Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30149
|
| Title: | 景氣循環與公司特性對股票型酬勞與公司績效之關聯性分析－以美國公司為例 |
| Authors: | 林幸儀 |
| Contributors: | 張清福
林幸儀 |
| Keywords: | 高階主管獎酬
景氣循環 |
| Date: | 2003 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-11 17:20:46 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本文探討美國高階經理人的股票型酬勞與公司經營績效的關聯性，如何受到景氣循環與公司特性的影響。景氣循環二分為景氣繁榮與景氣衰退時期；公司特性則分為新經濟公司與舊經濟公司。新經濟公司指新興的高科技產業，而舊經濟公司則是一般所謂的傳統產業屬之。實證結果顯示，就整體樣本而言，在景氣繁榮與景氣衰退時，公司績效指標對CEO股票型酬勞的關係有顯著的差異。但這種情況只存在股票報酬率中，會計績效指標對於景氣循環的變化並未發現有顯著的差異性。新經濟公司在景氣繁榮時，公司的資產報酬率與股價報酬率對CEO股票型酬勞的相關性均會顯著異於景氣衰退的時期。舊經濟公司在景氣繁榮時，只有公司的每股盈餘對CEO股票型酬勞的相關性會有顯著異於景氣衰退的時期。在景氣繁榮時期，新經濟公司的資產報酬率較舊經濟公司的資產報酬率對於CEO股票型酬勞有顯著的相關性。在景氣衰退時期，新經濟公司的每股盈餘較舊經濟公司的每股盈餘對於CEO股票型酬勞有顯著的相關性。綜合而言，在不同的景氣循環與公司特性下，高階經理人的股票型酬勞與公司績效的相關性不同。
This study examines how the economic cycle and firm characteristics affect the relationship between American CEO’s stock-based compensation and performance. The economic cycle is dichotomized as expansion and recession periods while the companies are categorized as new economy firms and old economy firms. The new economy firms are high-tech companies and the old economy firms refer to traditional industries. The results indicate that based on the entire sample the relationship between performance and CEO’s stock-based compensation in the expansion period is significantly different from that in the recession period when the performance is measured as stock return, but not as accounting measures. In expansion period, the relationship between ROA and CEO’s stock-based compensation and that between stock return and the CEO’s stock-based compensation of new economy firms are significantly different from those in the recession period. In expansion period, the association between EPS and stock-based compensation for old economy firms is significantly different from that in recession period. In the expansion period, the association of ROA and stock-based compensation of new economy firms is significantly different from that of old economy firms. In the recession period, the association of EPS and stock-based compensation of new economy firms is significantly different from that of old economy firms. Accordingly, the relationship between CEO’s stock-based compensation and performance varies upon the change in economic cycle and the difference in company characteristics. |
| Reference: | 一、 中文部分
王婉茲，2002，高階主管獎酬、盈餘結構與後續經營績效之實證研究，國立政治大學會計學系碩士班未出版碩士論文
朱念如，1996，景氣循環下不同產業的公司財務結構,營運績效之相關研究，國立成功大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文
李貞儀，2002，高階主管薪酬與績效關聯性之研究－考慮不同景氣時期，國立成功大學會計學系碩士班未出版碩士論文
吳幸蓁，2001，總經理薪酬績效敏感性、績效門檻與盈餘管理關聯性之研究，國立中正大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文
吳鈞麟，2003，景氣因素對會計資訊價值攸關性之影響，國立政治大學會計學系碩士班未出版碩士論文
曾玉潔，2000，我國高階主管薪酬決定因素之實証研究，國立中正大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文
張培真，2003，員工分紅入股與公司特質之關係及其對公司績效之影響，國立台灣大學會計學系碩士班所未出版碩士論文
辜秋屏，1997，高階主管酬勞與公司經營績效之實證研究，國立台灣大學會計學系碩士班所未出版碩士論文
邱秋芳，2001，員工認股選擇權制度，台灣證券交易所證交資料文章第469期
楊承澔，2002，景氣循環與企業經營績效、盈餘管理關聯性之探討，國立政治大學會計學系碩士班未出版碩士論文
廖致翔，2003，景氣循環、分析師盈餘預測與股價反應，國立政治大學會計學系碩士班未出版碩士論文
葉玉華，2003，高階主管薪酬與績效衡量資訊傳遞之關聯性研究，國立台北大學會計學系碩士班未出版碩士論文
賴倩婷，2001，高階經理人薪酬與其持股率、企業績效之關聯性研究，國立成功大學會計學系碩士
蔡佳臻，2003，景氣循環與分析師預測偏差程度之關係，國立政治大學會計學系碩士班所未出版碩士論文
蕭弘毅，1994，高階管理者薪酬計畫與企業營運績效關係之研究，東吳大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文
二、 英文部分
Agarwal, N. C. 1981. Determinants of executive compensation. Industrial Relations 20: 36-46.
Amato, L., and R. Wilder. 1990. Firm and industry effects in industrial economics. Southern Economic Journal 57 (July): 93-105.
Berman, J. 1997. Which industries are sensitive to business cycles. Monthly Labor Review (February): 19-25.
Bryan, S., L. S. Hwang and S. Lilien. 2000. CEO stock-based compensation: An empirical analysis of incentive-intensity, relative mix, and economic determinants. The Journal of Business 73(4): 661-693.
Core, J. and W. Guay. 2001. Stock option plans for non-executive employee. Journal of Financial Economics 61: 253-287.
Core, J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51: 371-406.
Finkelstein, S. and D. C. Hambrick. 1989. Chief executive compensation: A study of the intersection of markets and political processes. Strategic Management Journal 10: 121-134.
Gaver, J. J., and K. M. Gaver. 1993. Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16:125-160.
Hill, N. T., and K. T. Stevens. 1995. CEO compensation and corporate performance. Journal of General Management 20 (Summer): 65-67.
Ittner, C. D., R. A. Lambert, and D. F. Larcker. 2003. The structure and performance consequences of equity grants to employees of new economy firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 34: 89-127.
Jensen, M., and K. J. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98(2): 225-264.
John, T. A. and K. John. 1993. Top-management compensation and capital structure. Journal of Finance 48: 949-974.
Kim, M. K., and D. A. Burnie. 2002. The firm size effect and the economic cycle. The Journal of Financial Research 25 (Spring): 111-124.
Lambert, R. A., and D. F. Larcker. 1987. An analysis of the use of accounting and market measures of performance in executive compensation contracts. Journal of Accounting research 25: 85-129.
Matolcsy, Z. P. 2000. Executive cash compensation and corporate performance during different economics cycles. Contemporary Accounting Research 17: 671-692.
Mehran, H. 1995. Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 38: 163-184.
Murphy, K. J. 1985. Compensation performance and management remuneration: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7:11-42.
Murphy, K. J., and J. L. Zimmerman. 1993. Financial performance surrounding CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 16: 273-315.
Murphy, K. J. 2003. Stock-based pay in new economic firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 34: 129-147.
Ramcharran, H. 2001. Inter-firm linkages and profitability in automobile industry: The implication for supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management 37 (Winter): 11-17.
Yermack, D. 1995. Do corporations award CEO stock options effectively? Journal of Financial Economics 39: 237-269. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
91353024
92 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091353024 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 264 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
