English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50932392      Online Users : 982
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/20231


    Title: 憲法作為一種制度
    Other Titles: Constitution as an Institution
    Authors: 林繼文
    Lin, Jih-wen
    Contributors: 政治系
    Keywords: 憲法;憲政體制;制度論;社會契約;社會均衡
    constitution;constitutional system;institutionalism;social contract;social equilibrium
    Date: 2003-06
    Issue Date: 2008-12-30 14:46:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文認為，把憲法當作抽象理念的體現或具體政治鬥爭的結果，都將忽略其重要特質。因此，本論文補充了契約論的假設，提出制度論的觀點。制度論並不假設基於合意所訂的契約就必然會被執守，而強調訂約人為了追求更大的利益，永遠都有違約的可能。因此，憲法之所以具有正當性，並非其具有強制力，而是基於在共識決之下的「社會均衡」特質，亦即所有成員都無法單獨背離憲法而得利的狀態。同時，根據憲法所產生的秩序也必須是社會均衡。根據這些原則，本論文重新審視社會正義，證明羅爾斯所提的「無知之幕」乃制定公平憲法的特殊情境，但並非社會均衡的唯一樣態。據此，本論文也審視了實存憲法常見的困境與其補救設計，以及台灣憲政問題的根源。
    This article argues that, to grasp the essence of a constitution, it is necessary to view it both as the embodiment of normative ideas and the outcome of political struggles. It shows this by constructing an institutional analysis, which rests on modified contractarian assumptions. An institutional theory does not presume that all parties signing a contract will automatically abide by it, and highlights the incentive to break the rules insofar a larger benefit is obtainable. Thus, the legitimacy of a constitution is not based on power, but on its social equilibrium nature. Originated in a unanimity rule, this equilibrium is a state where no one can defect to increase his welfare. Meanwhile, the constitutional order thus derived should also be a social equilibrium. On these principles, this article demonstrates that John Rawl`s veil of ignorance is a special kind of social equilibrium out of which fairness can be claimed, but not a general state of constitution making. On the same basis, this article also examines the troubles faced by existing constitutions-in particular the one modified for six times in Taiwan in the past decade.
    Relation: 政治與社會哲學評論,5,35-74
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    3574.pdf1763KbAdobe PDF21035View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback