系未出版碩士論文。
    王寶琇,2003,台灣DRAM廠商無形資產評價之研究-資本化超額盈餘法之應用,國立交通大學科技管理學程系未出版碩士論文。
    台灣智慧資本研究中心與財團法人資訊工業策進會資訊情報中心,2006,智慧資本管理,台北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
    朱博湧、熊杏華、林裕淩與劉子衙,2005,非營利研發機構之智慧資本與績效評估-工研院之實證研究,管理學報,第二十二卷,第3期:277-293。
    李坤致,2001,智慧資本與價值動因對企業價值影響之研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    吳秀娟,2000,企業市場價值與淨值差異影響因素之研究—以我國資訊電子業為例,國立政治大學會計學系研究未出版碩士論文。
    余秋琄,2005,中山科學研究院智慧財產權管理研究,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    林明德,2004,無形資產之價值攸關性與決定因素之探討,國立政治大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    周延鵬,2006,虎與狐的智慧力─智慧資源規劃9把金鑰,台北:天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
    陳世顯,1999,宏碁的專利管理系統(上),智慧財產權,第12期(12月):23-33。
    陳世顯,2000,宏碁的專利管理系統(下),智慧財產權,第13期(1月):74-83。
    陳達仁、黃慕萱與楊牧民,2004,從美國專利看台灣企業科技創新競爭力,政大智慧財產評論,第二卷,第2期(10月):1-24。
    陳和銳,2003,企業智慧資本之影響因子研究-以我國上市機電類股為例,逢甲大學工業工程學系未出版碩士論文。
    張永強與陳益智,2005,智慧財產權管理新思維-以ISO品質架構建立系統化的智權管理制度,智慧財產權,第74期(2月):5-34。
    郭美玲,2004,智慧資本外部報導之研究-以資訊電子及金融服務業為對象,國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
    黃雅琪,1997,台灣電子業品質認證與研究發展對經營績效之影響,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    彭瑋彥,2002,企業建立專利管理制度之研究,中原大學企管研究所碩士論文。
    曾栗萱,2003,智慧資本與經營績效關聯性之研究—以我國資訊產業為實證對象,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    董碧玫,2001,智能資本之衡量:以國內資訊電子產業為例,國立中央大學企業管理系未出版碩士論文。
    資策會,2001,我國產業智慧資本先導性個案研究,財團法人資訊工業策進分包學術機構研究計畫期末報告。
    廖芝嫺,2002,智慧資本與經營績效關聯之實證研究:以我國資訊電子業技術人力資本為例,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    劉江彬、劉文卿與張孟元,2004,技術價值關鍵指標之研究,資訊管理學報,第十一卷,第3期(7月):79-120。
    劉尚志與陳佳麟,2000,專利策略管理與運用(上),能力雜誌,第538期(12月):106-112。
    劉博文,1999,智慧財產權資產管理,智慧財產權,第8期(8月):10-17。
    謝月香,2000,無形資產,國立成功大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    饒祥浩,2002,從企業、分析師及會計師觀點論資訊電子業智慧資本資訊之揭露,國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
    龔明鑫與林秀英,2003,從專利分析台灣創新能量與趨勢,「2003年產業科技創新關鍵年代的政策與挑戰」國際研討會,台灣經濟研究院。
    (二)英文文獻
    Ashton, W. B., and R. K. Sen. 1989. Using patent information in technology business planning Ι. Research Technology Management 32 (January/February): 36-42.
    Barney. J. A. 2001. Comparative Patent Quality Analysis. NACV White Paper.
    Berkowitz, L. 1993. Getting the most from your patents. Research Technology Management 32 (March/April): 26-31.
    Bontis, N. 1999. Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing the state of the field. International Journal of Technology Management 18 (5/6/7/8): 433-462.
    Bontis, N., and J. Fitz-enz. 2002. Intellectual capital ROI: A causal map of human capital antecedents and consequents. Journal of Intellectual Capital 3 (3): 223-247.
    Buderi, R. 2004. The patent scorecard. Technology Review 107 (May): 71-74.
    Bukh, P. N., H. T. Larsen, and J. Mouritsen. 2001. Constructing intellectual capital statements. Scandinavian Journal of Management 17 (1): 87-108.
    Davis, J., and S. Harrison. 2001. Edison in the Boardroom: How Leading Companies Realize Value from Intellectual Assets. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
    Dzinkowski, R. 1998. The measurement and management of intellectual capital: An introduction. Management Accounting 78 (2): 32-36.
    Edvinsson, L., and M. S. Malone. 1997. Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower. New York : Harper Business.
    Ernst, H. 1998. Patent portfolio for strategic R&D planning. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 15 (September/December): 279-308.
    Ernst, H. 2003. Patent Information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information 25: 233-242.
    Hufker, T., and F. Alpert. 1994. Patents: A managerial perspective. The Journal of Product and Brand Management 3: 44-55.
    Khoury, S., J. Daniele, and P. Germeraad, 2001. Selection and application of intellectual property paluation methods in portfolio management and value extraction, les Nouvelles 36 (September): 77-86
    Knight, D. J. 1999. Performance measure for increasing intellectual capital. Strategy and Leadership 27 (2): 22-27.
    Mouritsen, J., H. T. Larsen, P. N. Bukh, and M. R. Johansen. 2001. Reading an intellectual capital statement: Describing and prescribing knowledge management strategies. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2 (4): 359-383.
    PricewaterhouseCoopers. 1999. Value Reporting Forecast 2000. Pricewaterhouse-Coopers.
    Rabino, S., and E. Enayati. 1995. Intellectual property: The double-edged sword. Long Range Planning 28 (October): 22-31.
    Rubin, A., and E. Babbie. 1993. Research Methods for Social Work. Pacific Grove, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.
    Sveiby, K. E. 1997. The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-based Assets. San Francisco. CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
    van Buren. M. E. 1999. A Yardstick for knowledge management. Training and Development (May): 71-78.
    van Wijk, L. 2000. Measuring the effectiveness of a company’s patent assets. Les nouvelles 36 (March): 25-33.
    van Wijk, L. 2005. Building shareholder value through effective patent management. Management Intellectual Property 148 (April): 79-81.
    Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Method. 2nd. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
    Zacks, R. 2000. The TR university research scorecard. Technology Review 103 (July/August): 88-90.
    (三)網站資料
    元勤科技,智識網:專利情報。http://www.ipnavigator.com.tw/news/pat_index.asp
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    94353024
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094353024
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2281View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback