政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/29799
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113313/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50945529      Online Users : 1034
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/29799


    Title: 親情Online：網路媒介與家庭溝通型態之相關研究
    Family online：the correlational study of the Internet and family communication patterns
    Authors: 沈孟燕
    Contributors: 孫式文
    沈孟燕
    Keywords: 親子溝通
    網路溝通
    關係維持行為
    parental relationships
    internet communication
    relationship maintenance behavior
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 16:20:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著電腦科技的普及，網路逐漸成為親子溝通的工具之一，父母和孩子也與其他的關係一樣，在網路上相處、溝通與互動，然而目前的網路研究中，親子溝通鮮少成為研究的對象，而家庭傳播中對網路的討論，則大多將焦點集中在新科技使用與家庭生活時間的互斥與否的爭議之上，網路在此研究脈絡中喪失了溝通互動的性質，本研究並不企圖否定過去對電腦與家庭關係中的互動討論，而是期望加入目前實際生活中，網路在親子關係中所發揮的溝通功能，而使網路在親子溝通的角色可以更加完備。
    本文以網路問卷調查的方式，期望瞭解在強調父母威權（社會取徑）與鼓勵與子女互動（概念取徑）的兩種不同家庭中，子女對媒介特質的感知有何差異，以及是否會有不同的網路關係維持行為。研究結果指出，家庭中越是強調父母權威，子女越能感受到：網路讓他們比較敢向父母表達自身想法，並且也越能在與父母溝通前有更多時間好好地組織自己想法，而越是重視父母權威的家庭，子女也越會傾向在網路中與父母分享心事與表現出對父母的體諒，網路讓這些原來關係緊張的親子之間有了更多親密互動的可能。
    With the population of the computer technology, internet has become one of the tools of parent-child communication. Parents and children nowadays also interacted and communicated on line, just like any other relationships. However, parental communication rarely became the topic in the study about the internet. In family communication research, the researchers always talked about whether the internet interaction reduces the actual interaction in family life. In this thesis, the context of this idea lacked the communicative function of the internet.,
    This study investigates how children have different perception of media characteristics and different internet communication behavior in the social oriented families (that emphasis parent’s power) and concept oriented families (that encourage children to share their opinions). Firstly, the study finds that the children from social oriented families are more likely to feel that they have more various topics which are unable to show while being together with their parents by face-to-face. Secondly, they consider that they are able to arrange their ideas more perfectly before talking with their parents. Moreover, the finding also indicates that the children from social oriented families are willing to share their secrets and express understanding for their parents on line. Thus, for the social oriented families, the internet provides another way to improve parental relationships.
    Reference: Bakardjieva, M. (2005). Internet Society: The Internet in Everyday Life. London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE.
    Brelsford, G. M., & Mahoney, A. (2008). Spiritual Disclosure Between Older Adolescents and Their Mothers. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 62-70.
    BusinessDictionary.com. Retrieved January 13, 2009, from BusinessDictionary.com website: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/non-verbal-cue.html
    Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59(3), 243-267.
    Canary, D. J., Stafford, L., Hause, K. S., & Wallace, L. A. (1993). An Inductive Analysis of Relational Maintenance Strategies: Comparisons Among Lovers, Relatives, Friends, and Others. [Article]. Communication Research Reports, 10, 5-14.
    Carducci, B. J., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1995). Are you shy? Psychology Today, 28(6), 34-40,64,66,68,70,78,82.
    Chaffee, S. H., McLeod, J. M., & Atkin, C. K. (1971). Parental Influences on Adolescent Media Use. American Behavioral Scientist, 14, 323-340.
    Dainton, M., & Aylor, B. (2002). Patterns of Communication Channel Use in the Maintenance of Long-Distance Relationships. Communication Research Reports, 19(2), 118-129.
    Dictionary.com (2009). Retrieved April 13, 2009,: http://dictionary.reference.com/
    Duck, S. W. (1994). he goes: Relational maintenance as a shared meaning system. In D. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintena (pp. 45-60). New York: Academic Press.
    Dumlao, R., & Botta, R. A. (2000). Family Communications Patterns and the Conflict Styles Young Adults Use with Their Fathers. Communication Quarterly, 48(2), 174-189.
    Farber, B. A. (2006). Self-disclosure in psychotherapy New York Guilford Press.
    Franzoi, S. L., & Davis, M. H. (1985). Adolescent self-disclosure and loneliness: Private self-consciousness and parental influences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(3), 768-780.
    Gottman, J. M. (1999). The seven principles for making marriage work New York Three Rivers Press.
    Greene, K., Derlega, V. J., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 1268-1328). New York Cambridge University Press.
    Hanzal, A., & Segrin, C. (2007, ). Conflict Patterns and Family of Origin Conflict in Newly Initiated Remarriages. Paper presented at the Conference Papers -- International Communication Association.
    Harp, K., Webb, L., & Amason, P. (2007). Family Communication Patterns and Young Adults` Conflict Styles with Romantic Partners: Two Alternative Paths of Influence. Paper presented at the Conference Papers -- National Communication Association.
    Ho, S. S., & McLeod, D. M. (2008). Social-Psychological Influences on Opinion Expression in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communication. Communication Research, 35(2), 190-207.
    Huang , L.-N. (1999). Family communication patterns and personality characteristics. Communication Quarterly, 47(2), 230-243.
    Keaten, J., & Kelly, L. (2008). Emotional Intelligence as a Mediator of Family Communication Patterns and Reticence. Communication Reports, 21, 104-116.
    Kelly, L., & Keaten, J. A. (2007). Development of the Affect for Communication Channels Scale. Journal of Communication, 57, 349-365.
    Kelly, L., Keaten, J. A., Finch, C., Duarte, I. B., Hoffman, P., & Michels, M. M. (2002). Family Communication Patterns and the Development of Reticence. Communication Education, 51(2), 202.
    Kennedy, T. L. M., & Wellman, B. (2007). The Networked Household. Information, Communication & Society, 10(5), 645-670.
    Knapp, M., & Vangelisti A. L. (1992). Interpersonal Communication and Human Relationships (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn&Bacon.
    Koesten, J. (2004). Family Communication Patterns, Sex of Subject, and Communication Competence. [Article]. Communication Monographs, 71, 226-244.
    Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet Paradox Revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49-74.
    Ledbetter, A. M. (2009). Family Communication Patterns and Relational Maintenance Behavior: Direct and Mediated Associations with Friendship Closeness. Human Communication Research, 35, 130-147.
    McLeod, J. M., & Chaffee, S. H. (1972). The Construction of Social Reality. In J. T. Tiedeschi (Ed.), The Social Influence Process (pp. 50-99). Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
    McLuhan, M. (1995). Understanding Media: the Extensions of Man (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
    Mesch, G. S. (2006a). Family characteristics and intergenerational conflicts over the Internet. [Article]. Information, Communication & Society, 9, 473-495.
    Mesch, G. S. (2006b). Family Relations and the Internet: Exploring a Family Boundaries Approach. Journal of Family Communication, 6(2), 119-138.
    Nick Yee, J. B. (2007). The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 271-290.
    Olson, D. H. (1993). Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems: Assessing Family Functions. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal Family Prosess (2nd ed., pp. 104-137). New York: The Guilford Press.
    Olson, D. H. (1995). Circumplex Model of Families. In D. H. Olson (Ed.), Families what makes them work (pp. 47-80). Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications.
    Olson, D. H., Russell, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1980). Marital and Family Therapy: A Decade Review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42(4), 973-993.
    O`Sullivan, P. B. (2000). What You Don`t Know Won`t Hurt Me: Impression Management Functions of Communication Channels in Relationships. Human Communication Research, 26, 403-431.
    Papini, D. R., & Farmer, F. F. (1990). Early adolescent age and gender differences in patterns of emotional self-disclosure to parents. Adolescence, 25(100), 959.
    Pew Internet & American Life Project. ( 2004 , December). Parents& Teens 2004 Survey. Retrieved September 9, 2008, from Pew Internet: http://www.pewinternet.org/Shared-Content/Data-Sets/2004/Teens--Parents-2004.aspx
    Rabby , M. K., & WALTHER, J. B. (2003). Computer-mediated communication effects on relationship formation and maintenance In D. J. Canary & M. Dainton (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication : relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 141-162). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Rabby, M. K. (2007a). Relational Maintenance and the Influence of Commitment in Online and Offline Relationships. [Article]. Communication Studies, 58, 315-337.
    Rabby, M. K. (Writer) (2007b). Relational Maintenance and the Influence of Commitment in Online and Offline Relationships [Article], Communication Studies: Central States Communication Association.
    Rabby, M. K., & Walther, J. B. (2003). Computer-mediated communication effects on relationship formation and maintenance. In D. J. Canary & M. Dainton (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: relational, contextual, and cultural variations
    Rainie, L., Lenhart, A., Fox, S., Spooner, T., & Horrigan, J. (2000). Tracking Online Life Pew Internet & American Life Project Retrieved 2009.5.9, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2000/Tracking-Online-Life.aspx
    Rossler, S., Ting-Toomey, S., & Lee, P. (Writer) (2007). Family Communication Patterns and Conflict Management Styles in Dating Relationships [Article], Conference Papers -- National Communication Association: National Communication Association.
    Sally, V.-B., Pamela, J. K., & Michael, J. B. (1999). Perceived equity, satisfaction, and relational maintenance strategies in parent-adolescent dyads. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28(1), 27-49.
    Sarah A. Birnie, & Peter Horvath (2002). Psychological Predictors of Internet Social Communication. On Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.
    Shearman, S. M., & Dumlao, R. (2008). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Family Communication Patterns and Conflict Between Young Adults and Parents. Journal of Family Communication, 8, 186-211.
    Sheeks, M. S., & Birchmeier, Z. P. (2007). Shyness, Sociability, and the Use of Computer-Mediated Communication in Relationship Development. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 64-70.
    Sherry, T. (1995). Lift on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Intenet. New York : Simon & Schuster.
    Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunication. London: John Wiley.
    Stafford, L. (2003). Maintaining Romantic Relationships: A Summary and Analysis of One Research Program. In D. J. Canary & M. Dainton (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 51-77). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance Strategies and Romantic Relationship Type, Gender and Relational Characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(2), 217-242.
    Stafford, L., & Dainton, M. (2000). Measuring Routine and Strategic Relational Maintenance: Scale Revision, Sex Versus Gender Roles, and the Prediction of Relational Characteristics. Communication Monographs, 67(3), 306-323.
    Stafford, L., & Reske, J. R. (1990). Idealization and Communication in Long-Distance Premarital Relationships. Family Relations, 39(3), 274-279.
    Stafford, L., Kline, S. L., & Dimmick, J. (Writer) (1999). Home e-mail: Relational maintenance and gratification opportunities [Article], Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media: Broadcast Education Association.
    UCLA (2003). THE UCLA INTERNET REPORT: Surveying the Digital Future Year Three Retrieved 2.1, 2008, from http://www.digitalcenter.org/pdf/InternetReportYearThree.pdf
    Universal McCann(2008, September). When did we start trusting strangers? How the internet turned us all into influencers. Next Thing Now. Retrieved May 21,2009, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/6026440/When-did-we-start-trusting-strangers-Universal-McCann-Sept-2008
    Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction: A Relational Perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52-90.
    Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.
    Wright, K. B. (2004). Online Relational Maintenance Strategies and Perceptions of Partners Within Exclusively Internet-Based and Primarily Internet-Based Relationships. Communication Studies, 55, 239-253.
    Zhang, Q. (2007). Family Communication Patterns and Conflict Styles in Chinese Parent-Child Relationships. Communication Quarterly, 55(1), 113-128.
    丘忠融、李紋鋒譯（2008）。《網路社會與日常生活》，台北：韋伯。（原書Bakardjieva, M.〔2005〕Internet society the Internet in everyday life London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE.）
    台南市衛生局（2009年5月5日）。〈宅青春—小心不要被網路操控你的人生〉（五月五日新聞稿）。台南市衛生局。上網日期：2009年6月28日，取自http://www.tnchb.gov.tw/KNews_Detail.aspx?ID=854
    吳姝蒨 (1996)。 《電腦中介傳播人際情感親密關係之研究--探訪電子布告欄(BBS)中的「虛擬人際關係」》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    吳就君譯（2006）。《家庭如何塑造人》，台北：張老師。（原書Satir, V. The New Peoplemaking）
    李青霖 (2009年6月16日)。〈一人一信抓飆仔，網軍力量大〉，《Upaper》，3版。
    李政忠 (2004)。〈網路調查所面臨的問題與解決建議〉，《資訊社會研究》，6：1-24。
    林承賢 (2004)。〈近五年來台灣傳播學界博碩士論文使用網路問卷研究方法之後設分析〉，《資訊社會研究》，6：25-58。
    祁安國、林沿瑜 (2008年10月9日)。〈G mail防衝動，寄信前先考數學題〉，《聯合報》，頁AA2。
    喬慧玲 (2006年8月7日)。〈親子拉親子拉近距離 MSN好媒人〉，《中國時報,》北市新聞/C2版。
    黃郁婷 (1994)。 《親子溝通、因應方式與老年人幸福感之關係》。文化大學家政研究所碩士論文。
    楊孝濚 (1996)。《傳播研究方法總論》。台北：三民。
    盧諭緯 (1999)。《當我們同在一起：BBS社交性討論區之言說分析》。國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。
    薛怡青 (2009年4月9日 )。〈只有5%的父母一定陪孩子上網，兒童網路安全成隱憂〉，《Yahoo!奇摩新聞》，上網日期：2009年5月12日，取自 http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/090409/35/1hk3t.html
    羅文輝 (1997)。《精確新聞報導》。台北：正中。
    譚天譯（1998）。《虛擬化身：網路世代的身份認同》，台北：遠流。（原書Sherry, T. 〔1995〕Lift on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Intenet. New York : Simon & Schuster.）
    蘇蘅、吳淑俊 (1997)。〈電腦網路問卷調查可行性及回覆者特質的研究〉，《新聞學研究》， 54：75-100。
     
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    新聞研究所
    95451008
    97
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095451008
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Journalism] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2387View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback