政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/28484
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51327246      線上人數 : 840
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 新聞學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/28484


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/28484


    題名: 科斯的傳媒論述：與激進的反政府論對話
    其他題名: Ronald Coase`s Media Discourses: A Dialogue with Radical Anti-state Thesis
    作者: 馮建三
    關鍵詞: 公共財;外部性;科斯;媒介經濟學;傳播政策
    public goods;externality;Ronald Coase;media economics;communication policy
    日期: 2007-12
    上傳時間: 2009-01-20 15:34:30 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 對於傳播學界，1991年諾貝爾經濟學獎得主科思(Ronald Coase)的論旨，而特別是他的傳媒觀點，有其意義。根據主流經濟學的因有看法，傳媒「內容」具有公共財與外部性兩種性質，造成市場失靈，因此，政府宜研擬合宜的傳播政策，介入傳媒市場。但科斯得獎的重要理由，正在他破除定論，鬆動外部性應由國家干預的正當性，科斯另文也挑戰公共財必定由政府提供的史實。此外，從1950至1979年，科斯分別針對傳播課題，撰寫了八篇論文，更能清晰展現他的理念，可說是激烈地反對政府介入。是以，科斯先說，公營壟斷廣播出現於英國，多屬時代精神所致，以此暗示BBC模式出於偶然；次則質疑美國聯邦傳播委員會，指其電波公共信託模式徒然製造尋租機會；繼之，他論稱言論與一般產品並無不同，政府介入規範二者的水平，應該相當；然後，科斯再往前誰進，宣稱廣告無非是言論的一種特殊類型，付費打歌是出資者無意讓閱聽人知道出資者身分的廣告，而政府對於這些廣告與打歌現象的管制效果，經常適得其反。本文引述這些論說且有所對話與批評，最後則指出，建構有效且民主的政府，仍然是面對傳媒內容特殊性時，難以迴避的選擇。
    As a prestigious Nobel Prize winner in economics, Ronald Coase`s media discourses deserve specific attention. With its `public goods` and `externalities` natures, media `content` is one key case where market fails to bring about satisfactory performance and therefore calls into the state to intervene. Coase has however made his name known exactly for his argument against the inevitable outcome of government actions whenever market `fails`. Five of his media essays published between 1950 and 1979 are critically reviewed. Coase considers the creation of BBC has more to do with accidents than any careful state reasoning, FCC adopts a public-trustee model to allocate radio spectrum only to provide its bureaucrats opportunities of rent-seeking, and the state has no more legitimacy in regulating speech, advertising and payola than in regulating goods in general, what`s more, in cases when the state does intervene, the ensuing results are often deteriorating, rather than improving. This paper reflects upon Coase`s radical rhetoric and concludes that, contrary to his ideal, it`s wiser and more practical to have a more effective and democratic state macro regulating the media market, not to leave market on its own.
    關聯: 臺灣社會研究, 68, 361-392
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[新聞學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    10219528-200712-x-68-361-392-a.pdf985KbAdobe PDF21093檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋