政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/29818
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51587246      線上人數 : 913
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/29818


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/29818


    題名: 集團企業子公司之綜效利益與彈性限制---網絡觀點
    作者: 任慶宗
    Jen, Ching-Tsung Malany
    貢獻者: 司徒達賢
    于卓民
    Seetoo, Dah-hsian
    Yu, Chow-ming Joseph
    任慶宗
    Jen, Ching-Tsung Malany
    關鍵詞: 集團企業
    綜效利益
    彈性限制
    網絡核心度
    日期: 2002
    上傳時間: 2009-09-11 16:40:27 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 摘 要

    集團企業是典型的網絡組織，綜效利益則是集團形成的策略目標。但是，集團企業究竟是如何形成綜效利益以及集團所屬各子公司所獲致的綜效利益何以有所差異，卻一直是文獻上較少探討的議題。再者，集團企業追求綜效利益的同時，網絡關係是否也會對所屬子公司產生負面的影響結果，亦是理論與實證急待釐清的缺口。
    本研究運用網絡觀點與分析方式，以集團企業子公司為研究對象，探討集團內部子公司網絡關係所形成的綜效差異與彈性限制，以及綜效利益與彈性限制對子公司經營績效之影響。其次，針對集團企業網絡組織型態，本研究亦推論子公司網絡核心度的形成因素，同時分析集團控制程度對子公司網絡連結關係之影響。
    根據網絡觀點的分析取向，本研究選擇資產網絡核心度與知識網絡核心度為研究集團企業內部網絡特性之範疇。經文獻回顧與理論推導，合計提出十項二十六個假說驗證本研究所提出之理論架構。透過問卷設計與資料蒐集，合計共寄發47家集團企業之442家子公司，有效之回收樣本為14家集團企業之所屬111家子公司，回收率為25.1%。
    實證結果顯示，影響集團企業子公司之資產網絡核心度的前置因素包括子公司自擁優勢、自主意願與進入集團時間。影響集團企業子公司之知識網絡核心度的前置因素則包括子公司自擁優勢、自主意願、進入集團時間，以及外部合作經驗與國際化程度。針對網絡核心度對綜效利益與彈性限制之影響，分析結果顯示子公司的網絡核心度愈高，則子公司所獲得的綜效利益亦愈高；其次，網絡核心度與彈性限制的關係則是呈倒U形的結果，亦即核心度愈高或核心度愈低的子公司所受到的彈性限制愈低；反之，居於上述二者之間的子公司所承受之彈性限制最高。
    最後，針對綜效利益與彈性限制對子公司經營績效之分析，實證結果支持綜效利益對子公司經營績效的正向影響結果。然而，彈性限制的負面影響僅出現在高度綜效利益的子公司群組。
    針對集團控制程度對子公司網絡核心度之影響，實證結果顯示子公司自擁優勢、自主意願、進入模式與資產網絡核心度的關係會受到集團控制程度之影響。知識網絡核心度與自擁優勢、國際化程度的關係，則會受到集團控制程度的正向調節作用影響。顯示集團控制程度對自擁優勢的子公司有加分效果，因為透過集團的控制程度設計，自擁優勢的子公司將增強網絡核心地位，進而增加其綜效利益，並促進經營績效的提升。
    綜合上述之實證結果，本研究發現子公司綜效利益的產生乃源於其所處的資產或知識網絡的核心地位，亦即網絡位置愈核心的子公司，愈能享受集團所帶來之綜效利益。另外，網絡地位不高不低的子公司，反而容易保有較多的彈性限制，形成網絡連結關係的犧牲者。其次，集團控制程度會強化子公司的網絡核心度，進而提高子公司的綜效利益，最後增加子公司的經營績效。因此本研究綜合結論建議，集團企業應鼓勵並協助各子公司建立網絡連結關係，以使每一位集團成員能分享綜效利益，同時降低子公司所受到之彈性限制。

    關鍵詞：集團企業、綜效利益、彈性限制、網絡核心度
    Abstract

    Business Group is typically a network organization. The strategic goal of business group has been the synergetic benefits. However, how business group reaches its synergetic benefits and why different affiliates share various synergetic benefits are topics that have been rarely studied. Meanwhile, the issue that business group, pursuing synergetic benefits, results in negative impact on affiliates has been the question urgent to be answered for practical and academic reason as well.
    This study, by means of network concept and approach, selects affiliates of business group as the research objects. The purpose of this study is to probe the effects of varied synergetic benefits and flexible constraints among affiliates due to network relationship within a business group. Meanwhile, this study also discusses the influence of synergetic benefit and flexible constrains on affiliate performance. Regarding network organization like business group, this study also infers the variables that lead to the network centrality of the affiliates within a business group and the impact of business control on network relationship of group affiliates.
    According to the analytic approach of network concept, this study chooses the property centrality and knowledge centrality as the scope of network features of business group. Following literature review and theory inference, 26 hypotheses of 10 main arguments are presented to test the theoretic framework. By survey design and data collection, 422 affiliates questionnaires of 47 business groups were sent. Valid returning mails include 111 affiliates of 14 business groups. The valid returning rate is 25.1%.
    The analytical results show that the variables, affecting the affiliate centrality of property network within business group, include resource advantage, autonomous intension and entrance timing. The variables, influencing the affiliate centrality of knowledge network within business group, include resource advantage, autonomous intension, entrance timing, external alliance experiences, and internationalization. For the effect of synergetic benefit and flexible constraints on affiliate performance, the analysis result shows that the more central the affiliates within network, the higher the performance. In addition, the relation of flexible constraints and network centrality exhibits inverse U shape. That is, the more and the less central the affiliates within network, the less the flexible constraints. In other words, those affiliates between the more and the less centrality of affiliates receive much more flexible constraints.
    Finally, in terms of the influence of synergetic benefits and flexible constraints on affiliate performance, result shows the more synergetic benefits an affiliate shares, the better performance it is. Nevertheless, the negative impact of flexible constraints on performance only appears on affiliates with higher synergetic benefits.
    As to the influence of business control on network relationship, result shows that the relation between property centrality and resource advantage, autonomous intension, and entrance mode are moderated by the extent of business control. Same result is also found between the relation of knowledge centrality and resource advantage and internationalization. It implies that the business control reinforces the relationship between resource advantage and network centrality, by which also increases the synergetic benefits and, moreover, improves affiliate performance.
    In conclusion, this study finds that the synergetic benefits of affiliates result from the centrality position of the affiliates of property network or knowledge network. In other words, the more central position an affiliate is, the higher synergetic benefits the affiliate shares within the network of business group. On the other hand, network positions between central and phenral locations take much more flexible constraints and become the sacrifices of network embeddedness. Next, the business control reinforces the network centrality, increases synergetic benefits, and, finally improves business performance of the affiliate. Thus, this study comes up with the suggestion that business group should encourage and help affiliates to embed network relationship in order to have each affiliate share synergetic benefit and reduce flexible constraints within the business group network.

    Keywords: Business group; Synergetic benefits; Flexible constraints; Network centrality
    參考文獻: 參 考 文 獻
    中文部分：
    于卓民，巫立宇(2001)，「集中度變動之競爭意涵---台灣前一百大製造業之實證」，國立政治大學學報，第八十二期，頁97-122。
    中華徵信所(1999)，台灣地區集團企業研究，中華徵信所，台北。
    中華徵信所(2002)，台灣地區集團企業研究，中華徵信所，台北。
    天下文化公司(2000)，天下雜誌---台灣一百大集團企業，天下文化，台北。
    方世杰(2001)，「網絡觀點之企業國際化的探討---我國中尉體系廠商之實證研究」，台灣銀行季刊，第五十一卷第二期，頁77-98。
    方世杰、鄭仲興(2001)，「組織間學習機制與合作研發之組織學習績效的實證研究---組織間互動之觀點」，管理學報，第十八卷第四期，頁503-526。
    王仕圖(2000)，「個人社會支持的網絡結構：以快速成長的郊區社區為例」，台灣社會學刊，第二十三期，頁141-178。
    王俊如、林文鼎、于卓民(2001)，「多點競爭之僵固性分析」，中山管理評論，第九卷第四期，頁595-620。
    司徒達賢(1980)，「關係企業之立法」，中國論壇，第十卷第八期，頁25。
    Peng, M. W. and Y. Luo (2000), “Managerial Ties and Firm Performance in a Transition Economy: The Nature of A Micro-Macro Link,” Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), pp.486-501.
    Penrose, E. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Blackwell: Oxford.
    Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik (1978), The External Control of Organizations, New York：Harper and Row.
    Podolny, J. M. (1994), “Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, pp.458-483.
    Podolny, J. M. and K. L. Page (1998), “Network Forms of Organization,” Annual Review of Sociology, 24, pp.57-76.
    Polanyi, M. (1967), The Tacit Dimension, London：Toutledge and Kegan Paul.
    Poppo, L. and T. Zenger (2002), “Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements?,” Strategic Management Journal, 23, pp.707-725.
    Porter, M. (1996), “Interrelationships Across Businesses,” In Goold, M. and K. S. Luchs(ed.), Managing the Multibusiness Company, New York: Routledge, pp.178-217.
    Portes, A. (1998), “Social Capital：Its Origins and Applications in Morden Sociology,” Annual Review of Sociology, 24, pp.1-24.
    邱瑜瑾(1998)，台中市非營利組織社會福利體系的網絡結構與變遷之研究：社會網絡理論與政治經濟觀的整合分析，八十七年國科會研究成果摘要報告，NSC87-2412-H-126-001。
    Gnyawali, D. R. and R. Madhavan (2001), “ Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 26(3), pp.431-445.
    Powell, W. (1990), “Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 12,pp.295-336.
    Powell,W., K Koput and L. Smith-Doerr (1996), “Inter-organizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41,pp.116-145.
    Powell,W., and L. Smith-Doerr (1994), “Networks and Economic Life,” In N.J. Smelseer and R. Swedberg(ed.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology, Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press.
    Prahalad, C. and G. Hamel (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporate,” Harvard Business Review, 67(3), pp.79-91.
    Prahalad, C. and R. A. Bettis (1986), “The Dominant Logic：A New Linkage between Diversity and Performance,” Strategic Managemetn Journal, 7, pp.485-501.
    Prahalad, C. and Y. Doz (1987), The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision, New York: The Free Press.
    Provan, K. G. and H. B. Milward (1995), “A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, pp.1-33.
    Quinn, J. (2000), “Outsourcing Innovation: The New Edge of Growth,” Sloan Management Review, 41(4), pp.13-28.
    Ramanujam, V. and P. R. Varadarajan (1996), “Research on Diversification,” In Goold, M. and K. S. Luchs(ed.), Managing the Multibusiness Company, New York: Routledge, pp.263-284.
    Reagans, R. and E. W. Zuckerman (2001), “Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams,” Organization Science, 12(4), pp.502-517.
    Goold, M. and A. Campbell (2000), “Taking Stock of Synergy: A Framework for Assessing Linkages between Businesses,” Long Range Planning, 33,pp.72-96.
    邱瑜瑾(1999)，「台中市非營利組織資源網絡連結分析----社會網絡取向」，國立政治大學社會學報，第二十九卷，頁117-165。
    Reed, R. and R. DeFillippi (1990), “Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation and SusTsainable Competitive Advantage,” Academy of Management Review, 15(1), pp.88-102.
    Ring, P. and A. Van de Ven (1994), “Developmental Process of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships,” Academy of Management Review, 19,pp90-118.
    Roth, K. and A. J. Morrison (1990), “An Empirical Analysis of the Integration-Responsiveness Framework in Global Industries,” Journal of International Business Studies, 22(4), pp.541-64.
    Roth, K., M. D. Schweiger, and A. J. Morrison (1991), “Global Strategy Implementation at the Business Unit Level: Operational Capabilities and Administrative Mechanisms,” Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3), pp.369-402.
    Rowley, T. J. (1997), “Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences,” Academy of Management Review, 22(4), p.887-910.
    Rowley, T., D. Behrens and D. Krackhardt (2000), “Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries,” Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.369-386.
    Rumelt, R. (1974), Strategy, Structure and Performance, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Sanchez, R. (1995), “Strategic Flexibility in Product Competition,” Strategic Management Journal, 16, pp.135-159.
    Sanchez, R. (1997), “Preparing for an UncerTsain Future: Managing Organizations for Strategic Flexibility,” International Studies of Management & Organization, 27(2), pp.71-94.
    Goto, A. (1982), “Business Groups in a Market Economy,” European Economic Review, 19, pp.53-70.
    Scott, J. (2000), Social Network Analysis, 2ed, London: Sage Publications.
    金玉梅(1999)，「抓住方向，成長才不會紊亂」，天下雜誌，第二二一期，頁92-99。
    Sparrowe, R.T., R. C. Linden, S. J. Wayne and M. L. Kraimer (2001), “Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups,” Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), PP.316-325.
    Taggart, J. (1997), “Autonomy and Procedural Justice: A Framework for Evaluating Subsidiary Strategy,“ Journal of International Business Studies, 28(1), pp.51-77.
    Thomas, L. (1990), “How Do We Measure Synergy? Diversity and Performance in the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry,” Academy of Management Proceedings, P15, pp.17-21.
    Tracy, E. M. and R. F. Catalano (1990), “Reliability of Social Network Data,” Social Work Research & Abstracts, 26(2), pp.33-36.
    Tsai, W. and S. Ghoshal (1998), “ Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks,” Academy of Management Journal, 41,pp.464-476.
    Tsai, W. (2000), “Social Capital, Strategic Relationship and the Formation of Intra-organizational Linkage,” Strategic Management Journal, 21,pp.925-939.
    Tsai, W. (2001), “Knowledge Transfer in Intra-organizational Network: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capability on Business Unit Innovation and Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), pp.996-1004.
    Tsai, W. (2002), “Social Structure of ‘Coopetition’ Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing,” Organization Science, 13(2), pp.179-190.
    Govindarajan, V. and J. Fisher (1990), “Strategy, Control Systems, and Resource Sharing: Effects on Business Unit Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 33, pp.259-285.
    Tu, H. S., S. Y. Kim, and S. E. Sullivan (2002), “Global Strategy Lessons from Japanese and Korean Business Groups,” Business Horizons, March-April, pp.39-46.
    Uzzi, B. (1996), “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organization: The Network Effect,” American Sociological Review, 61, pp.674-698.
    洪貴參(1999)，關係企業法—理論與實務」，元照出版公司，台北。
    Uzzi, B. (1997), “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp.35-67.
    Varadarajan, P., S. Jayachandran and J. C. White (2001), “Strategic Interdependence in Organizations: Deconglomeration and Marketing Strategy,” Journal of Marketing, 65, pp.15-28.
    Very, P. (1993), “Success in Diversification: Building on Core Competence,” Long Range Planning, 26(5), pp.80-92.
    Wasserman, S. and K. Faust (1994), Social Network Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A Resource-Based View of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp.171-180.
    White, M., M. Smith, and T. Barnett (1994), “Strategy Inertia: The Enduring Impact of CEO Specialization and Strategy on Following Strategies,” Journal of Business Research, 31(1), pp.11-22.
    Williamson, O. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: Free Press.
    Granovetter, M. (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, 78, pp.1360-1380.
    Williamson, O. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press.
    Young-Ybarra, C. and M. Wiersema (1999), “Strategic Flexibility in Information Technology Alliances: The Influence of Transaction Cost Economics and Social Exchange Theory,” Organization Science, 10(4), pp.439-459.
    洪廣朋、史習安、廖珮如(2001)，「公司內部創業統治機制選擇之實證研究－－交易成本觀點」，中山管理評論，第九卷第二期，頁271-296。
    苗豐強(1997)，雙贏策略---苗豐強策略聯盟的故事，天下雜誌社，台北。
    徐聯恩(1988)，組織內人際結構之研究，國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文。
    張笠雲(1999)，網絡台灣：台灣的人情關係與經濟理性，遠流出版社，台北。
    張笠雲、譚榮康(1999)，「形構產業網絡」，收錄於張笠雲主編之網絡台灣：台灣的人情關係與經濟理性，遠流出版社，台北。
    許士軍(1973)，「集團企業的管理與其社會經濟意義」，管理通訊，第九卷第五期，頁1-2。
    許金水(1990)，集團企業總部對所屬關係企業控制型態之研究--以台灣區集團企業為例，國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文
    郭晉彰(2000)，永不停駛的驛站—聯強國際的通路霸業，商週文化公司，台北。
    Granovetter, M. (1985), “Economic Action and Social Structure: A Theory of Embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology, 91, pp.481-510.
    陳希沼(1976)，「台灣地區集團企業之研究」，台灣銀行季刊，第二十七卷第三期，頁62-71。
    彭金隆(2001)，「組織間網絡連結關係之選擇與改變---以實質選擇權觀點」，第一次全球化經營策略論壇論文集，頁1-28。國立政治大學企業管理學系，台北。
    彭漣漪(1997)，「聯強國際對決宏□科技」，天下雜誌，第一九一期，天下文化，台北。
    游常山(2000)，「度書伍悍奪世界第一」，天下雜誌，第二三一期，天下文化，台北。
    游常山、王正勤(1998)，「蔡豐賜：用全球運籌轉虧為盈」，天下雜誌，第二０九期，頁53-62。
    經濟部中小企業處(2002)，「90年中小企業白皮書重要統計資料」http://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/index.asp。
    經濟部統計處(1999)，企業多角化調查報告，經濟部統計處編印，台北
    廖曜生(2002)，The Role of Resource Sharing, Corporate Control Strategy and Human Resource Management Control System: An Empirical Study for Subsidiary of Conglomerates in Taiwan，國立成功大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文。
    熊欣華(2001)，組織間合作的信任管理，國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文。
    熊瑞梅(1992)，「快速成長的郊區之菁英影響力結構及居民社會資源」，國科會專題研究計劃。
    Granovetter, M. (1994), “Business Groups,” In N. Smelser and R. Swedberg(Ed.) The Handbook of Economics Sociology, pp.453-475, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    熊瑞梅(1995)，「社會網絡的資料蒐集、測量及分析」，收錄於章英華、傅仰止、瞿海源主編之社會調查與分析，中央研究院民族學研究所。
    熊瑞梅(2002)，「評Nan Lin, Karen Cook, and Ronald S. Burt eds.(2001) Social Capital: Theory and Research」，台灣社會學刊，第二十七期，頁207-215。
    劉萍(2001)，「苗豐強首度公開，把知識便黃金的秘訣」，數位週刊，第十八期，頁36-55。
    歐錫昌(1997)，「苗豐強掀起通路戰爭」，天下雜誌，第一九一期，頁68-78。
    蔡渭水、蔡新豐(1998)，「集團企業赴大陸之經營模式與其影響因素之研究」，中原學報，第二十六卷第四期，頁35-52。
    盧智芳(2001)，「調兵遣將、擴充版圖」，天下雜誌，第二三七期，頁170-176。
    顏和正(2000)，「夥伴、綜效、新觸角」，天下雜誌，第二二九期，頁118-119。
    羅芳怡(2002)，競爭優勢來源、網絡中心性及績效之研究－以參與醫療聯盟群之醫院為例，私立靜宜大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
    譚仲民(1995)，大顯神通---台灣電腦業開路先鋒的故事，商週文化公司，台北。
    英文部分：
    Grant, R. M. (1991), “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage：Implications for Strategy Formulation,” California Management Review, 33(3), pp.114-135.
    Adler, P. S. and S-W Kwon (2002), “Social Capital: Prospects for A New Concept,” Academy of Management Review, 27(1), pp.17-40.
    Ahuja, G. (2000), “Collaboration Network, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, pp.425-455.
    Allison, G. (1971), Essences of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
    Andersson, U and M. Forsgren (2000), “In Search of Center of Excellence: Network Embeddedness and Subsidiary Roles in Multinational Corporations ,“ Management International Review, 40(4), pp.329-351.
    Andersson, U., M. Forsgren and U. Holm (2001), “Subsidiary Embeddedness and Competence Development in MNCs --- A Multi-level Analysis,” Organization Studies, 22(6), pp.1013-1034.
    Aoki, M. (1990), “Toward an Economic Model of the Japanese Firm,” Journal of Economic Literature, 28, pp.1-27.
    Astley, W. G. and E. J. Zajac (1990), “Beyond Dyadic Exchange: Functional Interdependency and Sub-unit Power,” Organization Studies, 11(4), pp.481-501.
    Athanassiou, N. and D. Nigh (1999), “The Impact of U.S. Company Internationalization on Top Management Team Advice Network: A Tacit Knowledge Perspective,” Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), pp.83-92.
    Athanassiou, N., W. Crittenden, L. M. Kelly and P. Marquez (2002), “Founder Centrality Effects on the Mexican Family Firm’s Top Management Group: Firm Culture, Strategic Vision and Goals, and Firm Performance,” Journal of World Business, 37, pp.139-150.
    Baker, W. (1990), “Market Networks and Corporate behavior,” American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), pp.589-625.
    Grewal, R. and P. Tansuhaj (2001), “Building Organizational Capabilities for Managing Economic Crisis: The Role of Market Orientation and Strategic Flexibility,” Journal of Marketing, 65, pp.67-80.
    Baliga, B. R. and A. M. Jaeger (1984), “Multinational Corporations: Control Systems and Delegation Issues,” Journal of International Business Studies, 15(3), pp.25-40.
    Barney, J. B. (1986), “Strategic Factor Markets: Expectation, Luck, and Business Strategy,” Management Science, 42(10), pp.1231-1241.
    Barney, J. B. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, 17, pp.99-120.
    Bartlett, C. A. and S. Ghoshal (1989), Managing Across Borders, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Bavelas, A. (1948), “A Mathematical Model for Group Structure,” Human Organization, 7, pp.16-30.
    Beckman, C. M. and P. R. Haunschild (2002), “Network Learning: The Effects of Partners’ Heterogeneity of Experience on Corporate Acquisition,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, pp.92-124.
    Bettis, R. and C. Prahalad (1986), “The Dominant Logic: A New Linkage between Diversity and Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 7, pp.485-501.
    Birkinshaw, J., N. Hood and S. Jonsson (1998), “Build Firm-Specific Advantages in Multinational Corporations: The Role of Subsidiary Initiative,” Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), pp.221-242.
    Blumberg, B. F. (2001), “Cooperation Contracts between Embedded Firms,” Organization Studies, 22(5), pp.825-852.
    Brass, D. (1995), “A Social Network Perspective on Human Resource Management,” Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 13, pp.39-79.
    Gruca, T., D. Nath and A. Mehra (1997), “Exploiting Synergy for Competitive Advantage,” Long Range Planning, 30(4), pp.605-611.
    Burt, R. (1992), “ The Social Structure of Competition,” In Nohira, N. and R. Eccles(Ed.) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Campbell, A., M. Goold and M. Alexander (1995), “The Value of the Parent Company,” California Managaement Review, 38(1), pp.79-97.
    Caves, R. and M. Uekusa (1976), Industrial organization in Japan, Washington, DC：Brookings Institution.
    Chandler, A. D. (1962), “Strategy and Structure,” In The History of the American Industrial Enterpries, Cambridge: MIT Press.
    Chandler, A. D. (1991), “The Functions of the HQ Unit in the Multibusiness Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp.31-50.
    Chang, S and J. Hong (2000), “ Economic Performance of the Korean Business Groups: Intra-Group Resource Sharing and Internal Business Transaction,” Academy of Management Journal, 43, pp.429-448.
    Chang, S. and U. Choi (1988), “Strategy, Structure, and Performance of Korean Business Groups: A Transaction Cost Approach,” Journal of Industrial Economics,37, pp.141-159.
    Chatterjee, S. and B. Wernerfelt (1991), “The Link Between Resources and Type of Diversification: Theory and Evidence,” Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp.33-48.
    Chu, W. (1999), “The Changing Pattern of Business Groups in Tsaiwan,” Sun Yat-Sen Management Review, international issue, pp.689-712.
    Chung, C. (2001), “Markets, Culture and Institutes: The Emergence of Large Business Groups in Tsaiwan, 1950s-1970s,” Journal of Management Studies, 38(5), pp719-745.
    司徒達賢(1995)，策略管理，遠流出版社，台北。
    Chung, S., H. Singh and K. Lee (2000), “ Complementarity, Status Similarity and Social Capital as Drivers of Alliance Formation,” Strategic Management Journal, 21,pp.1-22.
    Coleman, J. S. (1988), “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital,” American Journal of Sociology, 94(supplement), pp.95-120.
    Coleman, J. S. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
    Cook, K. S. (1982), Social Structure and Network Analysis, edited by Marsden P. V. and Lin N., London：Sage Publication.
    Das, T. and B. Teng (1998), “Resource and Risk Management in the Strategic Alliance Making Process,” Journal of Management, 24, pp.21-42.
    Das, T. and B. Teng (2000), “A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliance,” Journal of Management, 26, pp.31-61.
    Dyer, J. and H. Singh (1998), “The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage,” Academy of Management Review, 23(4), pp.660-679.
    Dyer, J. and W. Chu (2000), “The Determinants of Trust in Supplier-Automaker Relationships in the U.S., Japan, and Korea,” Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), pp.259-285.
    Dyer, J. (1997), “Effective Interfirm Collaboration: How Firms Minimize Transaction Costs and Maximize Transaction Value,” Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp.535-556.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review,” Academy of Management Review, 14(1), pp.57-74.
    Guillen, M. F. (2000), “Business Groups in Emerging Economies: A Resource-Based View,” Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), pp.362-380.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. and D. C. Gulunic (2000), “Coevolving: At Last, a Way to Make Synergies Work,” Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb., pp.91-101.
    Ellis, P. (2000), ”Social Ties and Foreign Market Entry,” Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3), pp.443-69.
    Eriksson, K., J. Johanson, A. Majkgard and D. Sharma (1997), “Experiential Knowledge and Cost in the Internationalization Process,” Journal of International Business Studies, 28, pp.337-360.
    Freeman, L. C. (1979), “Centrality in Social Networks：Conceptual Clarification,” Social Networks, 1, pp.215-239.
    Fukuiyama, F. (1995), Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, London: Hamish Hamilton.
    Geringer, J. M., S. Tallman and D. M. Olsen (2000), “Product and International Diversification Among Japanese Multinational Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.51-80.
    Ghemawat, P. and T. Khanna (1998), “The Nature of Diversified Business Groups: A Research Design and Two Case Studies,” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, pp.35-61.
    Ghoshal, S. and C. Bartlett (1990), “The Multinational Corporation as An Interorganizational Network,” Academy of Management Review, 15(4), pp.603-625.
    Ghoshal, S. and N. Nohria (1989), “Internal Differentiation within Multinational Corporations,” Strategic Management Journal, 10(4), pp.323-337.
    Gulati, R. (1995), “Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, pp.619-652.
    Gulati, R. (1999), “Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation,” Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), pp.397-420.
    Gulati, R. and M. Gargiulo (1999), “Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?,” American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), pp.1439-1493.
    Gulati, R., N. Nohria, and A. Zaheer (2000), “ Strategic Networks,” Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp203-215.
    Gupta, A. K. and V. Govindarajan (1991), “Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control within Multinational Corporations,” Academy of Management Review, 16(4), pp.768-792.
    Gupta, A. K. (1987), “SBU Strategies, Corporate-SBU Relations, and SBU Effectiveness in Strategy Implementation,” Academy of Management Journal, 30, pp.477-500.
    Hair, J. F., Jr., R. E. Rolph, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, NJ：Prentice-Hall.
    Hakansson, H. (1989), Corporate Technological Behavior：Cooperation and Networks, London：Routledge.
    Hamel, G. (1991), “Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning within Strategic Alliances,” Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp.82-103.
    司徒達賢(2001)，策略管理新論：觀念架構與分析方法，智勝出版社，台北。
    Hansen, M. T. (1998), “Combining Network Centrality and Related Knowledge: Explaining Effective Knowledger Sharing in Multiunit Firms,” Working Paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.
    Hansen, M. T. (1999), “The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subunits,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, pp.82-111.
    Hansen, M. T. (2002), “Knowledge Networks: Explaining effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies,” Organization Science, 13(3), pp.232-248.
    Harrigan, K. (1983), “Exit Barriers and Vertical Integration,” Academy of Management Proceedings, pp.32-36.
    Haspeslagh, P. and D. Jemison (1996), “Creating Value in Acquisitions,” In Goold, M. and K. S. Luchs(ed.), Managing the Multibusiness Company, New York: Routledge, pp.178-217.
    Hatch, J. and J. Zweig (2001), “Strategic Flexibility: The Key To Growth,” Ivey Business Journal, 65(4), pp.44-47.
    Hennart, J. F. (1991), “Control in Multinational Firms: The Role of Price and Hierarchy,” Management International Review, 31, pp.71-96.
    Hill, C. (1985), “Diversified Growth and Competition: The Experience of Twelve Large UK Firms,” Applied Economics, 17, pp.827-847.
    Hill, C., M. Hitt and R. Hoskisson (1992), “Cooperative Versus Competitive Structures in Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms,” Organization Science, 3(4), pp.501-521.
    Hill, C. and R. Hoskisson (1987), “Strategy and Structure in the multiproduct Firm,” Academy of Management Review, 12, pp.331-341.
    司徒達賢、于卓民、曾紀幸(1997), 「環境特性與公司特性對多國企業網絡關係之影響---在台外商公司之實證研究」，管理學報，第十四卷第二期，頁155-176。
    Hitt, M., B. Keats, and S. DeMarie (1998), “Navigating in the New Competitive Landscape: Building Strategic Flexibility and Competitive Advantage in the 21st Century,” Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), pp.22-42.
    Hofer, C. W. and D. Schendel (1978), Strategy Formation：Analytical Concepts, St. Paul, MN：West.
    Hosskisson, R. E. (1987), “Multidivisional Structure and Performance: The Contingency of Diversification Strategy,” Academy of Management Journal, 30, pp.625-644.
    Hosskisson, R. E. and M. A. Hitt (1994), Downscoping: Taming the Diversified Firm, Oxford University Press, New York.
    Human, S. E. and K. G. Provan (1997). “An Emergent Theory of Structure and Outcomes in Small-Firm Strategic Manufacturing Network,” Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), pp.368-403.
    Ito, K. and E. L. Rose (1994), “The Genealogical Structure of Japanese Firms: Parent-Subsidiary Relationships,” Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp.35-51.
    Jarillo, J. C. (1988), “On Strategic Networks,” Strategic Management Journal, 9, pp.31-41.
    Johanson, J. and L-G Mattsson (1988), “ Internationalization in Industrial System--- A Network Approach,” Strategies in Global Competition, (ed) By Hood and Vahlne, pp.287-314.
    Johanson, J. and J. Vahlne (1977), “The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments,” Journal of International Business Studies, 8,pp.23-32.
    Jones, C., W. S. Hesterly and S. P. Borgatti (1997) “A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms,” Academy of Management Review, 22(4), pp.911-945.
    朱文儀、莊正民(1999), 「Decision-making autonomy and divisional effectiveness in multibusiness firms: From contingency perspective to culture control perspective」，亞太管理評論，第四卷第四期，頁345-356。
    Kanter, R. M. (1989), When Giants Learn to Dance, London: Simon and Schuster.
    Kanter, R. M. (1996), “Achieving Synergies,” In Goold, M. and K. S. Luchs(ed.), Managing the Multibusiness Company, New York: Routledge, pp.240-255.
    Keister, L. A. (1998), “Engineering Growth: Business Group Structure and Firm Performance in China’s Transition Economy,” American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), pp.404-440.
    Khanna, T. and J. W. Rivkin (2001), “Estimating the Performance Effects of Business Groups in Emerging Markets,” Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp.45-74.
    Khanna, T. and K. Palepu (2000a), “Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets: An Analysis of Indian Diversified Business Groups,” Journal of Finance, 55(2), pp.867-891.
    Khanna, T. and K. Palepu (2000b), “The Future of Business Groups in Emerging Markets: Long-run Evidence from Chile,” Academy of Management Journal, 43, pp.268-285.
    Koka, B. R. and J. E. Prescott (2002), “Strategic Alliances As Social Capital: A Multidimensional View,” Strategic Management Journal, 23, pp.795-816.
    Kraatz, M. S. (1998), “Learning by Association? Inter-organizational Networks and Adaptation to Environmental Change,” Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), pp.621-643.
    Larsson, R. and S. Finkelstein (1999), “Integrating Strategic, Organizational, and Human Resource Perspectives on Mergers and Acquisitions: A Case Survey of Synergy Realization,” Organization Science, 10(1), pp.1-26.
    Lebas, M. and J. Weigenstein (1986), “Management Control: The Roles of Rules, Markets and Culture,” Journal of Management Studies, 23(2), pp.259-272.
    行政院主計處(1996)，中華民國行業標準分類，台北：行政院主計處。
    Leff, N. (1976), “Capital Markets in the Less Developed Countries: The Group Principal,” In R. McKinnon(ed.), Money and Finance in Economic Growth and Development, New York: Dekker.
    Leff, N. (1978), “Industrial Organization and Entrepreneurship in the Developing Countries: The Economic Groups,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26, pp.661-675.
    Liao, Z. and P. Greenfield (2000), “The Synergy of Corporate RandD and Competitive Strategies: An Exploratory study in Australian High-Technology Companies,” The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11(1), pp.93-107.
    Liebeskind, J. P., A. L. Oliver, L. Zucker, and M. Brewer (1996), “Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms,” Organization Science, 7(4), pp.428-443
    Lincoln, J., M. Gerlach and C. Ahmadjian (1996), “Keiretsu Network and Corporate Performance in Japan,” American Sociological Review, 61, pp.67-88.
    Madsen, T. K. and P. Servais (1997), “The Internationalization of Born Globals：An Evolutionary Process,” International Business Review, 6(6), pp.561-583.
    Malnight, T. W. (1996), “The Transition from Decentralized to Network-based MNCs Structures: An Evolutionary Perspective,” Journal of International Business Studies, 27(1), pp.43-65.
    Maloni, M. and W. C. Benton (2000), “Power Influences in the Supply Chain,” Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), pp.49-73
    Markides, C. and P. Williamson (1996), “Corporate Diversification and Organizational Structure: A Resource-Based View,” Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), pp.340-367.
    Marsden, P. V. (1990), “Network Data and Measurement,” Annual Review of Sociology, 16, pp.435-463.
    吳思華(1996)，策略九說：策略思考之本質。台北：智勝出版社。
    Martin, J. and K. Eisenhardt (2001), “Exploring Cross-Business Synergies,” Academy of Management Proceedings, BPS: H1-H6.
    Martinez, J. I. and J. C. Jarillo (1989), “The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations,” Journal of International Business Studies, 20(3), pp.489-514.
    Melin, L. (1992), “Internationalization As A Strategy Process,” Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp.99-118.
    Miller, D. and J. Shamsie (1996), “The Resource-Based View of the Firm in Two Environments：The Holleywood Firm Studios from 1936 to 1965,” Academy of Management Journal, 39,519-543.
    Money, R. B. (1998), “International Multilateral Negotiations and Social Networks,” Journal of International Business Studies, 29(4), pp.695-710.
    Montgomery, C. (1994), “Corporate Diversification,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8,pp163-178.
    Montoya-Weiss, M., A. Massey and M. Song (2001), “Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Team,” Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), pp.1251-1262.
    Morgan, G. (1986), Images of Organization, Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
    Morgan, R. and S. Hunt (1994), “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 58, pp.20-38.
    Nahapiet, J. and S. Ghoshal (1998), “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage,” Academy of Management Review, 23,pp.242-266.
    吳思華(1999)，「組織邏輯：人情與理性」，收錄於張笠雲主編之網絡台灣：台灣的人情關係與經濟理性，遠流出版社，台北。
    Nakatani, I. (1984), “The Economic Role of Financial Corporate Grouping,” In Aoki, M.(ed.) , The Economic Analysis of the Japanese Firm, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp.227-258.
    Nebus, J. (1998), “International Teams: Their Social Capital and Its Effects on MNE Knowledge Creation and Knowledge Transfer,” Working Paper, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
    Nohria, N. and S. Ghoshal (1994), “Differentiated Fit and Shared Value: Alternatives for Managing Headquarter-Subsidiary Relations,” Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp.491-502.
    Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company：How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, New York：Oxford University Press.
    O’Donnell, S. W. (2000) “ Managing Foreign Subsidiaries: Agents of Headquarters, or An Interdependent Network?” Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.525-548.
    Okhuysen, G. A. and K. M. Eisenhardt (2002), “Integrating Knowledge in Groups: How Formal Interventions Enable Flexibility,” Organization Science, 13(4), pp.370-386.
    Oliver, C. (1990), “Determinants of Inter-Organizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions,” Academy of Management Review, 15, pp.105-124.
    Ouchi, W. G. and M. A. Maguire (1975), “Organizational Control: Two Functions,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(4), pp.559-569.
    Ouchi, W. G. (1977), “The Relationship between Organizational Structure and Organizational Control,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), pp.95-113.
    Ouchi, W. G. (1979), “A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms,” Management Science, 25(9), pp.833-848.
    吳萬益、陳淑惠(1999)，「集團企業組織文化、決策模式與經營策略之研究：中美日德主要集團企業運作模式之實證分析」，交大管理評論, 19(2), pp.131-179.
    Palich, L., G. Carini and S. Seaman (2000), “The Impact of Internationalization on the Diversification-Performance Relationship: A Replication and Extension of Prior Research,” Journal of Business Research, 48, pp.43-54.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    A88355501
    91
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088355501
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2518檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋