政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/29893
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51310275      線上人數 : 835
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/29893


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/29893


    題名: 品牌人格與自我一致性及消費幻想對於消費者品牌偏好度影響之研究
    The Effects of Congruity between Self and Brand Personality and Consumer Fantasy on Brand Preferences
    作者: 張惠涵
    Chang, Hui-Han
    貢獻者: 別蓮蒂
    張惠涵
    Chang, Hui-Han
    關鍵詞: 品牌人格
    自我概念
    自我一致性
    消費幻想
    Brand Personality
    Self-Concept
    Self-Congruity
    Consumer Fantasy
    日期: 2006
    上傳時間: 2009-09-11 16:48:31 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究探討真實自我、理想自我與品牌人格的一致性以及消費幻想，對於消費者品牌偏好度之影響，並將真實自我、理想自我與品牌人格的一致性分為五大構面，探討各構面對於消費者品牌偏好度之相對影響。採用Aaker (1997) 所發展出來的品牌人格量表來衡量真實自我、理想自我以及品牌人格，消費幻想的衡量則是採用黃依婷 (2006) 所發展之幻想程度的量表。
    本研究選擇進行問卷調查的品牌包含象徵型及功能型兩類型，且具高知名度、不同來源國、消費者使用目的及產品價格等特質，經由與專家討論，選出台灣的宏碁 (Acer)、法國的路易威登 (LV)以及美國的星巴客 (Starbucks)，並將問卷以品牌分為三類，採隨機發放，共收集428份有效問卷，其中Acer品牌問卷有134份、Starbucks品牌問卷有143份、LV品牌問卷有151份，透過一般線性模式分析，驗證品牌人格與自我一致性以及消費幻想，對於消費者品牌偏好度之影響。
    研究結果顯示，真實自我及理想自我與品牌人格的一致性、消費幻想及品牌對於消費者品牌偏好度均無影響，但是真實自我及理想自我與品牌人格的一致性與消費者品牌偏好度間的關係，會受到消費幻想及品牌的影響。對於象徵性品牌而言，消費幻想高的人並不在意品牌與自己之真實自我或是理想自我有無一致，只要品牌的象徵性意涵豐富，能夠滿足其幻想，消費者就會對品牌有較高的偏好，消費幻想低的人比較務實，所以對於象徵性品牌的偏好度較低；就功能性品牌而言，消費幻想高的人除了產品基本的功能性訴求之外，還希望品牌能夠用來表達真實自我或是理想自我，但是消費幻想低的人比較實際，較注重產品的功能面，所以比較不在意品牌是否能展現自己。若將真實自我一致性分為五個構面來看，真實領先自我一致性對於消費者品牌偏好度有影響，且此關係亦會受到消費幻想的影響，真實誠懇自我一致性與消費者品牌偏好間的關係，會受到消費幻想及品牌的影響。
    對於廠商而言，若其品牌屬於象徵性品牌，應該將品牌之象徵性意涵更為突顯吸引更多消費幻想高的人，不需在意品牌人格是否與消費者之自我一致，若其品牌屬於功能性品牌，廠商對於消費幻想低的人應該著重加強品牌功能的宣傳，對於消費幻想高的人要使得品牌具有人格特質以表達消費者的自我。對於消費者而言，若能先瞭解自己消費幻想的程度，將有助於選擇適合自己的品牌。消費幻想高的人，在選購象徵性品牌時，可選擇象徵性意涵豐富的品牌，在選購功能性品牌時，建議選擇符合自己所追求人格特質的品牌；若為消費幻想低的人，不建議購買象徵性品牌，在購買功能性品牌時，要特別注意其功能的表現。
    本研究將品牌人格與自我一致性分五大構面，探討其對於消費者品牌偏好的影響，確實瞭解真正影響消費者對於品牌偏好度之品牌人格與自我一致性的特質，能夠給予廠商明確的建議。在本研究之前，對於消費幻想的研究僅止於理論的發展及量表的建構，本研究將消費幻想進行品牌偏好度的實務驗證。
    The main purpose of this research is to investigate the effects of real-self congruity, ideal-self congruity, and consumer fantasy on consumers’ brand preferences. Furthermore, the research divided real-self congruity and ideal-self congruity into five dimensions to discuss the effects of each dimensions on consumers’ brand preferences. The American brand personality scale proposed by Jennifer Aaker in 1997 was used to measure brand personality and self congruity, while consumer fantasy was measured using the fantasy scale by Huang, Yi-Ting (2006).
    Brands in the research included both symbolic brands and functional brands, that are well-known, come from different countries of origin, used for different usage purposes, and carry different prices. After discussions with a professional, Acer, Louis Vuitton (LV), and Starbucks were selected. Questionnaires for each brand were developed and were distributed randomly. 428 valid questionnaires were collected, among which 134 were Acer brand questionnaires, 143 were LV questionnaires, and 151 were for Starbucks. Data was analyzed by general linear model.
    The results of the research are in the following.
    1. There were no effects of real-self congruity or ideal-self congruity, consumer fantasy, and brands on brand preferences.
    2. The relationships between real-self congruity and brand preferences or ideal-self congruity and brand preferences are affected by consumer fantasy and brands.
    3. For symbolic brands, consumers with high fantasy don’t care whether the personalities of the brands are consistent with their real-self or ideal-self concepts. As long as the symbols of the brands can satisfy their fantasy, they will have high brand preferences.
    4. For functional brands, consumers with high fantasy still hope that the brands can express their real-self or ideal-self concepts. In contrast, people with low fantasy are realistic so they focus a lot on the function that the brands can provide them and don’t care whether the brands can express themselves.
    5. The relationship between real-leading-self congruity and brand preferences is affected by consumer fantasy.
    6. The relationship between real-sincere-self congruity and brand preferences is affected by consumer fantasy and brands.
    Businesses whose brands are symbolic ones should emphasize the symbols of their brands to attract more consumers with high fantasy levels but don’t need to be as concerned with whether the personalities of the brands are consistent with consumers’ real-self or ideal-self concepts. On the other hand, businesses whose brands are functional brands should emphasize the great functionality of their brands to attract consumers with low fantasy and make the brands have personalities to express consumers’ real-self or ideal-self.
    Moreover, consumers should understand the degree of their fantasy to help them purchase suitable brands. When purchasing symbolic brands, consumers with high fantasy can select brands with rich symbols, while when purchasing functional brands, they should buy brands with personalities that fit their real-self or ideal-self. Consumers with low fantasy should buy less symbolic brands and should pay attention to the functions of the brands when purchasing functional brands.
    This research contributes by dividing the real-self congruity and ideal-self congruity into five dimensions and discussing the effects of each of them on brand preferences. This can lead to a better understanding of how the real personalities of brands and consumers’ self concepts affect brand preferences which will be useful to help companies form branding strategies. In addition, prior to this research, the studies about consumer fantasy were limited to the development of theories and the construction of the scale to measure consumers’ fantasy. This research connects consumer fantasy and brand preference to study the relationship between them.
    參考文獻: 吉中行 (民92年)，促銷形式對品牌態度之影響：品牌形象與品牌忠誠度的干擾角色，私立元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
    吳祉芸 (民92年)，兩岸品牌個性之跨文化比較—以報紙廣告為例，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    李德儀 (民94年)，年輕人的幻想與消費幻想之初探與架構建立，國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    別蓮蒂 (民92年)，企業品牌傘策略之企業名稱背書效果，管理學報，第20卷第6期，12月，頁1175-1199。
    周文賢 (民93年)，多變量統計分析 SAS/STAT 使用方法，台北市：智勝文化。
    倪培軒 (民94年)，吸煙者多重自我概念與品牌人格之一致性對於香煙品牌態度之影響，國立政治大學廣告學系碩士論文。
    徐怡芬 (民93年)，產品族群的探討—比較Alfa Romeo車隊與Audi車隊，國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    黃依婷 (民95年)，幻想與消費行為：幻想量表之建製，國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    黃耀正 (民87年)，產品人格與品牌人格對品牌延伸評價的影響，國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    鄭英輝 (民86年)，品牌人格與產品類別對品牌延伸評價的影響，國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    趙振豪 (民88年)，品牌與消費者間人格自我狀態互動之研究—交流分析觀點，國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    Aaker, David A. (1996), Building Strong Brands, New York: The Free Press, 137-173.
    Aaker, Jennifer L. (1997), “Dimensions of Brand Personality,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.34(August), 347-356.
    Aaker, Jennifer L. (1999), “The Malleable Self: The Role of Self-Expression in Persuasion,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.36(February), 45-57.
    Aaker, Jennifer L., Jordi Garolera, and Verónica Benet-Martínez (2001), “Consumption Symbols as Carriers of Culture: A Study of Japanese and Spanish Brand Personality Constructs,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.81(September), 492-508.
    Alt, Michael and Steve Griggs (1988), “Can a Brand Be Cheeky?” Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol.6(4), 9-16.
    American Marketing Association (2006), http://www.marketingpower.com/ 2006/8/23.
    Batra, Rajeev, Donald R. Lehmann, and Dipinder Singh (1993), The Brand Personality Component of Brand Goodwill: Some Antecedents and Consequence, in David A. Aaker and Alexander L. Biel Eds., Brand Equity and Advertising, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 83-96.
    Belch, George E. and E Laird Landon Jr. (1977), “Discriminant Validity of a Product-Anchored Self-Concept Measure,” Journal of Marketing Research (pre-1986), Vol.14(May), 252-256.
    Belk, Russell W., Guliz Ger, and Søren Askegaard (2003), “Tthe Fire of Desire: A Multisited Inquiry into Consumer Passion,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.30(December), 326-351.
    Biel, Alexander L. (1992), “How Brand Image Drives Brand Equity,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.32(6), RC-6-RC-12.
    Birdwell, AL E. (1968), “A Study of the Image Congruence on Consumer Choice,” The Journal of Business (pre-1986), Vol.41(January), 76-88.
    Britt, Steuart Henderson (1960), The Spenders, New York: MaGraw-Hill Book Company, 105-106.
    Carr, Steven D. (1996), “The Cult of Brand Personality,” Marketing News, Vol.30(May), 4-9.
    Dichter, Ernest (1964), Handbook of Consumer Motivations, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 6.
    Dolich, Ira J. (1969), “Congruence Relationships Between Self Images and Product Brands,” Journal of Marketing Research (pre-1986), Vol.6(February), 80-84.
    Eysenck, HansJurgen, Wilhelm Arnold, and Richard Meili (1972), Encyclopedia of Psychology, New York: Herder and Herder, 367-369.
    Farquhar, Peter H. (1990), “Managing Brand Equity,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.30(August/September), RC7-12.
    Fenichel, Otto M. D. (1945), The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 49-51.
    Fournier, Susan (1998), “Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.24(March), 343-373.
    Gardner, Burleigh B. and Sidney J. Levy (1955), “The Product and the Brand,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.33(March/April), 33-39.
    Grubb, Edward L. and Harrison L. Grathwohl (1967), “Consumer Self-Concept, Symbolism and Market Behavior: A Theoretical Approach,” Journal of Marketing Research (pre-1986), Vol.31(October), 22-27.
    Hall, Calvin S. and Bardner Lindzey (1957), Theories of Personality, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 467-475.
    Halliday, Jean (1996), “Chrysler Brings out Brand Personalities with ’97 Ads,” Advertising Age, Vol.67(September), 3 and 64.
    Hair, Joseph F., William C. Black, Barry J. Babin, Rolph E. Anderson, and Ronald L. Tatham (2006), Multivariate Data Analysis, New Jersey: Upper Saddle River, Pearson Education, Inc., 119-120.
    Hirschman, Elizabeth C. and Morris B. Holbrook (1982), “Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.46(Summer), 92-101.
    Holbrook, Morris B. and Elizabeth C. Hirschman (1982), “The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (September), 132-140.
    Hughes, G. David and Jose L. Guerrero (1971), “Automobile Self-Congruity Models Reexamined,” Journal of Marketing Research (pre-1986), Vol.8(February), 125-127.
    Jacobson, Eugene and Jerome Kossoff (1963), “Self-Percept and Consumer Attitudes Toward Small Cars,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.47(4), 242-245.
    Kapferer, Jean-Noël (1992), Strategic Brand Management: New Approaches to Creating and Evaluating Brand Equity, New York: The Free Press, 31-53.
    Kassarjian, Harold H. (1971), “Personality and Consumer Behavior: A Review,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.8(November), 409-418.
    Keller, Kevin L. (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.57(January), 1-22.
    Landon, E. Laird Jr. (1974), “Self Concept, Ideal Self Concept, and Consumer Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Consumer Research (pre-1986), Vol.1(September), 44-51.
    Leach, William (1993), Land of Desire: Merchants, Power, and the Rise of a New American Culture, New York: Random House.
    Levy, Sidney J. (1959), “Symbols for Sale,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.37(July/August), 117-124.
    Lowe, C. Marshall (1961), “The Self-Concept: Fact or Artifact?” Psychological Bulletin, Vol.58(4), 325-336.
    Lundholm, Helge (1940), Reflections upon the Nature of the Psychological Self, in Herbert S. Langfeld Eds., Psychological Review, Washington: American Psychological Association, Inc., Vol.47(1940), 110-126.
    Macrae, Chris (1991), World Class Brands, Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 85-107.
    Martin, Brett A. S. (2004), “Using the Imagination: Consumer Evoking and Thematizing of the Fantastic Imaginary,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.31(June), 136-149.
    Martineau, Pierre (1957), Motivation in Advertising, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 52, 66-92.
    McCracken, Grant (1989), “Who Is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.16(December), 310-321.
    McWilliam, Gil and Leslie De Chernatony (1989), “Branding Terminology—the Real Debate,” Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol.7(7/8), 29-32.
    Mead, George H. (1934), Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, Charles W. Morris Eds., Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, Vol.1, 135-226.
    Murray, Henry A. (1938), Explorations in Personality, New York: Science Editions, 111-112.
    Murray, Henry A. (1938), “Types of Human Needs,” in McClelland David C. (1959), Studies in Motivation, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 63-70.
    Plummer, Joseph T. (1985), “How Personality Makes a Difference,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.24(6), 27-31.
    Reynolds, Thomas J. and Jonathan Gutman (1984), “Advertising Is Image Management,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.24(1), 27-37.
    Robinson, William A. (1981), “How to Tie Promotions to a Product’s Image,” Advertising Age, Vol.52(June), 56.
    Rook, Dennis W. (1988), “Researching Consumer Fantasy,” in Elizabeth Hirschman and Jagdish N. Sheth Eds., Research in Consumer Behavior, London England: Jai Press Inc., Vol.3, 247-270.
    Ross, Ivan (1971), “Self-Concept and Brand Preference,” The Journal of Business (pre-1986), Vol.44(January), 38-50.
    Sarbin, Theodore R. (1952), A Preface to a Psychological Analysis of the Self, in Carroll C. Pratt Eds., Psychological Review, Washington: American Psychological Association, Inc., Vol.59(1), 11-22.
    Schenk, Carolyn Turner and Rebecca H. Holman (1979), “A Sociological Approach to Brand Choice: The Concept of Situational Self Image,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Jerry C. Olson Eds., Vol.7 (October25-28), 610-614.
    Shuler, Laura (1999), “Make Sure to Deliver When Staging Events,” Marketing News, Vol.33(September), 12.
    Simmel, Georg (1990), The Philosophy of Money, David Frisby Eds., Tom Bottomore and David Frisby Translated, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 65-73.
    Sirgy, Joseph M. (1982), “Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review,” Journal of Consumer Research (pre-1986), Vol.9(December), 287-300.
    Solomon, Michael R. (1983), “The Role of Products as Social Stimuli: A Symbolic Interactionism Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research (pre-1986), Vol.10(December), 319-329.
    Strong, Donald J. and Feder, Daniel D. (1961), “Measurement of the Self Concept: a Critique of the Literature,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol.8(2), 178.
    Swann, William B., Jr., Alan Stein-Seroussi, and R. Brian Giesler (1992), “Why People Self-Verify,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.62(3), 392-401.
    Swann, William B., Jr., Chris De La Ronde, and J. Gregory Hixon (1994), “Authenticity and Positivity Strivings in Marriage and Courtship,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.66(5), 857-869.
    Triplett, Tim (1994), “Brand Personality Must Be Managed or It Will Assume a Life of Its Own,” Marketing News, Vol.28(May), 9.
    Tucker, William Thomas (1957), Foundations for a Theory of Consumer Behavior, New York: Rinehart and Winston, 139.
    Vitz, Paul C. AND Donald Johnston (1965), “Masculinity of Smokers and the Masculinity of Cigarette Images,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.49(3), 155-159.
    Wylie, Ruth C. (1961), The Self Concept, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    94355015
    95
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094355015
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2327檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋