English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113313/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50945594      Online Users : 1064
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30166
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30166


    Title: 財稅差異與管理階層獎酬之探討
    A Research on the Tax-Book Difference and Management Compensation Incentive
    Authors: 徐瑩杰
    Hsu, Ying-Chieh
    Contributors: 林宛瑩
    徐瑩杰
    Hsu, Ying-Chieh
    Keywords: 財稅差異
    管理階層獎酬
    盈餘管理
    公司治理
    Tax-book difference
    Compensation incentives
    Earnings management
    Corporate governance
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:22:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 從1990年起,美國財政部發佈之消息顯示,公司之財稅差異不斷擴大,每年預估之財稅收入不斷向下修正,公司是否透過財務會計準則與稅法間不同規定所產生之差異進行避稅行為,引發政府機關與學者之關切。另一方面,盈餘管理為近年來熱門的探討主題之一,因此,財稅差異是否為其中一種手法,為本研究探討之主題。
    過去學者透過稅前財務所得之變動及組成來判斷盈餘管理之存在,本研究則透過財稅差異之變動幅度與稅前財務所得之連動關係,及過去文獻用以衡量盈餘管理之變數來測試財稅差異是否與盈餘管理有關。另一方面,管理階層獎酬為產生盈餘管理行為的重要誘因之一,故分析管理階層之誘因是否會影響財稅差異之幅度,也納入本研究探討之主題。最後,本研究從公司治理機制中財務報表之角度,分析公司治理機制是否對於財稅差異幅度有同樣之影響,加強本研究之結果。
    本研究之實證結果顯示:(1)財稅差異之幅度可能為盈餘管理操弄手法之一;(2)管理階層獎酬誘因越大,透過財稅差異操弄盈餘之幅度越大,尤其以管理階層所獲取之現金紅利具有最高關聯性,且有持續三年影響效果;(3)公司治理機制之良莠,影響財稅差異幅度;(4)當財務所得大於課稅所得或是大於零時,管理階層透過財稅差異操弄盈餘之情形更加顯著。
    According to the report published by Internal Revenue Service in 1990s, corporate tax-book differences trends increasingly and consequently brings about the government and researchers’ concerns about whether managers’ incentives influence the way they manipulate the earnings by different regulation among financial income and taxable income. In this study, I will first develop the model to measure the relation between earnings management and tax-book differences.
    On the other hand, compensation incentives are the major factors in earnings management. Therefore, the more the incentives, such as higher bonus, stockholding and bonus rates, the more possibilities earnings management. In addition, to enhance the result of the analysis; variables of corporate governance which have been testified as having connection with earnings management are added as robust test.
    The result demonstrates that corporate tax-book difference is related to earning management, and that compensation incentives are the motives of managers to manipulate financial income for extra return. Moreover, corporate governance is also another factor which affects the degree of earnings management. Besides, this situation becomes more obvious when financial income is larger than taxable income or when it appears to be zero. This study may help explaining why large tax- book gaps trend increasingly.
    Reference: 一、中文文獻:
    陳子民,1990,企業節稅,台北:經濟日報社。
    許崇源、林宛瑩及戚務君,2006,建構台灣企業公司治理評等指標,國立政治大學商學院卓越計畫:「金融、會計、財務、保險領域整合平台」研究報告。
    鄭丁旺,2003,中級會計學,作者自版。
    薛明玲,2000,財管工具書系列-營利事業稅務指南,台北:財團法人省屬行庫中小企業聯合輔導基金。
    二、參考網址:
    Tax Policy Center
    http://www.taxpolicycenter.org
    Internal Revenue Service
    http://www.irs.gov
    Bureau of Economic Anlysis
    http://www.bea.gov
    The school of accountancy at the Robinson College of Business
    http://www.robinson.gsu.edu/accountancy/gov_score.html
    公開觀測站
    http://newmops.tse.com.tw
    三、英文文獻:
    Agrawal, A. and S. Chadha. 2003. Corporate governance and accounting scandals. Working paper, University of Alabama.
    Barth, M., W. Beaver, and W. Landsman. 2001. The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accunting standard settings: Another view. Journal of Accounting and Econimics 31:77-104.
    Bergstresser, D. and M. A. Desai. 2003. The gerstner effect: Managerial motivations and earnings manipulation. Working papers, Harvard university, NBER and MIT.
    Brown, L. D. and M. L. Caylor. 2004. Corporate governance and firm performance. Working papers, Georgia state university.
    ________, and M. L. Caylor. 2005. Corporate governance and firm valuation. Working papers, Georgia state university.
    Burgstahler, D. and I. Dichev. 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of accounting and economics 24(1): 99-126.
    Chaney, P. and D. Jeter. 1994. The effect of deferred taxes on security prices. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 9 (Winter):71-116.
    Chen, K. Y., R. J. Elder, and Y. M. Hsieh. 2005. Corporate governance and earnings management: The implications of corporate governance best- practice prinples for Taiwanese listed companies. Working papers, National Cheng Kung University, Syracuse university and Soochow university.
    Choi, W. W., F. D. Gramlich, and J. K. Tmomas. 2001. Poteneial errors in detecting earnings management: Reexamining studies investigating the AMT of 1986. Working papers, Columbia business school.
    Chtourou, S. M., and J. Bedard. 2001. Corpoeate governance and earnings management. Workings papers, Fsegs SFAX Tunisia and university Laval Canada.
    Cohen, J. 1983. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Collins, D., E. Maydew, and I. Weiss. 1997. Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years. Journal of accounting and Economics 24:39-67.
    Cornett, M. M., A. J. Marcus, A. Saunders, and H. Tehranian. 2006. Earnings management, corporate governance, and true financial performance. Working papers, Southern Illinois university, Boston College, New York university and Boston university.
    Crocker, K. J. and J. Slemrod. 2005. The economics of managements manipulation and managerial. Working papers, The Pennsylvania state university and university of Michigan business school.
    DeAngelo, L. 1986. Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes: A study of management buyouts of public shareholders. The Accounting Review 61:400-420.
    Dechow, p., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70: 193-225
    Degeorge, F., Y. Ding, T. Jeanjean, and H. Stolowy. 2005. Does analyst following curb earnings management? International Evidence. Working papers, University of Lugano Switzerland, HEC school of management France, and China-Europe international business school.
    Desai, M. A. 2002. The corporate profit base, tax sheltering activity, and the changing nature of employee compensation. Working Paper, Harvard university and NBER.
    ________. 2002. The Divergence Between Book and Tax Income. Working papers, Harvard University and NBER.
    ________, and D. Dharmapala. 2004. Corporate tax avoidance and high powered incentives. Working papers, Harvard Univerity, NBER and University of Connecticut.
    ________, and ________. 2005. Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. Working papers, Harvard Univerity, NBER and University of Connecticut.
    Finkelstein, S. and B. K. Hambrick. 1998. How Much Does The CEO Matter? The Role of Managerial Discretion in The Setting of CEO Compensation. Academy of Management Journal 41:179-199.
    Francis, J. and K. Schipper. 1999. Have financial statements lost their relevance? Journal of Accounting Research 37:319-352.
    Francis, J., R. LaFond, P. M. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2004. Cost of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review 79 (4): 967-1010.
    Frank, M. M., L. J. Lynch, and S.O. Rego. 2004. Does aggressive financial reporting accompany aggressive tax reporting (and vice versa)? Working paper, University of Virginia and University of Iowa.
    Friendlan, J. M. 1994. Accounting choices of issues of initial public offerings. Comtemporary Accounting Research (Summer):1-31
    ________, R. Lafond, P. M. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2004. Costs of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review 79(4):967-1010.
    Gao, P., and R. E. Shrieves. 2002. Earnings management and executive compesation: A case of overdose of option and underdose of salary. Working papers, University of Tennessee.
    Goerke, L. 2005. Tax overpayments, tax evasion, and book-tax differences. Working papers, Johannes Gutenberg-University Germany.
    Gompers, P., J. Ishii and A. Metrick. 2003. Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118:107-155.
    Goolsbee, A. 1999. What happens when you tax the rich? evidence from executive compensation. Working paper, University of Chicago, and American Bar Foundation.
    Graham, J. 1996. Debt and the marginal tax rate. Journal of Financial Economics 41: 41-74.
    ________, M. Lang, and D. Shackelford. 2003. Employee stock options, corporate taxes and debt policy. Working paper, Duke University and The University of North Carolina.
    Hanlon, M., and T. Shevlin. 2002. Accounting for tax benefits of employee stock options and implications for research. Accounting Horizons 16 (1): 1-16.
    ________. 2003. What can we infer about a firm’s taxable income from its financial statements?. National Taxable Journal 56(4): 831-863
    ________, and T. Shevlin. 2004. Book-tax corporate income: An Introduction to the Issues. Working papers, University of Michigan and University of Washington.
    ________, E. Maydew, and M. Erickson. 2002. How much will firms pay for earnings that do not exist? Evidence of taxes paid on allegedly fraudulent earnings. Working papers, University of Chicago, University of Michigan and University of North Carolina.
    ________, E. Maydew, and M. Erickson. 2004. How much will firms pay for earnings the do not exist? Evidence of taxes paid on allegedly fraudulent earnings. The Accounting Review 79 (2): 387-408.
    ________, E. Maydew, and T. Shevlin. 2005. Book-tax conformity and the information content of earnings. Working papers, University of Michgan, University of North Carolina and University of Washington.
    ________. 2005. The persistence and pricing of earnings, accruals, and cash flow when firms have large book-tax differences. The Accounting Review 80 (1):137-166.
    Healy, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7:85-107.
    Holden, R. T. 2000. The original management incentive schemes. Working papers, Harvard university.
    Huddart, S. and H. Louis. 2005. Managerial stock sales and earnings management during the 1990s stock market bubble. Working papers, The Pennsylvania state university.
    Jones, J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 34:193-228.
    Joos, P. and M. Lang. 1994. The effects of accounting diversity: Evidence from the European Union. Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement) 32:349-410.
    ________, J. Pratt, and S. Young. 2002. Using deferred taxes to infer the quality of accruals. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    Kadan, O. and J. Yang. 2005. Executive stock options and earnings management: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Working papers, Washington university
    Lev, B. and D. Nissim. 2004. Taxable income, future earnings, and equity values. New York University, Columbia University. The Accounting Review 79 (4): 1039-1074.
    Lipe, R. 1990. The realation between stock returns and accounting earnings given alternative information. The Accounting Review 65:49-71.
    Manzon, G. B., and G. A. Plesko. 2002. The relation between financial and tax reporting measures of income. Tax Law Review 55: 175-214.
    Mills, L. 1996. Corporate tax compliance and financial reporting. National Tax Journal 49:421-435.
    ________. 1998. Book-tax differences and internal revenue service adjustments. Journal of Accounting Research 36(2): 343-356.
    ________, and K. Newberry. 2001. The influence of tax and non-tax costs on book-tax reporting differences; Public and private firms. The Journal of American Taxation Association 23(Spring): 1-19.
    ________, K. Newberry, and W. B. Trautman. 2002. Trends in book-tax income balance sheet differences. Working papers, University of Arizona.
    ________, K. Newberry, and W. B. Trautman. 2005. Trend in book-tax income and balance sheet differences. Working papers, University of Arizona.
    Mills, L. F. 1996. Corporate tax compliance and financial reporting. National Tax Journal 49 (3):421-435.
    ________, and K. J. Newberry. 2003. The influence of tax and nontax costs on book-tax reporting differences: public and private firms. The Journal of the American Taxation Associatio: 23 (1):1-19.
    Myers, M. 2000. The impact of taxes on corporate defined benefit plan asset allocation. Working paper, University of Chicago.
    Northcut, W. D. and C. C. Vine. 1998. Earning management in response to political scrutiny of effective tax rates. The Journal of the American Association 20 (2): 22-36.
    Osma, B. G. and B.G. A. Noguer. 2004. Corporate governance and earnings management in Spain. Working papers. Lancaster university UK and universitat Jaume I Spain.
    Penman, S. and X-J. Zhang. 2002. Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings and stock returns. The Accounting Review 77:237-264.
    Phillips, J., M. Pincus, and S. O. Rego. 2001. Earnings management: New evidence based on the deferred tax expense. Working papers, University of Connecticut and University of Iowa.
    ________, M. Pincus, and S. O. Rego. 2003. Earnings management: New evidence based on the deferred tax expense. The Accounting Review 78 (April): 491-522.
    Phyllis L. L. M. and K. H. Chan. 2002. The impact of firm characteristics on book-tax-conforming and book-tax-difference Audit Adjustments. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 24 (2): 18-34.
    Plesko, G. 2002. Reconciling corporation book and tax net income: Tax years 1996-1998. SOI Bulletin. Wachington DC: U.S. Government press Office.
    Richardson, S. 2003. Earnings surprise and short selling. Accounting Horizon 17:49-61.
    Schmidt, P. S. 2006. The persistence, forecasting, and valuation implication of the tax change component of earnings. The Accounting Review 81(3):589-616.
    Shackelford, D. A. and Shevlin T. 2000. Empirical tax research in accounting. Working papers, University of North Carolina, NBER and University of Washington.
    Shevlin, T. 1990. Estimating corporate marginal tax rates with asymmetric tax treatment of gains and losses. The Journal of American Taxation Association 14 (1): 58-79.
    Slemrod, J. 2004. The economics of corporate tax selfishness. National Tax Journal, forthcoming.
    ________, and S. Yitzhaki. 2002. Tax avoidance, evasion and administration. Handbook of Public economics 3:1423-1470.
    Stubben, S. R. 2006. Do firms use discretionary revenues to meet earnings and revenue targets? Working papers, Stanford University.
    Tabachnick, B. G. and S. L. Fidell. 2001. Using multivariate statistics (4th edition). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    Watts, R. 2003. Conservatism in accounting, Part 1: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizon 17:207-221.
    Weisbach, L. 1995. Insider ownership and the decision to go public. Review of Economic studies 62:425-448.
    Weisbach, D. 2002. Ten truths about tax shelters. Tax Review 55:215-253.
    Wright, D. W. 1996. Evidence on the Relation Between Corporate Governance Characteristics and the Quality of Financial Reporting. Working paper, University of Michigan.
    Zeng T. 2001. Taxpayers’ tax and financial reporting decisions and Auditing in a game theoretical model. Working paper, Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    93353011
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093353011
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2249View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback