政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/20776
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51734515      線上人數 : 522
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/20776


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/20776


    題名: Criticism Against Einhorn and Hogarth`s Theory of Diagnostic Inference
    作者: 顏乃欣
    Yen,Nai-Shing
    日期: 1988-12
    上傳時間: 2008-12-31 10:51:26 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 所謂診斷性推論，是指人們會依所發生的事件，來推測造成這些現象之原因的推測方式。艾宏及侯佳士(1982)認為診斷性推論是一個主動的，強調因果關係的，由果推因的歷程，所關心的是對特殊事件而非一般性事件的推論。他們批評一般統計模式無法處理有這些特質的診斷性推論，所以提出一個新的描述性模式說明人們處理這類問題的歷程。事實上，他們對於一般統計模式的批評是不合理的，他們錯將所處理的貝氏問題以點估計問題視之，以至於提出很多錯誤的論點。同時他們提出的新模式雖然得到研究結果的支持，但在研究方法上卻有缺失之處。這篇文章主要就艾宏－－侯佳士文中有關統計及研究方法方面提出批判。
    The particular issue with which this paper is concerned is diagnostic inference. That is, given the occurrence of a set of outcomes/results/symptoms, one has to infer to what extent is a particular action or event responsible for the observed effects. Einhorn and Hogarth (1982) argued that the essential aspects of such inferences are that they are causal rather than correlational, backward rather than forward (one goes from effects to prior causes), concerned with specific rather than the general cases, and constructive rather than nonconstructive (one can synthesize, enlarge, or otherwise develop new hypotheses). They further argued that the most common statistical model (e.g., Peterson & Beach, 1967) involving inferences does not consider these four aspects, and they developed a new model to describe how people assess the likelihood that one of two hypotheses is true on the basis of varying amount of evidence for each. I shall show, however, that their claims against the usual statistical model are unfounded and that they, in fact, misconceive the type of statistical problem with which they are faced. They think they are dealing with point estimation problems, when, in fact, the diagnostic problems with which they are dealing are Bayesian problems. Furthermore, even though they concluded that their model fitted the data reasonably well, some methodological considerations provide questions about their conclusion. The main purpose of this paper is to critique Einhorn and Hogarth`s arguments and model in statistical and methodological terms.
    關聯: 國立政治大學學報, 58, 69-79
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[心理學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    fb140702151550.pdf900KbAdobe PDF2525檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋