資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/29714
|
| 題名: | 線上遊戲領導力形塑歷程研究-以魔獸世界公會為例
A process analysis of how the leadership skills honed in multiplayer online games: A case study of a world of warcraft`s raiding guild. |
| 作者: | 劉瑋 |
| 貢獻者: | 張寶芳
劉瑋 |
| 關鍵詞: | 線上遊戲
魔獸世界
公會
RL
副本
社會認知
領導力
團體動力
On-line Game
War of Warcraft
Guild
Raid Leader
Dungeon
SCT
Leadership
Team Dynamics |
| 日期: | 2008 |
| 上傳時間: | 2009-09-11 16:09:53 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 多人角色扮演線上遊戲內是否有領導力？若有，這種能力如何培養、展現與有效實踐？本研究期待藉由探索魔獸世界公會團隊隊長(Raid Leader，簡稱RL)的遊戲歷程，探究線上遊戲如何可能成為形塑領導能力的場域，並分析此領導力應用於現實世界的機會與限制。
<br> 以線上遊戲「魔獸世界」為觀察環境，從RL在遊戲裡的日常工作、與他人相處、副本經歷到追求集體目標的過程，了解RL如何帶領玩家獲得成就感及形成影響力。擁有深遠故事背景、明確角色定位、任務導向及短中長期目標的「魔獸世界」正好提供良好的虛擬試煉空間，讓玩家組隊挑戰副本空間，讓玩家在自由組隊及各種征戰練習中，以團隊的力量尋找解答與達成擊敗魔王的目標。投入條件不斷變化的副本環境獲得利益與經驗等級，此過程所產生的情感與經濟的交換，使玩家間的關係變得複雜，也增加玩家對遊戲的黏著度，線上遊戲不但塑造出新的交友管道，更可能追引出新的管理模式與領袖培養機制。
<br> 本研究透過不同年齡與社會歷練之RL深度訪談，加上公會論壇的內容分析，察知在管理公會事務與副本征戰過程中的RL，將會於實踐遊戲目標之際建立自信與玩家間的信賴關係，並逐步形塑其領導力。此歷程中發現之策略運用、資源交換等遊戲技能；風險承擔與情緒管理等服務態度與合作分享等人格特質，與Drucker與Senge提出的領導力特質不謀而合，玩家將遊戲裡所獲得的心得分析、重組、整合，並把遊戲中與朋友相處的法則與解決問題的方式轉化及複製為現實社會裡的應用知識，線上遊戲除了可形塑創造願景、審時度勢、協調利益、嘗試創新、激勵賦能等領導者能力，可轉換至現實社會或不適宜轉換但可引以為戒的反向思考與限制也將一併於本研究中呈現。
Is leadership really existent amongst on-line games? If so, how can those players develop, display or effectively practice their leadership when playing games? Then what will this capability affect or contribute to the virtual environment and our physical social context after players possess it? In order to answer these questions, this research has examined the character Raid leader or RL in on-line game, the World of Warcraft, investigated the forming process of his leadership and explored the ways in which an on-line game has become an arena to train leadership.
Based on the World of Warcraft, we have observed RL’s daily routines in the game, the interaction with other players and the process from the dungeon (also called instance) experience to achieve team’s goal pursuit in attempts in order to realize the model of interaction in on-line game as well as the ways in which RL has led all the team member to attain achievements and form their influence.
MMORPG with a long storyline, clear role position, mission orientation and different term goals offers an on-line gaming world where designed a series of quizzes and a dungeon for different player communities to challenge. Player can team up with the others, match with one another and conquer difference practices to find the resolution and defeat the monsters (also called Boss) in the dungeon.
After campaigning with team members in different personalities and joining continuously changing dungeon environments to gain different bonus and experience levels, players may form a close bond with one another and exchange treasures or information on hand in terms of their economic profit during the game.
Furthermore, after having some intensive interviews with RLs who are at different ages and having their own social experience in the real society as well as the analysis of the context in the guild forum, this research has discovered that RLs who manage guild affairs and conquer dungeon will establish their self-confidence and dependence with the other players when achieving the goals in games, and extend his leadership to those players.
Those findings from this forming procedure not only agree with the rules to hone leadership asserted by Drucker and Senge in recent years and the characteristics but also drew forth a team dynamics force to on-line player communities and a new mass movement that may influence the social impression or educational direction in the future.
By means of daily play of on-line games, players analyzed, re-organized and integrated their own feedback from the games, and involuntarily transferred the ways to get along with friends in games and to solve questions to tacit knowledge to manage the real society.
In addition to the search for the vision formed in on-line games and the characteristics of leadership as consideration of the situation, co-ordination of the profits on hand, attempt to innovate and ability to stimulate talents, some changeable key points, mechanism or limitation to the real society or unchangeable but referring points will also be presented in this research. |
| 參考文獻: | 中文部份
丁志成（2002）。《線上與電腦遊戲玩家參與行為之探討》。高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理系碩士論文。
王裕（2005）。＜我眼中的魔獸世界＞，《軟件工程師》。7：70-73。
王樂成、林祐聖、葉欣怡譯 (2002)。《網際網路與社會》。台北市：弘智文化事業。(原書 Slevin, J. [2002]. Internet and Society.)
艾胡裴譯（2008）。《器量－領導人的十項成長歷鍊》。台北市：商智文化。(原書 Baum, S.H., & Conti D. [2008]. What Made jack welch JACK WELCH -- How Ordinary People Become Extraordinary Leaders. )
江靜之（2003）。《網際網路的衝擊》。台北市：韋伯出版社。（原書Jordan, T. [2003]. Cyberpower : The Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet.）。
江麗美譯（2008）。《領導的藝術》。台北市：經濟新潮社。(原書 Max, D.P. [2008]. Leadship is an art.)
李湘平譯（2005）。久恆哲一。圖解杜拉克管理精華。台北市：先覺出版。
辛西亞．蒙哥馬利Montogmery A. Cynthia、麥可波特Porter E. Michael。＜給下一個百年基業的策略領導學Leadership & Strategy＞(2008)。《哈佛商業評論－ 全球繁體中文版》。台北市：天下遠見出版社。新版第17期，1:279-297。
何長珠（1997）。《心理團體的理論與實際》。台北：五南出版社。
何長珠（1999）。＜班級團體的動力性輔導＞。《學生輔導》。64：8-25。
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287.
Bandura, A. (Ed.) (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
Bartle, R. (1996). “Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs.” in Journal of MUD Research vol.1, no.1 (1996).Available at http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm
Bartle, R.”A self of sense.”(2003) Available at http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/selfware.htm.
Canales, M. K. “Othering: Toward an understanding of difference.” in Advances in Nursing Science vol.22, no.4 (2000), pp.16-31.
Cohen, A. (1985). The Symbolic Construction of Construction of Community, Chichester and London, Ellis Harwood and Tavistock.
Denegri-Knott, J., & Taylor, J. “The labeling game: A conceptual exploration of deviance on the Internet.” In Social Science Computer Review vol.23, no.1 (2005), pp.93-107.
Griffiths, M.D, Davies, M N O., & Chappell, D. “Breaking the stereotype: The case of online gaming,” in CyberPsychology and Behavior vol.6 (2003), pp.81-91.
Day, D. V., & Lord, R G.. (1988). Executive leadership and organizational performance: suggestions for a new theory and methodology. Journal of Management, 14(3), 453-464.
Lin, H., Cheng H H., & Chuen T S. (2003). Game Tips as Gifts:Social Interactions and Rational Calculations in computer gaming. Paper
Forsyth, D.R. (2006). Group Dynamics, 4th Edition. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
Gibb, C. (1984）.The Influence of Cattell in social psychology and group dynamics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 19 , 193-206.
Fiedler F.E. (1967). The theory of leadership effectiveness. (pp.36) . New York: McGraw-hill Book Company .
Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., Otten, S., & Hinkle, S. “The Social Identity Perspective: Intergroup Relations, Self-Conception, and Small Groups,” in Small Group Research vol.35, no.3 (2004), pp.246-276.
Hsu, M.H., Ju, T.L., Yen, C.H., & Chang, C.M. (2007), “Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Virtual Communities: The Relationship between Trust, Self-Efficacy, and Outcome Expectations,” Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 65, pp. 153-169.
Hill A.L., & Hemp P. (2008). ”搜尋未來領導人 Where Will We Find Ttomorrow’s Leaders.” Harvard Business Review, 繁體中文版。 April 2008. p107-115.
Kelly, R.V. (2004). Massively multiplayer online role-playing games: The people, the addiction and the playing experience. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company.
Katzenbach, R. J., & Smith K D. (2007). ”The Discipline of Teams.” Harvard Business Review, Novermber 2007. p93-105.
Kurt, L.（2001, Mar/Apr）.Psychology Today, 34 , 92.
presented at DiGRA 2003 Conference：Level Up, University of Utrecht, Netherlands.
Gratton, L., & Erickson, J T. (2007). ”Eight ways to Build collaborative Teams.” Harvard Business Review, Novermber 2007. p107-117.
Galarneau L., & Zibit M. (2002). Online Game for 21st Century Skills.
21st Century Literacy Summit (2002) 21st century literacy in a converent media world. (White paper). Berlin, Germany.
http://www.21stcenturyliteracy.org/white/WhitePaperEnglish.pdf
Lummis M. (2005). World of World of Warcraft Official Strategy Guide 1st Edition. 魔獸世界官方攻略本 。Brady Games, Person Education.台北市：智冠科技股份有限公司。
Lin, H., & Sun, C. (2003). “Problems in Simulating Social Reality: Observations on a MUD Construction.” Simulation & Gaming, 34(1):69-88.
Lin, H., & Sun, C. (2005). The ‘White-eyed’ Player Culture: Grief Play and Construction of Deviance in MMORPGs. Paper presented at DiGRA 2005 Conference：Changing Views-Worlds in Play, Vancouver, Canada.
Melymuka, K.（2008）. MMORPGs -- Massively multiplayer online role-playing games -- like World of Warcraft. Computerworld, http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=317260 .
Mulligan, J., & Patrovsky, B. (2003). Developing Online Games: An Insider’s Guide. New Riders, Indiana.
Mats, W. (2005). Game Mediated Communication: Multiplayer Games as the Medium for Computer Based Communication. Paper presented at DiGRA 2005 Conference：Changing Views-Worlds in Play, Vancouver, Canada.
Nightingale, V., & Ross, K (Ed.).(2003). Critical readings : Media and Audiences (pp. 268-293). England: Open University Press.
Pajares, F. (2004). Albert Bandura: Biographical sketch. Retrieved month day, year, from http://des.emory.edu/mfp/bandurabio.html
Riel, M., & Polin, L. (2004). Online learning communities. Common ground and critical differences in designing technical environments. In S. A. Barab, Kling, R., Gray, J.H.,(Ed.), Desinging for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning. New York:Cambridge University Press.
Rieber, L. P. (1996) “Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games,” in Educational Technology Research & Development vol.44, no.2 (1996), pp.43-58.
Reeves, B., Malone T.W., & O’Driscoll T. (2008). Leadership’s Online Labs. Harvard Business Review, May 2008. p59-66.
吳齊殷（1998）。《真實社區與虛擬社區：交融、對立或互蝕？第二屆資訊科技與社會轉型研討會》。中央研究院社會學研究所。
Runkel, P. J., Lawrence M., Oldfield S., Rider M., & Clark C. (1971). Stages of group development. An empirical test of Tuckman`s hypothesis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 7:180 93.
Steinkeuhler, C., & Dmitri W. (2005) “Where everybody knows your (screen) name: online games as “Third Places” Digital Games Research Association (DIGRA),
Changing Views: Worlds in Play International Conference.
http://www.gamesconference.org/digra2005/download/DiGRA_2005_Program.pdf.
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 16-31). San Diego: Academic Press.
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performances: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240-261.
Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E.(2004). Rules Of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge.
Thor A. (2005). Massively Multiplayer Game Development 2.
Hingham, Massachusetts: Charles River Media. 113-123.
吳濱伶編（2005）。＜團隊技巧大詳解＞，《網路遊戲密技吱吱叫專刊 攻略大補丸》。台北市：電腦人文化事業。10：125-134。
Tuckman, B. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological bulletin, 63, 384-399.
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A (1977). Stages of small group development revisited. Group Org. Studies 2:419 27,.
Wasko , M., & Faraj, S. (2000). “It is what one does”. Why people participate and help
others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of Strategic Information
Systems,9 ( 2-3), 155-173.
Yeh ,Y C., & Luo, J D. (2001). Are Virtual Social Relationships independent from Reality?. Journal of Cyber Culture and Information
Society , 1:33-55.
Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal-setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 663-676.
宋妍(2006)。＜魔獸世界的領導哲學＞，《互聯網週刊 China Internet Weekly》。7：61-61。
李田樹等譯（2003）。《管理是什麼？》。台北市：天下遠見出版股份有限公司。P27-28司徒達賢推薦文、P29-31吳思華推薦文。(原書 Magretta, J. [2003] . What Management is？)
李佳純（2001）。＜虛擬社區介紹＞，《網路社會學通訊期刊》。台北市：遠見出版股份有限公司。12：25-50。
怪獸病毒（2006）。〈想當公會會長？請先準備熱血！公會會長辛酸史！Game Q告訴你什麼是好會長.〉，《Game Q 數位娛樂雙週刊 專題企劃 》。台北市：台灣索尼通訊網路股份有限公司So-net。77：112-117。
林文祥譯 (2008)。《部落領導學》。台北市：商智出版社。(原書 Logan, D., King, J., & HaleeFischer, W. [2008]. Tribal Leadership Leveraging Natural Groups to Build a Thriving Organization.)
林宏達 (2008)。＜10歲玩出領導力＞，《商業週刊》，1076：106-134
林豐智、吳尚和（2005）。＜虛擬組織之形成與發展－信任觀點之研究＞，《電子商務研究》，3(4)：399-424。
林鶴玲（2001）。〈虛擬互動空間設計中的權力及控制──一個MUD社會創設的經驗〉，《台灣社會學》。台北市：台灣大學社會學研究所。2：1-53
邱威傑、林義傑、胡為君譯（2005）。《魔獸世界－官方攻略本繁體中文版》。台北市：智冠科技股份有限公司。
金祖詠譯 (1995)。《模擬真實》。 台北市：時報文化出版企業有限公司。
姜汝祥（2008）。《榜樣》。北京市：錫恩企業管理顧問公司 。
施寄青譯 (1987)。《電腦革命－人工智慧所引發的人文省思》。台北市：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。(原書 Turkle.S. [1984]. The Second Self-Computers and The Human Spirit.)
許晋福譯 (2004)。《卓越領導者完全養成手冊》。台北市：美商麥格羅．希爾國際股有限公司。(原書 Zenger, J H., & Folkman, J. [2004]. The Handbook for Leaders.)
胡泳、范海燕（1997）。《網路為王 Internet：The King who rules》。台北市：捷幼出版社。
范瑞薇譯（2005）。。《杜拉克談領導未來》。台北市：知識流出版股份有限公司。(原書 Drucker, P.F. [2005]. Kardinaltugenden effektiver Fuhrung. )
夏鑄九譯 (1998) 。《網絡社會的崛起》。台北市：唐山出版社。(原書Castells. M. [1998]. The Rise of Network Society.)
財團法人資訊工業策進會編譯（1987）。《問題與衝擊－資訊化社會面面觀》。台北市：財團法人資訊工業策進會。
張維安 (2001)。〈文字模式線上訪談的特質及限制〉，《資訊社會研究》。1: 279-297。
張維安主編（2004）。《網路與社會》。新竹市：國立清華大學出版社。
郭進隆譯（1990）。《第五項修鍊－學習型組織的藝術與實務.》。台北市：天下文化。(原書 Senge M.P.[1990]. The Fifth Discipline-the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization.)
陳向明（2002）。《社會科學質的研究》。台北市：五南圖書出版公司。
陳怡安（2003）。《線上遊戲的魅力：以重度玩家為例》。嘉義縣：南華大學社會學研究所。
陳建勳（2006）。《鉅量多人線上遊戲中玩家公會的動態與演變 The Dynamicand Evolution of Player Guilds in Massively Multiplayer Online Game》。國立交通大學 資訊科學與工程研究所 碩士論文。
陳美靜譯（2001）。《網路心理講義》。台北市：天下遠見出版社。(原書 Wallace.P. [2001]. The Pschology of the Internet.)
陳豐偉（2000）。《網路不斷革命論》。台北市：商業週刊出版。
游森期（2001）。〈E世代青少年網路成癮及網路使用之輔導策略〉。《學生輔導》，74：34-43。
黃少華、陳文江（2002）。《重塑自我的遊戲：網路空間的人際交往》。嘉義縣大林鎮：南華大學社會所。
黃玉（1985）。＜團體動力理論與團體活動＞。《教師研習簡訊》。19-23。
黃玉（1986）。＜公民教育的具體實踐──談學生團體活動的發展＞。《中等教育》，27（5），42-48。
黃玉（2000）。＜在團體中成長:團體動力運用與社團活動指導 ＞。《高中教育》。10，7-14。
黃厚銘（2001），〈虛擬社區中的身分認同與信任〉。《e世代心理學》台大社會所博士論文，國立政治大學心理系主編。臺北：桂冠出版社。
黃惠惠（1998）。《團體輔導工作概論》。台北市：張老師出版社。
凱利．湯姆（2008）。《決定未來的10種人》。台北市：大塊文化出版社。( 原書Tom K. [2008]. The Ten Faces of Innovation.)
傻呼嚕同盟（2002）。《遊戲線上－漫談線上遊戲獨特迷人的世界》。台北市：城邦文化事業。
楊雅婷譯(2003)。《童年之死-在電子媒體時代下長大的孩童》。台北市：巨流圖書公司。第4-6章。(原書 Buckingham D. [2003]. After the Death of Childhood: Growing Up in the Age of Electronic Media.)
楊瑞明(2001)。＜網際網路對青少年的影響＞，《資訊與教育雜誌特刊》。302-318。
董素蘭、湯允一、林富美、許瑩月等譯（2002）。《媒體／社會－產業、形象與閱聽大眾》。台北市：學富文化事業有限公司。
董素蘭、葉佳蓉、林佳蓉等譯（2003）。《大眾傳播理論》。台北市：學富文化事業有限公司。
詹偉雄 (2005)。《美學的經濟-台灣社會變遷的60個微型觀察》。台北市：風格者出版社。110-111。
廖永靜（2000）。＜親職教育的方案設計:一個團體動力取向＞ 。《家庭教育課程與方案論文集》。1-38。
廖瑞雯譯（1999）。《虛擬新世界》。台中市：晨星出版社。
翟本瑞（2001）。《網路文化》。台北市：揚智文化。
鄭榮基（2006）。《大型多人線上角色扮演遊戲公會之初探性硏究：以「魔獸世界」的公會玩家為例 "Guild" in Massive Multi-player Online Role Playing Game : An Exploratory Study of Guild in "World of Warecraft"》。嘉義國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。
闕帝丰譯 (2006)。《編故事：互動故事創意聖經》。台北市：閱讀地球文化事業有限公司。(原書 Andrew, G.. (2006). Interactive Storytelling：Techniques for 21st Century fiction.)
蕭瑞麟（2006）。《不用數字的研究－鍛鍊深度思考力的質性研究》。台北市：台灣培生教育出版股份有限公司。
韓揚（2006）。＜遊戲的江湖＞，《中國電子商務》。10。
譚天，吳佳真譯（1998）。《虛擬化身：網路世代的身份認同》。台北市：遠流出版社。(原書 Turkle, S. [1998]. Life on The Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet.)
蘇健華 (2003)。《科技未來與人類社會：從Cyborg概念出發》。嘉義縣大林鎮：南華大學社會研究所。
顧瑜君譯（1998）。《質性研究寫作》。台北：五南圖書出版社。(原書Harry F .W. [1998]. Writing up qualitative research.)
英文部份
Anderson, T., & Kanuka, H. (1998) Online social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction, Journal of Distance Education/Revue de l`enseignement à distance, Volume13.1 http://cade.icaap.org/vol13.1/kanuka.html
Antonucci, M. (2005). Game skills pay off in real life. Research finds benefits of video games in unexpected areas. Mercury News.
http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/11616646.htm
Beck, J., & Wade, M.,. (2004). Got game: how the gamer generation is reshaping business forever. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Bonk, C. J., & Dennen, V. P. (2005). Massive multiplayer online gaming: A researchframework for military training and education.
http://www.adlnet.org/downloads/files/186.cfm
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1978a). Reflections on self-efficacy. Advances in Behavioural Research and Therapy, 1, 237-269. |
| 描述: | 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院碩士在職專班
95941020
97 |
| 資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095941020 |
| 資料類型: | thesis |
| 顯示於類別: | [傳播學院碩士在職專班] 學位論文
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 904 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
