English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51579444      Online Users : 978
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/20226


    Title: 代表的理論與實際：規範與經驗的對話
    Other Titles: Theory and Practice of Representation: A Dialogue between Normative and Empirical Studies
    Authors: 張福建;劉義周
    Liu,I-Chou;Chang,Fu-Kien
    Keywords: 代表;柏克;彌爾;盧梭;台灣的立法委員
    representation;E. Burke;J. S. Mill;J. J. Rousseau;Taiwan`s legislator
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2008-12-30 14:45:37 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 代議制是近現代民主的常軌，「代表」則是人民主權理念得以部份落實的主要機制。在理論上，「代表」理當重現(re-present)人民的心聲和利益，然而在實際政治運作中，此種期望不免有所落差，甚或全然落空。因此自代表制實施以來，如何縮短和避免此一落差，便成為民主政治的主要課題。本文的目的是嘗試就代表的規範理論著眼，一方面考察英、美、法三國憲政史上有關「代表制」所引發的爭議；另一方面則擬據此回探我國憲政史上中央民代與民意關係的變遷，進而依據現有的抽樣訪談資料，分析我國選民對於中央民代的認知和期望，我們相信藉由經驗與規範的對話，將有助於政治現象的理解與釐清。
    Representation is a general rule of modem democracy and a major mechanism through which the idea of popular sovereignty is realized. In theory, representatives should re-present the voices and interests of the people; in practice, however, they are not always satisfactory. How to level the difference between theory and practice of representation becomes therefore a significant issue in democratic theory. This essay is intended to explore both the normative and empirical sides of the problem. We first review some renowned representation theories, then compare them with constitutional practice. Against this theoretical background and with the empirical data collected from some recent interviews, we try to analyze the cognition and expectation of Taiwanese electorate toward their legislators. We believe a dialogue between normative and empirical studies will enhance our understanding of this important political question.
    Relation: 政治與社會哲學評論,1,117-149
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    117-149-a.pdf1327KbAdobe PDF2837View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback