Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30144
|
| Title: | 公司治理結構、資訊透明度與股票報酬變異關聯性之研究 |
| Authors: | 林政衛
Lin , Cheng Wei |
| Contributors: | 許崇源
林政衛
Lin , Cheng Wei |
| Keywords: | 公司治理
資訊透明度 |
| Date: | 2003 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-11 17:20:13 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 近幾年來公司治理已成為熱門的管理議題之一。尤其是安隆（Enron）案之後，市場投資人與債權人對公司管理當局之不信任日益加重，此時公司若能開誠佈公告知利害關係人其相關之資訊，非但能提升公司之資訊透明度，亦獲取投資人的重新認可，即為一種最有效解決代理問題之管道。然其中能完善建立此種管道即須透過公司治理的相關機制。而當有了健全的公司治理機制，企業才有可能在進一步順利地在資本市場上籌措資金，進而維持公司的長期競爭力，取得永續經營。
因此，本研究以國內電子業上市公司為樣本，民國91年為研究期間，嘗試對企業資訊透明度以綜合性的指標衡量，探討公司治理結構對資訊透明度的影響。此外，再從投資人之觀點來看，探究公司資訊透明度之高低，對投資人而言，其獲取之股價報酬之變異程度，是否會因資訊透明度之高低而有顯著之變動。
研究結果顯示：
1. 控制股東的盈餘分配權愈大，資訊透明度愈高；控制股東之控制權與現金流量權偏離程度愈大，資訊透明度愈高，不符合原先預期；控制股東掌控之監察人席次愈高則資訊透明度愈低。
2. 資訊透明度之高低對股票報酬變異性有顯著負相關影響。
3. 當加入公司治理結構後，公司治理之變數對股票報酬之變異性並無顯著之影響，亦即無增額之解釋能力。
Recently, corporate governance has become one of the most popular managerial issues, especially after the case of Enron fraud. Since then, the relationship between the company management and market investors has aggravated increasingly due to lack of trust. It is believed that if the company management can frankly and earnestly publish related information to the stakeholders, the company’s transparency and thus the investors’ trust will be promoted. This approach may be the most effective one to solve the agency problem between the owners and the company management. However the success of this approach depends on good corporate governance. Sound corporate governance will make enterprises sustainable and competitive in the long-run.
The research uses a sample of Taiwan electronic companies of 2002 to examine the effect of corporate governance factors on the transparency of the company. The corporate governance factors in the study include ownership structure, institutional investors, and independent directors and supervisors. In addition, the research also investigates the effect of transparency and corporate governance factors on the variation of stock return.
The empirical results indicate follows:
1. Controlling shareholder’ cash flow rights and the deviation of voting rights and cash flow rights have significantly positive effect on company’s transparency; the proportion of audit committee members related to controlling shareholder has significantly negative effect on company’s transparency.
2. Company’s transparency has significantly negative effect on the variation of stock return.
3. There is no incremental information content of corporate governance factors on the variation of stock returns after controlling for the effect of information transparency. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
吳安妮，1996，經理人員自願揭露盈餘預測資訊給外界之決定因素，會計評論，第25期(2月):1-24。
吳庭州，1996，股權結構、盈餘管理與盈餘資訊性之研究，輔仁大學管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。
沈宜慶，2001，企業資訊透明度與債券發行資金成本關係之實證研究，私立淡江大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
李德冠，2001，公司監理機制對於關係人交易影響之研究，私立輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
何幸芳，2003，獨立董監事對公司價值與盈餘資訊內涵影響之研究，私立輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
金志遠，2000，董事會特性與年報自願性揭露關係之研究，國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
邱碧珠，2000，資訊揭露水準與權益資金成本間之關係：我國資訊電子業之研究，國立臺灣大學未出版碩士論文。
林明謙，2001，股權結構、董事組成對大股東介入股市行為影響之研究，私立輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
林玉霞，2002，台灣上市公司代理問題、公司治理與股東價值之研究，私立中原大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
柯承恩，2000，我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議（上），會計研究月刊，第173 期:75-81。
柯承恩，2000，我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議（下），會計研究月刊，第174 期:79-83。
許崇源、李怡宗、林宛瑩、鄭桂蕙，2003a，控制權與盈餘分配權之衡量(上)，貨幣觀測與信用評等:15-31。
許崇源、李怡宗、林宛瑩、鄭桂蕙，2003b，控制權與盈餘分配權之衡量(下)，貨幣觀測與信用評等:11-26。
陳美娟，1997，年報自願性揭露水準與公司特徵之關聯性研究，國立政治大學會計學系碩士班未出版之碩士論文。
葉銀華、邱顯比，1996，資本結構、股權結構與公司價值關聯性之實證研究：代理理論，台大管理論叢:57-89。
葉銀華，2002，從臺灣上市公司網站資訊揭露看透明度，會計研究月刊，第200期:70-77。
蔡其諭，2001，揭露程度與負債資金成本之關係，國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
二、英文部分
Amihud, Y. and H. Mendelson.1986. Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics 17: 223-249.
Beasley , M.S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of directors composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review (October): 443-465.
Botosan, C.A. 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review (July): 323-349.
Cooke, T.E. 1991. An assessment of voluntary disclosure in the annual reports of Japanese corporations. The International Journal of Accounting 26: 174-189.
Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. P. H. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang, 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance 57: 2741-2771.
Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang, 2000, The separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 81-112.
Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. P. H. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang, 2000, Expropriation on minority shareholders: evidence from east asia, policy research. Working paper, Diamond, D. and R. Verrechia.1991. Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of equity capital. The Journal of Finance (September): 1325-1360.
Fama, E.F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88: 288-307.
Fan, J. P. H., and T. J. Wong. 2002. Corporate ownership structure and the
informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and
Economics 33:401-425.
Forker, J.J. 1992. Corporate governance and disclosure quality. Accounting & Business Research 22: 111-124.
Hossain, M., L.M. Tan, and M. Adams. 1994. Voluntary disclosure in an emerging capital market：some empirical evidence from companies listed on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Ecxhange. International Journal of Accounting 29: 334-351.
Hossain, M., M.H.B. Perera, and A.R. Rahman. 1995. Voluntary disclosure in the annual reports of New Zealand companies. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 6: 69-85.
Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm :managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.
Jensen, M.C., and R. Ruback. 1983. The market for corporate control : the scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11: 5-50.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54: 471-517.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, 2000, Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58:3-27.
Leuz, C., & Verrechia, E. 2000. The economic consequences of increased
disclosure, Journal of Accounting Research 38: 91-124
Meek, G.K., C.B. Roberts, and S.J. Gray. 1995. Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosure by U.S., U.K. and continental European multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 26: 555-572.
OECD. 1998a. Global corporate governance principles. Paris: OECD.
OECD. 1998b. Corporate governance : improving competitiveness and access to capital in global markets. Paris: OECD
Rediker, K.J., and A. Seth. 1995. Boards of directors and substitution effects of □□ alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal 16: 85-99.
Sandeep,A. P., A. Balic, and L. Bwakira. 2002 .Measuring transparency and disclosure at firm-level in emerging markets, Standard & Poor’s, May 2002
Sengupta, P. 1998. Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt .The Accounting Review 73 (October): 459-474.
Shleifer, A. ,and R.W. Vishny. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52: 737-783.
Spence, M , Job Market Signaling. 1973.Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(3) :355- 379.
World Bank, 1999, Corporate Governance：A Framework for Implementation- Overview, The World Bank, Washington D. C.
Whittington, G. 1993. Corporate governance and the regulation of financial reporting. Accounting and Business Research 23: 311-319..
Yermack, D. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40: 185-211.
. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
91353009
92 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091353009 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 295 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
