English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51041628      Online Users : 911
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/16157


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/16157


    Title: 自然科學時代的道德：對康德《純粹理性批判》的一個異端導讀
    Authors: 張鼎國;黃柏誠
    Keywords: 純粹理性批判;先天綜合;知識;道德;科學;實踐;世界公民;定言令式;自由;形上學
    Critique of pure reason;The synthetic a priori;Knowledge;Morality;Science;Praxis;Cosmopolitan;The categorical imperative;Freedom;Metaphysics
    Date: 2005-07
    Issue Date: 2008-12-17 14:04:27 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文試圖對《純粹理性批判》提出一種有別於傳統的「異端」讀法 (eine häretische Lesart)，傳統（或即正統）讀法認為《純粹理性批判》處理的主要是知識問題，並認為全書致力於客觀知識的分析、客觀知識的正當性以及作為科學的哲學等問題，而道德問題只是次要或補充性的。本文的異端讀法則認為，《純粹理性批判》根本就是以道德問題為關注焦點，理論性的工作是為鋪陳道德的優位性而服務的。雖然理論性的工作在《純粹理性批判》中佔據大部分的篇幅，康德應會反對知識具有自為目的 (Selbstzweck) 之想法。
    This essay attempts an alternative interpretation about Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. This interpretation is distinguished from the established (or orthodox) interpretation which regards the Critique of Pure Reason as primarily dealing with the status of knowledge, thus the work engaging in the analysis of objective knowledge, the legitimacy of objective knowledge, and philosophy as a science, while problems of morality being second in order. My “heterodox” interpretation, in contrast, suggests that morality is the central concern of this book, and that the investigations about knowledge serve to demonstrate the priority of morality. Kant would have refused Selbstzweck to knowledge, despite that theoretical investigations occupy most of his book.
    Relation: 國立政治大學哲學學報,14,17-35
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1735.pdf405KbAdobe PDF21259View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback